Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: anton on January 12, 2003, 04:36:39 PM
-
WHY WAS MY POST CLOSED?
-
My post "well at least I know what im up against ...." was closed. Is HTC blatently confirming my "old boy network" statement? (in best Jack Nicholson) YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!
Anton
-
in before the lock
-
Had to look to see what the other closed threads had in common with mine.
Moderators seems to be the "touchy subject". GO FIGURE. Mandies "I'm leaving" Is a classic example of what im talkin about. Prolyy on page 10 by now... check it out........U can still read it, just cant respond.
Anton
-
dumbest thread... ever.
-
Originally posted by ergRTC
dumbest thread... ever.
Oh, how soon we forget. (http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74739)
-
Yeah, it's unbelievable that they locked your thread when its only purpose was to accuse and insult. What a bunch of whoopeeed facists! And, no doubt, you were having a pleasant discussion with the other pile-it online when you were muted and they just did it to pick on you.
I'M SICK OF ALL THIS FAVORITISM! I QUIT!!!!!! YOUV ALL CONSIPIRD AGANST ME AND YOUR BIG JERKS!!!!!!!!!
SOB
-
LOL
Well, I suppose if HTC had bothered to respond to any of the various 4 threads that hold the requests for P-squelch. Or the 3or so threads that cover the problem with squad size in regards to hi-lite (increase squad size or enable ch-5 hi-lite) . Then maybe I would have a different opinion.
But they didnt, instead they moved the threads without any response or aknowledgment. My points are true & valid. The truth is often not pretty but the facts are indeed present.
Anton
-
I agree with you completly anton.
HT Should personally reply to every thread no matter how long the horse has been dead, or how unimportant the issue.
I'd much rather he personally confirm the existance of known bugs than actually work on fixing them.
-
Posts that have 50 or so responses argeeing that the need for an item has increased, MAY be a good indicator of CHANGE. Just because it was previously decided against doesnt mean it will NEVER be a good idea. It is very obvious that many people agree with me. You can verify this by reading Ecke's post in the feedback forum.
Anton
-
So, because HTC didn't respond to the posts about perma-squelch and big squad highlight, they are excluding you? That's a great leap of logic.
SOB
BTW...HT has responded to the perma-squelch issue before. He didn't like the idea.
-
Originally posted by anton
LOL
Well, I suppose if HTC had bothered to respond to any of the various 4 threads that hold the requests for P-squelch. Or the 3or so threads that cover the problem with squad size in regards to hi-lite (increase squad size or enable ch-5 hi-lite) . Then maybe I would have a different opinion.
But they didnt, instead they moved the threads without any response or aknowledgment. My points are true & valid. The truth is often not pretty but the facts are indeed present.
Anton
HiTech has already responded about permanent squelch and he's decided that's not the way to go.
Just because he doesn't reply to every single thread about permanent squelch doesn't mean he's ignoring anything. I would have thought the first time he said 'No' would have been a clue to you all that keep on demanding...err posting that it's not going to be added.
Ack-Ack
-
Full moon fever....no doubt about it. Good thing the CT has another excellent setup or Id be bonkers by now as well.
-
With posts like these, its a wonder you're still able to post here at all. :rolleyes:
-
New rules for a while gents: Not going to put up with this stuff any longer.
HiTech