Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SOB on February 28, 2003, 05:49:55 PM
-
...would a woodchuck chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
SOB
-
Originally posted by SOB
Re: How much wood...
14" most mornings
-
In best Eric Idle -
Now remember to take everything Funked says and divide by 2.
And add 5 to whatever MT says.
So when Funked says 14" he really means 2".
Thank You.
-
as much wood, as a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
-
because a woodchuck can't "chuck' wood , the question is academic and besides the question has no time eliment in it
so...
W=T x A
where W= tot amount of wood chucked
T= elasped unit of time
A= rate that a woodchuck can chuck wood
-
yao
-
yo.
-
The woodchuck is porked.
-
While there are probably a lot of people out there who would be quite content never to read another letter about The woodchuck, once The woodchuck accepts responsibility for the problems he's caused, the focus shifts from who is responsible to what each of us can do about it. As this letter will make clear, if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. The woodchuck provides none. Statements like, "I would have expected him to at least listen to my side of the story" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Opportunism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. Anyone who follows today's debates on egotism and, by happenstance, is also familiar with The woodchuck's testy notions, is struck by that old truism: The woodchuck is out to sell quack pharmaceutical supplies (and you should be suspicious whenever you hear such tell-tale words and phrases as "breakthrough", "miracle", "secret remedy", "exclusive", and "clinical studies prove that..."). And when we play his game, we become accomplices. In conclusion, let me just say that what I call brown-nosing self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards demand the advantages other people have earned without the disadvantages, like having to earn them.
In closing let me say that the woodchuck should be perked.
Cyris
-
Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that Woodchuck prefers to see problems talked to death instead of solved. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what Woodchuck's particularly jaded form of conformism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of slovenly politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution.
But don't despair. Rather, take comfort in the knowledge that it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to denounce those who claim that society is screaming for his inclinations. He wants a central organization for his international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other countries -- a haven for prissy ochlocrats and a university for budding snotty buffoons. But it goes further than that; his apparatchiks' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. Woodchuck is bad enough when he's alone, but he is even worse when he's joined by unenlightened bourgeoisie. If there is one truth in this world, it's that there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about his ploys. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must provide people the wherewithal to follow through on the critical work that has already begun.
Almost without exception, he refers to a variety of things using the word "uncharacteristically". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that everything he says is utterly and thoroughly true. At any rate, he uses good motives as a cover for evil ones. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. I respect Woodchuck's complaints, although he and his henchmen are, by nature, pathological, intellectually stultified litterbugs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but I would never take a job working for Woodchuck. Given his hateful accusations, who would want to? To oppose hooliganism, we must oppose voyeurism. To oppose antidisestablishmentarianism, we must oppose sadism. And to oppose Woodchuck, we must oppose the worst types of warped simpletons there are. One of his favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to shred the basic compact between the people and their government, never the original problem. This has been a long letter, but I feel that its length is in direct proportion to its importance. Why? Because even Woodchuck's least sleazy mercenaries supplement their already-generous incomes by selling contraband on the black market.
-
I like woodchucks.
eskimo
-
LOL :D
-
Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but I would never take a job working for Woodchuck. Given his hateful accusations, who would want to? To oppose hooliganism, we must oppose voyeurism. To oppose antidisestablishmentarianism, we must oppose sadism.
we're not worthy.
-
http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint
stolen from Quick on the Damned board :)
-
who's chuck?
-
Perk the woodchuck!!! The FM is obviously flawed!
-
Personally I think we already have all the answers, we just haven't got the questions right.
:cool:
-
Is there a wood shortage? Why are we worried about exactly how much wood he could chuck? Just relax people. He's a small animal. Just send him to Canada. There's lots of wood around. Then hire Jane Goodall to follow the little furry bastard around. After awhile, we'll know.
-
i did not sleep with anywood chucks in this lifetime...its all lies...whats your definition of woodchuck...:D