Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Custom Skins => Topic started by: Greebo on May 16, 2014, 02:21:30 AM

Title: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Greebo on May 16, 2014, 02:21:30 AM
I found this Aviation Forum thread (http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?82232-Special-lightened-high-altitude-African-Spitfires) on SAAF lightened Spitfires and thought one would make a cool skin.

The South African Air Force's 10 and 41 Squadrons were based at Idku in Egypt from late 1943 to 1944 and were tasked with defending the Suez Canal. The Luftwaffe were still sending Ju-86R spy planes over to check on Allied ship movements. These aircraft were the U-2s of WW2 with pressurised cabins and high compression diesel engines allowing them to operate at over 40,000 ft. To intercept these aircraft the Idku Wing set up a flight of specially lightened Spitfire Mk IXs. These had reduced armament, no armour and all the paint including RAF markings removed. A tactic was devised where three aircraft would take off together, but with only one equipped with a radio. Once visual contact with the enemy was achieved the lighter radio-less aircraft would climb to intercept. The lightest of these had only 2 mgs and would force the enemy make evasive mauneuvers and so lose altitude. It would then be finished off by the second cannon-equipped aircraft.

On the 15th April 1944 a Ju 86R was successfully intercepted at 45,000 ft but not shot down. I suspect this may have been down to gun freezing, a common Spitfire problem at high alt. Now they knew the Ju-86R was no longer immune from interception the Luftwaffe stopped their reconnaissance missions over Egypt.

This particular aircraft MA504 was cannon-armed and test flown up to 47,000 ft by the Idku Wing's base commander, New Zealander Wing Commander Dereck "Bill" Kain.

(http://www.gfg06.dial.pipex.com/screenshots2/41_Sqn_SAAF_Spitfire_Mk_IX_SC1.jpg)

(http://www.gfg06.dial.pipex.com/screenshots2/41_Sqn_SAAF_Spitfire_Mk_IX_SC2.jpg)
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: USRanger on May 16, 2014, 03:44:40 AM
Wow!!!!  :O :rock
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: lyric1 on May 16, 2014, 04:46:42 AM
 :aok
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: FTJR on May 16, 2014, 06:07:26 AM
Very, very nice Greebo.
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Nefarious on May 16, 2014, 09:00:24 AM
Shiny.  :aok
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Dragon Tamer on May 16, 2014, 10:18:22 AM
 :aok
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Bruv119 on May 18, 2014, 09:06:26 AM
A Spitfire born free!     :aok
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Vraciu on May 18, 2014, 12:53:06 PM
Way cool.
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Devil 505 on May 18, 2014, 01:15:52 PM
Outstanding. A perfect example of bare metal skinning.

That said, this scheme is so unique that I hope that you don't submit it. As I see it being the most used SpitIX skin. 
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: skorpx1 on May 18, 2014, 04:24:27 PM
Outstanding. A perfect example of bare metal skinning.

That said, this scheme is so unique that I hope that you don't submit it. As I see it being the most used SpitIX skin. 

I think that once the "new" wears off a bit people will go back to their old favorites for the Spit9.



Nice skin Greebo.
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: SFRT - Frenchy on May 18, 2014, 11:29:34 PM
Cool story  :aok Nev er heard of it before.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT2b1m5YVwE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT2b1m5YVwE)
Title: Re: Not very heavy metal
Post by: Volron on May 19, 2014, 02:40:04 PM
If it's valid for submission, then submit it. :aok  I like it! :x