Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: popeye on April 30, 2002, 12:46:29 PM

Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: popeye on April 30, 2002, 12:46:29 PM
The doctors say my medication is no longer effective.  If we don't get a P-40 in AH soon.....they won't be responsible for the consequences.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: TheOxman on April 30, 2002, 12:50:43 PM
It must be going around. 'Cause i got it too:(
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Ripsnort on April 30, 2002, 12:53:59 PM
Its funny, after waiting 7+ years for a P61 in any flight simulator, medication not required here because there is probably not a CADD modeler that could possibly get the contours, surfaces of such an aircraft correct...
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Dago on April 30, 2002, 01:02:24 PM
Gee Pop, are you reporting that Viagra loses it's effectiveness without sufficient stimulation?  :)

dago
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Sikboy on April 30, 2002, 01:10:24 PM
If plane whining were terminal the epidemic would have wiped out the Luftwhiner tirbes long before the 110 was added. Most of us have suffered this affliction in its earlier stages. Hopefully you've not developed a resistance to antibiotics (Pinachillin' works best. Or Chronic)

-Sikboy
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: TheOxman on April 30, 2002, 01:13:49 PM
Ya' know i bet when that movie "Pearl Harbor" came out Hitech said "Awww heck beware the P-40 deewebs cometh!":D
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: moose on April 30, 2002, 01:20:36 PM
there are so many better planes they could release before the p40

i dont think we'll see it until after 1.10. this next release looks like it's gonna be a midway planeset.

i like the p40 but it's just fodder for my 109
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: CavemanJ on April 30, 2002, 01:27:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Its funny, after waiting 7+ years for a P61 in any flight simulator, medication not required here because there is probably not a CADD modeler that could possibly get the contours, surfaces of such an aircraft correct...


Someone posted a link to a decent visual model of the Widow for CFS/CFS2.  Can't say I cared for the fm much in CFS/CFS2, but what do ya expect from microshaft

I'm just hopin and prayin they'll put the Widow in AH sometime in the foreseeable future :D
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Ripsnort on April 30, 2002, 01:32:23 PM
Quote
Originally posted by CavemanJ


Someone posted a link to a decent visual model of the Widow for CFS/CFS2.  Can't say I cared for the fm much in CFS/CFS2, but what do ya expect from microshaft

I'm just hopin and prayin they'll put the Widow in AH sometime in the foreseeable future :D


Yeah, I have that one, forgot about it, that was a nice job...your right, the FM did suck.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Eagler on April 30, 2002, 01:43:17 PM
besides the very cool looking tiger mouth on the P40, what are its strengths?

Was it a T&B'er? B&Z? I thought it was dated at the time WW2 started for the US and the only planes it shoot down were the first Japs with fixed landing gear...

Not slamming, just wondering what the big fascination for this plane is...
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Ripsnort on April 30, 2002, 01:55:05 PM
Against the Rufe, Zeke and other aircraft it facecd in China, and Indo-China, it was used strictly as a B and Z aircraft.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: hblair on April 30, 2002, 01:56:17 PM
You guys will have to excuse moose for what he posted above. He is an impressionable young man trying to find his way. He meant nothing by it.

;)
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Ripsnort on April 30, 2002, 01:58:26 PM
Quote
Originally posted by hblair
You guys will have to excuse moose for what he posted above. He is an impressionable young man trying to find his way. He meant nothing by it.

;)


Yeah, but given the scenario he put forth (and two equal pilots with equal pilot skills) I do believe that the P40E WOULD be fodder for ANY 109. ;)
Title: O/T
Post by: Russian on April 30, 2002, 02:14:16 PM
Don't know if anyone care but it will be coming to IL-2

Here are some pics
http://www.il2center.com/Allied/US/02/10.jpg
http://www.il2center.com/Allied/US/02/08.jpg
http://www.il2center.com/Allied/US/02/07.jpg
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: TheOxman on April 30, 2002, 02:19:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by moose
there are so many better planes they could release before the p40

i dont think we'll see it until after 1.10. this next release looks like it's gonna be a midway planeset.

i like the p40 but it's just fodder for my 109


Don't upset the Ox, Moose:D
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Montezuma on April 30, 2002, 02:21:02 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler

I thought it was dated at the time WW2 started for the US and the only planes it shoot down were the first Japs with fixed landing gear...


P40s shot down plenty of German aircraft in the Mediterranean theater and on the eastern front in Russian service.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: popeye on April 30, 2002, 02:38:05 PM
P-40s shot down plenty of German aircraft in WB too.   ;)
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Dowding on April 30, 2002, 02:46:46 PM
P-40 was outlcassed by the 109 in the Desert war, if I remember rightly. Although against Italian biplanes it faired better.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Sikboy on April 30, 2002, 02:51:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing


Fair question.

Several years ago, I was researching an article on the 49th Fighter Group in the SWPA during 1943-44. During most of that period, the 7th and 8th Fighter Squadrons flew the P-40, while the 9th FS (with whom Bong flew) went from P-40s to P-38s to P-47s and finally back to P-38s again.

Anyway, the 7th and 8th had many encounters with the Ki-61 and most of the pilots I interviewed agreed that it was an even match for their P-40s. The difference being better training and better tactics. Bob DeHaven would tell you that the two aircraft were a very close in combat capability, with the pilots being the deciding factor. Mr. DeHaven fought some epic battles against the Tony and barely survived some of them.

Peformance can be compared.

P-40K-1: Weight was roughly 6400 pounds empty, 8400 pounds gross, and 10,000 pounds max. Maximum speed of the P-40K was 320 mph at 5000 feet and 362 mph at 15,000 feet. Cruise speed was typically 280 mph. A climb to 15,000 feet took 7.5 minutes at Military power, 7.2 minutes with Combat power.

P-40N-1: 6000 pounds empty, 7400 pounds gross, and 8850 pounds maximum, the N-1 was the fastest P-40 variant and was engineered for for combat at higher altitudes than previous models. Maximum speed was 378 mph at 10,500 feet and service ceiling was 38,000 feet. An altitude of 15,000 feet could be attained in 6.6 minutes at Military power, 5.8 minutes using Combat power.

Ki-61-1b: 4872 pounds empty, 6504 pounds loaded, 7165 pounds maximum. Maximum speed 368 mph at 15,945 feet. Cruising speed 249 mph at 13,125 feet. An altitude of 16,400 feet could be reached in 5 minutes 31 seconds. Service ceiling 37,730 feet.

There exists a TEAC test of the Ki-61, but I don't have a copy handy. Perhaps someone has it on hand and can provide details.
I do, however, have a report by 5th AF technical personel, which  states that their impression of the Tony is that it at least the equal of the P-40, being inferior in some areas, as well as having some minor advantages as well. I have better sources in my collection at home, but I'm in the office today.

My regards,

Widewing


In case anyone was wondering.

-Sikboy
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: hblair on April 30, 2002, 02:57:49 PM
Guys, the thing with the P40 isn't performance. A couple of reasons the P40 is cool:

1. The teeth
2. The John Wayne movie, was it Flying Leathernecks? (who cares about the special effects, the Duke was in it for crying out loud)
3. It's the Flying Tiger's plane!
4. It was the first plane the US really kicked the crap outa the Japanese in.
5. AVG
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Sabre on April 30, 2002, 02:59:29 PM
P-40 was a very stable gun-platform was rock-steady in a dive.  This combined with its respectable fire power led to its extensive use as a fighter-bomber in the Med and on the Eastern front.  It wasn't until well after Operation Huskie that Jugs began to replace the P-40s as F-B's.  The first Axis aircraft that could keep up with it in a dive was the Bf109F.  The P-40 had very good high-speed handling, including a repectable role-rate.  In WB, I more than once out-scissored Oscars and Zekes in it.  

While not competative with the late war planeset, it deserves it's day in the virtual sun.  Through a good part of the war, when folks back home (in the USA) thought about American air power, the Warhawk is what they saw in their mind's eye.  It played a role in every theater, and served right through from beginning to end.  Personally, I'd like to see a -B model in AVG garb, and an -E or -N in ANZAC livery.
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Superfly on April 30, 2002, 03:37:48 PM
Maybe you should check the New section  ;)
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Beefcake on April 30, 2002, 03:37:49 PM
check news :D


god that thing looks beautiful!!
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: hblair on April 30, 2002, 03:42:16 PM
Very cool looking Superfly. :)

What's the history of that particular plane?
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: popeye on April 30, 2002, 03:53:29 PM
I'm saved!!!!!!!!

Thank you, HTC.  :)


(Think I'll go buy a lottery ticket...this is my lucky day.)
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Superfly on April 30, 2002, 03:57:01 PM
Major Sidney S. Woods, 9th FS circa 1943
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Sabre on April 30, 2002, 03:58:54 PM
I'm sooooo Happy!!!

Sabre
P.S. New they'd add this all along:) Never doubted it, no sir. "Ouch! Yep, I'm awake."
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Dead Man Flying on April 30, 2002, 04:19:44 PM
Situation:  Normal

-- Todd/Leviathn
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: pbirmingham on April 30, 2002, 04:54:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Montezuma


P40s shot down plenty of German aircraft in the Mediterranean theater and on the eastern front in Russian service.


If I remember correctly, the Tuskeegee Airmen flew P40s at first, right?
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Aub on April 30, 2002, 05:01:35 PM
The Tuskegee flew P-47s first

Aub
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: Sabre on April 30, 2002, 05:09:55 PM
No, the Tuskegee Airmen flew the P-40 when they first went operational.  We had one of the original cadre talk to our Squadron Officers School back in 1996, and I had the pleasure of speaking with him afterwards.  He mentioned how much they appreciated the Jug when they finally received them as replacements for their P-40s.  He also recounted their well known feat of killing that enemy destroyer with nothing but their massed 50-cals.  True patriots and heros all.

Sabre
Title: Situation: Critical
Post by: moose on April 30, 2002, 10:46:35 PM
i was really hoping someone would go for my troll! :-X

well, actually, im real happy we're getting a p40