Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Ripsnort on March 31, 2003, 01:32:10 PM
-
This has just GOT to piss Weazel off ;)
Bush's overall job approval rating is at 71%, about the same as it has been since the war began. The current rating is 13 points higher than the pre-war rating measured on March 14-15, reflecting the usual "rally effect" that accompanies challenges to the United States on foreign shores. Bush's father received job approval ratings in the low 80% range in 1991 when the first Persian Gulf War began. The current president received a job approval rating of 90% in September 2001 -- the highest in Gallup Poll history.
-
Anything that might piss Weazel off is worth a punt to me, keeping this on page one for a while. :D
-
gotta' wonder if that 'poll' is really representative or not...
-
Based on people I know, I would say 71% is a very low figure.
-
Originally posted by Wlfgng
gotta' wonder if that 'poll' is really representative or not...
Thats worthy of a discussion in itself! I think they can be quite misleading, and said that during the Clinton administration as well.
-
Originally posted by Wlfgng
gotta' wonder if that 'poll' is really representative or not...
Considering that Gallup lives or dies by making sure their polls are representative, I would think so. Here's some more information on this particular poll in case you were actually interested in in.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr030325.asp
[edit] This poll was from the 25th, Rip might be talking about something more recent.
[/edit]
I'm wondering when the latest Zogby will be available?
-Sik
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Thats worthy of a discussion in itself! I think they can be quite misleading, and said that during the Clinton administration as well.
That is interesting indeed. I posted the Gallup results from the 25th or March in my reply above. But now look at the Zogby results from the same day.
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=691
[edit] I think i found it. Zogby offers peopel four options: Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor. Excellent and Good are "favorable" and fair/poor are "unfavorable"
Gallup only gives two options: approve/dissaprove.
It looks like people are more comfortable saying that hte president is doing a "fair" job, than they are of dissaproving of him.
Pretty cool stuff.
[/edit]
-Sik
-
(http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/MyHTML3.gif)
(http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/MyHTML1.gif)
Related stuff here (http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/).
-
http://www.gallup.com/poll/specialReports/pollSummaries/sr030224.asp
-
i like that little chart of the doward slope. looks alot like his fathers.
-
punt
-
Makes perfect sense to me. I don't know anyone that does not support the troops and the majority of those think that supporting the President is the same thing.
Once the troops are on the field, the Prez get's a jump in his approval.
-
Bush Sr.'s approval rating during Desert Storm was 91%.
-
without wars or terrorist attacks both the bush's approval rateings plumet
-
bush will not survive the next election.
just my lil prediction.
-
Originally posted by Frogm4n
without wars or terrorist attacks both the bush's approval rateings plumet
As does the approval rating of just about any president. The mean approval rating for presidents over time stands at about 54%. Typically approval does not begin at that level, however, and when you consider that the average approval rating for presidents entering office hovers at around 70%, from a statistical perspective there's an over-time stochastic push downward on approval ratings irrespective of actual events. In other words, there's not a lot of room to go above 70%, but there's a lot of room to go below it. The natural process of equilibration tends to push high numbers toward the mean in the middle.
For that reason, so long as approval ratings stand above about 54%, you'll see that downward trend like Bush Sr. suffered. You didn't actually expect to see an upward trend from his 91% approval, did you? By the same token, approval ratings below the mean level tend to push upward toward the equilibrium over time.
Wars and terrorist attacks may offer a temporary boost to approval, but time and again we see that this boost decays back to standard levels after awhile.
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
Thats 20% too close to country separation...
-
Originally posted by Dead Man Flying
Wars and terrorist attacks may offer a temporary boost to approval, but time and again we see that this boost decays back to standard levels after awhile.
-- Todd/Leviathn
What the hell do you know Todd? Everyone knows that only external reasons allow approval to go up, while approval goes down because political capitol is "squandered"
You're going to have to educate yourself if you want to take part in these types of discussions.
-Sik
-
very few presidents managed to have a high approval rateing during peacetime, but to go from a 90 pecent to losing a election in what 1 year? that is just poor management on the home front comming back to haunt you.
-
Originally posted by Frogm4n
very few presidents managed to have a high approval rateing during peacetime, but to go from a 90 pecent to losing a election in what 1 year? that is just poor management on the home front comming back to haunt you.
It's the economy, Stupid.
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
punt
-
Iraqi gallup polls still shows Saddam approval rates at over 100 %:p
-
All that "public opinion polls" hav one and only purpose: to manipulate public opinion. Something like a positive feedback. Very effective, BTW.
Ineresting to see that manipulation technologies at work.
-
Originally posted by Boroda
All that "public opinion polls" hav one and only purpose: to manipulate public opinion. Something like a positive feedback. Very effective, BTW.
Ineresting to see that manipulation technologies at work.
Yes. People offering their position in an anonymous poll manipulates public opinion.
wake up.
-
Originally posted by Boroda
All that "public opinion polls" hav one and only purpose: to manipulate public opinion. Something like a positive feedback. Very effective, BTW.
[/B]
LOL! Wrong as usual. Check out The Macro Polity by Erikson, MacKuen, and Stimson. In it, they analyze over 50 years of polls from dozens of organizations (resulting in hundreds of thousands of observations) and find that, after some initial delay, public policy closely follows aggregate public opinion.
Meaning, in other words that your arrow of causality goes in the wrong direction. As public opinion on issues shifts from liberal to conservative or vice-versa, public policy tends to match the shift after a brief pause that may be explained as legislators and bureaucrats gauging public opinion and implementing policy change accordingly.
Ineresting to see that manipulation technologies at work.
That you would even begin to argue that Gallup represents a "manipulation technology" indicates your complete ignorance of American society.
-- Todd/Leviathn
-
Originally posted by Boroda
All that "public opinion polls" hav one and only purpose: to manipulate public opinion. Something like a positive feedback. Very effective, BTW.
Ineresting to see that manipulation technologies at work.
I'm sure you could go out there in US to make your own poll and get same kind of results as these several news networks whos been doing the polls.
Not surprising at all or unexpected.
However, propaganda sure does exist... I'm already tired of the freedom waahwaah and it always amazes me how the crowd cheers while Bush talks his freedom waahwaah free iraqi people waahwaah...
yeah right, thats his main goal... NOT.
A Republican using money solely to free oppressed people? no way in hell!
-
the fat lady on cnn says that bush's approval rating is "only[/i] 70%"
is she letting her personal feelings intrude on unbiased reporting?
-
Just waving the crucifix to keep Weazel away. Seems to be working. ;)
-
Weazel is banned, Iron.
If he were here, I imagine he might say that a 71% approval rating during war time is not exactly something to brag about. ;)
-
Ineresting to see that manipulation technologies at work.
on all sides...