Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Shane on November 02, 2024, 02:54:35 PM

Title: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 02, 2024, 02:54:35 PM
I think this says quite a bit.  :rofl

(https://i.postimg.cc/s2RfJspZ/selfexplanatory.png) (https://postimg.cc/xXtSfrp0)
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Dadtallica on November 02, 2024, 02:56:23 PM
Wonder what do you all say about me on 200?

No interest in finding out.
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: nrshida on November 02, 2024, 03:16:01 PM
I don't know what was said before but you can get a text ban for saying unpopular things?
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Lazerr on November 02, 2024, 03:34:50 PM
If you don't have anything nice to say it's probably a good idea to keep your trap shut.

Not to mention the lengthy history chat suspensions he has.

It's always someone else's fault though...  I hope you forget to vote this election shane.... ;)
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 02, 2024, 03:39:33 PM
I don't know what was said before but you can get a text ban for saying unpopular things?

 

If enough people do something like this and mash the .rpt button, sure.  Is it worth calling HTC about, lofl, no.  This from a few days ago.

(https://i.postimg.cc/hPChBfH8/coordinate-much.png) (https://postimg.cc/tYx9dCR7)

.rpt used to have actual intent and meaning. Now, apparently not so much.

I'm more concerned about why people continue using masked vulgarity and continue to do so without repercussion. There's a reason the filter is in place.

Or saying truly offensive things like calling people certain real-life terms that have no business being said in the first place (true offensiveness) also without repercussion. I have been suggested to call HTC about this when the .rpts on it exist.

HTC has always come from the viewpoint of "you're responsible for what you say" - I get it, sure.

But I also dispute that people are being held accountable for their truly offensive comments or for bypassing the language filter.

It's who says something, not what's being said.  It's the blatant hypocrisy on display.





Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 02, 2024, 03:41:01 PM
If you don't have anything nice to say it's probably a good idea to keep your trap shut.

Not to mention the lengthy history chat suspensions he has.

It's always someone else's fault though...  I hope you forget to vote this election shane.... ;)

Well, I've had 2 players accuse me of being a pedophile on top of the whole false accusations of stolen valor.

You're a prime example of the blatant hypocrisy.

Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Lazerr on November 02, 2024, 04:48:25 PM
Well, I've had 2 players accuse me of being a pedophile on top of the whole false accusations of stolen valor.

You're a prime example of the blatant hypocrisy.

Got any examples?
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 03, 2024, 10:26:24 AM
Got any examples?

yes, I do.

lofl. the irony.


(https://i.postimg.cc/158XpmLB/theironylofl.png) (https://postimg.cc/N5wQtcG2)
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Lazerr on November 03, 2024, 11:43:58 AM
yes, I do.

lofl. the irony.


(https://i.postimg.cc/158XpmLB/theironylofl.png) (https://postimg.cc/N5wQtcG2)

Thanks, I'm glad you took the time dig that up.  Thanks for showing a clip of something I said in frustration in comparison to your full time attitude and resulting dozens of chats privilege suspensions.
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 03, 2024, 01:13:42 PM
Thanks, I'm glad you took the time dig that up.  Thanks for showing a clip of something I said in frustration in comparison to your full time attitude and resulting dozens of chats privilege suspensions.

You asked. Wasn't even hard.  Want other examples that you can try and spin?  lofl.

And lies in your lying, pls.  Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

You point to the abuse of .rpt as somehow being valid.  Circular logic.

Yeah, .rpt used to mean something real, now it's just a tool being abused that only seems to work in one direction.

You're always on my ankle, and I always post something that exposes your hypocrisy.  :rofl :aok

And yeah, I punched a bunch of wannabe fascists with my vote.



Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: JimmyD3 on November 03, 2024, 06:45:09 PM
You asked. Wasn't even hard.  Want other examples that you can try and spin?  lofl.

And lies in your lying, pls.  Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

You point to the abuse of .rpt as somehow being valid.  Circular logic.

Yeah, .rpt used to mean something real, now it's just a tool being abused that only seems to work in one direction.

You're always on my ankle, and I always post something that exposes your hypocrisy.  :rofl :aok

And yeah, I punched a bunch of wannabe fascists with my vote.

What?? you mean you didn't vote demoncrat?????? Who knew...
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 04, 2024, 09:03:08 AM
What?? you mean you didn't vote demoncrat?????? Who knew...


All I can say is that I don't look good in brown or giving unquestionable chess piece loyalty - maybe side switching will open your perspectives.  :aok

Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: LCADolby on November 05, 2024, 08:04:17 PM
Do yourself a favour and tune out 200 for a week. Without relapsing.  :old:
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Eagler on November 05, 2024, 08:43:29 PM
Do yourself a favour and tune out 200 for a week. Without relapsing.  :old:

Had it tuned out from Saturday..I would leave it off but many send <S> that way

Just need to ignore if not squelch ..very rare

Eagler
Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: Shane on November 05, 2024, 09:00:16 PM
Do yourself a favour and tune out 200 for a week. Without relapsing.  :old:

I have done that. The chat buffer is still full of things that have no place being there.

Title: Re: self-explanatory <eyeroll>
Post by: PropNut on November 07, 2024, 08:17:30 AM
This thread reminds me of the Monty Python skit of two old bags (guys dressed as women) having a purse fight with tiny purses.