Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: NUKE on April 08, 2003, 08:44:03 PM

Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: NUKE on April 08, 2003, 08:44:03 PM
A fair and objective website (thanks for the link Sandman). The trick is to find one article that portrays Iraq as being guilty of anything.  

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/lawindex.htm

International Humanitarian Law Issues in a Potential War in Iraq (February 20, 2003)

2003
One Rule for Them (March 25, 2003)
Washington complains that displaying captured US soldiers on Iraqi TV breaches the Geneva Conventions....

Law Groups Say US Invasion Illegal (March 21, 2003)

Tearing Up the Rules: The Illegality of Invading Iraq (March 2003)

As Attack on Iraq Begins, Question Remains: Is It Legal? (March 21, 2003)
itor)

Sorry, Mr Blair, but 1441 Does Not Authorise Force (March 17, 2003)

Law Unto Themselves (March 14, 2003)
It is the near-unanimous view of international lawyers.... ( LOL)

Are Bush and Blair Breaking the Law? (February 25, 2003)

Bush and Blair Must See that Law Has a Life of its Own (February 23, 2003)

Lawyers, Doctors Warn UN Over US Attack on Iraq (February 12, 2003)

US Prepared to Violate International Law (February 1, 2003)

Before the War (February 2003)

Lawyers Grapple With Attack on Iraq (January 31, 2003)

America's Dangerous New Style of War (January 29, 2003)

US Lawyers Warn Bush on War Crimes (January 28, 2003)

Iraqi Minister: US Violates International Law (January 4, 2003)
2002

Iraqis' Suffering Can Be Made Worse (December 27, 2002)

CND Asks High Court to Outlaw War on Iraq (December 9, 2002)

Lawyers Statement on UN Resolution 1441 on Iraq (December 5, 2002)

Material Breach: US Crimes in Iraq (December 1, 2002)

Legal Opinion: In the Matter of the Potential Use of Armed Force by the UK Against Iraq (November 2002)

See You In Court (November 25, 2002)

Bombing Dual-Use Targets? (November 12, 2002)

Avoiding War: Using International Law to Compel a Problem-Solving Approach (November 5, 2002)

Letter to the Members of the Security Council (October 2, 2002)
(LAW) outlines the illegality of a war against Iraq.

The United Nations Charter and the Use of Force Against Iraq (October 2, 2002)

The Use of Force by the United States Against Iraq: Legal Issues (September 30, 2002)

Iraq and the “Bush Doctrine of Pre-Emptive of Self-Defense” (August 20, 2002)

The Logic of Empire (August 6, 2002)

Invading Iraq Would Violate US and International Law (2002)

Bombing Dual-Use Targets: Legal, Ethical, and Doctrinal Perspectives (May 1, 2001)
Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: Bodhi on April 08, 2003, 11:08:46 PM
More Liberal Spew....  

Cripes, makes me sick to think these people have 7 years of "higher" education.....      :rolleyes:
Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: Rasker on April 09, 2003, 01:30:06 AM
yeah, I don't wonder why the U.S. doesnt accept unrestricted jurisdiction of the World Court.  As soon as we do that, guess who's going to be dragged in there all the time for one reason or another, while all the world's Saddam's do their thing undisturbed.
Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: StSanta on April 09, 2003, 06:54:42 AM
Kill them all. And then loot their dead corpses.

That is what my ancestors are telling me; they gotta be right, coz they had swords and stuff.
Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: Toad on April 09, 2003, 07:26:54 AM
No, Santa. Your ancestors didn't kill them all. Think about it.

There's a few you want to take home with you. Now I'd expect YOUR longboat to be full of male captives.......

but MY longboat would be like those sailing cruises in the Carribean with an all female crew.  :D
Title: Who's the bad guy again?
Post by: Dowding on April 09, 2003, 07:35:55 AM
I thought your ancestors consisted of a thoroughbred Danish racing goat and the notorious hunch-backed pervert of dubious sexuality and all round wrong 'un, Marquis de Saanta? :D