Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Kommandant on October 17, 2003, 06:43:37 PM
-
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433875.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433743.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433715.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433685.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433661.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/ah_156_1066433636.jpg)
As for the Arado Glider, I would love to be able to have a guy drive a tank into it, then take off. Land somewhere a hundred miles away and have him drive the tank out. If someone shoots it down, they get two kills. Trust me, this would be Freakin Awesome for GV combat!
-
All great choices but KI-84 & ki-43 should come 1st given the shortage of jap plains
-
all good choices, btw i got that book too:)
-
Excellent choices! I'd really like to fly the Salamander, but it seems like the most expendable of the (excellent) list you provided.
The B-29 was turbocharged? Gosh, I always thought it was supercharged. I guess you learn something new every day!
-
AS USUALY I AGREE WITH U BUT....
Italian pilot have no Bomber and NO Jabo, so plz
Choose at least one from my list......
[SIZE=8]THE 3 ENGINEED BOMBER[/size]
SM-79 "sparviero" called "the cursed hunchback"
History and spec (http://www.aviation-history.com/savoia-marchetti/sm79.html) and at History and Spec (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/sm79%20page.html)
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/savoia/sm79_otranto_1941.jpg)
(http://www.regiaaeronautica.it/immagini/aerei/bombardieri/S79_4.jpg)
Cantz 1007bis "Alcione"
History and spec (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/cantz%201007%20page.html
)[/color]
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/cantz/cantz1007bis_230sq_95gr_35st.jpg)
(http://www.regiaaeronautica.it/immagini/aerei/bombardieri/1007_2.jpg)
[SIZE=8]FIAT FIGHTERS[/size]
Fiat g50bis "Freccia" (Arrow)
History and spec (http://www.xs4all.nl/~fbonne/warbirds/ww2htmls/fiatg50.html) or at
History and spec (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/g50%20page.html)
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/fiat/fiat_g50bis162sq161gr_egeo.jpg)
fiat g55
History and specifications (http://www.comandosupremo.com/G55.html)
OR AT
History and specifications (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/g55%20page.html)
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/fiat/fiat_g55-archivio_ami02.jpg)
[SIZE=8]REGGIANE'S FIGTHERS[/size]
Rggiane 2000 "falco I" (hawk I)
History and specifications (http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Reggiane.html)[/size]
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/reggiane/re2000_pantelleria.jpg)
Reggiane 2001 "Falco II" (hawk II)
History and specifications (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/re2001%20page.html)[/size]
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/reggiane/re2001_mm409.jpg)
Reggiane 2002 "Ariete" (Ram)
History and specifications (http://web.tiscali.it/no-redirect-tiscali/aeromania/Caproni%20Reggiane%202002.htm)[/size]
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/reggiane/re2002_239sq102gr5st_tuffatori.jpg)
Reggiane 2005 "Sagittario"
History and specifications (http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/f5avipatches/re2005%20page.html)[/size]
(http://www.finn.it/regia/immagini/reggiane/re2005.jpg)
All Reggiane 2000-2001-2005 Specifications in a PDF file
History and spec (http://uncleted.jinak.cz/pdf/reggiane.pdf)
-
How could the He162 be an interceptor with a climbrate of just over 1000 feet per minute? Is that an error? Or perhaps the aircraft had to accelerate to a high speed to get a good climbrate?
-
just over 1000 huh? 1900 and somethin seems like abit more than just over 1000, thats almost 2000 which isnt to bad compared to other interceptors of its day
-
Heres better climb rates for 162... :aok
3780 ft/min (19.2m/sec) at sea level
1950 ft/min (9.9m/sec) at 19,690 ft (6000m)
315 ft/min (1.6m/sec) at 36,090 ft (11,000m)
-
I just want to fly it, I have never seen a game where you could fly it. The one I REALLY want to see is the HO or DO Flying Wing, I think its HO, but I can't remember
-
I agree with P39 and B25 and Fiat G.50.
But wheres Curtiss Hawk?
(http://www.kesalesket.net/llv32/valokuvat/CU_580.jpg)
And Brewster?
(http://www.kesalesket.net/llv32/koneet/brewster_model_239_bw393.jpg)
If these 2 planes will be added, I'll be happy for long time :D
-
Originally posted by Puudeli
I agree with P39 and B25 and Fiat G.50.
But wheres Curtiss Hawk?
(http://www.kesalesket.net/llv32/valokuvat/CU_580.jpg)
If these 2 planes will be added, I'll be happy for long time :D
WTG mat8 specially fiat -50 finnish flag ;)
_____________________________ ______________________
(http://www.altoprogetto.it/bigjava.gif)
-
i think you mean Go-229 not sure if those are the correct numbers, but that was the Luftwaffe flying wing being developed when the war ended. You can fly that in CFS3 as well as the DO-335. But I doubt we'll see the Go-229 in AH ever because it wasnt a ww2 plane but maybe the Do-335 as it was in further stages of development. With this scenerio comein out that happend 10 years after the war, maybe HT would consider some just missed the war planes.
-
I agree that we need more Japenese Planes, it will be better in the plane set IMO. Jap planes are very limited. The noobs really need to get out of the japenese planes and really learn how to boom and zoom.
-
I have that book Kommandant :)
-
Originally posted by HeLLcAt
I agree that we need more Japenese Planes, it will be better in the plane set IMO. Jap planes are very limited. The noobs really need to get out of the japenese planes and really learn how to boom and zoom.
Why go to easymode BnZ planes when you can learn to survive in a challenging environment where your SA is pushed to keep up?
-
Originally posted by Karnak
Why go to easymode BnZ planes when you can learn to survive in a challenging environment where your SA is pushed to keep up?
Like in a niki? :rofl
-
I love Barnes and Nobel
-
I'd love to see the P-39Q(preferably in russian colors). Built in fairly large numbers, and would make a good MA capable plane, while adding another russian(and US of course) aircraft
-
Lets get rid of the Marauder and add the Mitchell!
-
Originally posted by frank3
Lets get rid of the Marauder and add the Mitchell!
That i can agree with.