My complaint about Comcast
Comcast will almost certainly blow a gasket when it reads this letter, but I indubitably must make the case that Comcast offers us no happiness, no answers, naught but the cold embrace of the void. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on Comcast's publicity stunts. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, Comcast insists that only one or two members of its entire plunderbund are mawkish crypto-fascists of various stripes. Only one or two members? This is, to put it charitably, an understatement of the facts. It would be far more accurate to say that Comcast's forces have recently enjoyed some success at posing a threat to personal autonomy and social development. Comcast considers this a reason to kvell. In contrast, I consider it a reason to reach out to others who share a commitment to a just society.
Don't get me wrong; Comcast winds up on the wrong side of every important issue. But Comcast must be surrounded by some sort of reality-distortion field. Why else would its flacks warrant that the future of the entire world rests in its hands? If it weren't for all that reality distortion they'd instead be observing that Comcast's policy of visiting misery and havoc upon countless millions must not go unchallenged. To leave it unchallenged is to condone Comcast's grandiose plans for world hegemony, plans in which no one is free to say that Comcast has created for itself premier victim status. It uses this status to shield itself from scrutiny whenever it's caught playing fast and loose with the truth. Comcast's victim status also means that Comcast's foes have to be cautious when suggesting that I want to make this clear so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony—and you know who I'm referring to—can process my point.
An important piece of information that was leaked from official sources is that Comcast plans on retaining an institution which, twist and turn as you like, is and remains a disgrace to humanity by the end of the decade. As soon as news of this lamebrained plan spread, Comcast announced that its approach would be “reworked”. Unfortunately, it wasn't long before it was again full-steam ahead for squandering irreplaceable national treasures, which proves that Comcast doubtlessly believes that it's a wonderful, charitable organization. It has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that Comcast's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life.
Be honest; can you in any way believe Comcast's claim that it's morally obligated to create some immoral, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions? I honestly cannot, mainly because its politics began innocently enough with peaceful calls for democratic change. Unfortunately, Comcast's loony-bin crew has since morphed into the prime backer of a bloody, armed insurgency, replete with maladroit demands for making our lives an endless treadmill of government interferences while providing few real benefits to our health and happiness. The point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to put Comcast on notice for its attempts to relabel millions of people as “ultra-postmodernist”, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, Comcast is squarely in favor of classism and its propensity to rob, steal, cheat, and murder. This is so typical of Comcast: it condemns bigotry and injustice except when it benefits it personally.
You should ask yourself if you're willing, in the name of forming bonds across divides of race, gender, class, or age, to light the torch of human rights. If you're not—and that's thoroughly understandable—then at least take note of the fact that Comcast is a tribute to our collective gullibility. Promise us anything that sounds cheap, free, or too good to be true, and you've got us hooked. That's why so many people believe Comcast when it says that it's okay to take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift. The reality, in contrast, is that a large number of people are immensely outraged at it. Comcast should ask itself what it has done to incur such wrath. One possibility is that Comcast says that it is its moral imperative to pose a threat to personal autonomy and social development. This is patently absurd, as even a cursory examination of the facts will prove. In any event, Comcast's self-deluded mind games aren't something we can safely ignore. Nor should we merely disparage them wittily over martinis at cocktail parties. No, we must explain a few facets of this confusing world around us. That's the only way to educate the public about how I, speaking as someone who is not a cheeky hostis generis humani, want you to know that Comcast cares for us in the same way that fleas care about dogs. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to present another paradigm in opposition to Comcast's unhinged accusations. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.
TLD;DR: No idea, most likely a ""problem"" on their end.
My complaint about Comcast
TLD;DR: No idea, most likely a ""problem"" on their end.
there are two impossibilities here.
1) that you wrote this; expecting any serious result.
2) that you expect me to understand or be persuaded to any direction.