Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: ML52 on March 02, 2014, 02:46:30 PM

Title: Shipyard strat
Post by: ML52 on March 02, 2014, 02:46:30 PM
What do you gentlemen think of the idea of adding a shipyard strat to the game? It'd be placed at the port closest to the city, maybe have a small rail yard, and add a debatable amount of down time to CV reconstruction.
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Tinkles on March 02, 2014, 03:04:28 PM
What do you gentlemen think of the idea of adding a shipyard strat to the game? It'd be placed at the port closest to the city, maybe have a small rail yard, and add a debatable amount of down time to CV reconstruction.

+1
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Blinder on March 02, 2014, 03:24:56 PM
+1  :aok

I like it. We can grab some B-25s and make like Lt. McElroy!
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Stresser on March 02, 2014, 04:31:31 PM
+1 :aok
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Rogue9Volt on March 02, 2014, 06:44:57 PM
+1, cool idea!
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on March 02, 2014, 06:52:28 PM
Yes Yes Oh Please Yes Hitech  :pray
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: TOMCAT21 on March 02, 2014, 08:12:02 PM
+1
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Arlo on March 02, 2014, 11:02:16 PM
+1
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: ONTOS on March 03, 2014, 12:06:48 PM
More stuff to bomb, I'm for it. :x
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: -27th- on March 03, 2014, 03:19:57 PM
Great recommendation. :aok May I also add a rail yard with many trains doing day to day resupply business surrounded by auto and man gunned acks.

 :salute
27th
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Blinder on March 03, 2014, 06:13:03 PM
Great recommendation. :aok May I also add a rail yard with many trains doing day to day resupply business surrounded by auto and man gunned acks.

 :salute
27th

Oh yes. I want to conduct some interdiction missions against rail.  :aok
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: XxDaSTaRxx on March 03, 2014, 06:18:33 PM
Oh yes. I want to conduct some interdiction missions against rail.  :aok
"We must shut down the trains to stop resupply of the Headquarters and strats, let's go bomb the railyards." This is a quote I've dreamed about hearing!

And if does ever happen...  :x
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: bustr on March 03, 2014, 07:18:48 PM
On the maps with the strat distributed about, when your country captures the nearest base to a strat. You can up a 110 and hover over the rail head and kill trains all night long every 10 minutes. It gets boring after the second choo choo spawns and you kill it. But, it does slow down the rebuild time if you have first reduced that strat to 0%.

Did you know you can belly land a C47 on the choo choo tracks and you will slide along for quite awhile? But, eventually some tree catches your wing, rips it off, and then the first train coming along flips you off the track ripping off your other wing and tail section. I still haven't tried belly landing an La7 on the tracks and waited for the choo choo to see if you can kill it shooting into the oncoming choo choo. Suppose I could test it offline first for the feasibility of the landing. Or maybe a 110 or 410. Even a Mossi......
Title: Re: Shipyard strat
Post by: Tinkles on March 04, 2014, 12:49:11 AM
On the maps with the strat distributed about, when your country captures the nearest base to a strat. You can up a 110 and hover over the rail head and kill trains all night long every 10 minutes. It gets boring after the second choo choo spawns and you kill it. But, it does slow down the rebuild time if you have first reduced that strat to 0%.

Did you know you can belly land a C47 on the choo choo tracks and you will slide along for quite awhile? But, eventually some tree catches your wing, rips it off, and then the first train coming along flips you off the track ripping off your other wing and tail section. I still haven't tried belly landing an La7 on the tracks and waited for the choo choo to see if you can kill it shooting into the oncoming choo choo. Suppose I could test it offline first for the feasibility of the landing. Or maybe a 110 or 410. Even a Mossi......

Are you saying this could be abused?