Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: molybdenum on September 04, 2025, 07:38:32 PM
-
Cat7 had 90% of the time been ready and willing to kill my buffs when I emerged from NOE to make a suicide run on strats with a K4. Okay, fine, maybe he lurks in tower for this sort of thing. I assumed it was simply that.
But.
A Rook (don't know who) changed his nick to something like "Cat7Chts!" and Cat7 disappeared for a couple of days.
And now a "new" guy, same style except spit14 vs 109K4, with a lot of stars, suddenly emerges?
Would love to know why the cat7cheats guy said what he said. The change of name and plane strongly suggests that the cheats guy was right/cat trying same cheat with similar plane and new name (SAAB).
Opinions?
-
Film to Hitech, not here! See Rule #7.
-
CatD regularly cancels my buffs in a 109. He is really good at management and angles. He is a tough out especially in a Lancaster.
-
Interesting. I saw that cat7chts handle the other day and thought that was strange. Then I see Cat7 hasn't played in 2 weeks which mid month I think is when accounts expire. Whats really interesting is that Cat7 and SAAB almost have identical scoring metrics which indicates similar styles of performance. Further, they both excel in the ki84 and have similar statistical patterns in plane K/D, and love the wirblewind. From the kills this month they both love shooting bombers, specifically Lancs, that's a lot of Lanc kills. Its also just a coincidence but both are right next to each other ln overall rank and fighter rank. Just based on looking at this month (would need more prior month confirmations) I'd say there an actual possibility of them being the same person. :t
-
Obvious name change, but I have never thought of him to be cheating. In my experience he is just extremely timid and only engages if he has near zero chance of dieing. Everytime I've been able to force a fight he just isn't good enough to put up an entertaining battle. It's hard to say he uses a shade because I haven't seen any obvious names on the team that would belong to him, he could just be a good tower queen that is good at reading the map. I love when I get to kill him because I always find him when im going up against impossible odds.
-
Cat7 had 90% of the time been ready and willing to kill my buffs when I emerged from NOE to make a suicide run on strats with a K4. Okay, fine, maybe he lurks in tower for this sort of thing. I assumed it was simply that.
But.
A Rook (don't know who) changed his nick to something like "Cat7Chts!" and Cat7 disappeared for a couple of days.
And now a "new" guy, same style except spit14 vs 109K4, with a lot of stars, suddenly emerges?
Would love to know why the cat7cheats guy said what he said. The change of name and plane strongly suggests that the cheats guy was right/cat trying same cheat with similar plane and new name (SAAB).
Opinions?
The only real “cheating” in question would be shade cheating—and yes, it’s still alive and well. Tower-sitting with the intent to drive up ENY is also still alive and well.
In the court of public opinion, the burden of proof falls on the accuser. Before 2020, the developer strictly enforced rules against making public accusations of cheating. Since then, the stance has shifted: the official response to ENY issues has been, “switch sides to balance it.”
Running multiple accounts is not bannable. Using them to shade or stack is only addressed at the developer’s discretion—and he’s been open about having minimal involvement with the game in recent years due to burnout and personal reasons. Enforcing it would mean shutting down accounts, and that directly cuts into revenue. That’s not good for business.
predátel'stvo :salute
My advice? Get good. Shoot down the shade cheaters. Don’t stack countries to inflate ENY.
The Baaaahhhh has spoken 🐏
-
Cat7 had 90% of the time been ready and willing to kill my buffs when I emerged from NOE to make a suicide run on strats with a K4. Okay, fine, maybe he lurks in tower for this sort of thing. I assumed it was simply that.
But.
A Rook (don't know who) changed his nick to something like "Cat7Chts!" and Cat7 disappeared for a couple of days.
And now a "new" guy, same style except spit14 vs 109K4, with a lot of stars, suddenly emerges?
Would love to know why the cat7cheats guy said what he said. The change of name and plane strongly suggests that the cheats guy was right/cat trying same cheat with similar plane and new name (SAAB).
Opinions?
:headscratch: ummmmmm who cares?
-
:headscratch: ummmmmm who cares?
Some make this game such a priority you have to wonder what life outside of it they really have..
Eagler
-
For some, the game is there life, and IMO thats ok. Keeps me outta bars lol.
I just want everyone here to know,… I’m very concerned with this issue.
Seriously, As spoken here many times, multi accounts is ok as ling as inly used on one side, NOT in mire than one country at a time. IF (prove it) they are ysing in two countries at a time now you have a concern.
-
Obvious name change, but I have never thought of him to be cheating. In my experience he is just extremely timid and only engages if he has near zero chance of dieing. Everytime I've been able to force a fight he just isn't good enough to put up an entertaining battle. It's hard to say he uses a shade because I haven't seen any obvious names on the team that would belong to him, he could just be a good tower queen that is good at reading the map. I love when I get to kill him because I always find him when im going up against impossible odds.
I've had similar experiences. I never believed him to be cheating, just very map aware. He was always on the hunt for bombers.
I seem to remember a player named SAAB back in the day... I could be making this up. Anyone else?
-
I had a few run ins with saab last night. My best guess is he is not cat7. As others have posted cat7 choses low probability of death missions.
Speaking of Saabs, they use to have a small, 2 cycle, 3 cylinder engine car back in the 60s. It had 4 speed on the column and front wheel drive. Good gas mileage as you would suspect. Neighbor across the street had one.
-
Im not so sure Randy, Saab still only has 6 deaths as an attacker this tour. Also, Saab hasn't played in a while, no history this year. But Cat7 plays around 80-140 hours a month, which is a lot. If you look at Saabs time + cat7s time, they total about 140 hours. So that's another indication. There is a probability here, but cant confirm 100% without real billing proof. It is interesting though that Cat7 has disappeared.
-
If SAAB only defends against bombers and bombs GVs with a KI84, he’s cat7. Oh, if he also waits with an M3 and then attempts to run away for a green end sortie after realizing the base capture is dead, then it’s cat7
Does it suck to try and chase his k4 down as he flees to his base? Yes. At the end of the day is it really an issue? I don’t think so. There are plenty of people in this game who take more stake in defending bases/strats rather than attacking, such as frosti, and that’s ok. The knights are very good at coordinating attacks along with having dedicated defenders
-
I’m pretty sure I have recently seen cat7, maybe last week.
-
So someone changed their callsign?
-
I can easily name at least 50 players that will only fight when they have the extreme numbers, plane and altitude advantage. Once they even get the slightest scratch or dent in their skin, they run home to land.
The question was asked about the whereabouts of CAT7. I have never heard him on VOX but have encountered SAAB who has helped me out of a few predicaments recently. From what I can tell he is a very good stick. Not sure if they are the same ppl. Also not sure to what concerns the OP here either :headscratch:
-
So someone changed their callsign?
No, potentially using 2 callsigns, atleast this month.
I’m pretty sure I have recently seen cat7, maybe last week.
He didn't get any kills since 8/22, check his plane kills in the scores.
If SAAB only defends against bombers and bombs GVs with a KI84, he’s cat7. Oh, if he also waits with an M3 and then attempts to run away for a green end sortie after realizing the base capture is dead, then it’s cat7
They do have a similar m3 kill count as well... just sayin. Im almost certain they are the same guy. Scoring metrics are almost identical and that is very hard to manipulate. Just like personalities, extremely hard to hide.
I can easily name at least 50 players that will only fight when they have the extreme numbers, plane and altitude advantage. Once they even get the slightest scratch or dent in their skin, they run home to land.
Also not sure to what concerns the OP here either :headscratch:
Well, if he's using a second account to see the other side and know where bombers are, that's a big problem and this will easily run bomber pilots out of the game. Just a huge waste of time for them to get gamed.
-
Well, if he's using a second account to see the other side and know where bombers are, that's a big problem and this will easily run bomber pilots out of the game. Just a huge waste of time for them to get gamed.
Ahhh gotcha.
I highly doubt he is using 2 accounts. I have seen CAT hunt for buffs and joined him a couple times when hunting for 99CRAPERA. Few times CAP has gone hiding off map where we both just Cat and I just land. I am sure if he had shades, he would of known where to go.
-
Rank? By that you must mean the points players. Much better things to do in this game than that...... really there are. :aok
-
Did anyone notice his squad name? Outrageous, & Vulgar come to mind. I would suspect Hitech did something about it. Just my opinion.
-
Ahhh gotcha.
I highly doubt he is using 2 accounts. I have seen CAT hunt for buffs and joined him a couple times when hunting for 99CRAPERA. Few times CAP has gone hiding off map where we both just Cat and I just land. I am sure if he had shades, he would of known where to go.
Yeah I mean the SAAB account hasn't been used this year, so he would have needed another account then, but it is striking how very similar their stats are, the Ki84 and m3 and wirble kills + overall time flying per month makes it very statistically probable, but again, cant necessarily prove without direct confirmation.
Did anyone notice his squad name? Outrageous, & Vulgar come to mind. I would suspect Hitech did something about it. Just my opinion.
No? Im intrigued now lol. But according to squad scores, Cat7 had been disbanded, which means his account is likely closed.
-
So someone changed their callsign?
I think it was questioning if SAAB was acting as a shade for Cat7 since it's obviously him but now on a different team. There is no overlap in Cat7 kills and SAAB kills because it's a name change, same person, same account. If SAAB was online when CAT7 is intercepting rooks bombers then we have a serious issue.
-
I think it was questioning if SAAB was acting as a shade for Cat7 since it's obviously him but now on a different team. There is no overlap in Cat7 kills and SAAB kills because it's a name change, same person, same account. If SAAB was online when CAT7 is intercepting rooks bombers then we have a serious issue.
I guess a valid question is has anyone seen them online at the same time?
Other than that, it's a player that changed callsigns. Possibly.
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
Wrong thread? No one here is complaining about score. People would like integrity in the games they play, otherwise it will run players off.
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
I was only using score for statistical reference and patterns. But as Haggerty said, we would like to maintain integrity with game strategy and scoring model so players feel they arent wasting their time trying to be strategic within the game. A bomber mission can take upwards of an hour so I would be pissed if someone with a second account was gaming my position the entire time so they could strike at the perfect time.
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
Good point.. now I have to wonder why I replied even though I rarely play. Fantasy football is much more fun
-
The knights are very good at coordinating attacks along with having dedicated defenders
As a Knight that regularly tries to herd the group it nearly pains me to read that statement. This is true only when a certain group (actually a couple/few from several squads) are on at the same time. But, c’mon bro, you’ve got to know by now Knights are traditionally home to the ‘do as they please’ types much more so than Bish or Rook.
Now for Cat7, I personally don’t care about much that has been written here and believe all he does is above board. If you truly want to find out though, see if you can beat SAAB to bombers over strats and even if you get there first, he still gets the kills and you get assists then you got your guy.
-
Well I guess I must only be on when those groups are playing because, as someone on the outside looking in, I regularly see the knights simultaneously attacking and defending. In good numbers on both sides I might add
-
even though I rarely play.
you say this quite often
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
No kidding
a weekly hysteria over something in that game that makes it all wrong.it does make the game stink a bit. Like old biddies.
-
Ganging in 5-8 eny planes runs more players out of the game more than anything. Gotta be tough in this game to be able to handle and accept the fact that you'll get ganged most often. Its just the name of the game. But many players dont know defense ACM and it makes it extremely difficult for them and after a while it just gets tiring. If its tough for me, I know its 3x times harder for most with less experience. Wish we could make an unwritten rule of 2 only but its just not gonna happen in a relm with no structural command.
-
Ganging in 5-8 eny planes runs more players out of the game more than anything. Gotta be tough in this game to be able to handle and accept the fact that you'll get ganged most often. Its just the name of the game. But many players dont know defense ACM and it makes it extremely difficult for them and after a while it just gets tiring. If its tough for me, I know its 3x times harder for most with less experience. Wish we could make an unwritten rule of 2 only but its just not gonna happen in a relm with no structural command.
There is some truth to that. More so, newbs may never get great.
That said, I get a chuckle out if draggin 4-6 anywhere I want, especially if we have troops coming in. Its very easy to pull a full troll line. If they are on your 6 they ain’t killin troops. :)
But ya, unsportsman-like.
Like all games, if they can, they will. This is why vents/scenarios are better than the MA, they are structured and have rules. The best part of this game is not the MA. Why worry about it?
I don’t mind as much the 5-1, its great SA training for scenarios, it makes 1 or 2 - 1. My best flying is in scenarios. Ya can’t just re-up 30 times.
>shrug>
Small beans
-
Wrong thread? No one here is complaining about score. People would like integrity in the games they play, otherwise it will run players off.
Naw this is the right thread. The OP doesn't like being confronted during his factory attacks and he's concerned it the same guy under a different name. Why care about that stuff, if not about messing up his milk run score sheet?
But my deeper point being, that is this thread is more about the attitude of a lot of players now. You talk about keeping the integrity of the game but what about the integrity of the players playing this game? Just a couple of posts above this one they're talking about 5 on 1 being a common and even expected thing. Where's the integrity there I ask? Everyone claims they're a big bad fighter pilot yet most fly in packs like a bunch of wolves like they did something. How about 2 go in and the other hold cap or something? But no it takes 7 Spitfires to kill a P40 now I guess. :rolleyes:
Everyone claims they want a fight, yet the OP seems concerned he keeps getting one. No, it's not about score. It's about egos and dislike for one another with this player base. It's a huge turn off for new and returning players. You guys have forgotten to have fun and have let this game turn into a full-time job. Y'all are too dang wrapped up in who is a spy or who changed their callsign and who did what when. It's downright childish for grown men to act this way. Integrity is more than just a word, and it starts at home.
If I were brand new and seen some of the downright nasty remarks on this bbs, I'd run away as fast as I could and never look back. The MA is 100 times worse, especially on 200. I fly under a different callsign every tour for this very reason. I love the game, but the biggest majority of players now have no manners, respect, sportsmanship or integrity anymore from what I'm seeing. It's a shame and I hate seeing it. I reckon all or most the fun players that played for the pure love of the game and played fighter pilots have either retired or have died off.
-
Theres a difference between natural occurrences in the MA like ganging unfortunately. I dont even think the ganging is about score. Its just what untrained people do naturally. Its more about getting the kill in lights. Another reason I dont care for the kill count showing for every kill. While I know that ganging is the biggest issue, there is really nothing we can do.
But, I think a player trying to game positions using multiple accounts on both sides is more detrimental. We want bomber pilots to stay in the game. If they feel their positions are being given up in a non natural way. They wont waste their time flying an hour for a mission and thus no more bombers. I think many of them are already having a tough time fighting Tempest every time as well, but thats natural to the game. Just wish Temps had a higher perk. But if someone is gaming the overall strategy of the game by knowing all player positions, that's an unfair advantage and should be called out. I dont know how thats a turn off since we are trying to keep the gameplay somewhat natural. I know for me personally. If I found out many players were gaming my position every time I took off. It would force me to leave since the fog of war would be ruined. We either have a simulation of war strategy or we have a game of team death match.
-
Theres a difference between natural occurrences in the MA like ganging unfortunately. I dont even think the ganging is about score. Its just what untrained people do naturally. Its more about getting the kill in lights. Another reason I dont care for the kill count showing for every kill. While I know that ganging is the biggest issue, there is really nothing we can do.
But, I think a player trying to game positions using multiple accounts on both sides is more detrimental. We want bomber pilots to stay in the game. If they feel their positions are being given up in a non natural way. They wont waste their time flying an hour for a mission and thus no more bombers. I think many of them are already having a tough time fighting Tempest every time as well, but thats natural to the game. Just wish Temps had a higher perk. But if someone is gaming the overall strategy of the game by knowing all player positions, that's an unfair advantage and should be called out. I dont know how thats a turn off since we are trying to keep the gameplay somewhat natural. I know for me personally. If I found out many players were gaming my position every time I took off. It would force me to leave since the fog of war would be ruined. We either have a simulation of war strategy or we have a game of team death match.
These convos do more harm than what goes on in the MA. You guys are repeating sonething you don’t even know if its true. Mist of these post like this are the same. Ya have eli gated threads that stay for ever, all this cheating talk you don’t even know if its true, yhe viewer unknowingly thinks it is and leave. If they din’t have proof then shut it. If they do gave proof ut should go to GT not here.
Same thing same group on other subjects, conspiracy theorist with no proof at all, but yet argue and speak as if its true.
Excuse it away all you want, these hurt the base.
What happens in the MA scrolls away and out of subject in minutes, these here last forever.
These factless threads of cheating hurt the base.
The convo is cheating, yet not one slice of evidence to back it up. The power of suggestion does damage. Why cheating accusations were never allowed here.
No proof, shut it, if proof send to HT. Its stupid to do it here.
-
7- Cheating allegations or descriptions are not allowed. Email support@hitechcreations.com to report any issues regarding this. HTC permanently bans anyone caught cheating in Aces High. We take cheating and allegations of cheating very seriously.
Rules are made to protect the integrity of the game. People should read them again
Politics, same thing, shut it.only reason I even jump in is because of massively misinforming people where it doesn’t belong in the first place
-
These convos do more harm than what goes on in the MA. You guys are repeating sonething you don’t even know if its true. Mist of these post like this are the same. Ya have eli gated threads that stay for ever, all this cheating talk you don’t even know if its true, yhe viewer unknowingly thinks it is and leave. If they din’t have proof then shut it. If they do gave proof ut should go to GT not here.
Same thing same group on other subjects, conspiracy theorist with no proof at all, but yet argue and speak as if its true.
Excuse it away all you want, these hurt the base.
What happens in the MA scrolls away and out of subject in minutes, these here last forever.
These factless threads of cheating hurt the base.
The convo is cheating, yet not one slice of evidence to back it up. The power of suggestion does damage. Why cheating accusations were never allowed here.
No proof, shut it, if proof send to HT. Its stupid to do it here.
You are out of line. I will call out clowns becasue I know it damages gameplay far more than a forum post that 10 people come to. And if people think they can come to this game and abuse the gameplay and concept of the game, they are going to get called out. I and others will not stand for it. Its not about you.
-
You are out of line. I will call out clowns becasue I know it damages gameplay far more than a forum post that 10 people come to. And if people think they can come to this game and abuse the gameplay and concept of the game, they are going to get called out. I and others will not stand for it. Its not about you.
I am not out of line, this thread us. You want to keep doing what pushes people away. Same as ppl who justify ganging. Fact is these threads should be locked via #7.
No it doesn’t work that way to call people out,90% of the time there is no evidence to back up one word. You are doing the exact opposite #7 was made. The rule itself and those in every game that makes it agrees with me/us.
I am NOT out of line, this thread and those like it are. In the past you start this thread you get hand smacked.
I was a mod/ga/tech, this would be shut down because the rule exist, fir a reason. Just accusing someone violates it. Some of you think rules and common logic only applies to others.
I stand by my words, it won’t change. It hurts us but being heard is more important to some.
Mits all about numbers out of ine side of the mouth, and everything that chases them away out the ither sude of the mouth. You cannot have both, unless numbers don’t really matter.
-
I am not out of line, this thread us. You want to keep doing what pushes people away. Same as ppl who justify ganging. Fact is these threads should be locked via #7.
No it doesn’t work that way to call people out,90% of the time there is no evidence to back up one word. You are doing the exact opposite #7 was made. The rule itself and those in every game that makes it agrees with me/us.
I am NOT out of line, this thread and those like it are. In the past you start this thread you get hand smacked.
I was a mod/ga/tech, this would be shut down because the rule exist, fir a reason. Just accusing someone violates it. Some of you think rules and common logic only applies to others.
I stand by my words, it won’t change. It hurts us but being heard is more important to some.
Mits all about numbers out of ine side of the mouth, and everything that chases them away out the ither sude of the mouth. You cannot have both, unless numbers don’t really matter.
Okay and where is any proof that this runs players away? Who has left the game becasue of this post? As far as im aware the player in question was exposed and closed their account which is actually good for the game since they are only using one account now. Same with huckster being called out who has changed his ways hopefully.
-
Okay and where is any proof that this runs players away? Who has left the game becasue of this post? As far as im aware the player in question was exposed and closed their account which is actually good for the game since they are only using one account now. Same with huckster being called out who has changed his ways hopefully.
Every-time you reprimand people with out even any proof you are telling readers cheating exist.
If we’re not going to use common logic I’m done here. The rule was written because it drives players out.
I’ll just dump 35 yrs experience out the window
You guys promote the game.
I agree 100% with Uptown.
Why don’t you explain why you think the rule was written
-
Every-time you reprimand people with out even any proof you are telling readers cheating exist.
If we’re not going to use common logic I’m done here. The rule was written because it drives players out.
I’ll just dump 35 yrs experience out the window
You guys promote the game.
I agree 100% with Uptown.
Why don’t you explain why you think the rule was written
This is not a hacking accusation. This is a player gaming positions accusation. Ive determined by looking at their stats that they are more than likely the same person. Again they closed their account with no defending themselves. I would rather have bombers and strategic players in the game than a fighter gaming their positions and forcing them to leave which hurts the game far more.
But yes. This thread has ran its course and should end since the problem has gone away. Just note that some of us arent going to tolerate unfair gameplay manipulation.
-
W.T.F. Ever
-
All of my fellow rook players try to take fields without a fighter cap or, when fighters show up, they scrape the enemy pursuers off on the M3 bringing troops.
The problem is one of competence.
-
Naw this is the right thread. The OP doesn't like being confronted during his factory attacks and he's concerned it the same guy under a different name. Why care about that stuff, if not about messing up his milk run score sheet?
But my deeper point being, that is this thread is more about the attitude of a lot of players now. You talk about keeping the integrity of the game but what about the integrity of the players playing this game? Just a couple of posts above this one they're talking about 5 on 1 being a common and even expected thing. Where's the integrity there I ask? Everyone claims they're a big bad fighter pilot yet most fly in packs like a bunch of wolves like they did something. How about 2 go in and the other hold cap or something? But no it takes 7 Spitfires to kill a P40 now I guess. :rolleyes:
Everyone claims they want a fight, yet the OP seems concerned he keeps getting one. No, it's not about score. It's about egos and dislike for one another with this player base. It's a huge turn off for new and returning players. You guys have forgotten to have fun and have let this game turn into a full-time job. Y'all are too dang wrapped up in who is a spy or who changed their callsign and who did what when. It's downright childish for grown men to act this way. Integrity is more than just a word, and it starts at home.
If I were brand new and seen some of the downright nasty remarks on this bbs, I'd run away as fast as I could and never look back. The MA is 100 times worse, especially on 200. I fly under a different callsign every tour for this very reason. I love the game, but the biggest majority of players now have no manners, respect, sportsmanship or integrity anymore from what I'm seeing. It's a shame and I hate seeing it. I reckon all or most the fun players that played for the pure love of the game and played fighter pilots have either retired or have died off.
Well said!
- oldman
-
My whole game play is about winning the war by defeating the enemy. This includes offensive and defensive actions.
In an Offensive action to capture a base, if a player ups to defend, it is my job to kill it or at least insure it does not hinder the effort. If that means 5 of us jump this defender to insure that, so be it, its part of the game.
In a Defensive action to defend a base, if a player arrives to attack, it is my job to kill it, or at least insure it does not contribute to the capture of the base. Again, if that means 5 of us jump this attacker to insure that, so be it, its part of the game.
While I have not played IL2 in several years, from what I hear here on the forum and see on Youtube, that is how it is played as well with multiple players.
Uptown is right about one thing on 200 though, It's about egos and dislike for one another with this player base. It's a huge turn off for new and returning players. You guys have forgotten to have fun and have let this game turn into a full-time job.
-
Logging in to hear the same three guys old enough to be my grandfather shrieking endlessly on range about how everyone is cheating gets old
-
Logging in to hear the same three guys old enough to be my grandfather shrieking endlessly on range about how everyone is cheating gets old
Ha! And all 3 countries have the same trio ranting nonstop. I never heard my grandfather say the F or C word or shriek and whine but the range channel helps me imagine it. No bueno.
I'm not averse to cursing, Hell I enjoy it. It's the shrieking, complaining and whining that hurts my ears.
-
And y'all wonder why people don't want to play this game anymore. Most of you people live and die by the stupid score as if it makes you something important. AcesHigh doesn't suck.....it's the players that run players off. Get some help. What a bunch of childish old men y'all are.
There are a few but the great majority just enjoy the game and fellowship.
-
I like to just play into it… my favorite is when, I think trapr, the automatic “graphics cheater detected online!” plays when one of the rook tankers gets online :rofl
I can’t remember which tanker, I think it’s whenever charger gets online
-
Community truly isn't that bad, most of you all haven't played other games(Such as console games). Where the talk is rough.
-
My whole game play is about winning the war by defeating the enemy. This includes offensive and defensive actions.
In an Offensive action to capture a base, if a player ups to defend, it is my job to kill it or at least insure it does not hinder the effort. If that means 5 of us jump this defender to insure that, so be it, its part of the game.
In a Defensive action to defend a base, if a player arrives to attack, it is my job to kill it, or at least insure it does not contribute to the capture of the base. Again, if that means 5 of us jump this attacker to insure that, so be it, its part of the game.
While I have not played IL2 in several years, from what I hear here on the forum and see on Youtube, that is how it is played as well with multiple players.
I completely understand where you're coming from. I started out with the SicPups and we would take ponys and Lancs shut a base down with a quickness. It was great! But then they upped the numbers allowed in a squad and the Bish just blew up with 2 or 3 huge swarm squads and it ended up everyone were competing over targets. You'd get there and half the time you'd have to drop ord and vulch the runway. Ghi would roll base after base like a swarm of locust. So I switched sides to fight against the masses. I like to see some of those big squads on the Bish side fly with the lowly Nits and Rooks once in awhile. The worst thing that could happen is ya might make a friend or two more. Not to mention help the ENY balance out some days. And that goes for the other 2 countries too.
I don't know man. Since I got back on the hippy lettuce I'm all about peace and love all of the sudden. I think we need a group hug or some crap :uhoh
-
Logging in to hear the same three guys old enough to be my grandfather shrieking endlessly on range about how everyone is cheating gets old
jvlees is probably pretty young, he was a squeaker not too long ago.
-
Community truly isn't that bad, most of you all haven't played other games(Such as console games). Where the talk is rough.
Or sims that don't have a killshooter and things can get out of hand right quick.
A teammate kills you're buddy so you shoot him down and then his buddy shoots you done etc....
Other team wins with no shots fired by them! And some very ugly things get said.
-
When i log in at 8:00 EST, it’s 22 bishops, 3 knights and 3 rooks.
The bish win the map by 9:00 and 90% of them leave after collecting perks.
It’s obvious that they are only there for the “winning the war perks”. They sure weren’t hording to get kills because they would have to fight each other for kills because the only opposition is one who keeps upping and dying over and over.
The other two countries should all go to the hording country and fly along with the horde complaining about having no kills available.
It will show that they are there only to collect the perks and that having zero opposition is of no concern to them.
-
When i log in at 8:00 EST, it’s 22 bishops, 3 knights and 3 rooks.
The bish win the map by 9:00 and 90% of them leave after collecting perks.
It’s obvious that they are only there for the “winning the war perks”. They sure weren’t hording to get kills because they would have to fight each other for kills because the only opposition is one who keeps upping and dying over and over.
The other two countries should all go to the hording country and fly along with the horde complaining about having no kills available.
It will show that they are there only to collect the perks and that having zero opposition is of no concern to them.
I doubt very much that it has anything to do with perks. My guess would be they have thousands of perks already and as they are under ENY more often than not they dont get to use perks, no perks is not what they are after.
They just like taking bases and winning the war, thats it.
-
When i log in at 8:00 EST, it’s 22 bishops, 3 knights and 3 rooks.
You can bet 2 of those knights are either AFK or most likely hitting rook bases.
I sometimes like to fly in the early hours. LOTS of very easy kills but if them steamrolling bases bother you, its best you not log on as it is a virtual cesspool.
Finetime was being a sore in the bish horde and its hilarious to see the horde thin down once they approach ANY opposition.
-
I am wondering if this has any connection to Cat 6 or Cat 6e. :D