Aces High Bulletin Board

Special Events Forums => Friday Squad Operations => Topic started by: CAP1 on January 07, 2013, 10:17:35 PM

Title: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: CAP1 on January 07, 2013, 10:17:35 PM
gentlemen(and you allied guys too  :devil  )

objectives have been sent. my sincerest apologies for having these out late. please take special note of the changes in red text within the orders. those changes are also noted in CAPS LOCK within the text body of the emails.

 if you have any questions/concerns, please feel free to pm/email or message me here.

 go kick some buttocks guys!!
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: Dantoo on January 08, 2013, 05:06:39 AM
--All Fighters 23K  Max Altitude

- Winds: Down Draft at 24K


Sigh.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: CAP1 on January 08, 2013, 07:41:00 AM
--All Fighters 23K  Max Altitude

- Winds: Down Draft at 24K


Sigh.

 there;s a reason for that.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: Randy1 on January 08, 2013, 07:53:43 AM
I just formed a squadron yesterday so we are new to the Friday squad operations.  Is there a good link to for information on Friday squad night?
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: CAP1 on January 08, 2013, 07:56:42 AM
I just formed a squadron yesterday so we are new to the Friday squad operations.  Is there a good link to for information on Friday squad night?

 lok around here.....

http://www.ahevents.org/fso-current-next-event.html

 you have to be registered in there.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: Dantoo on January 08, 2013, 05:13:45 PM
there;s a reason for that.

Would you mind sharing?  You actually want to remove the downdraught as a useful adjunct to maintain people below the max altitude?  You like sorting out post-frame arguments about who cheated by being above 23k?  Why do it different this particular FSO series to every other use of the downdraught?

Please share - I'm intrigued.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: ELD66 on January 08, 2013, 05:41:15 PM
I just formed a squadron yesterday so we are new to the Friday squad operations.  Is there a good link to for information on Friday squad night?

 You also need to wait until next month.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: CAP1 on January 08, 2013, 05:50:58 PM
Would you mind sharing?  You actually want to remove the downdraught as a useful adjunct to maintain people below the max altitude?  You like sorting out post-frame arguments about who cheated by being above 23k?  Why do it different this particular FSO series to every other use of the downdraught?

Please share - I'm intrigued.

 i've got all fighters max alt of 23k. there's a high probability of a 21k to 23k merge. at that point someone's gonna bust that alt cap by a couple hundred feet. it would suck for you in your zeek to manage to gain a great advantage over a p40 because you went a mere 100ft above the cap, and the downdraft blew your airplane straight down, while you're inverted and nearly stalled. and the same for the p40 managing to gain a good advantage on the p40.
 so my choice with this was to allow a buffer zone, and let everyone run on a sort of honor system. it must've worked last week, 'cause the massive number of p40's i spotted weren't any higher than 23k. on top of that, not a single complaint of anyone busting the limit.

 i like to think that 99.99999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999 999999999999999999% of the great pilots in here(even those trouble makers in jg54  :neener: ) wouldn't deliberate bust the alt cap, if the downdraft were left totally off.

 when i look at the squad lists, and the pilot names, i see a LOT i recognize from years of cartoon flying, and some i don't recognize. what i also realize, is that i see lots of people that i've come to respect over the years. i know it sounds cheezy, but that's how i feel.

 if you want, i'll adjust the two to coincide.......i was simply trying to leave a bit of a buffer zone is all. i'm easy. this is my fun. i seriously enjoy doing the reading, and research to make these, even if i don't make them perfect. then when i see everyone having fun, THAT makes it worth every second i spent.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: Dantoo on January 08, 2013, 06:02:27 PM
A max altitude is only a max altitude if you actually mean nobody to go above it period.   

If you put a down-draught and/or a cloud level at the max altitude then you have a useful reminder to people where the ceiling is.  Helps them comply.

If you want to keep people below a particular level, but still allow for a buffer zone, then delete the max altitude and institute a simple down draught at that level.  That way you get a buffer zone built in.  People can fly above the set altitude, but lingering there builds a penalty.  The longer you stay up there the more you pay.  A temporary transgression in the heat of battle means little penalty and keeps things simple and harmonious.


Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: ELD66 on January 08, 2013, 09:29:46 PM
Basically, yes. That's what I was thinking as well. More ways to incur penalty can change the dynamic of, the way the points fall come the End of Frame 3 and the final tally.
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: CAP1 on January 08, 2013, 10:19:54 PM
they shall be aligned. like i said....i'm easy.  :aok
Title: Re: INTO THE TIGERS DEN FRAME 2 OBJECTIVES
Post by: ink on January 09, 2013, 07:45:58 AM
they shall be aligned. like i said....i'm easy.  :aok

I have heard that :O













 :D