Aces High Bulletin Board
Help and Support Forums => Technical Support => Topic started by: bj229r on December 26, 2016, 08:44:52 PM
-
to make enemy icons visible--they a darkish transparency to them that simply eliminates my ability to pick them out of the ground clutter and shoot them. Are there card settings i ought be looking at here? Dunno (GTX 750)
-
Have you tried changing the colors of the enemy countries?
-
also turning down the antialison setting sharpens them up and makes them stand out more.
-
Disabling anti-alias in the graphic settings will sharpen the ICONS up.
-
I changed Nits from orar to red, helped...I'll fiddle w anti alias tonite, thanks
-
to make enemy icons visible--they a darkish transparency to them that simply eliminates my ability to pick them out of the ground clutter and shoot them. Are there card settings i ought be looking at here? Dunno (GTX 750)
When I was testing in the closed alpha for about 18 months, I used an HD 6770 which your GTX 750 has about 300 shaders less. But, your band width and data paths are the same. I ended up having to turn off post lighting if I really wanted to see the icons. You may need to increase your gamma. I found first adjusting gamma at the desktop then gamma in the game gave good results. Also I reduced the texture mode to 1024. If I over clocked I could get 85 Gbyte\sec and run the game in 2048 mode. Still, that really over heated the card.
GTX 750
RAM GDDR5
Data Paths - 128bit
Shaders - 512
Band Width - 80.2 Gbyte\sec.
HD6770
RAM GDDR5
Data Paths 128bit
Shaders - 800
Bandwidth - 82 Gbyte\sec.
-
Besides AA setting, the only way I found to make them more "solid" was to increase font size for them.
Color changing helps...I found yellow to be nice except in twilight.
-
Thanks for the replies....I think I'll prolly grab a 950 in the next month or so. The 750 I have is 2 years old, and it was a year or 2 behind when I got it
-
Why 950? The new 1050 would outperform that for the same price. Or rather a Ti, still in the same category.
-
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950-vs-GeForce-GTX-1060 (http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950-vs-GeForce-GTX-1060)
-
Dobs, you linked to a comparison between 950 and 1060. There's a whole lot of difference there, especially price.
I was talking about the #50 series: http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950-vs-GeForce-GTX-1050 (http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950-vs-GeForce-GTX-1050) shows them as equal performers, http://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=329,379&sort=a8&page=1 (http://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=329,379&sort=a8&page=1) tells that the newer is much cheaper.
-
I haven't looked into it hard yet, I assumed the 950 was 6 months to a year removed from the newest stuff, and I've seen them for $150 or so (Another problem is making sure it fits my Cooler Master 130 breadbox)....these $400-500 video cards amaze me (That...people SPEND that much)
-
Good call Bizman....hadn't heard about a 1050 before.
https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-GAMING-Support-04G-P4-6253-KR/dp/B01MF7EQJZ/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1483069103&sr=1-1&keywords=GTX+1050 (https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-GAMING-Support-04G-P4-6253-KR/dp/B01MF7EQJZ/ref=sr_1_1?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1483069103&sr=1-1&keywords=GTX+1050)
Single fan card should fit most cases.