Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: smoe on November 09, 2013, 08:36:43 PM

Title: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: smoe on November 09, 2013, 08:36:43 PM
A few of the systems that I designed a while back may now be running this baby.  :salute

http://news.yahoo.com/navy-christens-next-generation-aircraft-carrier-173824577.html (http://news.yahoo.com/navy-christens-next-generation-aircraft-carrier-173824577.html)
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: gyrene81 on November 09, 2013, 08:56:49 PM
oh the places i could go with that...

what systems did you design? that would be very cool to have them used on the ship...
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: Arlo on November 09, 2013, 09:34:50 PM
Classified. (I suspect.)  :)

 :salute :cheers:
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: Fud on November 09, 2013, 10:04:51 PM
My neighbor also works on the Ford. He's Navy and works in electronics and that's all he can say
It was awesome to see the super structure installed, I think back in March.
I'm looking forward to see and hope to help build the new Enterprise and JFK built here...
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: rpm on November 10, 2013, 03:24:23 AM
The Jerry Ford? Oh man if there was ever a ship destined to run aground...
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: pipz on November 10, 2013, 06:30:18 AM
Edit.
Found an article that explained my question.
Title: Re: USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) - Next Generation CV
Post by: smoe on November 10, 2013, 11:14:35 AM
The Jerry Ford? Oh man if there was ever a ship destined to run aground...

That or be the one CV that is lucky like the USS Enterprise (CV-6), except this one would nicknamed the Lucky F with some extra meaning in there.


oh the places i could go with that...

what systems did you design? that would be very cool to have them used on the ship...

Some items are public knowledge and others may not be, discussing details would be generally not be good.