Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Ripsnort on May 02, 2002, 01:14:37 PM

Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Ripsnort on May 02, 2002, 01:14:37 PM
Simply question, would you like to see this developed?  Think of the plane set, almost as large as WW2...

Yes or no?
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: air_guard on May 02, 2002, 01:17:16 PM
yeeees :)


airguard
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Wotan on May 02, 2002, 01:17:54 PM
no finish ww2 first
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SunKing on May 02, 2002, 01:24:40 PM
no, jets be boring.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: CyranoAH on May 02, 2002, 01:26:19 PM
Nope, not for me thanks.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Sikboy on May 02, 2002, 01:28:35 PM
No thanks.

-Sikboy
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Wanker on May 02, 2002, 01:30:32 PM
No thanks, would rather see "Dawn of Aces High".
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Greese on May 02, 2002, 01:33:04 PM
I would love it, but I wouldn't like it if it took talent and development away from the current project.  If HTC speads too thin, both products would suffer.

Now if it were all inclusive, all done in the same program, and you either chose one of many korea arenas with appropriate planesets inside, or on of many wwII arenas with appropriate planesets inside (it could keep expanding, all within the same program).  Offline, you could have any plane you want to kill those circling P-51's....
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Yeager on May 02, 2002, 01:42:05 PM
Absotively Posolutely!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Revvin on May 02, 2002, 01:42:21 PM
No, HTC are doing a mighty fine job with AH and I wouldn't want them to get sidetracked developing another sim.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Dago on May 02, 2002, 01:43:17 PM
Not at the cost of the current game.  Remember who brung ya to the dance.

dago
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: AKDejaVu on May 02, 2002, 01:43:17 PM
Just as soon as they model every aircraft used in WW2.

AKDejaVu
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Phantom4 on May 02, 2002, 01:43:29 PM
Yes
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SOB on May 02, 2002, 01:51:51 PM
What DJ said.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Apache on May 02, 2002, 01:52:43 PM
Same here, What DJ said.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Sancho on May 02, 2002, 01:59:25 PM
no.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Superfly on May 02, 2002, 01:59:52 PM
No, I'd like to have a life outside of HTC thanks.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Otto on May 02, 2002, 02:03:15 PM
Yes!  

    Either that or a '1946' arena....   Anything that provides options is good.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: loser on May 02, 2002, 02:06:49 PM
no
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: JoeDirt on May 02, 2002, 02:18:15 PM
YES!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Ripsnort on May 02, 2002, 02:26:50 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SunKing
no, jets be boring.


Ahhh, lets see:

F51 (P51 if you will)
F-82 (Twin boomed mustang)
B-29
A-26
FG-2 Corsair
YAK-3
LAGG-7
Convair B-36J
Sikorsky UH-19B "Chickasaw"
North American T-6D "Mosquito"
Cessna O-1G "Bird Dog"
The list goes on and on for prop/helo jobs...

Then theres the jets..just a few here:
Lockheed F-80C "Shooting Star"
McDonnell XF-85 "Goblin"
North American F-86A
Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 "studmuffinot"                                                Republic F-84E "Thunderjet"                   Republic F-84F "Thunderstreak"                Lockheed F-94A "Starfire"                     North American F-86H "Sabre"
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Ripsnort on May 02, 2002, 02:33:33 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SUPERFLY
No, I'd like to have a life outside of HTC thanks.


Ahh, your job would be the same, no extra work.  Just finish the WW2 planeset, then start adding Korean war aircraft types (the prop plane set would be relatively easy, you take your late war WW2 aircraft and modify them) then create a separate arena for only these aircraft. :D  Easier than you think.  AW did this along time ago, Jet arena or something? (too many lost brain cells ago)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Puck on May 02, 2002, 02:36:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SunKing
no, jets be boring.



It would?  I've always thought getting a guns solution in jets would be a blast.

Then again, a 200 perk AIM-9A might be entertaining.  Load 2 'winders?  400 perks.  Hope the kill's worth the cost, and how stupid will you feel when those 200 perks fly for the sun...
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Revvin on May 02, 2002, 02:38:36 PM
Quote
Just finish the WW2 planeset


That easy eh? I'd let Targetware crack on with the Korean sim, and let HTC carry on making the award winning WW2 sim we enjoy now.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Ripsnort on May 02, 2002, 02:38:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Puck



It would?  I've always thought getting a guns solution in jets would be a blast.

Then again, a 200 perk AIM-9A might be entertaining.  Load 2 'winders?  400 perks.  Hope the kill's worth the cost, and how stupid will you feel when those 200 perks fly for the sun...


No missiles were ever fired in Korea in ATA combat I'm quite sure. It would most definately be all guns.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: MrLars on May 02, 2002, 02:41:47 PM
Jets with guns!  YES!!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Steven on May 02, 2002, 02:49:57 PM
Someone is already making a dedicated Korean War online simulation.

http://www.targetware.net/
http://www.gamezone.com/gamesell/p18186.htm
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: deSelys on May 02, 2002, 02:55:54 PM
No...because the fighting would be much the same as we have here, just with faster planes.

I think a Vietnam theatre would be more interesting: the use of the rear-aspect missiles would ask for a completely different maneuvering to meet the firing parameters  like min and max range, G-load... (Cfr Shaw's book Fighter Combat, Tactics and Maneuvering).

But I agree: let's Superfly have a life (after he gives us the COMPLETE WWII planeset....including Bachem Natter and other curiosities). ;)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: JimBear on May 02, 2002, 03:11:45 PM
No Thankyou, would much rather see the rest of WWII fleshed out then a Spanish Civil War planeset  :)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: popeye on May 02, 2002, 03:31:36 PM
Jets smell bad.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: fdiron on May 02, 2002, 03:41:01 PM
By the time HTC finished a Korean War sim, the graphics and gameplay of AH and Korean War sim would be obsolete.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Apar on May 02, 2002, 03:50:16 PM
What Revvin said
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Replicant on May 02, 2002, 03:55:47 PM
The Hawker Sea Fury would surely be tempting but I would prefer to see many more WW2 planes in AH before they attempt a new project.

Regards
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Rude on May 02, 2002, 04:14:02 PM
no
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Mitsu on May 02, 2002, 04:18:39 PM
no.

If I wanna play Korean War, I will select Target Korea (or MiG Alley :)).

-Mitsu
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Hristo on May 02, 2002, 04:25:09 PM
Nope, WW2 only pls.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Mathman on May 02, 2002, 04:27:22 PM
Why?

We are doing fine with the WW2 setup and we have LOTS of new planes that can and hopefully will be added.

As others have said, if I want an online sim for Korea, I will go and use Target Korea when it is released.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: streakeagle on May 02, 2002, 04:38:28 PM
At some point, after all the planes, ships, tanks, and infantry weapons have been modeled, AH will have little room for improvement other than refining and updating existing models. If and when that point is reached, all that talent will need something to do to keep busy. I would like WWI first over Korea, but I would prefer Vietnam over everything including AH. If there is a plane I love the most, more than the P-51, F4U, B-17, F-86, and F-15, it is most certainly the F-4 Phantom II. Of course Project 1 finally got a publisher. If it is as good as it looks, my time for AH may dwindle even lower than it is now.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Dux on May 02, 2002, 04:44:13 PM
In a perfect world... yes.

In the real world... No. I'd rather see HTC add some cool experimental WW2 planes; that would satisfy my jet cravings.


Quote
At some point, after all the planes, ships, tanks, and infantry weapons have been modeled...


lol, I can imagine Superfly's enthusiasm when he's 83 years old, having to get up in the morning to model the Supermarine Walrus Mk.IV

 :D
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: palef on May 02, 2002, 04:47:46 PM
No thanks.

palef
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Buzzbait on May 02, 2002, 05:11:29 PM
S!

No, prefer to see a set of WWI planes and enviroment.

Or better yet, a Spanish Civil War enviroment...  :)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: mason22 on May 02, 2002, 05:12:28 PM
umm, does target korea (http://www.targetware.net/)  ring a bell?
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SpinDoc1 on May 02, 2002, 05:16:12 PM
I agree I'd rather see the WWII planeset finished. Plus, HTC deserves a life... Another point of interest that arises is the need for strat and graphics changes. When I mean graphics, I mean let's have some more interesting maps! Come on, the same three in rotation is getting a little old. I'd like to look forward to new planes AND new maps. Plus, I don't know how the maps are modeled, but is it possible to have some more interesting geographic features, like deep canyons or underpasses (arches)and such. I think different terrain features would interest a lot of people! For strat changes I think industry and performance of that country need to be tied closer together. It would be interesting if a certain factory (ex ball bearing) were hit, and then the 109's at a base would not work. This would be better suited to the CT. I'll put on my firesuit now...begin the flaming.

Jason
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Otto on May 02, 2002, 05:32:15 PM
Ok, I've read all the 'nays' on a Korea arena and I've changed my mind.

   I'm now in favor of a 1911 arena that explores the first use of aircraft as offensive weapon in Turkish-Italian War.

   My heart beats faster at the thought of this.....
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: -ammo- on May 02, 2002, 05:33:12 PM
Yes! I would love to see that eventually.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Animal on May 02, 2002, 05:35:23 PM
The was no LW in Korea.
No LW, no whinning.


No fun.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Animal on May 02, 2002, 05:36:21 PM
Yes, on a WW1 arena, though it wouldnt be as balanced as what we have now.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SKurj on May 02, 2002, 06:04:02 PM
NO to Korea!!

YES to WW1!!


SKurj
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Pongo on May 02, 2002, 06:29:02 PM
I wouldnt mind haveing the mig 15bis and F86F-40 available somewhere to duke it out together..but more like one arena with no other concession rather then a simulation of the Korean war.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Wutz on May 02, 2002, 06:35:30 PM
yes
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Joc on May 02, 2002, 06:41:01 PM
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  stick with WW2.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Swager on May 02, 2002, 07:15:43 PM
No, in fact, take the ME262 out of AH.  We dont need no stinkin jets!  

Hopefully, HTC will concentrate on updatinf and improving the WWII simulation they have built.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Toad on May 02, 2002, 07:25:14 PM
Jets are for kids.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: brady on May 02, 2002, 07:25:35 PM
NO
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SOB on May 02, 2002, 07:30:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SUPERFLY
No, I'd like to have a life outside of HTC thanks.


Shyaddup and get back to work!  :)


SOB
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: beemer on May 02, 2002, 07:41:41 PM
yes:)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: AKIron on May 02, 2002, 08:16:39 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SUPERFLY
No, I'd like to have a life outside of HTC thanks.


Much as I'd like for Superfly to have an occasional day off - YES to Korea!!!!!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Sandman on May 02, 2002, 08:17:49 PM
Not a chance. Would rather see HTC go the opposite direction than Korea.

Then, given the choice between WWI and WWII, I'll take the latter.
Title: Re: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Gypsy Baron on May 02, 2002, 08:28:19 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Simply question, would you like to see this developed?  Think of the plane set, almost as large as WW2...

Yes or no?


 No!

 Think of it this way...resources would need to be used
 for this "version"...that means fewer resources for AH
 as it now exists.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Turbot on May 02, 2002, 09:22:34 PM
Conditional YES, not knowing any better shouldnt be hard for them to do.  Just need model 2 more planes, right?

I'd ;eave the resource arguments to the professionals, but HELL YEAH I'd fly it.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Hangtime on May 03, 2002, 12:02:09 AM
Whelp.. if were talking about doing it with non-propoganda FM's.. it would be a rooski/chink walkover on the round eyed occidentals. A veritaible blond-haired-tied-eyed asskickin banquet with 20mm riddled shredded saber salads topping the menu.

i can't think of anything scarier than running into citabria in a mig15.

well... maybe if i had a whole buncha help and a coupla sidewinders..

:D
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Bonden on May 03, 2002, 12:06:12 AM
Nope
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Thunder on May 03, 2002, 01:27:29 AM
YES!:)
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Tumor on May 03, 2002, 01:53:11 AM
NOT... until the WW2 planeset is done along with a number of unneeded WW2 aircraft added for the fluff-factor.

Air Warrior Korea had some success, but I found it tedious shooting around at 500knts plus all the time, just not as fun.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Esme on May 03, 2002, 01:57:00 AM
No to Korea. it's about to be done to death by other sims, anyway.

The Spanish Civil War gets a resounding YES from me, though - and quite a few of its planes could be used early in WW2, too.


Esme
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Duedel on May 03, 2002, 02:25:15 AM
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! stick with WW2.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Wilbus on May 03, 2002, 02:56:43 AM
No thanks, never, no chance please ;)

If HTC would make a new Korean sim that would make them IMOL wannabee's, as soon as the WB crew or chief (Hotseat?) saw the Korea anouncement he went into modelling an F86 for WB3, WB3 not finnished, lots of planes still needing to be added etc. To me that seemed like "I can do this too" but all he does it take important time from the main idea. Don't want that to happen to HTC.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Angus on May 03, 2002, 06:18:55 AM
Korea? naaa
But the planes from 1946...yessss
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Widewing on May 03, 2002, 07:41:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Revvin


That easy eh? I'd let Targetware crack on with the Korean sim, and let HTC carry on making the award winning WW2 sim we enjoy now.


Yeah, I agree, leave it to targetware.

My regards,

Widewing
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: BUG_EAF322 on May 03, 2002, 08:00:38 AM
Only after we have all WWII  aircraft are done and remodelled
When we have all vechiles we need after all boats added after we can be soldiers and after the subs added.

Than when AH is finnished we could start a korean war set

But AH is never finnished there will always be work to do
isn't it the new planes than it is updating the game

For a korean plane set there is something like target korea.

i think it's just a stupid question

for once and for all this is a WORDWAR TWO!!! SIMULATION
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Yeager on May 03, 2002, 09:13:32 AM
All of u NO people STFU.

This is (afterall) a forum for people to say YES.

PS: Sounds like the art department is understaffed.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Wlfgng on May 03, 2002, 09:15:27 AM
NO



:cool:
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Dux on May 03, 2002, 09:20:20 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
i can't think of anything scarier than running into citabria in a mig15.

ooooo... that gave me shivers.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Bonden on May 03, 2002, 09:34:56 AM
NO - again.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: lasse on May 03, 2002, 12:13:24 PM
No, lets stick to WWII.


Lasse
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: hazed- on May 03, 2002, 05:53:51 PM
no WW2 1st later by all means
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: SELECTOR on May 03, 2002, 06:24:03 PM
while the korean conflict was the birth of the jet age and so hisoricaly important , I don't like the idea.
i pay my bucks for a WWII sim, and only that.
not interested in a korean sim..:)
Title: No
Post by: BotaBing on May 03, 2002, 06:27:52 PM
They should develop the WWII game first,

#1 fix scoring
#2 fix the ground vehicle problems
#3 add more ground vehicles
#4 add submarines
etc
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: qts on May 03, 2002, 06:51:56 PM
No thanks - keep it WW2 only.
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: CAV on May 03, 2002, 11:43:01 PM
YES!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Slayer on May 04, 2002, 04:47:16 AM
um.......NO!!!!
Title: "Aces High: Korea!~" Yes or no?
Post by: Alino on May 04, 2002, 07:25:22 AM
NO !!!!

Just give full concentration to make that existing Modell better step by step. And if everyone is contend you can beginn thinking for another Modell.

Greets,
Alino:rolleyes: