Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Pfunk on February 15, 2003, 05:56:50 PM
-
Takes a little while to load, BUT well worth it
http://gostaspoucogostas.web.pt/
-
I'm a big fan of #377 or #294, or 320, or 195, or ARGHHHHHHHHH mindbogling. Must take cold shower.
-
It is so immature to turn women into sexual objects like that.
I like #251 best.
ra
-
Ohh yeah good choice 251 is nice. Nothin like a little butt floss.
-
I'll take 264. :D
-
Cool page, but these are just girls. I bet they are all teen-agers.
-
Yeah... they all look rather young...
Funny thing is... remember the girls that you thought were attractive when you were fifteen? At forty, you'll still think they're attractive. With age, just keep adding to the list.
-
Funny thing is about 251 is that I saw pics of that same girl somewhere on the net with same outfit , also with her pantys off!
look at 58! ewww!!
-
I'll take 116 please.
-
What happened to 157?
-
Why are they all under 15?
(http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/extern/640697.jpg)
-
I'll take number 394, to go.
-
Ya'll better get that off your HD.
-
Originally posted by Swoop
Why are they all under 15?
(http://image1ex.villagephotos.com/extern/640697.jpg)
No kidding...
Far too young.
-
.
-
Originally posted by Monk
Ya'll better get that off your HD.
What do you mean?
-
The study of beautiful women is truly an artform. It's a way to recognise his creation. I definitely don't want to see anyone on that page less than 18 years old.
Once your 18, you are considered an adult (irregardless of how you behave).
You can't circulate pictures of underage women. Thats absolutely wrong.
I haven't picked a #. Too hard to select :)
Well, okay, #295 seems like number 1 in my book. Just too perfect :D
-
Link still works?
-
Allright, juts looked in my bedroom. It ruined my day :( lol
-
And some people say being gay is a choice. How could anyone choose gayness after looking at that site?
-
That many HOT TEENS!, and no nudity or steamy action. A first for the Internet.
Charon
-
Mr Rogers: Can you say... Ped-o-feeel-ya... isn't that special.
-
Most are amateur models. #404 is Jen Hilton (http://www.jenhilton.com). Its amazing how some of these girls look older but are largely 15-17...the amateur model biz is pretty intense, for the movie shoot I participated in, we had tons of little lolita's applying to be extras for high school scenes and such. Makes ya wanna be 15 again! LOL You should've seen some of the portfolios these girls had...dunno if I'd let my 15 year old be photographed in skimpy-stuff & lingerie...but a lot do.
P.S. Dibs on 425 :)
-
Damn I never really looked at the link when I posted it, lol 90% of those chicks are underage. opps
-
289 plz
-
They all could use a spanking.
nasty little she devils:aok
-
I feel like a bit of a perv after looking at that albiet interesting. I am now gonna put on some Kenny G and go for a long candle light bubble bath. Maybe I can get clean again...
-
382
-
I'd like to know what's in the milk some of these girls are drinking?:eek:
-
I'ld take No. 1 cause she has
( o Y o )
and i dont mean her eyes :D
-
Why is there no 180? Or 191.. okay there are definantly not 400 here.. I'm a little saddened by this news.
-
# 85 yowza!
# 382 yowza!
-
Some of them start young dont they. I bet a good number of them will be millionairs before they are 22. The future looks good for the internet.
:D
-
145 or 421 for me
-
Originally posted by LePaul
P.S. Dibs on 425 :)
whoops how did i miss her??!?!?
ill fight yas for her !!
-
I would swear that 309, 311 (same girl) is my ex from Or. Prolly right when she got out of high school...
-
Originally posted by DmdNexus
Mr Rogers: Can you say... Ped-o-feeel-ya... isn't that special.
Pedophelia is only applicable to youngsters who haven't reached the age of physical maturity. I'd say these girls, although young, have all more than scratched the surface of their breeding years.
-
Originally posted by Capt. Pork
Pedophelia is only applicable to youngsters who haven't reached the age of physical maturity.
No, pedophelia is when an adult lusts after a child.
They are children until 18, when they become adults by law.
-SW
-
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
No, pedophelia is when an adult lusts after a child.
They are children until 18, when they become adults by law.
-SW
I think you're confusing pedophelia with statutory rape. Pedophelia, although used as a legal term, was primarily a term describing a psychological condition where sexually mature adults prefer pre-pubescent children. Nabakov does a pretty good job of describing the difference in Lolita, although preverse. Yes, it can mean lust for a minor, but only if you think strictly according to how the government instructs you to think. An eighteen year old sleeping with a seventeen year old is not a pedophile unless you're a cop or a judge.
-
Uh... no, I looked it up in the dictionary.
Pedophelia is lusting after a child.
A child is between an infant and an adult.
Teenagers younger than 18 fall into this category.
. An eighteen year old sleeping with a seventeen year old is not a pedophile unless you're a cop or a judge
That isn't true either, theres a 2 or 3 year leeway. An 18 year old sleeping with a 17 year old is not illegal. Neither is a 20 year old sleeping with a 17 year old.
-SW
-
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
Uh... no, I looked it up in the dictionary.
Pedophelia is lusting after a child.
A child is between an infant and an adult.
Teenagers younger than 18 fall into this category.
-SW
Then what, do tell, is an adolescent? Again, a child, by medical, clinical terms is a human not yet of sufficient age to procreate. Pedophelia, and try looking this up in a dictionary with more than just a 9 word definition, is a phsychological disorder(meaning sickness) affecting adults who have preverse attraction for children with no outwardly apparent sexually-differentiating features. Being attracted to voluptuous 16 year old girls is quite natural, actually, even if the results of pursuing said girls are punishable by law. I repeat, just because the law says they are children, doesn't mean that they're children in every sense of the word. Do 15 year olds who kill and are tried as adults then suddenly become adults in your book?
-
BTW, legal age of consent in Hawaii is 14. So I guess that makes them adults then, right?
-
Just because you want to justify your sick perversion of chasing around young tail as a dirty old man doesn't mean I have to accept your definition of what pedophelia is.
Its clearly laid out in the dictionary what pedophelia is. Broken down to an adult lusting after a child. I feel I should clarify I paraphrased the definition since you weren't too quick on the draw the first time. An adult is an infant to a young teen.
Don't get arrested while you are circling the block at the local high school checking out "voluptous 16 year old"s, ok?
-SW
-
First of all, don't resort to insults. I know the law and I know my rights. Furthermore, I'm barely in my mid twenties, and thus hardly qualify as a dirty old man. Finally, try to broaden your understanding of the world a little. Look up pedophelia in a medical dictionary--Merriam Webster is a great one. It's not my definition in there, it's the definition as determined by people with more education than myself and, dare I say, you. Gain some enlightenment. Just because some guy defined a child (quite primitively, I might add) as a person between an infant and an adult, doesn't mean that that's the end all be-all of classifications.
Yes, I will admit that 16 year old girls can be attractive. I thought it when I was 16 and it hasn't changed. Doesn't mean I take it any farther than that. There is a such thing as mental maturity too, which, btw, is exactly the angle that state laws are designed to attack when mandating statutory rape lmits. The fact that they are physically mature is not in question.
Lighten up a little, I never meant to offend you.
-
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
That isn't true either, theres a 2 or 3 year leeway. An 18 year old sleeping with a 17 year old is not illegal. Neither is a 20 year old sleeping with a 17 year old.
-SW
nope wrong...
here in wisconsin we had 2 HS students that were dating for 2 years. he was 18 she was 17 (18 in 1 month). near end of senior year she got pregnant from him.
they planed a wedding after graduation, then he got arrested by the DA.
"mom" of the daughter got po'd and filed charges.
he was convicted of child molestation, sentenced to 22 years in federal prision, and is now a registered sex offender the rest of his life wherever he goes in the USA.
1 month means EVERYTHING in the eyes of the law. there are no "exceptions" if the girl is under 18.
-
A perfect example of how statutes are unyielding, unscientific, unreasonable and downright vengeful. The mother needs a psychiatric evaluation and the DA needs to go live in orbit without a spacesuit for a while.
-
Originally posted by JB73
nope wrong...
here in wisconsin we had 2 HS students that were dating for 2 years. he was 18 she was 17 (18 in 1 month). near end of senior year she got pregnant from him.
they planed a wedding after graduation, then he got arrested by the DA.
"mom" of the daughter got po'd and filed charges.
he was convicted of child molestation, sentenced to 22 years in federal prision, and is now a registered sex offender the rest of his life wherever he goes in the USA.
1 month means EVERYTHING in the eyes of the law. there are no "exceptions" if the girl is under 18.
I had no idea that Wisconsin was such a screwed up state.
-
Originally posted by Capt. Pork
First of all, don't resort to insults. I know the law and I know my rights. Furthermore, I'm barely in my mid twenties, and thus hardly qualify as a dirty old man. Finally, try to broaden your understanding of the world a little. Look up pedophelia in a medical dictionary--Merriam Webster is a great one. It's not my definition in there, it's the definition as determined by people with more education than myself and, dare I say, you. Gain some enlightenment. Just because some guy defined a child (quite primitively, I might add) as a person between an infant and an adult, doesn't mean that that's the end all be-all of classifications.
Yes, I will admit that 16 year old girls can be attractive. I thought it when I was 16 and it hasn't changed. Doesn't mean I take it any farther than that. There is a such thing as mental maturity too, which, btw, is exactly the angle that state laws are designed to attack when mandating statutory rape lmits. The fact that they are physically mature is not in question.
Lighten up a little, I never meant to offend you.
Hit the nail on the head...
-
My great Grandmother had her first child when she was 12, then went on to have 12 more kids lol. So does that mean Gramps was a pedophile statutory rapist husband for 6 years?
uhhm... this took place in Arkansas after all. NO THEY WERENT RELATED! :D
-
Hmmm...
My take on all this is based on what I understand as the law.
The specific state (U.S.) or nation or local sets the age range for consent. Such as California says 18, Nevada says 16 (i've heard haven't checked it as most young girls are just that YOUNG) Also heard it was 16 in England.
Can't remember which state it is Alabama or some state near there says 14 for consent. And someone from the Aloha state claims it's 14 there (earlier in this thread)
Some nations have NO age limit set or ignore it. Such as Thailand. Thus you have individuals that travel there and do things and then get arrested when the return to the states. (Was in the news not to long ago)
Biblically the age is 12 (with parental consent, and provided the female was developed enough). Someone not too long back tried to claim in a newspaper article that the age of consent all across the U.S. in the 1800's was 12.
Hmm there is a net article that claims there is a group of people trying to change the age of consent to a much lower age. Has some interesting statements within it.
In California for awhile judges were not sending the older males to jail provided they married and cared for the younger female they had impregnated. (Guys were in their early 20's and the girls were varying in age from 14 to 17) Word was that the girls were looking for older guys to take care of them and sought out the guys and basically seduced em and sooooo .....
Note: to my understanding 13 or younger is, or can be depending on circumstances***, considered child molesting. 14 to 18 is statutory rape. (depending on the state, nation, or local law) Legally speaking!
***(Kind of an if she's 13 but already has a baby type of thing here!)
OK that's the word according to my understanding.
Please allow me to be the first to say my understanding doesn't mean i'm correct.
I am not a lawyer, and suggest you check your local laws if you have reason for concern.
My take on the 400+ is (as someone has already said) there ain't 400 of em :(
Many appear to be European?, some look like there in bars partying?, and a few of them do look under the age of 18 but most look closer to 18 or perhaps just over that age.
#1, #76, and a couple of others. :D
-
I was just messin with you anyway Porky, I'm in my early 20s... I still can't look at girls under 18, though, and get the same thoughts as I do when I'm looking at a 20 or so year old. Not because of the law, but because I have a younger sister. And no, I will not post her picture for anyone - especially any of the FDBs.
JB73, I'm actually right... Sandman is right too - Wisconsin must be bassackwards if that can happen.
In the metro DC area, there is a 3 year leeway... probably because they observed dumb situations like that and for once (rare occasion in this area) turned their brains on.
-SW
-
I totally respect the younger sister angle. I don't have one myself, but I've been close friends with younger girls and have always been vehemently protective of them, in all situations. I'm not sure why, maybe it's because I know how guys think, and where they're brains are inevitably leading them, coupled with the fact that little girls these days tend to be free-spirited with their bodies while at the same time naive. It can be difficult with ten million Britney discples out there strutting around like it's no big deal. Anyway, I appreciate and respect your decency. Every older brother should do the same.
I live in Bethesda, btw, what about you?
-
Deale, its a real small town or something... Its about 20 minutes south of Annapolis.
-SW
-
Who are these girls anyways?
-
How did you get yourself on probation? Was it the insult thread you started? Because I thought it was a pretty sweet idea, all things considered.
-
Must have been it. It got deleted, and I did not post any inflamatory anything.
I cant even access my squad's board.
Whatever, I have been a loyal customer since forever, maybe they downgraded my treatment to consumer.
No explanation, no anything.
Let it be on record that I have supported this company since day 1. On direct recomendations alone there may be more than 10 active subscritpions on me, not counting mine, which is always active even when I dont have time to play. And I dont say its justification to do anything I want around here. Thats stupid. The way I see it I'm on probation because I outlived a close knit business model, and I'm out before the next step.
I guess the next step is turning into E.A (http://www.ea.com/home/home.jsp)
Whatever they see fit.
And I will probably get banned for this post.
To anyone who gets to reads this before its censored, you know where to reach me, maybe we'll play with each other in a playground that admits being what it is.
-
That thread was beautiful.
Like being in a mosh pit. Lotta violence with no real anger.
-
Well linking to another game manf site will warm HTs heart LOL.
-
O my... #244
:aok
You're all invited to the wedding. :lol
TBolt
-
Originally posted by Animal
Must have been it. It got deleted, and I did not post any inflamatory anything.
I cant even access my squad's board.
Whatever, I have been a loyal customer since forever, maybe they downgraded my treatment to consumer.
No explanation, no anything.
Let it be on record that I have supported this company since day 1. On direct recomendations alone there may be more than 10 active subscritpions on me, not counting mine, which is always active even when I dont have time to play. And I dont say its justification to do anything I want around here. Thats stupid. The way I see it I'm on probation because I outlived a close knit business model, and I'm out before the next step.
I guess the next step is turning into E.A (http://www.ea.com/home/home.jsp)
Whatever they see fit.
And I will probably get banned for this post.
To anyone who gets to reads this before its censored, you know where to reach me, maybe we'll play with each other in a playground that admits being what it is.
I'm not a real fan of how HTC moderates these boards to keep a "RATED: G" environment, either. These BB's are actually pretty damn suffocating at times...no room to be yourself.
Good luck, Animal.
TBolt
-
Aww come on, isn't this the guy who officially declared the rolleyes smiley all hoopty and cliche -- now going and making a post like this? Animal, you can't do any better than an "I got put on probation so I'm going to make a self-righteous post and get myself banned and go out on top because I've always been a loyal customer and HTC is going to hell in a handbasket and I'll just take my business elsewhere" post?
That thread was fun while it lasted, but it was like a bunch of kids lighting matches in the backyard. It's fun, but we all know we shouldn't be doing it, and it's going to get shut down as soon as an adult spots it.
Laugh it off. It'd be a shame to see you leave, especially on bad terms.
-
Well that last post above was an angry drunken late night post.
Now this is a early morning hungover post, so I'll keep it brief because the monitor brightness is hurting my brain.
Maybe I was self righteous, but I dont think that thread was reason enough to "punish" me. Everyone was having fun and there were no true bad feelings, unlike the other threads I see around where people truly insult each other for no other reason than having different ideals.
This is not my board and I have no say on what kind of enviroment the owners want, so whatever. I have seen people get banned for very stupid reasons so I gues I should not complain. I'll stay around but mostly I'll keep to my squad's board (if I'm even allowed to use that anymore) because maybe that place will stay "clean" (LOL!) for a while longer.
P.S: Dibs 259
-
I thought the thread was a great idea, and pretty damned funny to boot. Was kind of suprised to see it deleted, as it was just good natured fun.
-
Need older plushies SOB...then maybe I'd have more interest.;)
-
LOL, I knew it! ;) I was talking about Analmal's thread though.
-
"on probation"
Does that mean that you cant drink or something :confused:
-
Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
And no, I will not post her picture for anyone - especially any of the FDBs.
Awwww, come on...just ONE picture! :p
-
I'm starting a petition on behalf of Animal. I think at the very least, all those who participated should leave their signatures. And yes, this two is a half-assed, half serious attempt at absolutely nothing.
-
For clarification, I'd like to state that although I liked the thread, I hate Animal and think Skuzzy should have skipped probation and just banned him.
-
Let's get back on topic. BOOBIES.
Analmaul is a p*ssy.
-
Originally posted by SOB
For clarification, I'd like to state that although I liked the thread, I hate Animal and think Skuzzy should have skipped probation and just banned him.
Yes, I agree. He isn't much of a pilot and his absence wouldn't be a great loss to the team. Although, there was that one time when he posted up the picture of his girlfriend in her Halloween costume.
Ok....I changed my mind. He should be back in! :p
-
That site has a especially fishy smell. :D
18, 17, 16 as long as they don't call the co...
Uh mmm nevermind.... :eek: :D
-
Wow, skuzzy closed the petition thread already. Talk about earning his paycheck.
-
I disagree with Animal on most things.
but putting him on probation does seem a little over the top?
-
Naw I will take this one LOL
(http://home.comcast.net/~c.hambleton/wsb/media/134502/site1062.jpg)
-
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Let's get back on topic. BOOBIES.
Analmaul is a p*ssy.
This might just rate as sig material.
For a few days at least:D
-
(http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/108866/0.jpg)
-
LoL! thx brady! that will become a classic pic!!!
-
She's worth it
BUMP
-
:rolleyes: