Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Hortlund on March 12, 2003, 07:55:05 AM
-
Here's what I'm interested in seeing a vote on. I don't care how much you want to qualify your yes/no answer, but please put the yes/no up front.
In your opinion, is Iraq in violation of the 1991 cease fire agreement?
Yes.
[edit]
-I'm really serious.
I am interested in seeing what the opinion is on this BB. There is a similar thread on another BB I visit, and there the vote count right now is yes-no 20-0. I would like to know if it is similar here.
This is not an attempt to draw out anti war types and flame them...there are something like 700 such threads to chose from...so no flames in here please.
-
I know its a red herring to draw the anti-wars out....anyway, this fact is indisputable.
-
YEP
Karaya2
-
Irak is no threat to Amreeka, its plane redickulus!
-
yup
-
Yes
-
Undeniably, yes.
-
Yes.
Seriously though, it's in black and white. It isn't open to interpretation. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind any no votes, if there are any.
-
NO!!!!:mad:
-
Yes, was about to comment that the fishing looked a little slo, then ya hooked one. ;)
-
Yes. All Your Bases Are Belong To Us!
-
Originally posted by SLO
NO!!!!:mad:
Wrong answer SLO. They have not complied..even your UN buddies agree. You are answering a different question...such as "Do you think this is justification for war?"
Hope you can get that "hook" out..careful it has a barbed end.
-
YES !!! I want cheap oil.
-
Originally posted by fffreeze220
YES !!! I want cheap oil.
No cheap oil for you, 100 years!
-
YES
-
yes or no ???
that is not politically correct these days sorry ... need a third choice ... "sorta", "kinda", "maybe", "depends"
-
Yes.
-
Originally posted by Hortlund
In your opinion, is Iraq in violation of the 1991 cease fire agreement?
Yes.
No longer- they were in violation up to last week, but after destroying their missles they are no longer in violation of any UN resolutions.
-
No longer- they were in violation up to last week, but after destroying their missles they are no longer in violation of any UN resolutions.
bahaahaahahahahahahahaaahaa!
-
Originally posted by Airhead
No longer- they were in violation up to last week, but after destroying their missles they are no longer in violation of any UN resolutions.
Hehe good one Elf.
Can we maybe agree (to sidestep your little troll here) that they are in violation of the cease fire agreement at least until they have destroyed all those missiles?
-
Do you see Iraqi troops in Kuwait City?.. I don’t
Maybe their hiding in a hole
Maybe their hiding up a pole
maybe their hiding at the bar
maybe their hiding in the car
No matter where they look there ain’t no Iraqis in Kuwoot.
-
Originally posted by Hortlund
I don't care how much you want to qualify your yes/no answer, but please put the yes/no up front.
-
Yes, they sure are.
Ummm 10Bears, your trying to change the debate again. The Cease fire agreement (agreed to by Baghdad) had a lot more to do than simply remove Iraqi soliders from Kuwait. Go read it.
-
maybe, maybe not.
-
Originally posted by AKIron
No cheap oil for you, 100 years!
I allready suffer enough from expensive oil.
this is € per 1 Liter ( 4 Liter ~ 1 gallon )
-
Yessiree Bob. Ya dang betcha!:D
-
Yes.
Maybe their hiding in a hole
Maybe their hiding up a pole
maybe their hiding at the bar
maybe their hiding in the car
"They're" not "their"...just sayin
:)
-
Yes.
-
YES
-
You bet!
-
Yes.
-
yes/no who was that again ? Iran ?
ahhh sorry it was hærjedalen og jamtland ? yeeeeesssss
Seriously I have not a clue im diveded in two meanings here, and having big problems with that.
-
yes
and i do think it will be easier to invade than POLAND...
-
Duh!, Yup!, Uh Huh!, Roger!, Affirmitive!
-
Yes, most likely. The relavance of it to threat to US is a different issue though...
Vermillion: The Cease fire agreement (agreed to by Baghdad) had a lot more to do than simply remove Iraqi soliders from Kuwait. Go read it.
Care to provide a link? I'd really like to browse it.
miko
-
UNSC Resolution 687
You can find it at UN.org click on documents and maps, then resolutions then 1991
-
Yup
-
Thanks Hortlund, interesting reading. Here's the link:
http://ods-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/596/23/IMG/NR059623.pdf?OpenElement
argh - link doesn't work
-
yep
-
YES
-
http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/15016.htm
3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such asunmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such weapons, components, sub-components, stocks of agents, and related material and equipment, the locations and work of its research, development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to weapon production or material;
Iraq's show off Unmanned aircraft.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm.../170/3hrte.html
-
Re: "One simple yes/no question."
Answer: yes/no
:D
-
NO!
Absolutely not.
-
America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain ridiculous
Regards Blitz
Sorry, can't spell the other two you asked for :D
-
baliff!! whack his pee-pee!!
-
yes
-
.......no wait
-
what was the question again?
-
:confused:
-
I forgot the choices?
My dogs breath smells like dog food.
-
Yes
-
YES
-
.....MAYBE!!
-
Yes, as are the US & UK
-
You guys sound like a Clairol Herbal Essence commercial. "Yes...yes..yes.." Sheeesh, give Sadaam a break- he's really sorry this time.