Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: mietla on December 05, 2002, 06:36:20 PM

Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: mietla on December 05, 2002, 06:36:20 PM: ... 99! is?
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Staga on December 05, 2002, 07:15:34 PM: I'm speachless.
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: funkedup on December 05, 2002, 07:55:10 PM: I'm still imagining. Will check back tomorrow.
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Aaron on December 05, 2002, 11:02:03 PM: Yes I can imagine, it's about:

9.332621544394415268169923885 627 x 10^155

So there you go, no more imagining. Now get back to work.

-Aaron
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: whgates3 on December 05, 2002, 11:46:56 PM: its amazing how you can write down a number that is larger than the estimated number of particles in the [observable] universe ( 10^87 ) on such a small bit of space (5 ascii characters - 40 bits - on the hard drive)...John Napier (inventor of exponential notation) certainly the greatest math genius ever - much much better than gauss...factorial notation is much less discreet & therefore less powerful ( but slightly more dense if the number you need hapens to be a perfect factorial, or you need the most bang for your proverbial buck) - invented by John Wallis, who, compared to Napier, was a loser
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: CyranoAH on December 06, 2002, 05:55:31 AM: Easy, it's the number of results in "Google!" if you do a search for "sex". :D

Daniel
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Animal on December 06, 2002, 08:17:06 AM: its... almost 100... :eek:
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Nifty on December 06, 2002, 08:33:44 AM: it's the number of times you've masturbated this week??? :eek:
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: fffreeze220 on December 06, 2002, 08:35:07 AM: Quote
Originally posted by whgates3
its amazing how you can write down a number that is larger than the estimated number of particles in the [observable] universe ( 10^87 ) on such a small bit of space (5 ascii characters - 40 bits - on the hard drive)...John Napier (inventor of exponential notation) certainly the greatest math genius ever - much much better than gauss...factorial notation is much less discreet & therefore less powerful ( but slightly more dense if the number you need hapens to be a perfect factorial, or you need the most bang for your proverbial buck) - invented by John Wallis, who, compared to Napier, was a loser

Go take ur pills :)
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: fffreeze220 on December 06, 2002, 08:35:52 AM: Quote
Originally posted by CyranoAH
Easy, it's the number of results in "Google!" if you do a search for "sex". :D

Daniel

No thats 999.999.999.999.999 pages i tried it
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Animal on December 06, 2002, 08:41:49 AM: I am so bored
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Ripsnort on December 06, 2002, 08:45:10 AM: LOL Animal!
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: fffreeze220 on December 06, 2002, 08:47:12 AM: me too

dang my search took longer then urs. I wasted 0.02 seconds of my life not watching porn :(
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: whgates3 on December 06, 2002, 02:08:11 PM: "Searched the web for food. Results 1 - 20 of about 47,500,000"
"Searched the web for shelter. Results...about 3,250,000"
"Searched the web for water. Results...about 58,800,000"

so we've still not yet put survival over procreation
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: funkedup on December 06, 2002, 02:10:22 PM: Search for Masturbation: Results 1 - 10 of about 6,200,000

Whew there is hope for us yet. I guess this explains the homeless problem.
Title: Can you imaging how large...
Post by: Animal on December 06, 2002, 02:10:31 PM: Quote
Originally posted by whgates3
"Searched the web for food. Results 1 - 20 of about 47,500,000"
"Searched the web for shelter. Results...about 3,250,000"
"Searched the web for water. Results...about 58,800,000"

so we've still not yet put survival over procreation

LOL, so true