Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Xjazz on October 10, 2002, 11:56:19 PM
-
ROFLMAO! (http://vuso.wwiionline.com/movies/110yaw.wmv)
-
:eek: :D hilariuos!
-
That FM has issues, serious issues.
-
I agree Sandman- the Luger is definately overmodeled in WW2OL... It would take at LEAST a cannon round to make a plane spin out of control like that.
-
OH FUDGE..... IM HYPERVENTILATING........ROFLM AO
that is the dumbest thing i have ever seen!:D
-
I like the end message. A sense of humour is evident.
-
OMG.....that is a beauty right there! Fell out of my chair on that one! :D
-
Huh huh... I just stop laughing....
Muahahaaaa....
-
LOL that is hilarious.
I cant wait for some WWIIOL tard to come and justify it! (fishu?)
-
Originally posted by Animal
LOL that is hilarious.
I cant wait for some WWIIOL tard to come and justify it! (fishu?)
But 110's really could do that! It was developed after the battle of britain to give the 110's a chance against smaller more nimble fighters!
-
So where are TC and fishu?
You can bet they'll say 'Well, Aces high has some FM irregularities doesn't it?" :D
-
Excuse me but I'm the one whos been complaining of Bf110's yaw...
-
I'm just glad to see that no root directories were harmed in the making of that film.
-
GAHAHAHAHAHA!
-
Originally posted by Animal
LOL that is hilarious.
I cant wait for some WWIIOL tard to come and justify it! (fishu?)
Ive seen similar things in AH, this is no doubt a connect issue, definatly on the users end. I woud recommend he find another isp so he can enjoy the game. Planes shouldnt do that
-
uh.. I doubt very seriously if that was a connect issue.
it's just a face of the wonder FM over "there".
FM=Fargin Miraculous
-
Originally posted by rosco
Ive seen similar things in AH, this is no doubt a connect issue, definatly on the users end. I woud recommend he find another isp so he can enjoy the game. Planes shouldnt do that
Put down the crack pipe dude.
-
Too bad they dont fly that fast!
THAT THING TOOK OFF LIKE A ROCKET
lol
BOX
-
ROFLMAO!
I wish we could find something funny like that to do in AH :)
You know that reminds me of lighting off those Flying Saucer fireworks around the 4th. Anyone remember those?
-
still have 'em
-
Ok,..normally I would make a speech about how we should not be making fun of another vendors product,...but I cannot pull myself off the floor and stop laughing to make the statement! ROFL!
Very creative way to make a point.
-
HAHAHAHAHA!!!! :D :D :D
-
LOL..."no root directories were harmed in the making of this film!"
-
Where is hardcase now?
Speaking of WWIIOL - anyone read about the bug in one of the latest installers for WWIIOL that deleted windows system files off of people's computers?
That was pretty funny too.
-
I guess I should've read mason's post.
But I gave that up.
-
Originally posted by Raubvogel
Put down the crack pipe dude.
I was jokeing btw :) Ive never played WW2 and am not about to anytime soon.
-
i have always been fond of this shot i took about a year ago. I talked to the "pilot" while this was happening and he had no idea what the heck was going on.
-
Guys if you think AH's flightmodel is perfect you better stop smoking crack ;)
Climbing to 30k inverted or sideways, porked FWs etc...
Face it; Every game reflects the coders thoughts/opinions about what flightmodel should feel. The perfect one is still coming thought it could take 10-20 years.
Anyway I agree, there's something wierd how Bf110 handles in wwiiol, sometimes it makes really strange moves....
-
another flying ostwind. :D
-
Hmm.. now that we talk about AH, I remember the B17 when it was capable of going so fast that it was in danger of shredding its wings and eventually ending up so high that it bumped against the "roof"
Just didnt stop... not even at 60,000ft or what was the roof again :>
It was quite fun one.. could climb faster than any fighter and keep speed up to stresshold of the plane.
It actually kept speeding even without engines.
Spitfire was once a space rocket too.. nothing kept after it.
Once PzIV kept sitting on a field, I kept dropping bombs on it and strafing it.. getting kills once in a while.
Then I finally asked the guy where he really was, since he didnt seem to be there.
Appeared he was at the vehicle base, not 300 meters from my field.
So I was able to kill him every time from next to my field, when he spawned some 5km away
oh well, I guess those were just temporary features which were acceptable..
-
Anyone remember on the old map which had the 10k alt base in the dead center? If you tried to take a plane off from a vehicle field your arcraft would be shot upwards from the center of the base. I think I got a P51D up to 122k. It became known as the A1 Missile Silo I think. :D
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but these two games started development about the same time?
The major difference in your examples fishu is that HTC was not charging for the game at the time because it was obviously not finished (with the possible exception of the vehicle wreck bug, I think that was first live edition or so).
-
LOL
-
Now I'm jealous of the WWIIonline crowd. A helicopter option for a Me110? Maybe we'll get one for AH, heck they can even perk it if they want. Must of been designed by Kurt Tank. ;)
-
Good to know theres at least one bug-free P2P flightsim with correct FM and DM :D
-
way too funny... light the fuse and run like hell...
-
When I tried WW2OL i had a similar problem with the 110 when I rolled. Couple of times it just sat OTR spinning like crazy doing about 500 rpm (spinng like the one in the vid but not rising), WITH the engines off!
Interesting manoevre though, but I have to say its not very original - they're just copying the well known Death Blossom move from the Last Starfighter :D
-
I'm here. I've watched it several times. Since an engine out doesnt do that when flying, I suspect a ground model problem flowing over into the FM. Yep, it is a bug. Bounce boys, pounce.:D
Vulcan, both engines don't always crank at the same time. You
Duh, ,didnt read the full post. The ground model needs a bunch of work. I hope it and graphical damage make it soon.
Such rejoicing:D After all it is a beta version.....BTW you might water that "release" grudge, it is getting dusty and you do want to nuture it.
hardcase
-
Yes, fishu. But was AH pay-to-play when those bugs were around?
-
Look, I didn't bother to list everything, some were, some not, but one thing is definately: bugs existed even when pay-to-play.
I wonder whats with the dead on confidency with AH here.
These discussions have looked what most childish, straightly comparable to "whos daddy is biggest" competitions of 5 year olds.
I mean, whats the point of siding FOR A GAME(!) so stubbornly without a purpose?
Something I've never understood.. I don't like and I like games, but I'm not going argue over something in the way people do here.
Simply ridiculous attitude.
Since some people discussing here seem to be rather unintelligent, it's better for me to just forget the thread, where nothing is achieved.
At least I do realise it's worthless issue.
So, you few, grow up.
-
How long did it take to get rid of bomber gunners shooting thru the fuselage?
And that's a bug which had a efect to the gameplay btw.
-
AH has bugs but wwiiol has been and is bug ridden. Pull a fumigation tent over it and come back after all the pests are dead. Or condem it and burn it down.
Notice he has a pistol, I know you will say he a sapper but so is every other inf. It aint because of the satchels :)
Nice start on the new version ey HC???
I know its a beta and it will only get better :rolleyes: Wait didnt they say that with dx8.1 that frame rates would improve, from reading the board they got worse lol.
Carrying the crs line must be getting heavy, even for you fan bois.
What pos lol
One fek up after another. But its a "beta"..........
-
Fishu btw its you and hc that are arguing, most of us know wwiol is crap. You feel the need to come here and tell us it doesnt. If you dont wanna read this stuff well wiiol is there waiting on ya.
Everything you said in your last post applies to you. Take a look in the mirror. It aint ah guys that compare wwiiol to ah its you. Some of us think wwiiol is crap, you say why, we tell you, you make excuses and then say well AH has bugs.
As if that makes up for the crap that is wwiiol. No one here has a problem with you liking wwiiol. Thats great go play it. But you and hc have a problem with us not liking it.
Its you that take offense at those of us who think wwiiol is crap. Not the other way around.
No one in ah made that video. We just thought it was funny as hell and typical of everything else that goes on over there.
-
What /\ said.
-
Wotan,
as far as I know, I haven't argued for few days at all about WWIIOL.
You have been the one arguing.
I stopped doing any arguments when I saw which direction the over 300 post thread was going at - insulting and roadkill.
Especially Kieran excelled in this insulting.
So I haven't told people anything lately, than wondered why people has to have such aggressive stance for games, while I don't see any reason to slander games and convince other game better.
Rather let people do the decision than keep telling them up to throat how things are.
I've only pulled AH bugs up when I've tried to tell people that the other games hasn't been bug free either.
I could use *ANY* game, but wouldn't it be logically best to use AH, which everyone knows here?
I don't see what is bad in that, if people has already been comparing WWIIOL to AH, while having double stantards in the arguments.
I have neither tried to tell anyone to like or play WWIIOL, only argued against the arguments which aren't true.
If you have any reasonability still left, you would notice I haven't argued against any valid arguments against WWIIOL.
Of course you haven't seen that... you just put me in same caterogy with HC, who has had much different way of arguing than I have, sometimes unacceptable.
People seems to have problem with them who likes WWIIOL, as their names are pulled up every now and then if they have for once tried to say something against many of the lies about WWIIOL. (if you say people hasn't lied things about WWIIOL, to be used against it, then you're ignorant)
Sure, video wasnt either made by AH gang, but why do they nearly go insult me when WWIIOL is in the question, even if I haven't said a word or haven't had that in mind anyway?
When I say something bad about AH, theres good chance someone comes to tell me about WWIIOL, as if I didn't complain of AH in the past when WWIIOL wasn't even released.
No, they didn't say frame rates will improve in open beta, in fact they especially told that people shouldn't expect it.
Open beta is clearly there to be aid for CRS to implement DX 8.1 in the game - by common sense, it isn't fully implemented and it's not time make conclusions yet.
This goes for good example how you're making unreasonable arguments.
You fault me of things, but yet do wrong yourself... you know what word is used to describe that - hypocrit.
Say all you want now, I won't be taking part in this roadkill anymore.
It wouldn't make difference to anything what I would say.. and I'm don't mean WWIIOL involved things.
One thing what I hate the most is hypocriticism, you, Wotan and Kieren, are acting like ones.
Kieran has still to apologized his insults he made at me in the huge WWIIOL thread.
-
Fishu-
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting. I never intentionally insulted you or anyone in that thread, but did more and more forcefully strive to make the point. Wotan is right, you and HC won't allow anyone here to publicly dislike that game, period. Sorry that hurts your feelings.
As for being game specific and blindly loyal to one game- ? I have supported games such as DoA, Il-2, CFS2, BF1942, etc in my time here. The thing I don't do is compare them to AH, as that is silly. I try to sum up the good and bad on a game within the context of that game only. Bringing AH comparisons into the evaluation is only asking for a "my dad is bigger" argument. I know you can't see that, so I won't bother stressing it again. Further, if you think HC was doing anything other than sticking a rod in the cage and poking the dogs with his posts, you really don't understand english as well as I thought.
One thing I know; once it became very clear how strongly people felt about WWIIOL it was kinda stupid of you guys to keep coming back in here to convince people they are wrong. Whether you are right or wrong doesn't matter a bit- the viewpoint is going to receive a vitriolic response. In that respect your refusal to concede you weren't going to win people over was just as much a part of contributing to the degradation of the thread as anything I ever said.
So, I guess I'll just sit here and wait for your apology for not allowing an AH-centric board to have their opinion on a competitor's game. :D
-
As for having a problem with people that like WWIIOL, I don't believe that is fair or accurate. Like away. Tell us you like it. Tell us you are having fun. Tell us good things. No prob. DON'T tell us that things we saw happen didn't really happen. DON'T tell us we can't dislike WWIIOL because AH has similar problems.
I am not going to participate in another 500 post thread-
1. It doesn't belong here.
2. Check Six would welcome the traffic.
3. We aren't going to change one another's minds.
4. You aren't going to get an apology from me anyway, so turn that frown upside-down. ;)
I'm out. You wanna keep this going, head to Check Six. Otherwise flame away alone.
-
Kieran,
...since you don't know what I have taken as insult, here goes:
you and HC won't allow anyone here to publicly dislike that game, period. Sorry that hurts your feelings.
That is an insult.
I have let people state their opinions if it's not unreasonably made or a lie.
There were few lies about the game, which weren't true and I objected to those.
There was valid arguments, which I left uncommented, except in one case, where you, Kieran, made valid point and I even posted I agreed with it.
But when it fights for your good to say "he doesn't let others voice their opinion", I guess it's allowed insult and therefore you see no wrong in it, huh?
Why do I take it as an insult, is because respect of valid arguments is part of my principles.
1. It doesn't belong here.[/b]
Maybe you're the one who doesn't let others voice their opinion?
Exactly how much do these "belong here":
Red Baron 2 in OpenGL on your nVidia
Anyone Playing Earth and Beyond?
IL2 Friday update
Panzer Elite
BF1942 video w/Eminem music
Short AAR of IL-2 from a "2-week newbie"--Out of the box
IL2 screens
IL2 FB dev. update
WW2OL Revisited
P39N-1 Paint job
Battlefield 1942
well?
-
An unproductive 500+ post thread that devolves into insulting doesn't belong here (eating up company bandwidth). That seemed obvious to me. LePaul extended a welcome to carry the discussion onto a private board. That seemed obvious to me, too.
-
Maybe bushman can make one of his great videos showing the beta using more than a bug. Maybe the new Bofors shooting down some poor flyer. I doubt if the helicopter effect will bother too many ppl in beta. Most won't take off with one engine out. Needs looking at in other twin engine ac. I suspect it will be looked at and fixed before the release.
Now, all you guys join hands and chant the matra..WW2OL is a Turd! Itwon't draw ppl from AH and WB over time. Doo dah..Doo dah.:D
hardcase
-
Well, it was funny until I started reading the thread... anyone know of a game without bugs? :rolleyes:
-
Damn tc, your like a Robin Williams for a backhair removal infomercial.
Still, WWIIOL could draw me in, I'm even more interested than ever. Only because I reloaded WBS3 to give it a unbias shake most of today on my weekend and it was so poor. I'm ready to try the next best thing to consume my $ and time. At least divide it.
Thing is I smashed my WWIIOL CD (didn't save the scan) , but all those CRS guys would have to do is offer a free download to a non-beta game. Is that possible? If it is, hook me up.
All this hooping and laughing over a bug impresses me notta for judging how good a game is about as much as someone posting a AH tank flying, although the 110 film had some creative and great production entertainment qualities.
Gimme a link to get in on a full download, and I'll rack up a month on the Visa. All I have now is a lost scan of a smashed CD, and a bitter taste of a toejam business practice and stealing my $40.
I could give 2 toejams if AH is better, worse, or equal in the entertainment value. I have no loyalties. Matter a fact, if I heard one less scroll in the open AH channel, I'd be thrilled. Thing is, AH is just plain fun every damn time.
The only thing I hate worse than pumping $40 into CRS for their payrole is having to read another one of your posts. But if it's a link to a free DL of WW2OL so I can give it another fair shake, I'll stomach it.
-
Originally posted by hardcase
Maybe bushman can make one of his great videos showing the beta using more than a bug. Maybe the new Bofors shooting down some poor flyer. I doubt if the helicopter effect will bother too many ppl in beta. Most won't take off with one engine out. Needs looking at in other twin engine ac. I suspect it will be looked at and fixed before the release.
Now, all you guys join hands and chant the matra..WW2OL is a Turd! Itwon't draw ppl from AH and WB over time. Doo dah..Doo dah.:D
hardcase
If its beta why do you have to pay for it?
Can a company charge people while remaining in beta indefinetly as an excuse for poor programing?
Thats unethical.
When AH had the bugs fishu listed, the game was beta, as in, FREE FOR TESTING UNFINISHED PRODUCT.
-
There are two servers running. One is a beta release the other is the pay for play. You must have an account to access the beta host.The beta will become the new P4P when it is deemed ready.
Creamo, you can download 1.65 for free now but can only play offline. If you log in, it updates you to 1.66 the current P4P.Strat First will not let CRS sell CD keys(what is needed to create an account) in the US. They can do so overseas. Email rhodge@playnet.com Maybe the info from your account is still there. Remember, all you need to play for pay and play the beta is the CD key. The CD itself is worthless since it has to patch from version 1.00.
-
Hard, I had it happen, on the ground, when I was giving WW2OL another crack. It wasn't the beta version, it was the whatever-is-normal version right now.
Basically I throttled up, the plane started to roll then started spinng on the ground (I may have forgotten to lock the tailwheel), it got faster and faster, I switched the engines OFF, it continued to spin and som retardedly high RPM.
The plane wasn't damaged, all I was doing was trying to take off.
Not a biggy, I didn't even bother mentioning it in that update I did.
Originally posted by hardcase
I'm here. I've watched it several times. Since an engine out doesnt do that when flying, I suspect a ground model problem flowing over into the FM. Yep, it is a bug. Bounce boys, pounce.:D
Vulcan, both engines don't always crank at the same time. You
Duh, ,didnt read the full post. The ground model needs a bunch of work. I hope it and graphical damage make it soon.
Such rejoicing:D After all it is a beta version.....BTW you might water that "release" grudge, it is getting dusty and you do want to nuture it.
hardcase
-
If there were no damage, the twin engines ac will spin if one prop is not started. The engines do not start at the same time always. Each cranks independently of the other. You have to visually check each engine. They will also be at diff rpm if right at first if they didnt crank at the same time and you give full throttle. CC on locking the tail wheel.The sound can fool you.This will spin you. The ground model is buggy and you can continue to spin with the engines shutting down tho not always.
I have never seen the helo effect in 1.66 and if someone saw it, the fact woulda been all over the forums.
hardcase
-
OK Hard, one last time:
- started engines
- engines power up
- rolled outta hangar for about 50 metres
- lost control (possible tailwheel overcorrection)
- throttled back
- aircraft starts to spin
- throttles right back
- spins faster
- applied opposite ruder
- still spinning
- turn off engines
- fediddleer just kept going
- escaped out after a min
There was NO damage before or after to the aircraft. I only played 1.66 then gave up on it (remember).
-
Sorry, it just hasnt happened to me for a long while. If it gets away from you on the ground it is in trouble. Ground model is porky. No lock on the tail wheel and it gets goofy
hardcase
-
Meh didn't really worry me, FM is secondary IMHO to the main part of the game, which is ground combat. In the same way AH GM model is secondary to the FM.
-
Hi
I didnt post this video link here to point out or underline faults etc of WW2OL. Video was/is just funny (IMHO).
Cool down folks! These are just a GAMES!:rolleyes:
-
Hot? I don't think so. Hey, even Vulcan didn't blow his cool when HC suggested he was lying again.
-
Gotta love those "Your lying cause it never happened to me!" responses!:rolleyes: