Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: XxDaSTaRxx on November 02, 2013, 10:59:23 PM

Title: B-17F
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on November 02, 2013, 10:59:23 PM
Why isn't there a B-17F already?  :furious

The F model was an important piece of WWII mid war history.

(http://ftpmirror.your.org/pub/wikimedia/images/wikipedia/ja/e/ee/B17.sallyb.shuttle.050801.650pix.jpg)
F model

(http://richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Aircraft/Bombers/B17BankingHardLeft8oClock.jpg)
G model
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Tinkles on November 02, 2013, 11:05:08 PM
Why isn't there a B-17F already?  :furious

The F model was an important piece of WWII mid war history.

(http://ftpmirror.your.org/pub/wikimedia/images/wikipedia/ja/e/ee/B17.sallyb.shuttle.050801.650pix.jpg)
F model

(http://richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Aircraft/Bombers/B17BankingHardLeft8oClock.jpg)
G model

I am not informed on this subject, so I am going to ask this. 

What is the significant difference between the B17F and G versions than what we have now?

Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on November 02, 2013, 11:10:35 PM
I am not informed on this subject, so I am going to ask this.  

What is the significant difference between the B17F and G versions than what we have now?


Why the skins of course! Memphis belle, Ye Olde pub, etc. And mid war arena...  :airplane: That's AH anyway.

In real life one was faster, likely the G model, but I think the F had a higher service ceiling. Fighters can complain about alt tards all they want  :neener:

There were some other traits, but I'm to hammered to look them up right now.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 02, 2013, 11:34:17 PM
The B-17F was the faster one as it lacked the drag of the chin turret. Powerplants were the same so if the F had a higher service ceiling it was through being lighter.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: donna43 on November 03, 2013, 01:29:26 AM
The difference in the F and G models were that the F model didn't have much defensive firepower for headon attacks from german fighters and the chin turret was added to the G model for that reason.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Volron on November 03, 2013, 01:33:22 AM
Tail gun is different in the F as well.  Doesn't cover anywhere as well as the G's.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 03, 2013, 07:54:22 AM
Tail gun is different in the F as well.  Doesn't cover anywhere as well as the G's.
Early Gs also lacked the Cheyenne tail turret. The B-17G in AH does have a Cheyenne tail turret.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: earl1937 on November 03, 2013, 01:04:26 PM
I am not informed on this subject, so I am going to ask this. 

What is the significant difference between the B17F and G versions than what we have now?


:airplane: Aside from he chin turret, armour plating on the "G" for crew protection. I would guess that is the reason for the difference in the bomb load, 8K for F, 6K for the G. The F model had a 56,500 lb gross takeoff weight and the G had a 65,500 lb gross takeoff weight. That 10,000 lbs would make a lot of difference in their performance.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 03, 2013, 01:18:42 PM
G's max bomb load was technically 16,000lbs, but that required the use of underwing hard points that were rarely, if ever, used and massively reduced its operational range.  Given the bomb bay of the G and F were the same size I believe their typical bomb loads would also be the same sizes.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Devil 505 on November 03, 2013, 01:19:17 PM
Big +1 for the F model.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 03, 2013, 01:29:52 PM
If what was said in the Custom Skins forum is true that B-17F skins are not allowed on the B-17G that would indicate that HTC would like to add the B-17F at some point in the future.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: thndregg on November 03, 2013, 10:04:34 PM
I've called for the "F" in the Wishlist a few times. Would be a great addition for historical reasons.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Volron on November 03, 2013, 11:59:59 PM
The question is, what skin will be default for the F?  There are several famous F's, but I get the feeling that it will NOT be Memphis Belle that is default. :headscratch:
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Devil 505 on November 04, 2013, 12:10:35 AM
The question is, what skin will be default for the F?  There are several famous F's, but I get the feeling that it will NOT be Memphis Belle that is default. :headscratch:
Not every default skin is a "famous" scheme.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: wpeters on November 04, 2013, 02:33:43 PM
:airplane: Aside from he chin turret, armour plating on the "G" for crew protection.

GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!     A B-17 I can actually try to kill 999000 in. :devil


Pretty Please :pray
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: ONTOS on November 04, 2013, 06:06:20 PM
When I think of B-17's, the F model comes to mind. She's a beauty ( that chin gun on the G model  is like women with a beard).   :salute
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Tank-Ace on November 04, 2013, 07:28:45 PM
Meh....
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Volron on November 04, 2013, 09:56:17 PM
Not every default skin is a "famous" scheme.

I'm fully aware.  ALL skinned planes are "famous" in my book though.  The ballz it took any of em to fly into that hell and back...and not all of the skinned planes we have made it home, if I recall correctly.  Personally, when I think of the F, the Belle comes to mind.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: dirt911 on November 10, 2013, 12:40:20 AM
When I think of B-17's, the F model comes to mind. She's a beauty ( that chin gun on the G model  is like women with a beard).   :salute

I must say I kinda feel the same way.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Citabria on November 10, 2013, 01:02:03 AM
I based the B-17G plans used by HTC to build the 3d b17g off plans of the B-17F as they were the only ones that did the cockpit well.

all other B-17G drawings were incorrect. I still feel that the AH b-17 is one of the best looking b17 models out there and did take some pride in having a hand in its accuracy especially around the cockpit area which I always considered the face of a plane.

I'd always wanted a B-17F and B-24D both the most good looking versions of these planes.

I've never posted much of my artwork other than what you've seen of my skins this is one I did of a b-24D that is graceful even in ruins...

a bit off topic I know but Ive always been a fan of the B-17F and B-24D :)
(http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x205/p38fester/ladybegood_zpse3ebf743.jpg)
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: caldera on November 10, 2013, 07:04:09 AM
I based the B-17G plans used by HTC to build the 3d b17g off plans of the B-17F as they were the only ones that did the cockpit well.

all other B-17G drawings were incorrect. I still feel that the AH b-17 is one of the best looking b17 models out there and did take some pride in having a hand in its accuracy especially around the cockpit area which I always considered the face of a plane.

I'd always wanted a B-17F and B-24D both the most good looking versions of these planes.

I've never posted much of my artwork other than what you've seen of my skins this is one I did of a b-24D that is graceful even in ruins...

a bit off topic I know but Ive always been a fan of the B-17F and B-24D :)
(http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x205/p38fester/ladybegood_zpse3ebf743.jpg)

Very nice!  :aok 
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: earl1937 on November 10, 2013, 02:00:49 PM
Very nice!  :aok 
:old: Caldera, you need to change your avatar, it makes old men have "funny" feelings looking at it! LOL
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on November 10, 2013, 05:22:29 PM
Hopefully we can see this bird in the near future... (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/Memphisbellenose.jpg)
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Tank-Ace on November 10, 2013, 05:39:22 PM
Based on what I've been able to find out, it would perform near identically to the B-17G we have now. Slightly faster, and fewer guns pointing in an area that really doesn't matter in Aces High.


That being the case, -1.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: caldera on November 10, 2013, 06:22:39 PM
:old: Caldera, you need to change your avatar, it makes old men have "funny" feelings looking at it! LOL

As long as you still are getting those "funny" feelings, you have nothing to worry about.  :)


It's not German.  -1

Fixed.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 10, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Based on what I've been able to find out, it would perform near identically to the B-17G we have now. Slightly faster, and fewer guns pointing in an area that really doesn't matter in Aces High.


That being the case, -1.
The tail guns would have a significantly reduced field of fire.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Tank-Ace on November 10, 2013, 08:41:22 PM
The tail guns would have a significantly reduced field of fire.
[/quote

Okay, moved all the way up from -1 to 0. Other stuff we need to take care of first.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 10, 2013, 10:43:22 PM
Citabria,

Is that drawing of 'Lady Be Good'?
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Citabria on November 10, 2013, 11:31:23 PM
yeah I was fascinated by that plane for a long time so much so it became a subject of one of my drawing projects.

the navigator was on his first mission.

the sunset turned to night. already lost and seeking the radio fix from their home base unfortunately gave them a direction but having not the ability to gauge to or from with the instruments at the time it gave a reverse sensing heading to get home and the plane flew off into the desert away from its base.

1 by one the engines failed from fuel starvation till only one was left running.

given the b-24's problems in forced landings with its high Davis wing it seems the order was given to bail out.

the crew left the plane.

Lady be Good continued on alone with one engine running until in a slow wings level descent it contacted the flat planes of the desert at what would seem to be a firm but survivable impact rate and broke in half upon its unmanned landing.

it was found a decade and a half later by oil field explorers in amazingly preserved condition with guns still working and food and drink still edible in its own time capsule in the arid desert.

for a year or so the mystery of the crew became an obsession for the air force and a large search was undertaken where most of the crews remains were located. they survived the bail out it seemed but died of starvation and dehydration.

a few pieces of the lady be good were salvaged and installed in other aircraft in a possibly sentimental act but it seems the curse of this beautiful lady who was abandoned after being lead astray did not end well. one aircraft who had an armrest from lady be good crashed in the ocean with one of the few pieces of it washing up on shore... the armrest from lady be good. other aircraft with parts of the lady it is said also came to similarly gruesome ends.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on November 11, 2013, 02:40:09 PM
yeah I was fascinated by that plane for a long time so much so it became a subject of one of my drawing projects.

the navigator was on his first mission.

the sunset turned to night. already lost and seeking the radio fix from their home base unfortunately gave them a direction but having not the ability to gauge to or from with the instruments at the time it gave a reverse sensing heading to get home and the plane flew off into the desert away from its base.

1 by one the engines failed from fuel starvation till only one was left running.

given the b-24's problems in forced landings with its high Davis wing it seems the order was given to bail out.

the crew left the plane.

Lady be Good continued on alone with one engine running until in a slow wings level descent it contacted the flat planes of the desert at what would seem to be a firm but survivable impact rate and broke in half upon its unmanned landing.

it was found a decade and a half later by oil field explorers in amazingly preserved condition with guns still working and food and drink still edible in its own time capsule in the arid desert.

for a year or so the mystery of the crew became an obsession for the air force and a large search was undertaken where most of the crews remains were located. they survived the bail out it seemed but died of starvation and dehydration.

a few pieces of the lady be good were salvaged and installed in other aircraft in a possibly sentimental act but it seems the curse of this beautiful lady who was abandoned after being lead astray did not end well. one aircraft who had an armrest from lady be good crashed in the ocean with one of the few pieces of it washing up on shore... the armrest from lady be good. other aircraft with parts of the lady it is said also came to similarly gruesome ends.
Any idea for how long she flew unmanned?
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: Karnak on November 11, 2013, 03:14:03 PM
Any idea for how long she flew unmanned?
Not far as I recall.  A dozen miles or less I think.

It was a bad death for the crew.  The one who's parachute failed certainly had the cleanest exit.  They walked more than 100 miles in the Sahara before succumbing.
Title: Re: B-17F
Post by: ONTOS on November 11, 2013, 04:58:52 PM
The 17f and 17g may be close but the P-47 25 and 40 are near identical, along with a couple P-40's that are near identical.The B-24 D is a good idea also. If the 17f had less firepower and less arc of fire, that's the way it was.If you want to make this real, make it real. :salute