Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: dirtdart on December 09, 2013, 02:11:17 PM

Title: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: dirtdart on December 09, 2013, 02:11:17 PM
Please make the CAG happy and drop the safety chains and raise the hanger elevator on the carrier. It is not like you would have ever launched or recovered aircraft in that configuration, not even sure why it was modeled that way to begin with...  :headscratch:
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: PFactorDave on December 09, 2013, 02:15:25 PM
+1  I have wondered about that myself.
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 09, 2013, 03:27:18 PM
Crisis, not so much. If it's an easy code, though, sure, why not? +1
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Sabre on December 09, 2013, 04:34:19 PM
+1, by all means. :aok
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: BluBerry on December 09, 2013, 04:43:13 PM
+1 for sure.  :salute
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: SirNuke on December 10, 2013, 01:18:43 AM
+1
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Rino on December 10, 2013, 07:01:44 AM
     Navy is capable of doing some crazy stuff, check the photo...a little scary  :D

(http://i964.photobucket.com/albums/ae123/f4ephantom/HolyCow.jpg)
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Saxman on December 10, 2013, 08:30:19 AM
Speaking of the CV (and in fact, the TG ships in general), shouldn't its deck be painted? As clearly visible in Rino's pic, US ships didn't leave their wooden decks unpainted but would have instead been 20-B Deck Blue (http://paintfinder.ehaltom.com/paint/Testors-Model-Master-2159-20-B-Weather-Deck-Blue-USN/2428 even gives the RGB values).
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Karnak on December 10, 2013, 10:36:08 AM
Isn't the lowered aircraft elevator the location that we pick our plane on the CVs?
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 10, 2013, 11:18:24 AM
Isn't the lowered aircraft elevator the location that we pick our plane on the CVs?

Yes. That would be the CV hangar deck.
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: MachNix on December 10, 2013, 01:05:23 PM
The craziest thing I see in Rino's picture is either the island is on the wrong side or they are launching planes backwards.  Actually the image is flipped and the plane in the foreground is 85 not 28.  :)
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 10, 2013, 01:58:04 PM
(http://imageshack.us/a/img577/3750/wca3.png)

Red lights on port wing, as well.
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Karnak on December 10, 2013, 03:13:31 PM
Yes. That would be the CV hangar deck.
Yes, but the aircraft is sitting on that elevator.  If it were raised HTC would need to redo the hangar selection location.
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Lucifer on December 12, 2013, 06:30:01 PM
Excellent idea.  :aok
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 13, 2013, 01:49:37 AM
Yes, but the aircraft is sitting on that elevator.  If it were raised HTC would need to redo the hangar selection location.

Yup. Might even hafta be more 'internal.'

(http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/aircraft/fighter/grumman-f6f-hellcat-fighter/f6f-3/grumman-f6f-3-hellcat-fighter-uss-yorktown-hanger-deck-1943-01.png)
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: BluBerry on December 13, 2013, 02:18:41 AM
^that is a fantastic picture. thank you.  :salute
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 13, 2013, 10:54:43 AM
^that is a fantastic picture. thank you.  :salute

Twas a fantastic internet find. Looks like someone was always workin'. Even on movie night on the hangar deck.

(You're most welcome.)
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Tinkles on December 13, 2013, 08:45:47 PM
Yup. Might even hafta be more 'internal.'

(http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/aircraft/fighter/grumman-f6f-hellcat-fighter/f6f-3/grumman-f6f-3-hellcat-fighter-uss-yorktown-hanger-deck-1943-01.png)


 :O

Very nice find sir, thank you for sharing!   :salute
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: The Fugitive on December 14, 2013, 10:26:46 AM
While our decks on the "Eisenhower" were a bit bigger, the action never stopped. While launching they would be fueling and loading weapons on the other end of the deck. Switching over to recovery mode would just move the operations to the forward deck where it was out of the way. The hanger bay was mostly used as a repair deck where they did major work on the aircraft. 
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Arlo on December 14, 2013, 10:32:20 AM
While our decks on the "Eisenhower" were a bit bigger, the action never stopped.

An angled deck makes a difference, as well, but it seems even with the straight deck
of WWII and Korea, it was close quarters non-stop action.  :)
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Lone82 on December 15, 2013, 07:03:15 PM
LOL! That guy in the yellow is in "Fixing to run like hell if he don't catch that wire" Mode!
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: Blinder on December 18, 2013, 02:24:13 PM
Yup. Might even hafta be more 'internal.'

(http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/aircraft/fighter/grumman-f6f-hellcat-fighter/f6f-3/grumman-f6f-3-hellcat-fighter-uss-yorktown-hanger-deck-1943-01.png)


When I was a kid I had a book on US Navy fighters of WWII that had this pic in it. I lost that book a long time ago. Thanks for the memories!  :aok
Title: Re: Carrier deck obstructions
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on December 18, 2013, 03:03:11 PM
Please make the CAG happy and drop the safety chains and raise the hanger elevator on the carrier. It is not like you would have ever launched or recovered aircraft in that configuration, not even sure why it was modeled that way to begin with...  :headscratch:
Saw Arlo's post on this topic, could not stop thinking of it so I hunted down the post:

(http://imageshack.us/a/img46/1795/qrap.png)


Cap'n said raising the outboard elevator would endanger the hula dancers.