Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Sachs on February 04, 2003, 01:06:41 AM

Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Sachs on February 04, 2003, 01:06:41 AM
All I have to say is this.  A lot of planes need some serious re-working on their values.  First one the boston, great platform crappy guns and not a great value to fly.  Maybe at a capped field but besides that it is worthless.  

So in this order...

Boston  60
202       80
109 E-4  75
B5N        95
P-40 B    100
190 F8     45-50
Spit 14      10-15
Ta-152     5
F4-U4       15-20
Spit 5        30-35
Spit 1        80
Hurricane series minus the IIC   60-90
il-2  45
F6F   35
p-38 25
yak 9u  40
TBM  50
yak 9t  45
m8  50-60
m3 75
mossie 40 is good
bf-110c4    60-65
fmf4       55
fm2  40
D3A1       75
ju87        65


ok this is my drunken list but I am spot on so i think.  If you notice in our roster for aircraft we have quite the list of early war planes.  We should give them a chance and give other s chance to up them for a pay off.  I am all for giving early war rides a higher perk value to offset the balance of the MA which is laden with Late war machines.  And some late war rides have a low value when they do not compare to what the MA offers in play style so I think they should be adjusted.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: SOB on February 04, 2003, 01:22:54 AM
Kurt Tank is still gay.


SOB
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: BUG_EAF322 on February 04, 2003, 01:48:22 AM
Perk the D9 unperk the ta 152
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 04, 2003, 02:16:46 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong but what you want is for early war planes to generate more perks than they already do?

Try this to see if you think the perk values need adjusting.  Up in a C.202 and then shoot down a late war plane like a P-51D and record the perks generated.  Do the same thing but this time with a mid-war plane and then once again with a late war plane.  You'll see that you get more perks for kills in a C.202 than you would in a mid to late war plane.


Ack-Ack
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Frost on February 04, 2003, 10:14:58 AM
The Ta-152 should not be the lowest ENY value on the list.  It should come after the ME-262, Tempest, Spit 14 and F4U-4.  All of these planes are more dangerous than the Ta-152.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 04, 2003, 10:50:48 AM
By historical accounts the 152 had at least above average acceleration at its altitude >28k, but it doesn't do any better than average in the game, so something is amiss.
Word from the designers is it has the low alt boost system matching RL numbers; though engine doesn't make much power in the first place, but no word on whether the high alt GM1 system is there or working 1/2 or what.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Octavius on February 04, 2003, 10:56:40 AM
P40B definitely!  100 might be high, but it needs to be raised for sure.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Saurdaukar on February 04, 2003, 10:57:14 AM
Ah, its about time.

::looks at watch::

Yep - havent seen one of these in about 3 months.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Innominate on February 04, 2003, 11:24:44 AM
heh
The ENY's on some planes are out of whack.

Most notably IMO the p40s.

80 ENY is a bit extreme, thats 8 perks for killing a spit9, 60 eny or so is a decent CAP, and there isnt any real need to go above that.

Also, increasing ENY's on aircraft doesn't do much good for getting people to fly them.  The people who fly early war planes do so because they like the early war planes, not for the perks.  The perks themselves are nearly useless with the prop planes gangbang tags, which eliminate any fun in flying them.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: F4UDOA on February 04, 2003, 11:40:29 AM
The B5N has no foward guns.

And I believe the reward facing gun is a .30cal.

This thing is almost as deadly as a goon..... Almost.

ENY 100
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 04, 2003, 11:51:11 AM
Look at it this way: 190F8 still has lower ENY than the -A8.
gangbang tag or not you should by principle be earning more perks in a lesser ride.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Elysian on February 04, 2003, 12:36:57 PM
HTC has said in the past that ENY is determined by usage not performance.  That being said, re-evaluating these values based on current usage numbers could bring a lot of presently unused airframes back into the game/breath fresh life into the MA.

I'd hesitate to suggest numbers though, feels like that is telling HTC how to do their job and that might put them off.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: ALF on February 04, 2003, 12:48:15 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Innominate
heh
The ENY's on some planes are out of whack.

Most notably IMO the p40s.

80 ENY is a bit extreme, thats 8 perks for killing a spit9, 60 eny or so is a decent CAP, and there isnt any real need to go above that.


Considering the complete derth of P-40s in the air....even on the dreaded Pizza map (where its paint scheme is of benifit), I dont think its too out of wack :p


Quote

Also, increasing ENY's on aircraft doesn't do much good for getting people to fly them.  The people who fly early war planes do so because they like the early war planes, not for the perks.  The perks themselves are nearly useless with the prop planes gangbang tags, which eliminate any fun in flying them. [/B]


Ahhhh two of my favorite issues.   Yes, no matter what the ENY value is, many people will never fly them....heck Id bet the majority dont even know what ENY is for.

And of course, yes, the perk tags for varients  
is wrong  


It makes otherwise benificial aircraft useless for anything but:
[list=1]
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Kronos on February 04, 2003, 01:36:59 PM
Spit 5 is fairly common in the MA..  and is set right about where it should be... 30-35 is a but much IMO.  It can hold it's own against most planes, as most people turn fight too much where they shouldn't.  (including me)

F4u-4 and spit 14 should be lower ENY values than Ta-152.   But I don't make the game.......................
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Puke on February 04, 2003, 01:48:18 PM
I just recently started flying the perk planes in a non-miserly fashion so that I can whittle down my perk points.  But quickly found it to be no fun.  The F4U-4 is nothing great and I don't know why it's perked like it is.  The LA7 that was with me trying to attack a 3-ship of Lancasters didn't seem to have any handicap compared to my F4U-4.  I also found out the F4U-1C bites at defending a vulched field...lol.  It's a pig.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: SirLoin on February 04, 2003, 01:57:39 PM
Perk Budweiser!
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: wetrat on February 04, 2003, 06:38:57 PM
The yak9u is an incredible plane. If anything, it's ENY value needs to be lowered. Under 8k it's a nightmare. It can turn better than an la7, it can zoom climb as well as a G10, out-accelerates a G10, and outguns it. Basically, the 9U is the low-alt E-fighter's dream. The 9T on the other hand is garbage...

And Chris, you left out the 109F. I'm considering switching from G10's to F's, despite the obvious disadvantage I'll be giving myself :) It's ENY value is too low.

The LA7 and Mustang should have an ENY value of 10... I personally don't think the Spit14 should be perked, since it's just a spit-shaped mustang. The dora should be perked, and the 152 de-perked. I think the Typhoon's ENY value is a bit too high (22 or 24, I believe?).. it should be in the neighbourhood of 15. The thing is the ultimate fighter in AH.

Give us the later-war stuka with 20mm and I'll gladly attack bases (I know it's unrelated, but hey :))
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Taiaha on February 04, 2003, 09:40:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by wetrat
The yak9u is an incredible plane. If anything, it's ENY value needs to be lowered. Under 8k it's a nightmare. It can turn better than an la7, it can zoom climb as well as a G10, out-accelerates a G10, and outguns it. Basically, the 9U is the low-alt E-fighter's dream. The 9T on the other hand is garbage...

 


Yep, the 9U had a massively impressive 1.287 K/D ratio last tour (for comparison, the A5 had 1.597) and it was responsible for a mighty 2.7% of kills.  What a monster. :rolleyes:

And for the record, it's less heavily armed than the G10, 12.7mm mgs versus 13mm, and no 30mm option.

Methinks its ENY value is about right.  That A5 on the other hand. . . :)
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Kanth on February 05, 2003, 12:13:37 AM
no it's not :(

Quote
Originally posted by wetrat
The 9T on the other hand is garbage...
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 05, 2003, 12:25:55 AM
Yak9U doesn't outgun G10..
1 shvak + 1 vvs 50cal VS 2 131s + 1 151 if not 3.
MA furball is 75% at least mid-low E fighting, so 9U is excellent there, whereas 9T isn't.

on stats, D30 is the best 47 yet the "newbies" kill its stats.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: -ammo- on February 05, 2003, 12:39:45 AM
uhhh the yak9U has 2x 12.7 MM in the cowl with its cannon in the nose.

even so,  the G10's armament outclasses the yak's.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Black Sheep on February 05, 2003, 12:48:53 AM
OK if ENY is such a big deal - then HT should have it float the same as the perk multiplier. Cept this would be based on usage as a whole like they say and not by a countries numbers.

Seems fair: If the La7 and Spit9 continue to dominate in numbers on a daily basis - then its kill value increases, thus more people will hunt them down for perks - and in the same breath, if he lands 5, he might get .5 perkies :eek: my 2 cents
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 05, 2003, 02:24:20 AM
oops
the vvs 50 cal is harder hit than the US 50? and the shvak is stronger than the 151?
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: -ammo- on February 05, 2003, 08:32:35 AM
Evidently a certain model of the vvs 12.7 mm did produce a higher energy projectile than the browning 50, however I don't know the numbers, and I am not certain if the yak9U employed those guns.

shvak stronger than  the mg151?  I don't know. Both of them perform quite adequately.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 05, 2003, 11:58:38 AM
then there's still the question of 9U and G10 (151hub and no gondolas) compared firepower.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: Innominate on February 05, 2003, 12:03:39 PM
The shvak is quite similar to the mg151, perhaps with a better trajectory.

the 12.7 MG's on the yak are far better than the 13mms on the 109g10.  The 13mm MG's are quite weak in my experience.
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: maxtor on February 05, 2003, 01:10:58 PM
Just by the look of em I'd say you are right  (#5 and #3, yes?)
Title: Time to re-evaluate perk values
Post by: moot on February 05, 2003, 01:42:36 PM
thanks.