Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Citabria on January 10, 2002, 07:35:00 AM
-
it rules
I want one
I want one now
mememememememe
b17: bah old sincebeta hate it ugly, barf
lanc: british, no guns cept for tail
tbm: 30 cal eats tail go boom bah suck
ju88: lol whatever
b26: not nuff bombs
il2: see b26, no bombsight
b24: purty
b24: lots of bombs
b24: lots of guns
b24: mean and ugly
b24: american (america rules)
-
No. :D
-
yes!
-
B24, Yes.
Remember that German Ace, Heinz Knoeke mentioned that they burned so easily, much easier than B17, with a bright flame!!! :D
-
B24 Rules!
-
b24 adds no new capability or fills any gap in the current planeset. There are other aircraft imho that should be added before another 4 eng fluffer is added no matter what the country but especially not a allied 4 eng fluff.
b25 maybe
What is their in the main that requires a 4 eng buff now. They are nothing but "novelties" a b26 / ju88 or any jabo can do what the 4 eng buffs can and do it better.
Maybe if 1.09 delivers a new buff model it may make sense.
We need a b24 like a p47 needs more dts........
-
b24 rules!
-
b25!!! b25!!!! b25H w/ 75mm in the nose!!! :D I Neeeeed this bird!!!!
b25H
b25H!!!
-
I will use the b24 in the MA.
I will not use:
ju88
tbm
ki67
b26
therefore the b24 brings me a new buff i will use in the MA.
-
Howabout He-177 ?
-
HTC don't be lured by this new capability crap.
and trust me the b24 will be used MUCH MORE than the:
c202
ju88
tbm
ta152
fw190f8
ki67
il2
ki61
because it is a big truck with teeth. not a fancy gadget toy that sits in the hangar and gets rubbed with a diaper.
-
Originally posted by Staga:
Howabout He-177 ?
1.its not american
2. its a german gadget toy
[ 01-10-2002: Message edited by: Citabria ]
-
Well, that tears it then. If Citabria won't use them, might as well pull them off the menu. ;)
-
A-26!!!
-
Bring the B-24! :D
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
I would like to see HE-177 and maybe the b24 in AH
-
There are only two types of planes.
Fw 190's, and targets.
-
B-29A and H8K2 are the only 4 engined buffs that make any real sense to me.
The Tupolev Tu-2S would see more action than the B-24 I bet.
-
b24 makes more sense than that jap boat and monster perk buff
-
Originally posted by Udie:
b25!!! b25!!!! b25H w/ 75mm in the nose!!! :D I Neeeeed this bird!!!!
b25H
b25H!!!
YES! That was the only bomber I flew in WarBirds.
-SW
-
I totaly agree fester..
Nothing gets my mouth watering like seeing a lancaster.. damn so tasty. In some cases i almost feal like appoligizing to a lancaster that i shoot down above 20k, but afterall its his fault for flying the flying corpse that high and wasting his time.
Maybe the lancaster will be worth a damn if/when they get the 3 AI pilots, and maybe a few different bomb load outs.
i would be content with a b24 or even better a b29.
-
Nope...don't want to see B-24 in AH right now...maybe after about...say...twenty planes...
KI-67 and TU-2S are easily the best choises for new buffs to AH right now and I'm glad Pyro thinks so too.
-------------------
1Wmaker1
(http://koti.mbnet.fi/~paulusk/Lelv34.jpg)
-
Ki67
Tu2
He177
H8K
D4Y
D3A
Pe8
Ju188
SM79
P1008
B25 (in VVS markings)
then maybe a B24
-
Originally posted by Wmaker:
Nope...don't want to see B-24 in AH right now...maybe after about...say...twenty planes...
Oh, fine. How about a PB4Y then?
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
I would like to see:
for the CT and for scenarios:
P-40
SBD Dauntless
Judy
Jill
Oscar
Nick
Stuka
PBY
Ju-52
Yak-3
F-4f Wildcat
He-111
Me-110
for the MA:
bomber version of the Mosquito
Me-163, (perked of course)
B-29
A-26
B-25 with 75mm gun
Ki-84 Frank
various other vehicles that I would like to see:
T-34 tank
Sherman tank
King Tiger Tank
Jeep with .50 cal MG
Glider that can carry the jeep and be towed behind the C-47
Submarines
Infantry
-
I want one of those Viking boats. You know...single sail job with a bunch of slaves to slap around while they row you along when there's no wind. You could even have big spears to chuck at the SQUID!! I'm certain they'd see more action than PT boats.
Tumor
-
...see...more...action...than ...PT...boats...
What sim do you play? I see PT's all the time...
hehe
[ 01-10-2002: Message edited by: Kieran ]
-
Originally posted by Dead Man Flying:
[/qb]Oh, fine. How about a PB4Y then?
Well, when the time comes I'd rather see a Liberator than a Privateer. US plane set currently has 3 bombers and it needs forth? I think it's great that HTC is adding bombers (good bombers) to the nations in AH that don't have one yet.
As to my personal preference I'd like to see either Ju-188A-1 or He-177A-5. If and when AH planetset starts going back in time there will be some real nice bombers to add like Bristol Blenheim and Do-17Z. :)
--------------------
1Wmaker1
(http://koti.mbnet.fi/~paulusk/Lelv34.jpg)
-
Originally posted by Wmaker:
Well, when the time comes I'd rather see a Liberator than a Privateer. US plane set currently has 3 bombers and it needs forth? I think it's great that HTC is adding bombers (good bombers) to the nations in AH that don't have one yet.
I was thinking more along the lines of the PB4Y-1, not the PB4Y-2. :)
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
What we need is a fast low level bomber capable of closing a small airfield. B25!!! with the solid nose. 8 50 cals in nose, rockets, and parafrags.
-
Before any aircraft are added, I'd like to see the effects of weather. This would add to the realism.
Cold weather: icing the carbs, freezing up the flaps, the skin of the plane becoming more fragile as outside temp drops...ect...ect.
Warm weather: increasing your take-off distance (with thought given to wind direction and speed), changing the best-rate-of-climb speed for an aircraft, pilot behavior after a pilot wound...ect...ect.
Rain, sleet, snow, hail
And what about weapon performance and visibility?
One radio channel could be used for weather briefings.
Just a thought.