Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: brady on November 25, 2002, 04:13:42 PM

Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: brady on November 25, 2002, 04:13:42 PM
Obviously with the pissing and moaning I have done hear on the BBS at time's about this and that I am not the bellybutton kissing type. Howeaver I do think that we nead to take a moment and thank Skuzzy for what he has done for AH in genearl. From my own prespective the CT has a fully functioning and reliable rank system finialy do to his efforts, inumerable issues beyond my understanding and appriacation have been adreased to help with conectivaty in the MA and the CT, and his presence has been felt throught the comunity in a helpfull and understanding maner. While some of may complaine about the new language filters(myself included) something neaded to be done and frankly that is the most thankless aspect of this whole thing geting a bunch of grown kids to act like adults will never go over well. So TY Skuzzy your efforts like those of the staff in general will always be appricated even thought at time's it may not saem that way.
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Skuzzy on November 25, 2002, 04:18:53 PM
Ok brady,..I turned the CT Staff forum back on.

:D
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: sling322 on November 25, 2002, 04:36:47 PM
I think he trying to con you into turning on the spel cheker.
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Rude on November 25, 2002, 04:49:16 PM
Skuzzy? He's ok I guess.

:)
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Dago on November 25, 2002, 05:07:00 PM
Skuzzy? Skuzzy who?
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: hblair on November 25, 2002, 05:16:36 PM
i wood like too say i uhpreechiate skuzzie a lot. he duzz his beast four us wheech is mour than i kan say four sum peeple.

skuzzie!


(sorry brady ;))
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: NUTTZ on November 25, 2002, 05:48:09 PM
In around about way, I owe my livelyhood to Skuzzy!!!!
If anyone knows why his Nick is Skuzzy.



NUTTZ
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: SOB on November 25, 2002, 05:56:36 PM
SKUZZY IS A SCHMUCK!  :D


SOB
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: brady on November 25, 2002, 06:01:08 PM
Well when they used to have a spell checker, and I would use it it put such a hit on the seever that the MA lag Went through the roof.:)


          Thanks for fixing the Staff forum:)
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Saintaw on November 25, 2002, 07:57:55 PM
Happy birthday Skuzzy! :)









errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr......... :D
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: SirLoin on November 25, 2002, 10:23:17 PM
I got banned from the airwaves for saying "Booger".




:D
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Corrs on November 25, 2002, 11:57:20 PM
Skuzzy? Aint he one of the 7 dwafs? :cool:
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: lasse on November 26, 2002, 01:16:46 AM
SCSI are pronounced(sp?) Skuzzy.

I believe this is the reason, if that is a reason that is ? ;)

Lasse
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Tumor on November 26, 2002, 11:18:26 AM
Lets all give Skuzzy a big fat warm wiggly hug :eek:
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Puck on November 26, 2002, 11:23:04 AM
Quote
Originally posted by lasse
SCSI are pronounced(sp?) Skuzzy.

I believe this is the reason, if that is a reason that is ? ;)

Lasse


You spelled 'is' wrong.  SCSI is pronounced...

The question is whether or not Skuzzy is SCSI-1, SCSI-2, SCSI-2UW, etc.

Personally I think he's still SCSI 1.  :D
Title: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: leitwolf on November 26, 2002, 11:47:10 AM
SCSI.. this raises the questions if he's _wide_  or _narrow_  or _fast_ or sometimes even _ultra_ :D
I don't think he's _low_voltage_ though ;) :eek:
Title: Re: We should <S> Skuzzy
Post by: Maverick on November 26, 2002, 12:12:16 PM
Quote
Originally posted by brady
Obviously with the pissing and moaning I have done hear on the BBS at time's about this and that I am not the bellybutton kissing type. Howeaver I do think that we nead to take a moment and thank Skuzzy for what he has done for AH in genearl. From my own prespective the CT has a fully functioning and reliable rank system finialy do to his efforts, inumerable issues beyond my understanding and appriacation have been adreased to help with conectivaty in the MA and the CT, and his presence has been felt throught the comunity in a helpfull and understanding maner. While some of may complaine about the new language filters(myself included) something neaded to be done and frankly that is the most thankless aspect of this whole thing geting a bunch of grown kids to act like adults will never go over well. So TY Skuzzy your efforts like those of the staff in general will always be appricated even thought at time's it may not saem that way.


Bring in a mute on range and field vox and I'll agree to a . Squelching individual players is too time consuming. I got online to play not take my little playing time to type player handles into the squelch command. :rolleyes:

The buffer mute is nice but what about the VOX that spews over the speakers with no way to stop it other than turning sound off. Another nonsense "solution".