Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: brady on September 20, 2002, 06:52:56 PM
-
O ya she is awsome:)
I thought the early couple had no AA MG though.
-
If the new bigger bomber targets means the GVs get some real-size urban areas to fight in..
-
Originally posted by moot
If the new bigger bomber targets means the GVs get some real-size urban areas to fight in..
*drools*
-
.. and I hope no freakin 20mm / .50 armed planes can just spot it and decide to go strafe it a couple of times, knocking out both tracks, engine, and the turret guns.
I hope you'll need either good bomb hits or an IL-2 to kill that baby, otherwise if any Spitfire can decide to halt a tank from advancing by just strafing it a couple of times, its gonna be totally useless. Might as well take up an Ostie.
...
:D On the other hand, if its tough as it should be, beware Ostards!! We're gonna have some fun in GV fights now ! :D
-
Can we please have the rockets for our F8 now?
-
We need some allied armour to balance things out now!!! Sherman or Sherman Firefly,or maybe an M10 would be nice :)
-
Sherman to balance for a tiger? :D
-
how about a stuka to kill the tiger with that would be nice.....
-
yep stuka would be really nice.
so would a mk 4 hurricane
-
Originally posted by Wilbus
Sherman to balance for a tiger? :D
LOL...beat me to it.
Only effective US Armor to the tiger is the Jug :)
-
Not true.....Shermans were effective against tigers but had to employ tactics and numbers and hit them in the most vulnerable spot, the rear end.
Very late war saw the introduction of the T26E3 Pershing. This tank was capable of duking it out with a tiger 1 on 1. The only Pershing lost to a Tiger took 3 direct hits from the Tiger before it was destroyed. FWIW, Pershing had 90mm main gun.