Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: F1Bomber on October 10, 2003, 12:35:35 AM

Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 10, 2003, 12:35:35 AM
For example this picture

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/images/ah2ss/6.jpg)

Now Look close at the tail of the spitfire, what do you see? Yes its bumpmaping on the aircraft. The new aircraft in aces high 2 will have bumpmapping, increasing the quality and also look of the new aircraft. Just Imagin, having bullets holes with bump maping.

Do you think with the new Half Life 2 review of ATI and nvidia, cards with directX9 that hitech is having the same problem. Seeing that Half Life 2, engine uses directX9 and the best nvidia fx card only got around about 26fps in half life 2 benchmark, when the ati 9600 got about 42 fps and is half the price of nvidia best card. Just wondering if this is the same problem that hitech is facing in his development of aces high 2. That current fx nvidia cards cannot keep up with directx9 and as such, customers will have to upgrade there cards to ati 9600 or hitech has to use only directx8 for nvidia customers?

Even the requirements for aces high 2 have shifted from a 5200 nvidia card to a 9600 ati card from Hitech. This is what i read about when reading the forms on what card to get for aces high 2.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: ramzey on October 10, 2003, 02:11:39 AM
Dont worry about HT, he can handle with that:)
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: moot on October 10, 2003, 02:16:02 AM
looks more like higher texture resolution than bump mapping; the panel lines near the shadows should show the additional shade from the b.m.'s bevel effect, but I don't think I see any.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: gatt on October 10, 2003, 03:01:28 AM
After one year of development, it would be nice to take a look at more and better screenshots with some FSAA and AF on as well ...  :rolleyes:
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: BenDover on October 10, 2003, 06:46:56 AM
Ermm, last I heard hitech said AH2 would only need a a geforce 2.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: jonnyb on October 10, 2003, 08:06:44 AM
Ben, hitech's specs were listed as a geforce2 or similar and a p3 900 or similar.

F1Bomber, I don't see the bump-mapping, but rather high-res texturing.  Given the above benchmarking system, HTC cannot possibly be relying on dx9 functionality as the cards do not support it.  Further, as development on AH2 began prior to the release/testing/acceptance of dx9, I can't imagine that the developers decided in the middle of the engine development to scrap what they had and start from scratch again to utilize dx9.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: gatt on October 10, 2003, 09:35:11 AM
IIRC, the GeF2 series should be able to run AH2 at medium/low graphic settings. GF3, GF4, FX and Radeons should be able to show much better effects (shadows, smoke, explosions, clouds, sun ...).

At least I hope so .... really.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Nefarious on October 12, 2003, 12:15:40 AM
I think they would only use bumpmapping for the new damage effects, which i havnt seen anything of yet, But I have heard about so much.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: ramzey on October 12, 2003, 12:39:56 AM
Quote
Originally posted by BenDover
Ermm, last I heard hitech said AH2 would only need a a geforce 2.


as minimum ?

GF2 32 MB  is allmost not enought to fly 1024x768 with good framerate
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 12:58:17 AM
I got a geforce 2 and i get about 100 fps.

System.
AMD XP 1900
RAM 256 2700 .
Operating system: Windows LongHorn
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: ramzey on October 12, 2003, 01:42:37 AM
really? 32 MB? did you try  atack large bomber formations? or drop bombs flying buffs?;)
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Rutilant on October 12, 2003, 02:01:42 AM
Why do i think he's lying? I get 20fps on average with

geforce FX 5200 128mb, 224 megs SD ram, and a P3 500..

Too big a difference IMO.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: mrblack on October 12, 2003, 02:04:20 AM
Quote
Originally posted by F1Bomber
I got a geforce 2 and i get about 100 fps.

System.
AMD XP 1900
RAM 256 2700 .
Operating system: Windows LongHorn


:rofl
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 04:07:48 AM
http://www.bushtech.com.au/Chads/proof/Proof.html

Can i say more!

yes. :rofl
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Rutilant on October 12, 2003, 05:59:58 AM
Well ****!:eek:
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: BenDover on October 12, 2003, 06:00:37 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Rutilant
Why do i think he's lying? I get 20fps on average with

geforce FX 5200 128mb, 224 megs SD ram, and a P3 500..

Too big a difference IMO.


Because longhorn is still in the planning stage?
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 06:25:34 AM
Yup :)

nice os LongHorn.

But thats all i will say.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: SlapShot on October 12, 2003, 09:44:44 AM
Quote
Originally posted by moot
looks more like higher texture resolution than bump mapping; the panel lines near the shadows should show the additional shade from the b.m.'s bevel effect, but I don't think I see any.


AH II does use bump mapping ... it will be a settable option from what HT showed us at the con. Don't know enough about it to tell whether he has it switched on or off for this screen shot .
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 09:51:52 AM
Just in reply to the bump maping that i have started this crazy thread on.

I have found that viewing the screen shots with different monitors give different kinds of effects. For this reason i must say .

That Until aces high 2 comes out, we cannot really judge the screen shots. Because of degraded of quality from the compression utilitys like jpeg as such.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Arlo on October 12, 2003, 09:57:46 AM
Quote
Originally posted by F1Bomber
http://www.bushtech.com.au/Chads/proof/Proof.html

Can i say more!

yes. :rofl


How come AH thinks your geforce 2 (64 megs, right?) is a 128 meg card?
(http://www.bushtech.com.au/Chads/proof/ahss12.jpg)
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: vorticon on October 12, 2003, 10:30:35 AM
i have a gforce 2 mx 440 (64mb) on one of my computer...runs the game at 80fps at 1024*768...drops down to 20-40 when near big things...geforce 2 is more  than enough
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Reschke on October 12, 2003, 10:40:46 AM
Quote
Originally posted by F1Bomber
http://www.bushtech.com.au/Chads/proof/Proof.html

Can i say more!

yes. :rofl


Yeah but show us some pictures in an Main Arena setting with several hundred people on and you flying and not sitting in a tower. Maybe then I would lean towards believing your "proof".

Also why is your OS showing as:
Quote

------------------
System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 10/12/2003, 18:26:44
Machine name: SUNMICRO
Operating System: Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) (2600.xpclient.010817-1148)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: n/a
System Model: n/a
BIOS: Award Modular BIOS v6.0
Processor: AMD Athlon(TM) XP 1900+,  MMX,  3DNow, ~1.6GHz
Memory: 256MB RAM
Page File: 193MB used, 341MB available
Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS
DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0b (4.09.0000.0902)
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 5.03.0001.0902 32bit Unicode



Thanks
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 11:18:04 AM
sigh.

I run one machine with dual boot, windows xp and windows long horn installed. so I decided to use the Xp Pro for the benchmark because its more real to life what most people would have. I mainly do some work in longhorn, and i put it down as the OS because i use it now and then. Also to say its a nice os.

Anyway, i can change my chip memory size by going into the bios, its just put onto that setting and i havent changed it because i am lazy.

Finaly for people who say i should dive into 100 cons and stuff. Well firstly, the original post said

Quote
Why do i think he's lying? I get 20fps on average with


i wasnt lying. Anyway, data has been given.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 12, 2003, 11:44:38 AM
http://www.bushtech.com.au/Chads/proof/Proof.html

Check it out again, for those people who want me around some guys when taking the screen shot here it is.

I see no real point continue this debat about what fps i get really! Does it really matter?

Going onto more important stuff. Basicaly if your computer system cannot get the bandwidth required to your graphics card. You will never use 100% of your graphics card. It will mainly be waiting for your system to send it information or data to it. Now more advanaced cards, actualy take away the work load from the cpu. For example, this is the reason why when upgrading from a geforce 2 to a geforce 3, that you will notice a slight increase in fps. Mainly 2 reasons why. Much better programing in the hardware that allows it to comunicate better with your system as a whole. Also the fact that most new cards will do more processing on the card itself than let the cpu handel it.

I havent started programing Video card with my computer course at Univercity. That is all done down to the assembly level, no higher languages required.

Well its been fun, got to get some sleep.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: vorticon on October 12, 2003, 11:47:32 AM
how are you using a windows OS that hasent even entered the alpha test stage???
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Reschke on October 12, 2003, 01:45:55 PM
I had a GeForce2 GTS 32MB card that routinely got me no less than 50-60fps in AH up until I swapped it out for the GF4 Ti440 I have now. That was on an Athlon 700Mhz and my old AMD T-bird 1.4GHz as well.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 12, 2003, 06:22:37 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
How come AH thinks your geforce 2 (64 megs, right?) is a 128 meg card?
 



It doesn't think it's a 128meg.  What looks like is happening is that AH is reserving 64megs of your system RAM and adding it to 'resource' pool of available video RAM.


ack-ack
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Arlo on October 12, 2003, 06:44:14 PM
Well that's amazing. I should just upgrade my ram then and forget about upgrading my video card. :D
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 13, 2003, 01:29:44 AM
Fortunately AH2 isn't going to be as system intensive, at least that's the word on the grapevine (yes, terrible pun intended).  So instead of a complete system upgrade, upgrading your video card might be all that's needed.


ack-ack
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: F1Bomber on October 13, 2003, 03:07:48 AM
Arlo i would recommend holding off from buying anythink until aces high 2 comes out.

When aces high 2 does come out. Take your local computer down to a computer store, and say that your intrested in buying hardware off them. But you need hardware to actualy make the game play good. Show them the game, and the frame rates. Then ask them what equipment may or maynot help in the frame rate department. Normaly i found that computer stores are more than happy to swap ram and video cards in and out of your system, finding the best configuration. It saves you money and also it makes them a profit.

The solution above is the best choice i think. Firstly they will have more understanding of your system than you do and can simply point out what needs to be replaced. If the computer store doesnt want to help you out, take your businesses elsewere. Also, its good to show them the cash that you are expecting to puchase the hardware for. This will also add a bonus to your side, because they wont think your a con man!

Well i used this proccess, but i also knew the people at the computer store, so that was also a bonus.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Arlo on October 13, 2003, 07:57:33 AM
I wouldn't trust my "local store" to know squat about upgrading my pc, actually. Besides ... no swapping involved here ... just adding. :D
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: TPIguy on October 13, 2003, 09:04:07 AM
My old geforce2mx 32 meg card gave me solid 40-50fps in decent sized fights.

The only time it dropped down below 30 was over a smoking base with alot of cons around.

I just ordered a 9600 to replace it, hopefully it'll handle ah2.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: vorticon on October 13, 2003, 10:59:13 AM
i wouldent trust my local computer store to drop a 56k modem into the machine...
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: BenDover on October 13, 2003, 01:34:11 PM
I wouldn't trust my local computer store to know what a computer is.
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 14, 2003, 01:19:39 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
I wouldn't trust my "local store" to know squat about upgrading my pc, actually. Besides ... no swapping involved here ... just adding. :D


Besides, there's always those exiles on that other board that can always bail you out when you eventually connect it wrong and blow the fuse to your house.  Just as good as the local store and we get a good laugh as a bonus.



ack-ack
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Arlo on October 14, 2003, 08:59:49 PM
Geez .. are we ALL A+ certified? :D
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: BenDover on October 15, 2003, 02:02:49 AM
Not yet;)
Title: Closer Look at Aces High 2 Images
Post by: Arlo on October 15, 2003, 07:48:39 AM
GL. A+ ain't too bad but those other certs can be a mother. :)