Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: AKDejaVu on January 03, 2003, 06:43:42 PM
-
Tour 35 (http://www.dbstaines.com/TourStats/Tour35/Tour35.htm)
And the rest of them:
Beta Tour 1 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/BetaTour1/BetaTour1.htm)
Beta Tour 2 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/BetaTour2/BetaTour2.htm)
Beta Tour 3 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/BetaTour3/BetaTour3.htm)
Tour 1 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour1/Tour1.htm)
Tour 2 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour2/Tour2.htm)
Tour 3 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour3/Tour3.htm)
Tour 4 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour4/Tour4.htm)
Tour 5 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour5/Tour5.htm)
Tour 6 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour6/Tour6.htm)
Tour 7 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour7/Tour7.htm)
Tour 8 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour8/Tour8.htm)
Tour 9 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour9/Tour9.htm)
Tour 10 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour10/Tour10.htm)
Tour 11 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour11/Tour11.htm)
Tour 12 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour12/Tour12.htm)
Tour 13 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour13/Tour13.htm)
Tour 14 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour14/Tour14.htm)
Tour 15 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour15/Tour15.htm)
Tour 16 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour16/Tour16.htm)
Tour 17 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour17/Tour17.htm)
Tour 18 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour18/Tour18.htm)
Tour 19 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour19/Tour19.htm)
Tour 20 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour20/Tour20.htm)
Tour 21 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour21/Tour21.htm)
Tour 22 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour22/Tour22.htm)
Tour 23 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour23/Tour23.htm)
Tour 24 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour24/Tour24.htm)
Tour 25 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour25/Tour25.htm)
Tour 26 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour26/Tour26.htm)
Tour 27 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour27/Tour27.htm)
Tour 28 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour28/Tour28.htm)
Tour 29 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour29/Tour29.htm)
Tour 30 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour30/Tour30.htm)
Tour 31 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour31/Tour31.htm)
Tour 32 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour32/Tour32.htm)
Tour 33 (http://65.102.58.97/TourStats/Tour33/Tour33.htm)
Tour 34 (http://www.dbstaines.com/TourStats/Tour34/Tour34.htm)
Enjoy
AKDejaVu
-
P-51D is king, as I figured it would be (it's too beautiful not to be), but its K/D ratio isn't very good.
But what is "MA Impact"?
PS, how disgusting...the Seafire has more kills than any other carrier aircraft.
-
Seafire only has that many kills because it is a Spitfire Mk Vb with a 25 ENY instead of a 20 ENY like the actual Spitfire Mk V. In other words, people are using it from land bases in place of the Spitfire Mk V.
-
Where's the stuka?
I see the bf110 in there but no stuka.
-
Tour 35 Fighter Vs. Fighter stats, Kanth. :)
-
Explain how you define your 'MA impact' category please, DejaVu.
One other thing I'd like to see added is just a list of all kills, with the percentage each unit in AH had of them.
Wish there was a way to keep track of sorties flown, that would be the easiest way to tell exactly how much use each plane is getting.
-
Woah! Looks like the N1ks usage has gone down considerably when compared to tour 34. Considering the P51D, spit and la7 all rose a tad the n1k has taken a nosedive in usage.
-
Karnak,
That explains that. Is this where I feel stupid? lol
:)
So looking at the numbers, if the Seafire and SpitV are basically the same thing, we are seeing them account for about 8.2% of the kills in the main. In combination with the Spit 9's useage, that is a lot of "Spit" icons flying around.
-
As always, despite noble efforts by people like Akak and myself, the P-38 still has a horrid K/D. I suppose this is because it is a choice ride as a suicide jabo, and most people are clueless with it when they attempt to dogfight. Oh well. It remains one of the best planes in the game despite appearances. :)
-
The Stuka's stats are there, just not listed on the "fighter" page. Basically, if the aircraft doesn't have a "fighter" option from the hangar, its not listed there. You can look at the individual page though, and see how it fared against each type of vehicle by category.
As for the "MA Impact"... its just a little formula that takes kills and k/d into account. Nothing really all that complex and really only worth the pixels it takes up. I just thought there should be more to it than total kills.
AKDejaVu
-
Puke,
Yes indeed, there certainly are a lot of SPIT icons in the MA due to those three aircraft.
AKDejaVu,
The D3A1 is listed, but it doesn't have the "Fighter" option. Are you maybe grabbing the "Attack" option along with the "Fighter" option?
-
whoops forgot it's not officially a fighter...
sorry I'm a da, nice work on the stats
Originally posted by Urchin
Tour 35 Fighter Vs. Fighter stats, Kanth. :)
-
Oh my:eek: ... When you compare the 0.7 K/D of the P47-D30 compared to some of the 56thFG pilots ... hihihi ... shame shame shame:p
-
Originally posted by Puke
P-51D is king, as I figured it would be (it's too beautiful not to be), but its K/D ratio isn't very good.
The King this tour is definetly the 109G2 with K/D = 2.922 !!!
But unhappily its only an error in calculation
-
Well basic theory of why the F4u-1c was perked ws because it was once king kite. Seems like a perfect reason to perk the 51D or unperk the -C.
-
Originally posted by Jebo44
Well basic theory of why the F4u-1c was perked ws because it was once king kite. Seems like a perfect reason to perk the 51D or unperk the -C.
This is not correct. If it were correct each Tour would see another aircraft perked, and the aircraft perked the previous month unperked.
As best as anybody outside of HTC (and HTC isn't talking) has been able to tell the F4U-1C was perked because it was getting ~20% of the kills and three times the kills of the runner up in the popularity contest.
In the case of the P-51D it managed just 11.01% of the kills, and that was surely influenced by the fact that it just got a major face lift. The runner up, the Spitfire Mk IX, got 10.16% of the kills, not even a full percentage point behind the P-51D.
The P-51D simply isn't anywhere near as dominating as the F4U-1C was.
-
Not to mention the F4U-1C at the peak of its use was far more dominating than the P-51D. The C-hog frequently maintained a K/D of 1.3 or better (very high for a mass-use fighter); the P-51 OTOH generally has a K/D of well under 1:1.
That IMO is why you don't see many P-51 complaints...people don't mind fighting a plane that they can readily kill.
J_A_B
-
Karnak how is that not correct? Before the -C was perked it was one of the most flown AC in the roster. Now that is exactly what is happening with the 51D not to mention the N1K and the LA7. If you dont think so just check the tour logs. I started at tour 20 and went to tour 35 and guess what plane was always in the top 5 most of the time top 3 of AC with kills? 51D
I am not saying that when one plane is perked others should be unperked. All I am saying is that if a plane likt the -c is going to be perked because it gets to fly alot then so should all the other planes that are popular.
-
It's really the last couple tours that the P-51D takes the top spot in percentage of kills and I suspect this is because the Spit9 flyers now split their choice between that and the Seafire/SpitV. I personally rarely flew the P-51D before (preferring the P-51B) until this new P-51D was released and due to its beauty, I have been flying it exclusively. Like the Spitfire, the Mustang is famous and a lot of people will gravitate towards it but neither are huge menaces in the MA based on their K/D ratios.
What is interesting is that the percentage of kills seemed to overall be dropping each month for the top spots until just recently and it's spiked up a little again.
The F4U-1D is nothing great in the MA and for its popularity in the real world holds a low percentage-of-kills and K/D ratio. But switch its guns out (to create the F4U-1C) and it becomes something that needs to be perked. I can't put my finger on it, but there has to be something wrong with cannons or the damage model in this game if cannons can be so dominating to create this dichotomy. So for now, the fans of American Iron are limited in regards to the punch they can weild.
-
Originally posted by Karnak
The D3A1 is listed, but it doesn't have the "Fighter" option. Are you maybe grabbing the "Attack" option along with the "Fighter" option?
Thanks for pointing that out. I usually only check the first tour its released.
AKDejaVu
-
Originally posted by J_A_B
That IMO is why you don't see many P-51 complaints...people don't mind fighting a plane that they can readily kill.
J_A_B [/B]
I disagree with that. I'm a G10 and Fw pilot, and mustangs are the biggest pains in the ass.. worse than LA7's. If I come across a competant mustang pilot (1% of them tops) in a G10, the only way I'm gonna get the kill fast is to rope them... a tactic that usually works, but since the thing fires 50 cals, occasionally you get licked from d700 before they stall out.. A dora and a mustang meeting coalt, with equally skilled pilots.. the dora is pretty much screwed.
The only reason the mustang k/d is terrible is because so many newbies fly it.. when you first install AH, it's the default plane.
-
I flew the P-51D almost exclusively last month and the only aircraft I have a negative K/D ratio to is the 190D9. So in my particular situation, I guess I'd have to disagree with you on that one.
-
Perk the C47!!!! It's got a 2.4 K/D against the Ju88 ;)
-
Why is this apparently only fighter vs fighter? Why not also consider bomber and GV or boat kills - surely this would give a more accurate picture as to whats going on in the MA.
-
The Hawg-C was perked because it was the King HO Kite.
It has a great armament arrangement, 2 pairs of hispano's tightly groups with a good sighting elevation. We used to see hordes of 1C's doing one thing... HOing and Hosing. It was a game killer for many. There were also some FM tweaks that happened either at or shortly after perking.
Originally posted by Jebo44
Well basic theory of why the F4u-1c was perked ws because it was once king kite. Seems like a perfect reason to perk the 51D or unperk the -C.
-
Where are you guys getting the "fm tweaks" information on the F4u-1C? I don't recall anything other than them reducing the weight a couple of hundred pounds.
AKDejaVu
-
Thats what he was talking about, adding 600lbs to a plane is something I'd consider an fm tweak... There was no reducing, it was 300lbs lighter than D when in actuality it was 300lbs heavier, a net difference of 600lbs.
-
yea i would call adding 600 lbs a fm tweak.
like shooting a horse with a broke leg is a livestock tweak.
also the guns are less powerfull. used to be one or two was all your ever needed. unless it was torque. then 20 or 30.
-
Sorry Vulcan I am not buying that in whole. There was never a reason given to why the -C was perked by HiTech. So everyone that was around when it happened can only offer speculation and opinions. I am not arguing against the fact that the -C should not have been perked. All I am saying is if you are going to perk 1 plane because people use it as a HO master, then it is only proper to perk other planes that are as popular now as what the -C was then.
If we take your example for the reason of perking the -C then that would make the LA-7 a perfect candidate for perking.
-
The P51D is by far, out of all the plane set, the worst aircraft in AH. It is only flown because of it’s mystique from history long ago and American propaganda. The aircraft, although fast, is not very capable and I find it extremely difficult to fly, especially in high speed and high G maneuvers.
I’m not even going to get started on it’s anemic load out and shallow bullet load.
Now please, back away, there is nothing to see here.
-
Jebo44... there was a reason given by Pryo. He said that anytime one aircraft is getting 30% of the kills in the MA, they have to look at perking it.
Everything else is simply speculation, the above is the only thing that was said by HTC.
AKDejaVu
-
Originally posted by Puke
P-51D is king, as I figured it would be (it's too beautiful not to be),
Yep king of the chute shooters :)
[list=1]
- P-51D - 298 killed by chutes
- Spitfire Mk IX - 284 killed by chutes
- La-7 - 282 killed by chutes
[/list=1]
-
I can see why the -C was perked. Yet I believe that some of the other planes need to be considered as perk candidates. I am not advocating we unperk the CHOG just perk some of the other planes that are popular today. Just my opinion guys and I appreciate your input.
-
Ok, I'll bite here.
Since the P-51D, Spit IX, La-7, and N1K2 alone make up 40% of the kills I guess they should be perked. Perking would totally kill Spit 9 and N1K2 use, since they aren't fast enough to run away from your typical gangbang. So you see Spit V use spike by about 50,000 kills. Holy crap! The Spit V got 60,000 kills this tour! Lets perk it! The really funny thing is that it wasn't even first place! :eek:
Ok, now the Spit V is perked. Oh, and by the way, the Typhoon was first with 80,000 kills since almost everyone that flew the P-51D and La-7 switched to that. So lets perk that to.
Well, it is absolutely clear that we cannot have two planes getting 50% of the kills in the MA. So those evil planes are perked now.
But... now instead of Bore N Zoom Tiffies and P-51s... it is 190D-9s. And good GOD, they are everywhere. And there are a lot of Zekes around to now. Guess we'll have to perk those also.
Jebo, I understand what you are saying, I really do. I'm just trying to tell you that perking the Big 4 (or 5) wouldn't have the effect you intended. Unless your intended effect is to get the C202 perked eventually. In that case it would work splendidly, we'd just have to perk just about everything other than the Spit I and 109E first. Then the C202 would see so much use that, by golly, we'd HAVE to perk it.
-
You forgot the P-38....
And in one mans theory yes I guess that could happen.
Most likely HT will not act on anything that you or I might suggest. And they definetly would not allow for every single plane, boat, bomber and grass hut to be perked, because then the perk system really would be paying twice for the same game. Right? Sure but you knew that all ready. Didn't you?
Or it could simply turn out that the more advanced late war planes which happen to be more popular with the masses would be equally perked. Who knows maybe that would happen. But you know once you make a change like perking a plane it is set in stone and nothing can ever be changed.
I do not really see that perking a plane would kill its use, did it happen that way with the -C...no. The N1K will always be popular because it has cannons and is reasonably forgiving as far as flight characteristics. The LA-7 will continously be used because of its characteristics...so on and so forth. You see the pattern?
I see your point, but in all fairness I do not think that HT would allow the perk system to get that out of control. Maybe, just maybe there are some in the community that would like to see a few changes in regards to the perk structure in the MA.
-
I believe that people complaining that a plane used 10% of the time needs to be perked suggest they haven't been around much... in hardly any on-line sims.
The best answer to one plane being used too much is quite simply to add more planes. It has been and will always be the best solution.
AKDejaVu
-
Also notice Deja that those requesting something to be perked almost always tend to use something else?
I think you're right though, the best way to increase MA diversity is to add more "MA-suitable" fighters that would attract players.
Even then, the AH MA is more diverse than any other arena in an online flightsim I've ever seen.
J_A_B
-
"Most likely HT will not act on anything that you or I might suggest. And they definetly would not allow for every single plane, boat, bomber and grass hut to be perked, because then the perk system really would be paying twice for the same game. Right? Sure but you knew that all ready. Didn't you?
Or it could simply turn out that the more advanced late war planes which happen to be more popular with the masses would be equally perked. Who knows maybe that would happen. But you know once you make a change like perking a plane it is set in stone and nothing can ever be changed. "
Ok, you've made two important observations here. The first is ironically in your second paragraph. That is that the 'more advanced late war planes' are more popular with the 'masses'. Now, I'll ask you why? Why do you think they are more popular with the masses? Since you, and everyone else already knows the reason, I'll answer my own question. They are the most popular plane because they offer some significant advantage (or advantages) over 'early-war' planes. There will always be a plane or planes that has advantages over the rest of the planeset. The plane or planes with the most advantages will be the most used planes. It is simple human nature.
The second observation (in your first paragraph) actually isn't a good argument for someone to make if they are advocating perking 'late war monsters'. But I'll ask you - if you were HTC, where would YOU draw the line? What do your paying customers get to fly for 'free', and which do they essentially have to 'pay twice' for?
-
Well they never perked the Spit IX and it was getting more use and more kills then the f4u1c was. At least according to the stats on tour 1 2 and 3. Of course the Spit IX couldnt kill quite the same number of enemies that the f4u1c could and does.
-
The didn't have the perk system in tours 1, 2 and 3.
-
DejaVu, sure more planes would be great but from your statement your saying that the perk system would one day be worth abolishing if the plane set reached a certain number. And that will never happen, or 262's will be ramapant. And I do not judge someone by how many flight sims they have played before...everyone here has the right to their own opinion.
If what your saying is true then why not unperk the -C, we have had more planes since the CHOG was perked so maybe your theory would work. Dont you think? And do you honestly believe that planes like the N1K, LA7 and P-51D actually are used only 10% of the time??? Doesn't seem that that statement has any validity to it. But I could be wrong.
Urchin your rebutle says it all...if the late war planes are more popular and better equipped for fighting in the arena then what exactly keeps them from being perk candidates....not a thing. Makes them prime candidates. Thanks for driving that home!
And for you second comment...I was only stating what HT would not do, at least I would hope they would not do. It was in no way connected to the argument. I.E. you apply boring witticism...I apply boring witticism right back.
-
I often wonder if the whole eny/obj thing were extended to scoring how much more effective a tool it would be. There are those not so concerned about perks (so the tool doesn't work on them) but they are often the ones that are QUITE concerned about scoring and ranking.
In such a scenario it would not be necessary to perk anything more. Flying "late war monster" would not reward the player score-wise nearly as well as say a Hurricane 1-D in the same arena. How many Early War planes do you imagine you would see then?
-
Jebo, the point that you seem to be missing...
Any of the perk planes, if unperked would be unbalancing. The CHog was unbalancing simply due to use. As practical as it was.
The reference to experience had nothing to do with actuall flight sim history or knowledge, it had to do with actually knowing what it means to see a plane dominate or unbalance an arena. I don't believe you have enough experience to really know... especially if you are saying that planes with 10% usage are falling into that category.
And guess what... those planes with 10% usage used to be more around 12-15%. More planes... that number goes down. That trend has been consistant.
AKDejaVu
-
Jebo- I'm not trying to apply 'boring witticism'. I'm trying to make you see the point I'm trying to make. The point is that there will ALWAYS be a plane or planes that perform 'better' than the rest of the planeset. Those planes will be used more often. Those planes will be used more often BECAUSE they perform better than the rest of the planeset. Lets say the only planes we have are the P-51D, 109-G6, Spit IX, C202, P40B, and A6M2. Which of these planes will see more use than the others? I tend to think you'd see a lot of P-51D's, 109G-6s, and Spit IX's. So, since the P-51D is leading the pack, we'll perk it. What will happen? Do you think the P-51 pilots will jump in a P-40 now? I don't. I think they'll jump in a 109G-6, because that is the next 'best' plane for the way they like to fly. So lets say the P-51D, 109G-6, and Spit IX get 80% of the sorties. Lets perk all of them. What do you think will happen? Sure, for a while the C202, P40B, and A6M2 use will rise.... but to be quite honest I think after a month, maybe 2 tops, people will realize that the C202 is the 'best' plane available and start flying that more.
I really do sympathize with your position, because I used to feel the same way you do now. Even now, I'd really like to know the 'sortie count', since just knowing kills and deaths doesn't REALLY tell us how many sorties each plane flew. But to answer your question, no, I think the N1K2, P-51D, La7, and Spit IX (plus the Spit V and Seafire) probably get around 60-65% of the sorties flown. Theres no scientific way to tell, I'm just going off the number of icons I see, combined with the kill stats that we are given.
However, I learned a long time ago that it isn't human nature to want to 'diversify'. If Joe Newb the 109 driver keeps getting killed by La7s, pretty soon he's going to be flying an La7 instead. Why? Because they are 'better' than his plane is. If you want to see something other than Spit, N1K2, La7, and P51 icons, it is really on you. Grab a friend, up something different... and stare at his plane for a while :).
-
Urchin I understand that your saying that people will switch to the next best unperked thing, and then the whole episode will continue until the heavens become hell and vice versa. I however do not agree with that. Thats all. There is no harm in running a tour by perking, by 5 or 10 points, a few of the popular planes to see what happens. They did it with the -C and it has accomplished the goal they set out for. And I believe you have to look at the number of sorties and K/D ratio to be able to tell what planes have taken the roll of the -C. Your point of view might be right on or it may not be, who's to say. I would just like to see something different done with the perk system.
DejaVu great that is your opinion thanks for the input, however I believe you are wrong. First and for most I can not believe that the 51D, N1K and the LA7 are only used 10% of the time. If you can present hard undisputable evidence then sure I may change my mind. And once again I am not saying that the -C should be unperked, all I am saying is that some of the other popular planes should be as well. Not by 200 perks like the 262 but 5 or 10 like what we have seen with the -C.
Your opinion of whether or not I have adequate experience in the game is irrelevant. As you do not dictate to me, or anyone else in the community, what the bar is to be set at for a qualified observer and participant of this community. You are a respected member of the community and I will always listen openly to your suggestions and rebutle. But you do not set the standard of whom is qualified to make suggestions...that is everyones own choice. If you think I am full of it then great, thanks, have a nice day and asta lavista.
-
Sorry Jebo... I don't have to prove they are used only 10% of the time because that's what the stats indicate. You are the one stating the "I feel..." type comments based solely on one mans flight time. Prove the numbers are wrong.
Its hard to call planes uber and dominating yet argue that they are actually getting lesser kills/hr then other planes or lesser kills/sortie than other planes. Basically, the numbers work themselves out wether you want to believe it or not.
But here we go with another, "To me... there are too many... so they should be perked" statement.
AKDejaVu
-
Deja, just look what he spends most of his time flying. The planes he wants perked are ones he doesn't usually fly very much if at all (look at how much he flies the P-51 for example). Big surprise? I think not. The fact that he says "well HTC would stop it before the perking went too far" is just another way of saying "well I wouldn't want them to perk MY favorite planes".
J_A_B
-
DejaVu I never posted my reply with the slightest inclination that these planes would be perked. also, I never based my theory on the % of how many flights these planes had. I simply was going off the top planes that made the top five popular planes from the information you posted.
JAB If you will look closely at my stats, one of the planes that I do fly alot is the LA7 so how does that fit into your theory?. Perk the F4U-1 and the A6M2 I have the perks to pay for em and I promise I will still fly them just like I fly the -C.
-
Originally posted by Jebo44
DejaVu I never posted my reply with the slightest inclination that these planes would be perked. also, I never based my theory on the % of how many flights these planes had. I simply was going off the top planes that made the top five popular planes from the information you posted.
The information I posted shows them as having 10% of the kills (OK.. the P51 had 11% for the first time in 3 tours). Like I said.. these numbers are consistantly going down as planes are added.
If you're using my numbers for this argument... why the hell are you asking me to show numbers on this? sheesh.
And if you're just saying that the top x planes should be perked then... well... see what urchin has said repeatedly. Then combine it with what I said, because when you do it you are effectively reducing the number of available aircraft... and you'll begin to see what would happen.
AKDejaVu
-
Sure great what ever you say Deja. It is pointless to argue about it and neither you or Urchin has pushed me away from my opinion. Only reason I wanted you to give me proof was because you are telling me that I have to see it your way. Sorry but I do not. Lets just chalk it up to you not liking my opinion.
-
My way? Hmmm... how about doing this... look at the top planes and see if their % use has gone up or down as more planes have been added.
Its there.. you just don't want to see it because it doesn't conform to your "opinion". You ask me to show you "proof" that your "opinion" is wrong when its sitting right there.
Does perking a plane reduce its use? Yep... look at the CHog.
Does perking the top 5 planes mean that there won't be any more planes with 10% usage? ROTFLMAO!
Really.. stop and think about what you're saying some time.
AKDejaVu
-
AKDejaVu,
How do you calculate your "MA Impact' rating?
-
Deja for the last time I looked at what planes were in the top 5 in most of these tours and that is it. I looked only at that, nothing else. I could care less if the plane is used 10% of the time or 50% of the time. I never said that I did. I was looking at the planes that made it into the top 5 almost every tour. Not the numbers. Nothing else. Nadda! Some almost never made it out of the top 3! This is your information, the thing is your numbers do not tell you what they tell me. Hell I wasn't even looking at the numbers.
I do not care if their usage has gone up or down, left or right. Why are you so scared of those planes being perked? And dont use Urchins theory because we all know that if HT did perk some of the planes we have been talking about, lets say four of them, he would not perk every single one of the kites because people would raise all kinds of hell. My guess is you will respond that there is no need that the new additions of more planes will balance things out and give everyone more choices, so on and so forth. Well then to that end how about unperking the -C??? Sure at one point in time she was the massive killer of the skies, but now there are more planes so whats the harm???
-
Then once again Jebo... see Urchin's point. All that idea would do would be to perk every single plane in the MA because, since you've made % use irrelevant, THERE WILL ALWAYS BE A TOP 5.
Jeez... this isn't really that tough of a concept.
You want even usage? You need 1 plane.
AKDejaVu
-
Deja, whats the formula for MA impact rating?
-
Ok bud whatever you say. Thanks for the input.
-
Spoken like someone that flies the 6th most popuplar aircraft.
AKDejaVu
-
LOL you can perk that one if you want. I got the points.