Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: nzimmers on February 04, 2003, 01:43:44 PM
-
It's time we did something about the Arado.
There are many aspects about the plane that I feel aren't quite up to historical accuracy, and before I spend the time and money collecting sources and data, I really need to know what exactly do I need to do to convince HT to make a change?
I mean, If I go to Germany and find one of the last AR234 pilots alive and fly him to the US and waltz into HT headquarters and they hear it's performance charcteristics directly from his mouth in broken english...would that be enough?
Or, would a collection of definitive material written about the AR234 and published, shipped to HT with post-it notes to help point out pertinent information be enough?
how about photocopies of the pages?
how about scans?
there has to be some guidlines as to what is acceptable material and what isn't.
-
please make a list of the innacuracies in the Arado 234 flight model.
-
They are gonna fix the gunsite (for the tail gun), can't think of what else he could mean.
-
When did they say they were going to fix the gunsight/divebomb sight?
-
hitech said they were going to fix the Arado tail gun with 1.10 (but obviously they not got to it yet). I don't remember if this was arena chat or on the board, but I saw him type it.
-
How about the correct bombsite?????
-
He mentioned in the arena that he was having problems calibrating the rear sight while flying foward. He was running into some issues with handeling, and the sight working incorrectly.
-
I'd love to see the option of the ventral gun.
-
There's a ventral gun? Theres a tail gun?! Interesting for a 1 seat aircraft...
-
Originally posted by Ridge
There's a ventral gun? Theres a tail gun?! Interesting for a 1 seat aircraft...
it's fixed, and aimed by turning the plane.
It's quite good at killing me262s....
-
And can we have the C4 model, please?