Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Wanker on March 06, 2002, 11:36:55 AM

Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Wanker on March 06, 2002, 11:36:55 AM
Once 1.09 is out the door, I think HTC will be focusing on smaller development cycles for awhile. I applaud them for that, as we need more planes to open up opportunities for Special Events and for the CT.

While I know that everyone likes the fast, sexy rides like the Spitfire, P-51, 190D-9, etc.... I would personally like to see some attention on the more "unglamorous" planes. While these planes would have very limited use in the MA, their introduction would open up many more possibilities for the CT and the Special Events.

I'm talking about Dive bombers, Torpedo bombers and level bombers.

Needed for Pacific theater: SBD, Helldiver, Val, Judy, Kate, Jill, B-25C, B-25H.

Needed for BoB: Stuka, HE111, Blenheim

Needed for Eastern Front: Stuka, TU-2, PE-2

To get these planes into action in AH, it would take the better part of three releases. But IMO, their time has come. These planes are needed if we're going to be able to expand our horizons when it comes to the TOD's and Scenarios. I'm sure the CT guys would also agree with me.

If we don't get these planes, we'll have to keep on using substitutions like the TBM for the Kate, which just makes me shudder. No matter how much I use my imagination, there's no way I can look at a TBM and think of it as a Kate.

Pyro always told me that when someone asks for something from them, they better have a logical argument. Hopefully my arguments above are logical enough to get them to start producing these planes.

Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Seeker on March 06, 2002, 12:26:07 PM
I fully agree.

I wonder if there are facets to these planes which might help them out in the MA?; some advantage their dedicated role would give them?

What sighting systems did they employ for dive bombing, and is that an avenue to pursue? Dive brakes? The Stukas glass floor?

It's true that the Stuka would be vulnerable in hostile air, but it's accuracy should some how be represented.
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: SKurj on March 06, 2002, 01:32:26 PM
Beaufighter


SKurj
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: popeye on March 06, 2002, 01:45:45 PM
F4F, P-39, P-40
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: SKurj on March 06, 2002, 01:50:11 PM
Heh dunno what else but all I thought the Stuka used to help in aiming was a dive indicator to one side of the pilot.  It may have been just drawn on the canopy i don't recall.

It just showed the pilot the correct dive angle (just an angle  type shape I believe)


SKurj
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Animal on March 06, 2002, 01:52:14 PM
I agree with banana...
But my agreement may only detract from your cause in the eyes of Hitech Creations, Inc. ( :p Pyro)

I do believe its the way they are headed, and already planned for it. The CT is already a modest success, and with more planes and war periods modelled, it will improve tenfold, but that depends on the players who took the task of managing that arena.
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Sabre on March 06, 2002, 02:35:02 PM
The most difficult theater to do in the CT right now is definitely the PTO.  Getting some more Japanese a/c and some early US birds would definitely help out.  The P-40 would be a big plus, as it was used in every theater of war.  If I could only have one plane to help out the CT, that would be it, followed by the Japanese carrier planes, the Wildcat, and the Dauntless.

Sabre
CT Team
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Swoop on March 06, 2002, 02:41:15 PM
I cant believe Camo hasnt added his views on the Brewster yet......


(http://www.swoop.com/images/logo_small.jpg)
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: streakeagle on March 06, 2002, 03:14:34 PM
I have said before and I will say it again, I want them all and I want them now...

ALL OF THEM.

If it flew with a man on board, I want it in the game. Okay, so the Wright Flyer or the Cessna 152 don't exactly have a lot of MA appeal. I bet you could still get kills in those birds making people overshoot or crash into the ground trying to hang with you while flying low and evasive :)

I have seen requests for the Me-163... that's like the lowest end rocket plane you could ask for. I am thinking more like an X-15. It has no armament, but at Mach 6+ almost in orbit, somehow the war doesn't seem so significant. Besides, you will scare the crap out of any planes you buzz on the way up. Extra benefit: having the X-15 means you need the B-52 as well. Who wants a B-29 when you can carpet bomb the entire MA in a single pass at 500 mph?

HTC is way behind my personal wants and needs ;)

If I order AH on CD, does it come with a free woman? Now that would be a deal :D
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: bikekil on March 06, 2002, 03:15:32 PM
PZL p11c
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Dowding on March 06, 2002, 03:17:01 PM
I agree entirely.
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Sikboy on March 06, 2002, 04:01:59 PM
If you would have posted this in the Aircraft and Vehicles forum, we would have heard from the "WE NEED TO EQUALIZE THE NATIONAL REPRESENTATION" crew, and thier demands for a German Heavy Buff, or an Italian Torpedo plane, or a Bohemian transport, Transylvanian amphib ect ect.

Personally, I'd agree that we should add more planes from the PTO, and the early PTO specifically. So much of the pacific was fought with the F4F, P-40, P-39. without them we have no New Guinie, 1st Guadalcanal, no Midway, no Coral Sea... you get the picture.

I once tried to get a better feel for why people wanted certain planes. I hoped to maybe come up with some sort of accepted standard. But instead I just concluded that people want planes because "damnit I just want it" and choose rationales that fit their desires. Nothing at all wrong with that I suppose.


-Sikboy
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Li`l Snorkey on March 06, 2002, 04:08:50 PM
I'm all hope that HTC will be the very first online sim to introduce the He-111.

BoB scenario will be absolutely stunning if we have it :)


Snorkey
Title: Re: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: -moto- on March 06, 2002, 04:09:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by banana


I know that everyone likes the fast, sexy rides like the Spitfire, P-51, 190D-9, etc.... I would personally like to see some attention on the more "unglamorous" planes. While these planes would have very limited use in the MA, their introduction would open up many more possibilities for the CT and the Special Events.


spitfire fast? or did we get the spit 14 hmm ;)
But I do agree with banana. That is after we get the spit 14 :D




Moto_MOL
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Pongo on March 06, 2002, 04:49:19 PM
I aggree, once we have the Bearcat, P47M,Ki84,Spit XIV, B29,He177 and maby the Mig 15Bis and F86F40 we should do some eary war stuff...
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: funkedup on March 06, 2002, 04:58:40 PM
Quote
Bohemian transport, Transylvanian amphib


ROFLMAO, made my day!


NICE LIST banana!
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Beefcake on March 06, 2002, 05:12:09 PM
"B25H" OH Boy!! I can hear the whines now:

"Pyro, my 190 got hit by 5, 75mm rounds from a B25 today. EVERYONE knows that in WW2 a 190 could take 10-20 75mm hits."
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Octavius on March 06, 2002, 06:26:58 PM
LOL beef!  I agree banana 100%.  P40, P39, F4F, Stuka, He111, Kate, B25, Jill, Judy...

along with the Pam, joyce, liz, hellen, barb, janet, olga, helga, oh and dont forget Jenny... 8-6-7-5-3-0-niiieeeiiiiine...!
Title: Re: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: gavor on March 06, 2002, 07:56:03 PM
Quote
Originally posted by banana

I'm talking about Dive bombers, Torpedo bombers and level bombers.

Needed for Pacific theater: SBD, Helldiver, Val, Judy, Kate, Jill, B-25C, B-25H.




Nice list, but you forget Beaufighter, Buffalo and BOOMERANG! How many times must I stress the importance of this!

:)
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Karnak on March 06, 2002, 08:48:18 PM
Fast? Spitfire?  Same sentence?

banana, you must know something I don't because the Spitfires we have in AH certainly aren't fast.

There were fast Spitfires that were the contemporaries of most of the aircraft in the AH set, but we only have Spits from the first half of the war.
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Wanker on March 07, 2002, 08:49:28 AM
Quote
banana, you must know something I don't


:D



Quote
along with the Pam, joyce, liz, hellen, barb, janet, olga, helga, oh and dont forget Jenny... 8-6-7-5-3-0-niiieeeiiiiine...!


LOL Oct, that's too funny. You know a lot about music from the 80's for being such a young pup!


The only reason I didn't list more aircraft like the Beaufighter, Boomerang(lol), etc... is because the aircraft I listed above are just the foundation we'd need to move forward with the scenarios. And I left out fighter aircraft because I know those will come without having to beg for them. :)

I'm still trying to get Pyro to build an H8K2 Emily for us. That thing could bomb, torpedo and carry 64 troops! And it has 20mm defensive guns, tough armor plating.....could be the only perk floatplane you'd see in AH!
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Eagler on March 07, 2002, 09:21:54 AM
V-1 Buzz bombs to destroy cities from afar :)
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: MadBirdCZ on March 07, 2002, 03:28:06 PM
Schmetterling and Wasserfall  Surface to Air Missile sites for Strat. Target and HQ protection...

and of course an Avia B.534 :D
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: gavor on March 07, 2002, 05:09:53 PM
Quote
Boomerang(lol)


No laughing!
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: Lephturn on March 07, 2002, 05:32:44 PM
I don't think it's reasonable to intruduce all of any one type or nationality of aircraft in a release.  AH is made up of lots of folks, the majority of whom just want to furball in their favourity fighter I believe.  Any release that doesn't include at least a couple of new fighters wouldn't make sense if you think about it.

HTC has always had a really nice balanced approach to releasing new planes, and I don't expect that to change.

That said... I'd love the P-40, it's probably my most wanted ride at the moment.  The P-47-M/N needs to be the next perk.  A couple bomber type craft would be nice mixed in... :)
Title: Unglamorous, but neccessary
Post by: MadBirdCZ on March 07, 2002, 05:47:16 PM
I think that most people are aware of HTC's strategy when it comes to releasing new airplanes. Problem is that all those people just keep on rumbling because they are ALL just chronic dreamers! :D

Well guys keep on dreaming....

And HTC - gimme that B.534, P-61, Buffalo, Stuka, Me-410, Beaufighter, ........  :D