| Manufacturer: nVidia Series: GeForce GTX 400 GPU: GTX 465 Release Date: 2010-05-30 Interface: PCI-E 2.0 x16 Core Clock: 607 MHz Memory Clock: 1603 MHz (3206 DDR) Memory Bandwidth: 102.592 GB/sec Shader Operations: 213664 MOperations/sec Pixel Fill Rate: 19424 MPixels/sec Texture Fill Rate: 26708 MTexels/sec Vertex Operations: 53416 MVertices/sec | Manufacturer: AMD Series: Radeon HD 7k GPU: Cape Verde Release Date: 2012-02-15 Interface: PCI-E 3.0 x16 Core Clock: 1000 MHz Shader Clock: 1000 MHz Memory Clock: 2250 MHz (4500 DDR) Memory Bandwidth: 72 GB/sec FLOPS: 1280 GFLOPS Pixel Fill Rate: 16000 MPixels/sec Texture Fill Rate: 40000 MTexels/sec |
See if you can find a full HD monitor instead of the WXGA (non-standard resolution) TV you are using. Just as a test to see if your performance increases. I bet it does.A little sidestep, if you allow: For what I've learned it's the pixel count that matters when speaking about performance. The less pixels the less work the video card has to do. Some people here have even successfully lowered their resolution from full HD to some non-standard value to get more frames per second. Thus the WXGA TV should give more FPS than a full HD monitor would. If not, there's something else terribly wrong.