Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Manedew on February 16, 2003, 10:07:12 PM
-
On the Patriot Act II
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0213-09.htm
On "Clean war in Iraq"
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0214-03.htm
Compare to 1940
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0215-02.htm
On Iraq and Israel
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0216-07.htm
On Body Bags
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5966947%255E401,00.html
Like to see what some of you think of this crap
-
Punt!
-
The "conservative" wind-up dolls don't consider the consequences of the Patriot Act II as being too severe so long as they are protected against evil-doers like saddam and osama, they are so frightened they would sell their mothers for protection from those evil-doing meanies.
I've already emailed multiple Senators and Representatives about chimpys assault on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
But on the bright side we have less than two years before we elect someone who can begin undoing the damage chimpy and his thugs and goons have created.
Just imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth when the chimp-boy gets thrown out on his ass. :cool:
-
Here's another link- from Toronto about Oil:
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0216-04.htm
-
You're right Clinton was SUCH an honest guy!
-
Another useful link (http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/)
-
its not that conservatives want a patriot act II is just that look at communist left wing source mane is using as link.
<<<< not a conservative btw........
-
You really should look at tyhings before you dismiss them .... or attack others
Most of tho's articles are from Paper's like the LA Times or The Boston Globe .. you know the "commie newspaper's" :rolleyes:
-
Make's me scary :(
Regards blitz
America is threathened by Iraq in no way
-
The stories they select to link or put there are themed based to give a one sided slighted view.
Its common knowledge that the patriot act II is bs and is going no where. You didnt see on that site anywhere.
If you are a leftwing hippie communist stand up say so..... Theres no need to wrap your agenda up and sell it as "unbiased news".
-
Did I claim it was unbiased?... damn you people twist things to you own ends....
it's a sight that has a bunch of anti-war links ... you gotta do better than that. I don't go around calling warmongers Rednecks do I? and anyway I'm cowboy-hat wearing Texan, the best kind of hippie .. ask Willie Nelson :D
What BS like the patriot act was BS? ... that crap still has me thinking about becoming a Canadian. They are butchering our rights as they want to goto war... not a good combination IMHO
Go post some pro-war links if you want
Rather than post agin i'll just edit....:
you know how hard it would be to look through all though's newpapers to find the articles I wanted on Anti-War ... try it you'd be at it for a few hours ...
so next time maybe i'll spend hours doing what i can do in a few minutes useing a sight like that...
:rolleyes:
comeon do, I look like I'm pressing a progressive agenda.. this about anti-war
stop changing the subject
-
I am not for action against Iraq........ and I'm not a warmongering conservative but you can go to that site and see clearly they have an agenda. You passed that on as "news".
You also punted it up like you wanted some sort feedback..Well I gave it to you.....
Canada will love you........do have have black helicopters there to? You may wanna check 1st.
-
Paranoia...will destroy yaaaaaa....
http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/3647992.html
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- House and Senate negotiators have agreed that a
Pentagon project intended to detect terrorists by monitoring e-mail and
commercial databases for health, financial and travel information cannot be
used against Americans.
The conferees also agreed to restrict further research on the program without
extensive consultation with Congress.
House leaders agreed with Senate fears about the threat to personal privacy
posed by the Pentagon program, known as Total Information Awareness
(TIA). So they accepted a Senate provision in the omnibus spending bill
passed last month, said Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., who heads the defense
appropriations subcommittee.
Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., senior Democrat on the subcommittee, said of the
program, "Jerry's against it, and I'm against it, so we kept the Senate
amendment." Of the Pentagon, he said, "They've got some crazy people over
there."
The only obstacles to the provision becoming law would be the failure of the
conferees to reach agreement on the overall spending bill in which it is
included, or a successful veto of the bill by President Bush.
Lt. Cmdr. Donald Sewell, a Pentagon spokesman, defended the program,
saying, "The Department of Defense still feels that it's a tool that can be used
to alert us to terrorist acts before they occur." He added, "It's not a program
that snoops into American citizens' privacy."
One important factor in the breadth of the opposition is the fact that the
project is headed by retired Adm. John Poindexter. Several members of
Congress have said he is an unwelcome symbol because he was convicted of
lying to Congress when he was President Ronald Reagan's national security
adviser. That his conviction was reversed on the grounds that he had been
given immunity for the testimony in which he lied did not mitigate
congressional opinion, they said.
The conferees' decision spells almost complete failure for a last-minute
Pentagon effort, begun Friday, to protect TIA by establishing advisory
committees to oversee it.
TIA would enable a team of intelligence analysts to gather and view
information from databases, pursue links between individuals and groups,
respond to automatic alerts, and share information, all from their individual
computers.
It could link such different electronic sources as video feeds from airport
surveillance cameras, credit card transactions, airline reservations and records
of telephone calls. The data would be filtered through software that would
constantly seek suspicious patterns.
The program could be employed in support of lawful military operations
outside the United States and lawful foreign intelligence operations conducted
against non-U.S. citizens.
The action was praised by Democrats and Republicans and by outside groups
on both the political right and left.