Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: smoe on February 20, 2014, 05:18:29 PM

Title: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: smoe on February 20, 2014, 05:18:29 PM
I found this and thought it was kind of cool.

http://screen.yahoo.com/viral-hits/wolves-alter-course-rivers-162607632.html (http://screen.yahoo.com/viral-hits/wolves-alter-course-rivers-162607632.html)
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Arlo on February 20, 2014, 05:24:10 PM
Very illuminating. Thank you.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Shifty on February 20, 2014, 06:05:29 PM
I thought it was due to eating beaver.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Arlo on February 20, 2014, 06:14:51 PM
I thought it was due to eating beaver.

*Ba da bump - crash* :lol
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: kamori on February 20, 2014, 06:40:34 PM
Lame piece of Pro-Wolf Propaganda.... Its an environment with out the top predator for any animals.....Keep them in Yellowstone and I'm fine....Don't regulate them in the rest of Montana and you have the exact reverse of what he says.....Plus the wolves they introduced are NOT the ones Indigenous to The Northwest Continental United States. The wolves they Introduced are the Canadian Grey Wolf (The Largest most aggressive SPORT KILLING wolf out there and Yes they kill for sport wiping out Elk herds within a few years).

My Wolf Tags come 20 in a Box...

Kamori
Montana Resident and Hunter
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: USRanger on February 20, 2014, 06:54:34 PM
(http://foodmatters.tv/images/articles/beaver-hands-on-head.jpg)
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: rpm on February 20, 2014, 10:43:21 PM
I really need to clean my glasses. I saw How Wolves Ate the corpse of Joan Rivers. Now I haz a disappoint.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: ink on February 20, 2014, 10:45:50 PM
I really need to clean my glasses. I saw How Wolves Ate the corpse of Joan Rivers. Now I haz a disappoint.

 :rofl
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: MiloMorai on February 20, 2014, 11:08:52 PM
Lame piece of Pro-Wolf Propaganda.... Its an environment with out the top predator for any animals.....Keep them in Yellowstone and I'm fine....Don't regulate them in the rest of Montana and you have the exact reverse of what he says.....Plus the wolves they introduced are NOT the ones Indigenous to The Northwest Continental United States. The wolves they Introduced are the Canadian Grey Wolf (The Largest most aggressive SPORT KILLING wolf out there and Yes they kill for sport wiping out Elk herds within a few years).

My Wolf Tags come 20 in a Box...

Kamori
Montana Resident and Hunter

Oh please. :eek:

A bigger danger to domestic and wild animals are coywolves.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: kamori on February 21, 2014, 12:43:47 AM
Oh please. :eek:

A bigger danger to domestic and wild animals are coywolves.

Coywolves? Explain
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Slash27 on February 21, 2014, 01:00:53 AM
I thought it was due to eating beaver.
That's how you change the course of the evening.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Arlo on February 21, 2014, 01:13:49 AM
Coywolves? Explain

Coyote-wolf hybrid.
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: kamori on February 21, 2014, 02:20:07 AM
Oh please. :eek:

A bigger danger to domestic and wild animals are coywolves.


Oh Yeah...They live with the Jackalopes too..... LMAO  :x
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: Arlo on February 21, 2014, 03:26:47 AM

Oh Yeah...They live with the Jackalopes too..... LMAO  :x


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coywolf
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: kamori on February 27, 2014, 11:16:57 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackalope

The Coy-wolf or Coyote aren't taking out large herds of Elk, Deer or cattle.....

Kam
Title: Re: How Wolves Can Alter the Course of Rivers
Post by: MiloMorai on February 27, 2014, 01:02:06 PM
Elk are a bigger threat to cattle than wolves. Kill all the elk!!!

Honesty From A Wolf Hunter About Wolves And Elk
http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/mskoglund/honesty_from_a_wolf_hunter_abo.html

In an article about the first wolf killed by a hunter in northern Montana, the hunter that killed the wolf, Dan Pettit, offers some surprisingly candid commentary on wolves and elk in the Northern Rockies.

One of the most common -- and most erroneous -- gripes from the anti-wolf community is that wolves have annihilated the elk population in the Northern Rockies.

When asked about wolves and elk, Pettit gave an honest answer:

    "Do wolves affect elk?  Absolutely.  But in my opinion, the story of the wolves going into a basin and decimating the elk herd just isn't true."

Pettit is right, the "wolves have decimated all the elk" argument isn't true, and it's encouraging to hear a wolf hunter admit that.

What are the facts?  According to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, which is certainly not a wolf-loving organization, the elk population in the Northern Rockies has skyrocketed in the last twenty-five years, notwithstanding the reintroduction of wolves in the mid-1990s.  Wyoming's elk population has grown 35%, Idaho's has grown 5%, and Montana's a whopping 66%.

So, how have wolves affected elk?  Simple:  the presence of wolves on the landscape has made elk act more like . . . well, ummm . . . elk.

When wolves, a native predator to the Northern Rockies, were eradicated from this region in the 1930s, elk lost their primary predator and stopped behaving like wild elk.  They became less cautious and overbrowsed streamside vegetation, which negatively affected beavers, songbirds, and coldwater fish species like trout.

The reintroduction of wolves has been an ecological boon to the Northern Rockies.  So much so, in fact, that scientists hope to restore wolves to other ecosystems for purely ecological reasons -- chief among them the ecological devastation caused by overbrowsing elk.  An article about the need to restore wolves to Olympic National Park in Washington noted:

    Most famously, [two ecologists] showed that within three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding.  Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish and birds.

    It was an "explosive" discovery, said David Graber, regional chief scientist for the National Park Service.  "The whole ecosystem re-sorted itself after those wolf populations got large enough."

The elk population in the Northern Rockies is strong -- stronger than it was a quarter century ago -- but elk use the landscape differently with wolves present -- they use it in a more natural, ecologically friendly way.

And that means hunters have to hunt elk differently.  They need to cover more ground and move around the landscape more.  In essence, they need to hunt.

Pettit admitted that, too:

    Wolves, he said, surely have changed the way deer and elk act in the wilds, and that's changing the ways hunters must hunt.

Sure, hunters need to hunt differently nowadays, but the elk are still here, they're here in great numbers, and hunters can still find them, as evidenced by Petit's recent trip into the backcountry:

    "But in that same small basin, on the same morning we saw the eight wolves, we also saw seven cow elk.  Right there in the same little drainage with the wolves.

    The very next day, in fact, one of his hunting partners shot a five-point bull elk in the same area.

NRDC and other groups fought hard to stop the premature wolf hunts from proceeding, and it's difficult to read about Pettit or any other hunter killing a wolf.

But it's refreshing to see a wolf hunter finally talk straight about wolves in the heated debate over how they should be managed.  I hope others take notice.