Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Hardware and Software => Topic started by: Pollock on April 14, 2014, 05:40:40 PM
-
Been a while since I have posted. I am trying to determine why I can't get maximum performance from the game. My first suspect is time for a new video card.
Oops thats what happens when you hit the wrong button on a smartphone here are the specs.
Cpu: i5 -2500k @3.3ghz
Motherboard: asus p8z68-vpro gen3
Ram: corsair xms ddr3 16GB
Video: amd radeon hd6900 2gb
Hard drive 1 tb sata something
Monitor asus vs278q 1ms response
Track ir pro 5.
-
I mostly suspect that we cant tell you exactly unless you post your systems specs. and what exactly do you mean by maximum graphics and frame rates? last I heard only a few guys can play with everything maxed out.
semp
-
Sorry gun I reposted specs it is a tildeath system.
-
I have basically the same system. I upgraded from 2 465's to a 770 and only saw a slight improvement not in aces high but in wot lol.
wait until the new graphics come out and see how you do, then make a decision. I really wish I had :).
semp
-
My PC is awesome and everyting is on except that shiny slider which is 1/2 on.
Its not high frame rates it stability in all situations :old:
Dont have your frame rates displayed all the time it, if the game is ok its irelevant :old:
Stutters and warping are more of a concern in game :old:
As everyone knows your display is important as well :old:
-
Pollock,
I have an I7 at 3.8, 8 Gb RAM, and an MSI GTX 770 and I can get max frame rate (60) for my monitor at these settings
(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb1/bigsargewells/GraphicSettings.png) (http://s207.photobucket.com/user/bigsargewells/media/GraphicSettings.png.html)
The monitor is a Viewsonic VP2770 and I run AH at 2560x1440.
-
Which model of the four variations of the Radeon HD6900 series? Each was available with 2 gb. There must have been some differences between them, since the price of the cheapest one cost under a third of the price of the most expensive model.
-
i7 4770k, GTX 780 Classified, 16 GB of ram is getting me 50-60 frames with everything maxed out. The only time I even hint at low frames is in a big TT style ground/air furball, but given that I came from a laptop, it's still very playable even then.
Edit: CPU and GPU are running stock. I'm running the game at 1440p too.
-
Been a while since I have posted. I am trying to determine why I can't get maximum performance from the game. My first suspect is time for a new video card.
Oops thats what happens when you hit the wrong button on a smartphone here are the specs.
Cpu: i5 -2500k @3.3ghz
Motherboard: asus p8z68-vpro gen3
Ram: corsair xms ddr3 16GB
Video: amd radeon hd6900 2gb
Hard drive 1 tb sata something
Monitor asus vs278q 1ms response
Track ir pro 5.
I have a much weaker system yet i can get 50-60 fps with "almost" everything turned on, on one fullHD monitor.
I would try to max out everything but the reflection slider (whats its name lol), this should work.
-
Pollock,
I have an I7 at 3.8, 8 Gb RAM, and an MSI GTX 770 and I can get max frame rate (60) for my monitor at these settings
(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb1/bigsargewells/GraphicSettings.png) (http://s207.photobucket.com/user/bigsargewells/media/GraphicSettings.png.html)
The monitor is a Viewsonic VP2770 and I run AH at 2560x1440.
i7 at 3.06, 16 Gb RAM, and GTX 780. I have "most" settings on high, the ones i care about, and only have an occasional problem in heavy combats. I also run AH at 2560x1440 and have a 2nd at 1920x1080. I actually bought the card and extra RAM for BF4 which I ended up despising. But things should work out nicely when AH upgrades its aengine.