Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Karnak on August 27, 2002, 03:22:30 PM

Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Karnak on August 27, 2002, 03:22:30 PM
I was thinking of the aircraft, tanks and boats, that I'd like to see eventually added to AH (emphasis on eventually) and which planeset is most complete by my standards.

American:

B-17F
B-24J
B-25B
B-25H
B-25J
B-29A
F2A-1 (Finnish colors)
Gato Class
M4A3
M4A3 E8
M26
P-38F
P-38J
P-39D
P-39Q
P-47M
P-51A
P-61B
SB2C


British and Commonwealth:

Beaufighter Mk 24
Boomerang
Firefly Mk I (aircraft)
Firefly (tank)
Meteor Mk III
Mosquito B.Mk IV
Mosquito B.Mk XVI
Mosquito NF.Mk XXX
Spitfire Mk VIII
Wellington Mk IX


German:

Bf109G-14
E-Boat
Fw190A-2
He111H-3
He162A-2
He177A-5
He219A-7/R1
Hs129B-1
Ju87B-1
Ju87G-1
Ju88G-7b
Ju188A-2
Me410B-2
Panther V G
Puma
Tiger II
U-Boat Type VIII


Italian:

C.200
C.R.42
G.50
G.55
Re2000
Re2005
S.M.79-II
Z.1007


Japanese:

B5N2
B6N2
B7A2
D4Y2
G4M2
H8K2
J2M3a
J1N1-S
Ki-21-IIb
Ki-43-IIa
Ki-44-IIb / Ki-44-IIc
Ki-45-Kai B
Ki-61-Ia
Ki-61-IIb
Ki-84-Ia
Ki-100
Ki-102
N1K1-J


Russian:

I-16-10
I-16-24
I-153
Il-10
Is-2
LaGG-3
MiG-3
Pe-2
Pe-8
SB-2
T-34/85
Tu-2S
Yak-1
Yak-9D
Yak-3


French:

D 520
F223-3
MB-152C-1
M.S. 406


Polish:

PZL P.11c
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Mitsu on August 27, 2002, 03:28:06 PM
Ki-43-III is much better than Ki-43-II.
A lot of Japanese Hayabusa pilots loved it too.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Mitsu on August 27, 2002, 03:33:30 PM
Ki-43-II:
Max Speed - 515km/h (6,000m)
Climb Time - 5'49" to 5,000m
Range - 1,620km (normal) 3,000km (+DT)

Ki-43-III:
Max Speed - 555km/h (6,100m)
Climb Time - 5'19" to 5,000m
Range - 2,120km (normal) 3,200km (+DT)

BTW japanese planes list is nice, i hope to see them in AH someday. ;)
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Karnak on August 27, 2002, 03:59:51 PM
Mitsu,

I thought about the Ki-43-III, but decided that the Ki-44 and Ki-84 covered late war adequately.  I thought the Ki-43-II would be better for early war scenarios.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Mitsu on August 27, 2002, 04:10:29 PM
Ki-43's position is the same as A6M.
HTC released A6M5b first, so Ki-43-III should be released first too.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: BUG_EAF322 on August 27, 2002, 04:45:14 PM
c'mon karnak
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Karnak on August 27, 2002, 04:50:09 PM
Actually I was thinking I forgot the Mosquito NF.Mk XXX.

I don't know what use a Lysander or Storch would have in AH.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: BUG_EAF322 on August 27, 2002, 04:58:07 PM
IT CAN CARRY LITLE BOMBS

:cool:
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: brady on August 27, 2002, 06:59:00 PM
Grace made the list WOOOOHOOOO:)
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: MOSQ on August 28, 2002, 06:05:15 PM
"I don't know what use a Lysander or Storch would have in AH."

Why, for dropping Spies/Spec Ops in enemy countries of course !


Hmm, let's see, if a Lysander could drop off a spy/OSS agent  armed with a bomb that could be used to blow up targets like a field Radar.....of course the spy/spec op would have to have his icon "cloaked" for some set period of time, like 30 mins.

;)

Bring the OSS to Aces High !
Title: I've been thinking I wanted the P-47M......
Post by: eddiek on August 29, 2002, 01:09:36 AM
But after reading some of the flight analysis from the "N", I think that would be just as good.......more range, better roll than any of the "D" models, within 5mph of the "M" top speed......
Would be like a big, swollen up, superfast Pony, with more guns........hehehe!
But wait......
If HTC makes it like the "D"'s we have, i.e. slow to climb, slow to dive, what's the point?
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Seeker on August 29, 2002, 02:22:19 AM
You forgot the Westland Whirlwind.

The limitations and conditions in RL which foreshortend it's carreer wouldn't apply to AH; and I believe it would make a killer MA ride.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Bombjack on August 29, 2002, 04:22:23 AM
And it's got lovely big nacelles.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: AAvenger on August 29, 2002, 07:57:51 AM
B-25J would be great.

(http://www.airzoo.org/images/b25_1.jpg)
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Red Tail 444 on August 29, 2002, 11:09:18 AM
How about the P51-C Razorback? This version also has some heavy historical significance, IMO :cool:

Gotta have the right markings, though!

It was the first pony the Tuskegee Airmen were given when reassigned from A2G to fighter escort.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Red Tail 444 on August 29, 2002, 11:14:44 AM
forward view...anyone by chance have the specs? I dont:o :o
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Sachs on August 29, 2002, 11:16:37 AM
Why don't they add a polish or a french plane that is more deserving?  WE already have 2 51's and no french or Polish planes.  We have way to many US planes as it is.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: senna on August 29, 2002, 12:15:59 PM
RedTail, the B and C models are actually the same. The only difference was that they were manufactured at different locations. I'll let others who are pony experts fill in the details...
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Red Tail 444 on August 29, 2002, 12:27:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by senna
RedTail, the B and C models are actually the same. The only difference was that they were manufactured at different locations. I'll let others who are pony experts fill in the details...


Learning something every day...thanks!
Title: Re: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: cajun on August 29, 2002, 12:41:48 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak

C.R.42
I-16-10
I-16-24
I-153
PZL P.11c


:eek: Is that you Karnak? Well very good choices :)
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: jonnyb on August 29, 2002, 01:33:24 PM
Red Tail, I saw that P51-C in your picture last weekend here in Omaha.  Great airshow with plenty of WWII birds.

Anyway, on to your query...

North American had two factories producing P51s.  One was in Inglewood, CA, the other in Dallas, TX.  The only difference between the B and C models is where it was produced.  Those produced in Dallas got the C designation and those from Inglewood got the B.  Other than the designation, they were identical planes.

The early B&C models were powered by the Packard-Merlin V-1650-3.  It is a 1649  cubic inch engine producing a maximum of 1620 horsepower on WEP.  The later models were powered by the V-1650-7 (the same engine in the P51D).  It too is a 1649 cubic inch engine but produces a maximum of 1720 horsepower on wep.  The difference between the two engines is the two-staged supercharger on the 1650-7.  That was what gave it the added horses.

Some other subtle differences between the early and late models are in fuel capacity, weight and service ceiling.  All were outfitted with 4x.50 caliber wing-mounted machine guns holding 350 rounds each in the outer pair and 280 each in the inner.  All could carry armaments of 2x1000 pound bombs on hardened wingpoints, not the 500 pound max that is modelled in AH.

Well, I believe that about covers the P51 for you. ;)

BTW, there will be a quiz.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Red Tail 444 on August 29, 2002, 01:52:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by jonnyb
 All could carry armaments of 2x1000 pound bombs on hardened wingpoints, not the 500 pound max that is modelled in AH.


And the extra credit question would be, why is the loadout inaccurate in AH? :confused:

Thanks for the quick reply..that P-51C is based here in St. Paul, proud to say some of my $$ went into restoring it...wonder if they'll let me take her for a (flat) spin around the lakes:)
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: jonnyb on August 29, 2002, 02:50:34 PM
Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to that.  I can tell you that the P51A loadout consisted of 2x500 pound bombs.  That model was powered by the Allison V-1710-81 which was a 1710 cubic inch 1200 horsepower engine.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: gofaster on August 29, 2002, 02:54:57 PM
Gotta love those long French noses.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: J_A_B on August 29, 2002, 02:58:15 PM
"The difference between the two engines is the two-staged supercharger on the 1650-7. That was what gave it the added horses. "

Actually they both had two-stage superchargers.  The difference that the gear ratio of the -7's supercharger was reduced.  For what reason God only knows, because pilots hated it (it gave added power down low but sapped power at combat altitude).  In AH it helps because most combat is under 20K but compare the P-51B to the D at 30K and you WILL see a massive difference (at 30K the P-51B has more than 2x the climbrate of the 51D).

J_A_B
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Sundog on August 31, 2002, 01:22:56 AM
I agree with everything Karnak has, but would probably substitute the A-36A for the P-51A. But I might add the 4 cannon P-51 (No letter designation) as well ;) Yeah, P-51 & A-36A instead of the P-51A :)

I would also add the Gloster Gladiator, Arsenal VG-33, and the I-15bis to the list. The Gladiator could fill the early war role it played in the Med., the VG-33 would give the French a competitive airplane, although few were built (I really need more info on that one's service record) and the I-15 would allow us to run an effective Spanish Civil War scenario with everything else he already has on his list.
Title: Aircraft that I would like to see eventually
Post by: Blue Mako on August 31, 2002, 02:25:10 AM
Drop everything from the list except the Boomerang.