Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Slade on January 08, 2015, 07:48:16 AM

Title: INK
Post by: Slade on January 08, 2015, 07:48:16 AM
INK come back to AH now.

You are the best Ki-84 pilot on this planet.

Slade  :salute
Title: Re: INK
Post by: ozrocker on January 08, 2015, 07:49:29 AM
I thought Wofat was





                                                                                                                                       :bolt: Oz
Title: Re: INK
Post by: DrBone1 on January 08, 2015, 08:23:24 AM
There are many more that should also make a return even if it is for a day.  :aok
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Slade on January 08, 2015, 08:24:07 AM
True Oz and well Wofat is the best in any plane flown too.  :lol
Title: Re: INK
Post by: JOACH1M on January 08, 2015, 09:20:30 AM
There are many more that should also make a return even if it is for a day.  :aok
Your one to talk!   :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: INK
Post by: GhostCDB on January 08, 2015, 09:21:06 AM
Your one to talk!   :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

I was just about to say  :lol
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Skyyr on January 08, 2015, 10:42:04 AM
JUDAS is the new up and coming Ki-84 pilot. Who cares about the past? Let's look forward to the future!
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 08, 2015, 10:49:48 AM
I'd still give INK the edge over JUDAS.   I'll give him props for that even if I'm not on his Christmas card list.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Someguy63 on January 08, 2015, 10:52:49 AM
Judas is good.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: DrBone1 on January 08, 2015, 03:45:52 PM
It's just not a challenge for me anymore gents.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 08, 2015, 08:43:11 PM
Then try this:

http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.com (http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.com)
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Slade on January 09, 2015, 08:02:13 AM
Quote
It's just not a challenge for me anymore gents.

DrBone,

Respectfully, perhaps try flying something other than LA7, Spits and 262s.

You'd be amazed at how fun a rewarding getting kills in a P-40 can be for example.

Slade  :salute
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Max on January 09, 2015, 08:18:33 AM
Seems as though a number of old sticks have been popping up lately. Perhaps HTC might consider an e-blitz offering a free month to former subscribers when the new release is ready to launch.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: mthrockmor on January 09, 2015, 09:09:43 AM
Ink is really good in his Ki-84 right up until he gets low, slow and out of ideas in front of my Fw-190A5, at which point.....tower baby!!!

Good to have you back Ink. I returned from my solitary confinement about a week ago.

boo
Title: Re: INK
Post by: GhostCDB on January 09, 2015, 09:49:57 AM
DrBone,

Respectfully, perhaps try flying something other than LA7, Spits and 262s.

You'd be amazed at how fun a rewarding getting kills in a P-40 can be for example.

Slade  :salute

He doesn't fly any of those lol
Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.

His uncle flies under his name and he flies La7's and Spits majority of the time.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Slade on January 09, 2015, 09:59:24 AM
Quote
He doesn't fly any of those lol

OK.  I just assumed he flew under "DrBone" when I pulled those stats.


If he is flying really modest planes and purging the skies of all red guys with effortless ease I can understand for sure.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: DrBone1 on January 09, 2015, 11:14:58 AM
I should have been more specific there is a combination of things which causes me to lose interest in the game within the first 20 minutes of my flight time.

No other game can even come close to AH as a whole, You can take you're arcade games and pwn people with 1 hand all day but when you wanna show some true skill of ACM then come hit the skies of AH.  :airplane:
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 09, 2015, 02:01:10 PM
Respectfully....we were not speaking of War Thunder or World of Warplanes....
Title: Re: INK
Post by: DrBone1 on January 09, 2015, 04:33:13 PM
You can't name one game that can even come close to AH in any aspect of game play.

Respectfully....
Title: Re: INK
Post by: ink on January 09, 2015, 04:51:14 PM
Thanx Slade...

I do miss flying and fighting.

maybe someday

 :salute


Ink is really good in his Ki-84 right up until he gets low, slow and out of ideas in front of my Fw-190A5, at which point.....tower baby!!!

Good to have you back Ink. I returned from my solitary confinement about a week ago.

boo

 :D

I havnt returned :salute



Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 09, 2015, 04:53:02 PM
You can't name one game that can even come close to AH in any aspect of game play.

Respectfully....

Sure I can.  It just depends on what a person is looking for.

If you are looking for a game which overmodels torque, undermodels drag (to promote stall / turn fights), gives lots of help to a player for simplicity and/or fun sake (e.g. icons, minimized engine management, auto trim, etc).....AH is it.  It is what it is...a very good game which gives the player a flavor of air combat without getting into the details.

But don't for a second think its the pinnacle of air combat "simulation".

Just sayin'...again, respectfully.  :salute
Title: Re: INK
Post by: DrBone1 on January 09, 2015, 05:00:27 PM
You can take you're arcade games and pwn people with 1 hand all day but when you wanna show some true SKILL OF ACM then come hit the skies of AH.  :airplane:

Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 09, 2015, 05:32:35 PM
PM sent.  :aok
Title: Re: INK
Post by: rvflyer on January 09, 2015, 08:43:15 PM
Sure I can.  It just depends on what a person is looking for.

If you are looking for a game which overmodels torque, undermodels drag (to promote stall / turn fights), gives lots of help to a player for simplicity and/or fun sake (e.g. icons, minimized engine management, auto trim, etc).....AH is it.  It is what it is...a very good game which gives the player a flavor of air combat without getting into the details.

But don't for a second think its the pinnacle of air combat "simulation".

Just sayin'...again, respectfully.  :salute

What is? I've played them all.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: BiPoLaR on January 10, 2015, 12:41:03 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: JunkyII on January 10, 2015, 12:48:54 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: RTR on January 10, 2015, 01:09:27 AM
Sure I can.  It just depends on what a person is looking for.

If you are looking for a game which overmodels torque, undermodels drag (to promote stall / turn fights), gives lots of help to a player for simplicity and/or fun sake (e.g. icons, minimized engine management, auto trim, etc).....AH is it.  It is what it is...a very good game which gives the player a flavor of air combat without getting into the details.

But don't for a second think its the pinnacle of air combat "simulation".

Just sayin'...again, respectfully.  :salute

So...just curious, what do you base your opinion on that this game overmodels torque, undremodels dag, etc etc on?
Do you have some real world experience to base this on?
I'm not saying you are wrong necessarily, just curious on how you based this opinion.

RTR
Title: Re: INK
Post by: RTR on January 10, 2015, 02:05:20 AM
Apologies to Ink.

Was not my intention to derail the thread.

When you can make it back, please do Bro!

RTR
Title: Re: INK
Post by: JOACH1M on January 10, 2015, 02:42:59 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Changeup on January 10, 2015, 09:24:54 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: GhostCDB on January 10, 2015, 11:01:03 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: ink on January 10, 2015, 03:27:34 PM
Apologies to Ink.

Was not my intention to derail the thread.

When you can make it back, please do Bro!

RTR

 :D

all good :rock I have derailed a few threads in my day..... :cheers:

Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 10, 2015, 03:36:58 PM
So...just curious, what do you base your opinion on that this game overmodels torque, undremodels dag, etc etc on?
Do you have some real world experience to base this on?
I'm not saying you are wrong necessarily, just curious on how you based this opinion.

RTR

Let's take it tto PM rather than derail this thread....that was not my intent either.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Oyabun on January 10, 2015, 03:48:03 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 10, 2015, 03:50:21 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: SkyRock on January 10, 2015, 05:31:53 PM
Sure I can.
yet you haven't....   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Slash27 on January 10, 2015, 05:51:42 PM
Ink flew the 84?
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 10, 2015, 06:10:26 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: ink on January 10, 2015, 06:57:28 PM
Ink flew the 84?

once in awhile  :D
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Oyabun on January 10, 2015, 08:29:22 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: BiPoLaR on January 10, 2015, 09:00:29 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: SkyRock on January 10, 2015, 09:32:12 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zerstorer on January 10, 2015, 09:54:31 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Nath[BDP] on January 11, 2015, 12:03:30 PM
INK never impressed me.

Hence he should return and try again.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: JunkyII on January 11, 2015, 12:11:27 PM
 :rofl
INK never impressed me.

Hence he should return and try again.
Title: Re: INK
Post by: Zacherof on January 15, 2015, 03:27:23 AM
:D

all good :rock I have derailed a few threads in my day..... :cheers:


this  :rofl
 :aok