Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Lephturn on June 19, 2000, 09:32:00 AM

Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Lephturn on June 19, 2000, 09:32:00 AM
Thought some of you might like to check out this article I found.

 http://www.thehistorynet.com/MilitaryHistory/articles/0896_text.htm (http://www.thehistorynet.com/MilitaryHistory/articles/0896_text.htm)

My favorite part is this:

"When I was badly shot up on June 26, 1943 (see sidebar, P. 28), I had 21 20mm cannon shells in that airplane, and more than 200 7.92mm machine-gun bullets. One nicked my nose and another entered my right leg, where the bullet split in half. I still have those two little pieces, by the way; they went in just under the skin. I had been hurt worse playing football and boxing. However, I had never been that scared, I'll tell you that. I was always scared--that was what made me move quick."

I can't wait for a BnZ plane that has 8 fifties and can handle 20 cannon shells without going down.   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)  Jugs rule!

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs
Visit Lephturn's Aerodrome for AH news, resources, and training data.
 http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/ (http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/)
 (http://tuweb.ucis.dal.ca/~dconrad/ahf/lepht.gif)

"MY P-47 is a pretty good ship
And she took a round coming 'cross the Channel last trip
I was thinking 'bout my baby and lettin' her rip
Always got me through so far
Well they can ship me all over this great big world
But I'll never find nothing like my North End girl
I'm taking her home with me one day, sir
Soon as we win this war"
 - Steve Earl

[This message has been edited by Lephturn (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Ripsnort on June 19, 2000, 09:36:00 AM
Yes, yes! Bring the Jug!

Hey Leph, can you address the 'V-Sync' on or off issue in a post in this forum?  Thanks! http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum8/HTML/000544.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum8/HTML/000544.html)

------------------
Ripsnort(-rip1-)
~GeschwaderKommodore~I./JG2~Richthofen~[/i]
CLICK>> JG2 INFORMATION (http://Ripsnort60.tripod.com/JG2inquirer.html)
Panzer Group Afrika~15th Panzer Division~[/i]
 (http://saintaw.tripod.com/ripsnort.jpg)
I spare no class or cult or  creed,
My course is endless through the year.
I bow all heads and break all hearts,
All owe homage-I am Fear.

-------------General Patton

[This message has been edited by Ripsnort (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Saintaw on June 19, 2000, 09:37:00 AM
Yes Bring the Jug !


------------------
SAW/Saintaw
=XO=II/JG2~Richthofen~
GMT T.O.D. SITE (http://www.wardogs.org/ah/)
 (http://saintaw.tripod.com/sawp47.gif)
"It's supposed to be hard; that's what makes it great!"
Tom Hanks, A League of Their Own

.squelch creamo

[This message has been edited by Saintaw (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 19, 2000, 09:45:00 AM
I can't think of any reason the Jug would take significantly more damage than the similarly-sized F4U.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: juzz on June 19, 2000, 10:16:00 AM
It has a Mythical Aura that gives it +10 toughness vs bullets.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

[This message has been edited by juzz (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: -ammo- on June 19, 2000, 10:22:00 AM
No doubt about it!  AH needs the P-47D!


  (http://ww2.esn.net/~saved4sure/AMMO.jpg)  

[This message has been edited by -ammo- (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: fdiron on June 19, 2000, 11:02:00 AM
Air Force conducted a study after WW2 and found F4U was tougher than P47
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Lephturn on June 19, 2000, 11:07:00 AM
I'd be interested to see the details of that study.

It's not overly surprising however.  The Hog used the same engine, but I don't think it had the same super-charging system.  The Hog was also a carrier plane, so it had strengthened members in some places to withstand carrier ops.

Ok, now make the AH F4U able to withstand 20 cannon rounds. ;-)  Only the D model though. <G>

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs
Visit Lephturn's Aerodrome for AH news, resources, and training data.
 http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/ (http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/)
(http://tuweb.ucis.dal.ca/~dconrad/ahf/lepht.gif)

"MY P-47 is a pretty good ship
And she took a round coming 'cross the Channel last trip
I was thinking 'bout my baby and lettin' her rip
Always got me through so far
Well they can ship me all over this great big world
But I'll never find nothing like my North End girl
I'm taking her home with me one day, sir
Soon as we win this war"
 - Steve Earl
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Kats on June 19, 2000, 11:23:00 AM
 
Quote
I had 21 20mm cannon shells in that airplane,
                         and more than 200 7.92mm machine-gun bullets

That fellow had very good luck.


There are many cases where a human had taken a round to the head and survived. Would you consider that normal?
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 19, 2000, 11:25:00 AM
Good point Kats.  One 20mm round in the wrong place, and any plane ever built is going down.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: gatt on June 19, 2000, 11:27:00 AM

I agree Leph,
this sim needs a P-47D. But dont forget the Dora  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Wardog on June 19, 2000, 11:31:00 AM
Yes,but can a f4u fly and land with a telephone pole lodged into the wing root.

I think not,the structure of the p47 in not the same as the f4u. Funked of all people should know this.

Ill post the pic of the p47 that landed safely with the pole lodge in the wing as soon as i can find it.


Dog out.......
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: SFRT - Frenchy on June 19, 2000, 11:42:00 AM
about the telephone poles : http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/003909.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/Forum1/HTML/003909.html)

hehehe. Hey looks like this thing can turn too. In the URL above I asked for you guys to give their point of view about 'like which AH plane the P47 should turn' but none answered. Then, LW pilots, don't come whining "it's not right" when I will shot you down in a turnfight    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

Anyway, bring the P47D with gabriesky markings and we will flame each others with WW2 druk pilot reports and loosy trusty officials reports later   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

P47D is coming and if recall good, Pyro said: "the 56th will not be left over" hehehehe Gabby was 56th    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

------------------
Olivier "Frenchy" Raunier
    (http://home.cfl.rr.com/rauns/gabby.gif)     http://home.cfl.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm (http://home.cfl.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm)



[This message has been edited by SFRT - Frenchy (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Graywolf on June 19, 2000, 11:57:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Saintaw:
Yes Bring the Jug !


Yeah, bring it on. With my gunnery skills I need some bigger targets =)

------------------
---
Graywolfe <tim@flibble.org>
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Vermillion on June 19, 2000, 11:57:00 AM
I definitely agree that we need a P-47.

But I think we should have the M or N, given the type of arena we have.

And don't put out the old smoke screen of "not enough made" (1,500 N models alone saw combat), or that they "never really saw combat", because its not true and its easy to prove, just look in chronological history of AHT alone.

Bring on the P-47N !

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
"Real Men fly Radials, Nancy Boys fly Spitfires"
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Gorf on June 19, 2000, 12:04:00 PM
Vermillion,

You are correct on the P47Ns.  There was a considerable sum of them that did see service in WWII, the P47Ns were in route to the Euro theatre but the war ended before they got there so they were routed to the Pacific.  I will check when I get home tonight but, I believe it was the P47N that had the last air to air kill of a Japanese aircraft before the end of the war.  I have a Bio on that P47N pilot.  Will post it later tonight.  

LONG LIVE the P47.

Gorf
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Daff on June 19, 2000, 12:26:00 PM
The P-47D-25 or D-30 would be a much representaive of the P-47 than the uber M or N...even better would be a P-47D-22 Razorback  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

Daff

------------------
CO, 56th Fighter Group
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: NATEDOG on June 19, 2000, 12:35:00 PM
You guys need to learn to lobby better.  http://www.internetwines.com (http://www.internetwines.com)

 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

------------------
Nathan "NATEDOG" Mathieu
Art Director
HiTech Creations
-=HELLFIRE SQUAD=-

".... And on the eighth day, God created beer. "
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Sharky on June 19, 2000, 01:26:00 PM
Lephturn,

I really hate that story when it comes to the P-47 in online sims.  The problem with it is that people think that being able to absorb that kind of damage was the norm as opposed to being a very lucky pilot.  The Jug was indeed a very rugged airplane, but was not exceedingly more difficult to shoot down than any other U.S. airplane.

Every time a jug pilot in an online sim gets his bellybutton shot off, he mentions that story as to how it should be impossible to shoot down a Jug with less than 50 direct hits from 20mm cannon.  I love the Jug and hope it makes it's appearance in AH very soon, but I don't expect it to be a tank.  I would much rather see it perform more prototypically than the Jug in the "other" sim.

Sharky

------------------
Playboy Leader
307th FS/31st FG
You can run but ya just die tired
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Vermillion on June 19, 2000, 01:27:00 PM
Daff, we have an late war uber arena, so why not have the uber P-47??

I don't understand the reasoning. How are 1,500 P-47N's any less "representative" than 150 F4U-1C's, around 400 N1K2-J's, a couple of hundred C.205's, around 700 Bf109K4's (our G10 is really a K4, I'm not sure of actual G10 production), or even the 700 or so Fw190D9's (which I'm sure will show up here eventually).

Nate, effective lobbying??  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif) So tell me where you guys at HTC got the idea of that particular internet liquor and wine sales shop from? Umm... let me guess, from a certain bottle of Crown Royal that showed up at the door one day? Damn, talk about creating a monster  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif) LOL!!

------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
"Real Men fly Radials, Nancy Boys fly Spitfires"
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: easymo on June 19, 2000, 01:31:00 PM
 Nate. I suspect a relationship between that website. And my wings falling off at 250 IAS.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Daff on June 19, 2000, 02:05:00 PM
Vermillion,

First, I think that modelling the F4U-1C was just silly..I would have thought they had learned that lesson  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif).
As for the Macchi's, it was an easy way of grabbing a stack of the italian players from WB, the N12K, heck I dont know, maybe to have a reasonable competetive Japanese Aircraft?.
 As why the P-47D is a more representative than the N (And M), is that it was the work horse of the USAAF. By the time the N went into action, it was all but over.
Sure, it would be nice with an uber-P-47, (although the P-47N climbs just as bad as the early D's and Cs), but I'd much rather have a better historical representation of the P-47 actually flown in WW2...then again..."historical" doesnt really seems to be the issue in AH (Or in WB for that matter)

Daff

------------------
CO, 56th Fighter Group
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Yeager on June 19, 2000, 02:18:00 PM
I want everything.

Yeager
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 19, 2000, 02:22:00 PM
Once you model an M, it's pretty easy to do a D.  Do an M in 56th colors, then do a D in Jambock colors.   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: SFRT - Frenchy on June 19, 2000, 02:38:00 PM
Hum, you guys make me worried, let me put my monk suit...

BROTHERS!!! The dark side is getting on you. Don't fly the p47 because you think it's toughter than anything. Don't fly the P47 because u think u can outdive everybody. Don't fly the P47 because it has 8 .50s.

This is wrong, it's like driving a Ferrari because it's a girl magnet...no no no, a Ferrari is more than that, it's the shape, the vibrations, the presice gear box... hum hum... back to the P47.

Clear your saoul, fly the P47 because you feel something when u fly... because of the huge prop, the big radial, the intimidating shape, the invasions stripes, the red nose... Fly it because you respect it, because inside of you u are in love with it... Then only the beast will recognize it's master and go the extra mile to an efficient flying and a safe RTB.

Amen...

------------------
Olivier "Frenchy" Raunier
   (http://home.cfl.rr.com/rauns/gabby.gif)  

 http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm (http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm)



[This message has been edited by SFRT - Frenchy (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Karnak on June 19, 2000, 02:39:00 PM
I say D.

HTC hasn't yet modeled an aircraft that only saw service in 1945.  The P-47N would be a good candidate for one of the "bonus" aircraft along with the likes of the Ta152, Spitfire Mk F.21 and J7W1 Shiden.

Sisu
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: BlackHammer on June 19, 2000, 02:49:00 PM
the jug was rugged when it came to *ground fire*, which came from below and hit the underbelly of the plane.  and for non-explosive rounds much of the KE was lost on the way up.  with the exceptions of low 6 surprise attacks and head on's, air-to-air fire generally strikes the from the top down or from the rear of the plane.  despite it's rep the p47 was actually below average for a US plane for shells striking in this fasion.

Black Hammer
The Lead Enemas


[This message has been edited by BlackHammer (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: gatt on June 19, 2000, 03:28:00 PM
Guys, guys ...

Vermillion,
the C.205V is not an uber plane. It is a decent medium-low alt 1943 fighter. Only 260 have been built? For a little military power like Italy these are even good numbers when factories are bombed by USAF.  

Daff,
no it is only iEN stupidity not to have modeled an italian fighter yet. It is only iEN stupidity to have lost the oustanding LEM's C.205 3D model (designed for WB3).

Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: snafu on June 19, 2000, 03:44:00 PM
While we are on the subject of the "Jug" I was amazed by a TV program earlir this month.

There was an article on the "Discovery Wings" channel about a month ago full of people saying how the owe thier life to the "JUG" one guy recounted an attack on a train thought to be carrying supplies. As he lined it up the sides of the boxcar's came down and he was met by a row of 20mm cannon's. He destroyed at least 1 carraige but in his own words took several head on hits and the engine sounded like "A bag of spanners". Anyway he got back to base showing a respectable boost etc but after landing it was found 2 complete cylinders were missing and the broken ends of the Con Rod's were flapping around in the breeze.

Well I was impressed anyway!

Just thought you might like to know that  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif) Still got the Video as well.

TTFN
snafu
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Thunder on June 19, 2000, 03:55:00 PM
Yeager,
And we want it NOW!    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

CLICK HERE (http://www.hitechcreations.com/pyro/lol.wav)

   (http://www.geocities.com/tas13th/bbsfile/thunder.jpg)    




[This message has been edited by Thunder (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: -ammo- on June 19, 2000, 04:22:00 PM
Hey there are several of the 56th still alive, including Gabreski. As a matter of fact, a friend of mine was fortunate enough to be entertained by them last week and I am fortunated enough to get a signed Photo of one of them. Good to have friends (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

 (http://ww2.esn.net/~saved4sure/P47.jpg)
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Vermillion on June 19, 2000, 04:35:00 PM
Daff, we certainly agree on one thing  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif) the sillyness of the F4U-1C. Personally I don't mind it (think its an easy kill), but it did bring alot of ill will into the arena.

Now, I too care about "historical" as I am intensely interested in Scenarios (My work in Aces High player run "Jokers Low" scenario team in a good indication  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif) ) . And for that I agree the "D" model is better. But Scenario's/Historical Setups are one thing, and our (admittedly) fantasy arena is quite another. I don't see a reason not to include the "N" in an arena thats filled with other planes that weren't historically significant.

My fear is that if a "D" model was produced first, the "N" would most likely never see the light of day, (mostly due to cries of "Uber Bird", even though it is not). But if you do a "N" first for arena play, its highly likely that we would see a "D" for scenario's and other historical events very quickly.

As too the "N"'s climb, you know thats not quite the whole story  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif) It climbs like a "D", due to all that added fuel capacity. Load it pound for pound with fuel similar to a "M" and I expect to see similar climb rates.

Karnak, not true. Both the F4U-1C and the N1K2-J are both primarily 1945 aircraft. The Cannon Corsair first entered combat during the Okinawa campaign (mid 45), while the N1K2 only had 7 prototypes as late as June 1944, and didn't really see appreciable combat until the Phillipines campaign.

And your comparing the P-47N (1,500 produced) to the J7W1 Shinden (2 prototypes),
the Ta152 (48 produced), and the Spit 21 (120 produced)??? Come on... roughly speaking there were as many P-47N's in combat as there were 190D9's (700) and Spit XIV's (957)combined! Two aircraft you have vocally advocated to be included in the game (and I would like to see them as well  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif) ).

Gatt, I never said that the C.205 was an uber plane. I said that it wasn't "representative". If I had to select a "historically representative" Italian aircraft I would be much more likely to choose the C.202 or C.200 which were both built in much larger numbers and participated in more campaigns and more battles. Of the 260 C.205's produced, only 177 were completed before the armistice, the rest being done while the factory was under German control.  But I do agree that the C.205 was the right choice for AH, no arguements there.

All well, enough rambling  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

I still want the "N" though, with a followup variant "D".  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)



------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
"Real Men fly Radials, Nancy Boys fly Spitfires"
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 19, 2000, 04:55:00 PM
Ammo, I'm going to meet Gabby this week at the WarBirds con.    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 06-19-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Karnak on June 19, 2000, 05:29:00 PM
Vermillion, there were about 1,500 P-47Ns produced, I highly doubt that even a full third of them saw action.  Nearly every Spitfire XIV and Fw190D-9 saw action.

You're of course correct about the numbers of the Spitfire Mk F.21, Ta152 and J7W1 Shiden (of those three, only the Ta152 saw any combat in WWII AFAIK) but they were exclusively built in 1945, as was the P-47N.  The Fw190D-9 entered production and service in 1944, the Spitfire MkXIV entered production in 1943 and full service in 1944, neither are really comparable to the P-47N in timeframe.  Even the N1K2 was in production in mid '44 (Even the 262 and Meteor were in service before it was, both in '44).  Just because a nation had the capability to ramp up massive production doesn't mean that it should get first dibs on aircraft.  If that were the case we'd have nothing but American and Russian aircraft (Well, the Spit, 109 and 190 would still make the cut).

Now I'm no Jug fan, so I don't know what kind of performance the N would have, but the guys here are talking up a storm about it wiping the floor with every other aircraft, and to me that says "use the P-47D".  The "its an uber-plane arena" arguement doesn't cut it with me as we RAF types are fly the Spit IX and the Tiffie which are '42 kites (This doesn't look like its going to change anytime soon).  I'm not very good and almost always get killed before I can even fire a shot (2 BnZing P-51s did that too me on Sunday), the P-47D will still be able to do that to my Spitfire IX (425mph to my 408mph).  I'd hate to see how easy the P-47N (I seem to recall somebody quoting 470mph or 480mph for it in an old thread) would have it in the current arena.

If my numbers are wrong and its about the same as the D, then why not just take the D and avoid crossing the '45 only line?

That's my line of reasoning anyway (If you can call it reasoning.   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif))

Sisu
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Daff on June 19, 2000, 06:36:00 PM
Sisu, the P-47 would never be an uber plane, no matter what model, at least not if the model in WB is any indication  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif).
 A M or N model, though, would be a more competetive arena plane....if I really wanted uber, I'd say model the XP-47J <G>.

Daff

------------------
CO, 56th Fighter Group
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Sorrow[S=A] on June 19, 2000, 06:56:00 PM
Lephturn that "21 20mm" number just sounds WRONG. There was a link to that story a few months ago and I SWEAR it was only 2 20mm hits and over 200 7.65mm holes (I believe they stopped counting after that point).

And looking at the 2 pictures on my hard drive confirms only 2 cannon strikes, clearly seen in the tail of the plane. Right at the tip of the tail you can see a large shredded hole and on the rear stabilizer you can see the jagged marks where a shell detonated inside peeling off the metal.

 Can you double check that rather unbelievable 21 cannon strike figure?
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: -ammo- on June 19, 2000, 07:15:00 PM
Funked--I know your goin (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)  I would love to go but funds are not there (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/frown.gif)

Its a shame however that I live 40 miles from the WB's Con location and cannot make it. I do plan on driving out to see OVmech and RATNP sometime this week. Will try to meet them at a waffle house or something (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

Have a good time and dont get in any trouble playin AH;0

 (http://ww2.esn.net/~saved4sure/AMMO.jpg)
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: SnakeEyes on June 19, 2000, 07:45:00 PM
At least 1800 Ns were actually produced... so it's certainly reasonable to expect that 1000 or so were delivered and saw frontline combat.

And that's more than the 700 or so Doras (god knows how many of these were destroyed before they were even delivered to combat operational units), the 950 Spit XIVs, the 450 N1K2s, or the 260 M.C 205Vs.  

The N is a perfectly legitamite Jug variant to model.... y'all need to quit your pissing and moaning.  Hell, I frankly wish that they modeled the M and *gave* you whiners something to moan about!

------------------
SnakeEyes
o-o-o-
=4th Fighter Group=
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Pyro on June 19, 2000, 10:04:00 PM
Well the next 2 scheduled planes are the Lanc and Ju 88.  Since we don't get overtime, maybe you guys could make some pledges to Natedog to persuade him to work to midnight and on weekends to get it done without effecting our schedule.  I hear he likes Crown Royal, Kahula, and Absolut, although not all at the same time.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

Or are you not real Jug fans?  Hehe.



------------------
Doug "Pyro" Balmos
HiTech Creations

Most plans are just inaccurate predictions.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Karnak on June 19, 2000, 11:11:00 PM
SnakeEyes, many P-47Ns were sent to Europe, but arrived to late to fly a single combat mission.  All of those would count as delivered, but no combat.

You did not actualy address any of my comments, nor were any of them "Whines", they were, rather, opinions.

The reason that I don't want the P-47N in AH is because it would break the "only built in '45" barrier and would introduce a plane capable of doing 460mph in level flight.  How would you like to face that monster in your 408mph '42 Spitfire?

Sisu
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: SFRT - Frenchy on June 19, 2000, 11:13:00 PM
For gabrieski's P47 I sure can do something for Nate. He asks, I may provide.

It's amazing all those things you can find in Florida's swamps.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: juzz on June 20, 2000, 12:34:00 AM
 
Quote
Once you model an M, it's pretty easy to do a D. Do an M in 56th colors, then do a D in Jambock colors.

P-47M - perk, in 56th colours.

P-47D - normal, in Brazilian colours.

Everybody's happy(except those who aren't).
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 20, 2000, 05:11:00 AM
Juzz I don't think the M should be perk.  I don't think any production plane that saw combat should be in that category, except for jets.  I'd like the perks to be "what if" planes, or planes that were not in combat before the end of the war.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Daff on June 20, 2000, 05:11:00 AM
"Can you double check that rather unbelievable 21 cannon strike figure?"

I can..and I got several pictures of the plane too..and it's confirmed by every single 56th FG book I have.

Daff

------------------
CO, 56th Fighter Group
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: juzz on June 20, 2000, 08:29:00 AM
funked, with your idea the arena would end up full of Spit 14, F4U-4, P-47M, Fw 190D-9/Ta 152H etc. Just like WarBirds I believe, until they went with the RPS?
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Soup Nazi on June 20, 2000, 08:36:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Daff:
Vermillion,

First, I think that modelling the F4U-1C was just silly..I would have thought they had learned that lesson    (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif).As for the Macchi's, it was an easy way of grabbing a stack of the italian players from WB, the N12K, heck I dont know, maybe to have a reasonable competetive Japanese Aircraft?.<snip>
Daff

How many times are you going to repeat this Daff?  You seem alittle obsessed with it. You really think that HTC went out of their way to design A/C to suck the competition away from WB's, don't you?  What's in the water over there in the UK?

No soup for you!



[This message has been edited by Soup Nazi (edited 06-20-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 20, 2000, 08:36:00 AM
Fine with me Juzz.  Put in a point-multiplier (based on aircraft usage statistics) to create incentives to fly the less popular (and likely less capable) planes.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Gorf on June 20, 2000, 10:55:00 AM
Vermillion,

Getting back with you on the P47N to get the last kill of the war.  Here is the info on the pilot and his plane, he did not get the last air kill but was part of the FS that did, he was the last fighter ace of WWII.

The P-47N-1 was flown by Lt. Oscar Perdomo
Lil Meaties’ MEAT CHOPPER was the name of the plane.
464th FS/507th FG, le Shima, August 1945

“Lt. Perdomo arrived with the 507th on le Shima in June 1945, and flew his first mission on 2 July.  There was little chance for the 507th to meet the Japanese in the air, especially after the atomic bombings, but on 13 August 38 507th P-47Ns encountered 50 Japanese aircraft over the Korean capital, and the chase began.  In the subsequent melee, Oscar Perdomo downed five aircraft in this P-47N, thus making him the last known fighter ace of World War2..”

SOURCE: cc Mustang and Thunderbolt Aces of the Pacific and CBI, Osprey Aircraft of the Aces Volume 26

Below is a scanned image of his P47N.
ENJOY
PS having problems getting a image to shop up HELP?  anyway go to link below to see his plane.

GORF http://www.geocities.com/sangfugal/p47/Perdlrg.JPG (http://www.geocities.com/sangfugal/p47/Perdlrg.JPG)
 

[This message has been edited by Gorf (edited 06-20-2000).]

[This message has been edited by Gorf (edited 06-20-2000).]
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: juzz on June 20, 2000, 11:09:00 AM
That would only work on those people who actually care about their score. The vast majority would still be found flying the 1945 stuff.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: funked on June 20, 2000, 01:22:00 PM
I'd rather have a complete 1945 plane set than a set with only a couple of planes from each era.
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: juzz on June 20, 2000, 01:37:00 PM
But what we have now is an incomplete 1944 set...
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Karnak on June 20, 2000, 01:40:00 PM
Right now we've got a 1944 planeset.  Why advance it to 1945?  There are many aircraft that can be added while remaining in the '44 time frame.  The P-47D-30, the J3M2 Raiden "Jack", the Fw190D-9, the Spitfire MkXIV and the Tupolev Tu-2S are all 1944 aircraft.  There is no need to start adding things like the Spitfire Mk F.21, Ta152H or P-47N.

Sisu
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Westy on June 20, 2000, 01:44:00 PM
Thanks Gorf!

-Westy
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Lephturn on June 20, 2000, 02:41:00 PM
Sorrow and others:

Of course, I don't expect an AH version of the Jug to take 20 cannon shells.  I was just posting an interesting story, though I'm sure we've all heard versions of it before.  There is some interesting stuff in the interview portion as well.  Looking at the rest of the story, it does appear as though 2 cannon shells is the number.  One outside the cockpit, and one in the tail, however I was just copying from the article.

I think the current F4U is likely close to how tough the 47 is likely to be, and it's fine IMHO.

I knew that quote would stir the pot, LOL.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)  How does that hook feel lodged in the corner of your mouth gents?   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

------------------
Lephturn - Chief Trainer
A member of The Flying Pigs
Visit Lephturn's Aerodrome for AH news, resources, and training data.
 http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/ (http://users.andara.com/~sconrad/)
(http://tuweb.ucis.dal.ca/~dconrad/ahf/lepht.gif)

"MY P-47 is a pretty good ship
And she took a round coming 'cross the Channel last trip
I was thinking 'bout my baby and lettin' her rip
Always got me through so far
Well they can ship me all over this great big world
But I'll never find nothing like my North End girl
I'm taking her home with me one day, sir
Soon as we win this war"
 - Steve Earl
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: SnakeEyes on June 26, 2000, 09:27:00 AM
Karnak, I'd be willing to bet that as many 47N's flew combat operational sorties in the Pacific as the total number of Doras built.

I've never heard that the N was sent to the ETO, but Daff could probably comment more authoritatively on that.  They certainly didn't go to the 8th AF, as the 8th only have one FG using the P47 at that time.  Having said that, I do know that approximately 160 P47Ms found their way to the ETO and that they *did* fly combat there with the 56th FG (which was the only 8th AF P47 group).

------------------
SnakeEyes
o-o-o-
=4th Fighter Group=
Title: Why I want the Jug in AH
Post by: Daff on June 26, 2000, 09:34:00 AM
No N's were used in the ETO, although I do believe a few FG's trained on them after VE-day.
All P-47M's produced went to the 56th FG (All 130 of them, not 160 :P). The 56th received them in Dec '44 and started operational flying in Jan '45. The M's scored a fair amount of kills, although the exact number is hard to find out, as the 56th for a while used both D's and M's on the same mission. I do know of at least 4 Me262's being shot down by M's.

Daff

------------------
CO, 56th Fighter Group
"This is Yardstick. Follow me"