The majority of people now created in the US and the UK are bastards.
That's a fact, look it up.
The majority of people in the US and UK don't believe in Angels or Bigfoot
That's a fact, look it up
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: FLOOB on March 24, 2016, 05:37:13 AM
Maybe in the US and the UK but definitely not in the US or the UK.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: PJ_Godzilla on March 24, 2016, 07:54:32 AM
Zuck is a bit of a country himself. I wrote that about him - on facebook. I labeled him a Zucking Country. I went on to say that he was the type of zucking country that liked to strap on a fat guy named Bill Doe, ie, he was a zucking country sticking it to the rest of us with a strap-on Bill Doe, but, of course, what is written on Facebook is vetted by a whole Zucking Country and so Bundle-o-sticks-book spiked my post.
I picture him out in the barnyard with a rooster in his mouth or, perhaps as a thespian who masticates right there at the table in front of everyone.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: zack1234 on March 24, 2016, 08:18:27 AM
:)
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 24, 2016, 03:04:26 PM
The Social Network is an excellent movie. Very entertaining, and shows some nice back stabbing action by the Zuck.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Meatwad on March 24, 2016, 05:42:51 PM
Brokeback social network with a different kind of stabbing from the back area :D
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 24, 2016, 06:45:19 PM
Facebook bloke is in China to drum up more business.
How much more money does he need :old:
Privileged individual
you ever think that it's no longer the money for him but he still has a company with hundreds of thousands of employees to run? the majority of his employees arent billionaires.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 25, 2016, 10:17:45 PM
I think that Zuckerberg and Zack[1234]erberg are perhaps not separate people. . . . :noid
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: zack1234 on March 26, 2016, 03:15:13 AM
you ever think that it's no longer the money for him but he still has a company with hundreds of thousands of employees to run? the majority of his employees arent billionaires.
I think he is a self serving detached individual who thinks he has a right to impose his view on everyone else because he thinks he his right.
He is the bloke who like all the rest of the media elites flaunt their family on "Anti Social network" to the whole world to show solidarity with the masses who are being papauerised by the likes of himself.
by the way if this turd gave me $50000000 I would kiss his bellybutton like the rest of his cronies
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: guncrasher on March 26, 2016, 11:04:53 AM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 11:59:00 AM
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 01:02:11 PM
I'm with Zack and think that The Zuck is a stooge. Not because he tries to push his views (which lots of people do, me included), but because what he pushes is harmful leftist pablum.
If Zack's comments had been about the Koch brothers, I suspect Semp would have been fine with them.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: wil3ur on March 26, 2016, 01:07:33 PM
Facebook startup money came from DARPA and the CIA -- The Stasi could only dream on their citizens informing on themselves. Social Media is a lie, just like the ocean.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: guncrasher on March 26, 2016, 01:26:46 PM
I'm with Zack and think that The Zuck is a stooge. Not because he tries to push his views (which lots of people do, me included), but because what he pushes is harmful leftist pablum.
If Zack's comments had been about the Koch brothers, I suspect Semp would have been fine with them.
in my defense I am more with rolling rock brothers.
semp
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 01:47:35 PM
Here's a story for Zack's appreciation.
In September, 2015, the President of China, Xi Jinping, was to visit Obama in Washington DC. His first stop on American soil, though, was Redmond, Washington for a multiple-day extravaganza of high-profile events and meetings. (This was interpreted by some as a slight, since he could have done it on his way back instead of relegating the Obama meeting to secondary status.)
CEO's from Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Google, Boeing, IBM, GM, Berkshire Hathaway, Starbucks, Hyatt, Pepsi, Honeywell, Dupont, Disney, Cisco, and Dow were invited and attended. Chinese CEO's from Baidu, Lenovo, Bank of China, and Alibaba were invited and attended. Various political figures, such as former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger and former Treasury Secretary and top Wall Street croniest Hank Paulson, attended.
During the event, Xi invited many of these Billionaires and Leaders of Men to one-on-one meetings, but Zuckerberg was not invited to a meeting.
The event culminated with a private dinner for Xi at the estate of Bill Gates, and the next day, Xi flew to Washington DC to meet Obama.
Zuckerberg and his wife flew to DC, too, and were able to attend the associated state dinner at the White House, where they sat next to Obama.
There, Zuckerberg asked Xi in Mandarin if Xi would do him and his pregnant wife, Priscilla Chan, the honor of giving their expected baby an honorary Chinese name.
Xi's reply: "No. That would be too much responsibility."
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: guncrasher on March 26, 2016, 01:55:05 PM
my name is Paul, I was named after Paul McCartney since i was born in 1964. my youngest is named James Paul. was gonna name him James Paul McCartney but my exwife complained. it's just a fricking name.
semp
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 01:56:28 PM
My middle name is "Paul"!
We are related!
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 02:04:30 PM
I have wondered why some tech billionaires have such impractical views regarding socioeconomic systems. I think it might be because they skipped from larval college stage directly to winged billionaire stage without going through the formative pupal stage, where one works at normal jobs for a while and experiences how the real world works.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: wil3ur on March 26, 2016, 02:12:47 PM
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Ramesis on March 26, 2016, 02:28:50 PM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 02:37:05 PM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: wil3ur on March 26, 2016, 02:50:22 PM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Arlo on March 26, 2016, 03:07:43 PM
Batcrazy conspiracies can be a fun hobby if you never expect to be taken seriously the rest of your life. :aok
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 03:28:01 PM
Wil3ur is correct about these particular things, though:
Those are not conspiracy theories, or crazy, or baseless conjecture anymore.
It's technology. My mother-in-law (God rest her dear recently departed soul) was so scared of damned near everything she learned about ... on the internet ... that she made a large list of technological products to avoid at all costs because the government would be tracking her every movement. The wife and I knew that if we challenged her with 'What the heck do they want to track you, specifically, for? What super secrets or criminal activity are you up to?' she would just go on endlessly about how that wasn't the point at all. You, know .... pointlessly.
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: guncrasher on March 26, 2016, 06:59:48 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: Brooke on March 26, 2016, 08:42:09 PM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Zuckerberg
Post by: wil3ur on March 26, 2016, 08:59:31 PM