Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SunKing on February 24, 2003, 09:08:23 PM
-
Reguardless if they are avoiding the UN. It would be very interesting.
-
Might not be fair. I believe Saddam may have an unintended unfair advantage.
He probably speaks English better than GWBj.
;)
-
I would rather just see saddam dead, as morbid as that sounds.
sorry
-
Thunderdome.
Two go in....one comes out.
I think Dubya can take him.
Either way, it'd make great CNN.
Wab
-
W would probably lose the "shootin' a rifle aimlessly into the air" competition" though.
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
Thunderdome.
Two go in....one comes out.
I think Dubya can take him.
Either way, it'd make great CNN.
Wab
LOL
-
Didn't the Russians take out one of the Chechen leaders with a air to surface missle that was homing in on a satillite phone link?
That would be ok.
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
Thunderdome.
Two go in....one comes out.
Wab
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the women."
-
I wouldn't like to bet against Saddam in a head to head discussion. He's an unknown quantity... unlike Dubya. ;) Although one of the funniest things I've seen in years was the Gore v Bush debate in which Gore tried to be all menacing and sinister by 'invading the personal space' of Bush. That made me laugh out loud.
A thunderdome fight wouldn't be fair. Saddam's weapon of choice would be an acid bath and 50,000 secret police - that's a pretty big dome requirement. OTOH, Bush would probably not turn up and claim that he had 'forgotten the date of the bout or something'. :D
-
yeah .. new way to decide to go to war or not :rolleyes:
too bad we couldn't have a churchill/hitler debate .. what a load of pc crap
-
Would've been Chamberlain v Hitler I think. Maybe Tojo v Roosevelt too.
-
Originally posted by Toad
Might not be fair. I believe Saddam may have an unintended unfair advantage.
He probably speaks English better than GWBj.
;)
LOL you beat me to it, I don't speak Arabic, and don't understand GW!
Careful, Big Brother is watching this thread :eek:
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
Thunderdome.
Two go in....one comes out.
I think Dubya can take him.
Either way, it'd make great CNN.
Wab
F'k CNN, that sht's gotta be on Pay Per View!
-
Originally posted by Dowding
I wouldn't like to bet against Saddam in a head to head discussion. He's an unknown quantity... unlike Dubya. ;) Although one of the funniest things I've seen in years was the Gore v Bush debate in which Gore tried to be all menacing and sinister by 'invading the personal space' of Bush. That made me laugh out loud.
A thunderdome fight wouldn't be fair. Saddam's weapon of choice would be an acid bath and 50,000 secret police - that's a pretty big dome requirement. OTOH, Bush would probably not turn up and claim that he had 'forgotten the date of the bout or something'. :D
Bush has Cheney, and that dude has in intimidation factor of like 100. He's like the the wrestler that comes in unnanounced and way-lays an opponent at the interview.
Advantage: GW
-
Do any of you understand the psychological reason SD asked for a debate? Its very simple...as a dictator, you now can say to your people via the Gov't controlled press "See! He won't even debate the Great Ruler...ME!"
-
Thunderdome......
-
Originally posted by -ammo-
I would rather just see saddam dead, as morbid as that sounds.
sorry
It's also not something a good christian should say.
-
Darn, now I feel bad.
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
Thunderdome.
Two go in....one comes out.
I think Dubya can take him.
Either way, it'd make great CNN.
CNN!?!?
No! Pay per view!, Make some cash off of it!
-
Ops my finger slipped..... :D (what a perfect solution)
-
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
It's also not something a good christian should say.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by Sandman_SBM
It's also not something a good christian should say.
HAHA Christians are just Jews gone bad:}