Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: twitchy on November 24, 2009, 10:17:24 PM

Title: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 24, 2009, 10:17:24 PM
Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on November 24, 2009, 10:20:10 PM
Prawns swim in large schools aimlessly
 :cheers:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 24, 2009, 10:21:37 PM
And you wonder why you get flamed?? :huh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: L0nGb0w on November 24, 2009, 10:27:27 PM
I'm a bacon guy myself.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 24, 2009, 10:28:41 PM
And you wonder why you get flamed?? :huh
Neg  ;)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 12:40:14 AM
wow......you;'re single handedly trying to ruin the reputation of that squad, aren't ya?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Delirium on November 25, 2009, 01:22:30 AM
Yet another 'look at me, I need attention' thread.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on November 25, 2009, 01:35:41 AM
 :rofl

wow some people just never learn :rolleyes:

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on November 25, 2009, 01:43:48 AM
wasn't there a pig thread not to long ago? guess i'll get the popcorn out
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kazaa on November 25, 2009, 02:01:00 AM
I think I speak for everyone here when I say "not another fcuking PoTW thread".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: sunfan1121 on November 25, 2009, 02:15:44 AM
Yawn.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on November 25, 2009, 02:25:44 AM
(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/thsmiley_deadhorse.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bagrat on November 25, 2009, 02:33:33 AM
Samuel says a pig is a filthy animal
(http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd156/2004jasone/Guess-Who-Muthafcka_500x500.jpg)

Lets think female dog....
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on November 25, 2009, 05:26:16 AM
Where's the PigStompers when you need em.  SQWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEE  :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Crash Orange on November 25, 2009, 05:39:11 AM
When I think of mangoes, I think of goats, I think of goats, I think of you,
When I think of mangoes I don't think of stoats, I think of someone that is true...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYeNQUe_7Vo

 :banana:   :banana:   :banana:   :banana:   :banana:   :banana:

 :rock  :rock  :rock  :rock  :rock  :rock   :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 25, 2009, 06:54:35 AM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: thndregg on November 25, 2009, 07:30:28 AM
it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up.

If that were true, the game would have died YEARS ago. This is not the first time this subject has surfaced, and I see Aces High is still here after many years of the same arguement. And the "Song the Doesn't End" will come back in another few months. You wait. Seen it before. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 07:37:10 AM
I think I speak for everyone here when I say "not another fcuking PoTW thread".

 :rofl dude.......metinks you may wanna edit.......... :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 07:40:36 AM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

i'm a team player.

i fly with my squaddies when they manage to find me(i hide  :noid). i fly and play for the low numbers team. i use teamwork to help a countryman when he's in need.

 i'm in this game for fun, relaxation, and an escape from the rigors of doing what others expect of me.


you have erself a nice day.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Rino on November 25, 2009, 07:47:55 AM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

     Simple solution, don't like it?  Leave.  It's not like the rest of us are going to change
to appease you.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 07:50:32 AM
     Simple solution, don't like it?  Leave.  It's not like the rest of us are going to change
to appease you.

but....but.....we all must like spanky....eerr....sparky..... .twinkie........
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CHAPPY on November 25, 2009, 07:59:21 AM
(http://www.mysmiley.net/imgs/smile/adult/turninggay.gif) (http://www.mysmiley.net/free-evilgrin-smileys.php)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: AKDogg on November 25, 2009, 08:09:23 AM
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing

Pretty young squad.  Us AK's been doing that since 1991.  You have alot to learn yet.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TequilaChaser on November 25, 2009, 08:56:44 AM
Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing

and all this time I was being told that Pigs(swine, pork, etc ) are the Scavengers of the land, like shrimp ...etc... are scavengers of the oceans.........

I guess there is a new twist ( or Twitch? ) with Pigs on The Wing, being Scavengers of the Sky?   :cheers:  :bolt:  ( I hope you take this reply, all in good humor )

oh, edit: almost forgot

TC aka TequilaChaser ----> Flame Keeper of the "Damned" Dynasty 1988 ~ 2009  :old:  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BnZs on November 25, 2009, 09:10:35 AM
The problem with the base taker mentality is that the MA capture game resembles war in only the vaguest sense, and most war "winners" are essentially using sledgehammers to smash flies all the time.

FSO, scenarios, snapshots are all designed to resemble the air war as closely as possible. They are not dominated by the squads who concentrate on toolshedding down bases, suicide porking, or NOE smash and grab. They are consistently dominated by those individuals and squads who have focused on developing the very personal skill needed to actually achieve the prerequisite to any other goal in warfare since WWI-air superiority against actual resistance.

IOW, "Furballers".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 09:18:49 AM
The problem with the base taker mentality is that the MA capture game resembles war in only the vaguest sense, and most war "winners" are essentially using sledgehammers to smash flies all the time.

FSO, scenarios, snapshots are all designed to resemble the air war as closely as possible. They are not dominated by the squads who concentrate on toolshedding down bases, suicide porking, or NOE smash and grab. They are consistently dominated by those individuals and squads who have focused on developing the very personal skill needed to actually achieve the prerequisite to any other goal in warfare since WWI-air superiority against actual resistance.

IOW, "Furballers".

I USE electric fly swatters to kill flies. watch THEM try to fly missing a wing..... :bolt: :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: The Fugitive on November 25, 2009, 10:20:43 AM
Your original post said nothing more than I'm a pig, and we destroy everything in our path and leave nothing behind. So basically "We're the best and the rest of you suck", or as a few other have pointed out "Hey look at me!"  :rolleyes:

On the other hand if you want to discuss the furballers/landgrabbers issue we can do that too.

Personally I think the labels are interpreted wrong. Furballers like a fight, and most land grabbers do too, its the "hordes" that give land grabbers a bad name. If a big squad launched a mission with a purpose of something other than "lets steam roll this base next" even the furballers might be able to get along with them.

I hope that most landgrabber, or base capture type squads enjoy the challenge of capturing a base as apposed to just grabbing one with no opposition. Those that grab bases just for the sake of "stealing" a base might as well just go play sim city or some other game. On the other hand if you like a fight this is the game for you. Everything is set-up to generate fights. Yes there are ways around it, but being as it is the internet's premier COMBAT game why avoid combat?

Combat=good, hordes=bad
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bosco123 on November 25, 2009, 10:22:34 AM
I'm a bacon guy myself.
I'm eating bacon right now.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on November 25, 2009, 10:24:49 AM
Here's my take on it...

Henceforth, my sleepless nights, spent wondering what you thought, can end.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 5PointOh on November 25, 2009, 11:00:53 AM
I am a clown, we travel together typically in one car. I am a clown. We laugh, joke, steal Shamus's kill, listen to the Banana Phone song at crazy volumes.  We don't need to say "oink" or make threads everyweek to self glorify ourselves, and its total hell trying to fit giant shoes on rudder peddles.  I am a clown.

(http://budugllydesign.com/archivebud/badidea/picts/clowncar.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on November 25, 2009, 11:04:10 AM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

Judging from most all your posts so far..... I have to say you wouldn't know class if it hit you between the eyes.

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Strip on November 25, 2009, 11:15:09 AM
I would like to see both LW arenas used to test which group is bigger and more influential to play.

LWO would be capture system off...

LWB would be capture system on...

Same map in both arenas, then we shall see what the majority of the folks want. If the minority doesn't like it, tough, they can move on to other areas.

(Never happen tho....)

Strip
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Crash Orange on November 25, 2009, 11:19:21 AM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks.

You didn't like the Death Piggy song?  :(  Death Piggy rawks!  :rock

My take: taking six or eight guys NOE and grabbing a base with any opposition at all takes a lot more skill and coordination than taking fifty guys, capping a field, and vulching everything that moves for the next three hours (and adding insult to injury by porking the VH and spawning in flaks to sit on each runway end, in case the 50 guys in the air can't handle an upper), or flying in a swarm locusts can only dream of and ganging every plane that gets too close 6-1 or more, or flying around in a 262 at 30,000 feet and coming down only to pick planes that are already engaged by 2 or 3 friendlies - which is what a lot of folks in this game (and on this forum) seem to think of as "furballing".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Stang on November 25, 2009, 11:26:06 AM
 :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 11:30:55 AM
I would like to see both LW arenas used to test which group is bigger and more influential to play.

LWO would be capture system off...

LWB would be capture system on...

Same map in both arenas, then we shall see what the majority of the folks want. If the minority doesn't like it, tough, they can move on to other areas.

(Never happen tho....)

Strip

excellent idea. it'll never happen though, as some will always have some form of excuse..........


you know....like the guy ya just beat......well, uumm....the car pulled a little...or the engine coughed, or the right lane sucks........
always an excuse.  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on November 25, 2009, 11:32:37 AM
I have never taken the stance that it is furballing only, GVing only, or bombing only, or capturing bases only that makes this game what it is.  All are entertaining activities within the framework of Aces High.  I enjoy all of them (except bombers, ugh).  I never participate in one activity to the exclusion of all the other possiblities.  I would miss too much fun that way! :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Noir on November 25, 2009, 11:38:13 AM
who are the POTW again? I think I need another POTW thread so it becomes real clear in my mind. (Respect isn't something you can request)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SPKmes on November 25, 2009, 12:29:53 PM
I like land grabbers...I like furballers...... I'll shoot at them all
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 25, 2009, 12:32:32 PM
Who brought the marshmallows? I think we've got a great flame going now :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on November 25, 2009, 12:38:31 PM
leave the damn horse alone already, he has had quite enough  :mad:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 25, 2009, 12:49:10 PM
Yet another 'look at me, I need attention' thread.
:aok


you notice how he always says "founder of the pigs" :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on November 25, 2009, 12:51:42 PM
:aok


you notice how he always says "founder of the pigs" :rolleyes:

Opps missed that. Thought he said Flounder and Pigs.

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wax on November 25, 2009, 12:57:27 PM
Yet another 'look at me, I need attention' thread.

Was thinking the same thing..   :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 25, 2009, 01:10:34 PM

I have to admit, there are a few pigs i like. Some are good guys. But twitchy isnt one of them. This guy is either running off out of the mouth (not very well) or running in a cartoon plane and talking smack. The guy is a tool. I have honestly seen mentally handicap people talk better smack than him. (no im not one of the mentally handicap) :P

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on November 25, 2009, 01:30:32 PM
who are the POTW again?

Just pretend you know and the threads might stop.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 5PointOh on November 25, 2009, 01:37:57 PM
I have a feeling these will never stop.  But I am having ham for Thanksgiving, 1 pig down!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 25, 2009, 03:23:38 PM
Where's the PigStompers when you need em.  SQWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEE  :lol
As a former Pigstomer please refrain from posting that in any PoTW thread. Wouldn't want them to be painted with the same dweeb brush.  
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ardy123 on November 25, 2009, 03:30:49 PM
Frankly,
I like all the activities available in AH. On the topic of hoards, because of the numbers, its often a necessity. For example, last night. When I upped to fight, I was always ganged by 20+ cons. So, I organized with many of my squadies and did a fighter sweep, so that at least I could stand a chance.  You could be the best cartoon pilot in AH but you wont have any  success if after the first merge you have a small airforce chasing you around.

I think these issues could be solved by introducing  a limit to the number of airplanes available at one field. For example, if a small field could only have 30 planes operational at one time. This would spread the fight out. No more hoards of 100+ airplanes attacking one base.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on November 25, 2009, 03:33:45 PM
The real war is FSO and scenarios all the rest is just practice.
my 2 cents
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: NoBaddy on November 25, 2009, 03:41:04 PM
Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement

I believe the word you are looking for (or should be looking for) here is "naught"...not "not".  :)

BTW cupcake, pigs are also cannibals (they are even known to eat their own young) and they eat crap (yah...real, live porcine fecal matter). Sorry dude, just stating the facts. You might wanna stop laying your private parts out on the chopping block.  :devil

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 25, 2009, 04:13:08 PM
I believe the word you are looking for (or should be looking for) here is "naught"...not "not".  :)

BTW cupcake, pigs are also cannibals (they are even known to eat their own young) and they eat crap (yah...real, live porcine fecal matter). Sorry dude, just stating the facts. You might wanna stop laying your private parts out on the chopping block.  :devil


:rofl

OWNED!!!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TUK on November 25, 2009, 04:15:44 PM
Got 1 page into this forum b4 I quit reading..   Bunch of big babies.... :cool:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on November 25, 2009, 05:06:50 PM
 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on November 25, 2009, 05:11:58 PM
As a former Pigstomer please refrain from posting that in any PoTW thread. Wouldn't want them to be painted with the same dweeb brush.  

Well, I had been sqweeeing on 200 after killing pigs recently.  That's the sound a dying pig makes right?  My counter to the victory oinks.   :aok

Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

Twitchy, here's my take on land grabbing...

The maps are too big to land grab and win the war.  They reset the maps weekly if a war hasn't been won (which is never on big maps) so what's the point?  Why spend so much time taking bases again and again when it accomplishes nothing?

The small maps are another story.  You could actually accomplish something in a night on a small map and I actually could see the fun in trying to win the war.  Of course the other side of the coin to that is, the maps are so small there is much more opposition condensed into small areas so it makes taking bases exponentially more difficult.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on November 25, 2009, 05:14:43 PM

Twitchy, here's my take on land grabbing...

The maps are too big to land grab and win the war.  They reset the maps weekly if a war hasn't been won (which is never on big maps) so what's the point?  Why spend so much time taking bases again and again when it accomplishes nothing?

The small maps are another story.  You could actually accomplish something in a night on a small map and I actually could see the fun in trying to win the war.  Of course the other side of the coin to that is, the maps are so small there is much more opposition condensed into small areas so it makes taking bases exponentially more difficult.

Thoughts?
I agree, the big map are too big to reset normally, its worth a try on the small maps though.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Grind on November 25, 2009, 05:37:31 PM

Remove some of the bases, spread them out and mix the countries bases more for more 3 way fighting/base stealing.  ?

<S>

Grind
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 25, 2009, 06:06:02 PM


Thoughts?

I thought i farted, but.......................... .......... :bolt: :noid :bolt: :noid :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on November 25, 2009, 06:27:20 PM
Well, I had been sqweeeing on 200 after killing pigs recently.  That's the sound a dying pig makes right?  My counter to the victory oinks.   :aok

Twitchy, here's my take on land grabbing...

The maps are too big to land grab and win the war.  They reset the maps weekly if a war hasn't been won (which is never on big maps) so what's the point?  Why spend so much time taking bases again and again when it accomplishes nothing?

The small maps are another story.  You could actually accomplish something in a night on a small map and I actually could see the fun in trying to win the war.  Of course the other side of the coin to that is, the maps are so small there is much more opposition condensed into small areas so it makes taking bases exponentially more difficult.

Thoughts?


Grizz alot of what you say is true, but here's the problem like you said, they will never be able to keep the Map Size/Player numbers to match anything close to having a winnable Map, And quiet frankly i don't see comparing Furballers to BaseTakers, there not the same gameplay, Each side has there own merits, and opinions about the other ones play.

Theres two ways to basetake and theres two ways to furball, and i think we all know what they are. And on a side note Hey Das Muppets id love to fly in the DA with a few of you, my fighter skills are just off now for some reason, maybe just need a few good pointers  i dunno :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lusche on November 25, 2009, 06:31:03 PM
 They reset the maps weekly if a war hasn't been won (which is never on big maps) so what's the point?  

It's rare, but not never. Last week a big map (ozkansas) was won in LWO (No, not a TT reset).
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on November 25, 2009, 06:33:27 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on November 25, 2009, 06:38:09 PM
It's rare, but not never. Last week a big map (ozkansas) was won in LWO (No, not a TT reset).

Yeah, it happens rarely.  It doesn't happen often enough to warrant the effort which is what my point was.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 25, 2009, 08:23:04 PM
Well, I had been sqweeeing on 200 after killing pigs recently.  That's the sound a dying pig makes right?  My counter to the victory oinks.   :aok

Well in that case carry on. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on November 25, 2009, 08:45:54 PM
Yeah, it happens rarely.  It doesn't happen often enough to warrant the effort which is what my point was.

Ya last night some noob named fbgoose was calling his teammates morons because rooks took a few bases. Doesn't the map reset automatically after TT?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lusche on November 25, 2009, 08:47:33 PM
Doesn't the map reset automatically after TT?

No, just the arena name is changed and map stays up.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: The Fugitive on November 25, 2009, 10:02:58 PM
snip........

The maps are too big to land grab and win the war.  They reset the maps weekly if a war hasn't been won (which is never on big maps) so what's the point?  Why spend so much time taking bases again and again when it accomplishes nothing?

.........

Thats where the term is misconstrued. If you are just running base after base looking for the easy captures then I agree, its just a waste of time, wheres the challenge?

On the other hand if your using your forces to attack multiple targets, with timed attacks and maneuvers to pull defense one way then another, them I'm all for it! Create Combat, and if you grab 3 bases through a squad night then you won ! Thats what the game is about.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: oTRALFZo on November 25, 2009, 10:47:05 PM
Shouldnt be "furballers" VS "basetakers". This is a game that needs the furballers or people that like to fight, and also people that like the real estate part of the game. In my oppinion, taking bases should be the goal people have for beating the enemy down and fighting for it. Only problem I have with the landgrabbing aspect is that sometimes it takes over the whole idea of what the game is about and suddenly becomes a game of who can smash the heck out of a town at an undefended feild with 30-110s ect. That would be like calling yourself a sports fisherman when all you do is throw sticks of dynamite and claim the fish that pop up dead.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on November 25, 2009, 10:58:04 PM
Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing
the attention-'prostitute' thing is getting a bit long in the tooth, and by the lack of the normally 'herd-like' replies from the Pigs, I'd say it's a bit long in the tooth for them too
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on November 25, 2009, 11:00:49 PM
Base Taker's Meeting...

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/Dingleberries.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on November 25, 2009, 11:13:34 PM
Furballers Scrambling to there Perk Planes
 
(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/drag-360.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lazerr on November 25, 2009, 11:22:37 PM
that is a frat initiation pictured above.... just saw this being done in Lacrosse near me a few weeks ago.  I tried to find a gun..
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on November 25, 2009, 11:22:52 PM
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery...


Keep up the good work.

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/2-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BillyD on November 25, 2009, 11:26:08 PM
that is a frat initiation pictured above.... just saw this being done in Lacrosse near me a few weeks ago.  I tried to find a gun..


I got the SKS, you can borrow it next time.

610-867-5309 or comon over...its in the front room.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lazerr on November 25, 2009, 11:32:10 PM
how many rounds does the clip hold? there was a bunch of them...   :D :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BillyD on November 25, 2009, 11:37:17 PM
25, you can get the 50 but the shi@ jams all the time. Chinese POS. Good hitting power though. 7.62 FMJ will tear the shi@ outta that lightweight material those noobs were wearing. You can have the Remington 870 instead if you are more of the close in guy....00 buckshot to the mascara should do :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on November 26, 2009, 12:10:21 AM
25, you can get the 50 but the shi@ jams all the time. Chinese POS. Good hitting power though. 7.62 FMJ will tear the shi@ outta that lightweight material those noobs were wearing. You can have the Remington 870 instead if you are more of the close in guy....00 buckshot to the mascara should do :devil
30 rnd mag is available here as well as a fixed 10 rnd skk
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lazerr on November 26, 2009, 12:12:48 AM
ill have to invite you guys up next time I see a pack a fairys running around, obviously crossing the line.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on November 26, 2009, 09:16:40 AM

I got the SKS, you can borrow it next time.

610-867-5309 or comon over...its in the front room.
That your real number? Im a prank call it.  :P :D
ill have to invite you guys up next time I see a pack a fairys running around, obviously crossing the line.  :aok
*watches back from now on* :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 26, 2009, 09:33:58 AM
ill have to invite you guys up next time I see a pack a fairys running around, obviously crossing the line.  :aok
That would be funny as hell. I'm sure between our 2 minds, we could think of something evil to do to them
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Slash27 on November 26, 2009, 11:07:19 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt2zx1LDaHQ
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 26, 2009, 01:23:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt2zx1LDaHQ
Oink :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 26, 2009, 03:27:31 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt2zx1LDaHQ
was it wrong for me to watch that twice and laugh so hard i expelled gas?  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CHAPPY on November 26, 2009, 04:15:51 PM
 :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on November 26, 2009, 07:00:32 PM
On the other hand if your using your forces to attack multiple targets, with timed attacks and maneuvers to pull defense one way then another, them I'm all for it! Create Combat, and if you grab 3 bases through a squad night then you won ! Thats what the game is about.

I see mostly tunnel vision out of base takers.  Most only care about the base, not the fight.  They do a good job at creating combat for furballers, but I don't think that's their intent.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wagger on November 26, 2009, 10:56:19 PM
 :rofl  If you think about it this discussion parallels the HOing threads. Yady Yady Yady................ :old:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wagger on November 26, 2009, 10:59:51 PM
 :O HELLO!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on November 27, 2009, 12:31:31 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDlCcGBtGd0


MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on November 27, 2009, 12:46:23 AM
Bye twitchy, I thought I was the only one continually disagreeing with every post you made, guess not though. :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on November 27, 2009, 12:55:09 AM
To be honest I didn't mind twitchy and I do hate to see him go..  <S> twitchy and best of luck in your future endeavors..





MrMeaty  :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on November 27, 2009, 02:59:30 AM
Bye twitchy, I thought I was the only one continually disagreeing with every post you made, guess not though. :lol

You're not alone there stodd  :rofl It is a bit sad to see it end this way for him but he dug himself too deep a hole to handle. His posts here on the AH BBs made me and others feel embarrassed to be pigs.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on November 27, 2009, 03:00:22 AM
Double post  :furious
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: sunfan1121 on November 27, 2009, 04:28:05 AM
 :uhoh  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on November 27, 2009, 05:55:26 AM
Tribute to Twitchy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsEvLcrcKXY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsEvLcrcKXY)

"How can you kick me out, of what is mine!"
 :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 27, 2009, 07:39:54 AM
I see mostly tunnel vision out of base takers.  Most only care about the base, not the fight.  They do a good job at creating combat for furballers, but I don't think that's their intent.

it's not. quite often, i've joined into a small furball over a base, only to hear the people that're trying to take it, screaming for one of us to get troops, or to come kill that panzer, or to go drop the vh, etc etc etc.

 they get really mad when we don;t.  :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 27, 2009, 07:43:03 AM
To be honest I didn't mind twitchy and I do hate to see him go..  <S> twitchy and best of luck in your future endeavors..





MrMeaty  :rock
Wait what did i miss?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 27, 2009, 07:43:56 AM
Wait what did i miss?


+1

i just read back through the thread to see if i missed something.......
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 5PointOh on November 27, 2009, 07:45:57 AM
Thought I had missed something as well, does that mean no more pig threads?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on November 27, 2009, 10:21:12 AM
Thought I had missed something as well, does that mean no more pig threads?

Hopefully... unless someone decides to keep the "fun" going  :uhoh Twitchy wanted to turn POTW into a full time base-taking squad, If we wanted to go take bases we'd all go join Dogfite's crew.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 27, 2009, 10:36:56 AM
Hopefully... unless someone decides to keep the "fun" going  :uhoh Twitchy wanted to turn POTW into a full time base-taking squad, If we wanted to go take bases we'd all go join Dogfite's crew.
So he bailed on PotW?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on November 27, 2009, 10:43:17 AM
So he bailed on PotW?


I'll tell you this, he didn't leave willingly.  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 27, 2009, 10:48:16 AM
I'll tell you this, he didn't leave willingly.  :bolt:
:rofl Awesomenesezzz :rofl

I think he should head on over to the EW arena.. I hear SOARZ are recruiting. :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 27, 2009, 11:43:02 AM
I'll tell you this, he didn't leave willingly.  :bolt:

cool. he was a one girl wrecking crew....or trying to be anyway.

he's the first one of you guys that i've "met" that i didn't like.

 flew with way a couple times.....and had fun every time.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on November 27, 2009, 12:06:52 PM
That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

I guess not.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on November 27, 2009, 12:28:19 PM
To be honest I didn't mind twitchy and I do hate to see him go..  <S> twitchy and best of luck in your future endeavors..





MrMeaty  :rock
I really didnt care what he was saying, I did find his posts on the BBS annoying and when he talked about the "Squad" I wondered if he was tallking about the same squad ive been flying with for 3 years. I heared him over vox in game a few times being a dictator, I just ignored him but if he is going to drive other pigs away I say dont let the door hit him on the way out
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on November 27, 2009, 02:21:45 PM
I really didnt care what he was saying, I did find his posts on the BBS annoying and when he talked about the "Squad" I wondered if he was tallking about the same squad ive been flying with for 3 years. I heared him over vox in game a few times being a dictator, I just ignored him but if he is going to drive other pigs away I say dont let the door hit him on the way out



I have no clue what he has posted on the bbs, I only log on to this whine fest about once a month. Twitchy was a nice guy the way I saw it, I guess I didn't play enough to see what he was doing. Never the less I still hate to see him go.


MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bustr on November 27, 2009, 04:23:24 PM
Gentelmen,

We have all had our differences over the years. Many of you probably think of me only a littel less than the OP of this thread. Can we let this thread die quietly now? I beleive OUR community as a whole is better than this.

None of us is gaining honor here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: sunfan1121 on November 27, 2009, 04:39:49 PM
Gentelmen,

We have all had our differences over the years. Many of you probably think of me only a littel less than the OP of this thread. Can we let this thread die quietly now? I beleive OUR community as a whole is better than this.

None of us is gaining honor here.
Well said.  :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 27, 2009, 04:58:04 PM
Gentelmen,

We have all had our differences over the years. Many of you probably think of me only a littel less than the OP of this thread. Can we let this thread die quietly now? I beleive OUR community as a whole is better than this.

None of us is gaining honor here.

well said....and for the record, i don't recall seeing bad stuff from you here.,.,.or hearing bad about you in the arenas.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on November 27, 2009, 10:46:55 PM
Bustr, you are right.  We should move on.

















But 1st...










:banana:    :x

 :salute POTW  Great success!!

Hopefully... unless someone decides to keep the "fun" going  :uhoh Twitchy wanted to turn POTW into a full time base-taking squad, If we wanted to go take bases we'd all go join Dogfite's crew.

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-17.jpg)

I really didnt care what he was saying, I did find his posts on the BBS annoying and when he talked about the "Squad" I wondered if he was tallking about the same squad ive been flying with for 3 years. I heared him over vox in game a few times being a dictator, I just ignored him but if he is going to drive other pigs away I say dont let the door hit him on the way out

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/Looney-Tunes---Porky-Pig--C11754-1.jpg)


Great victory for Pigs and Knightland.  Wtg fellas.   :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on November 28, 2009, 06:18:20 AM
Bustr, you are right.  We should move on.

















But 1st...










:banana:    :x

 :salute POTW  Great success!!

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-17.jpg)

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/Looney-Tunes---Porky-Pig--C11754-1.jpg)


Great victory for Pigs and Knightland.  Wtg fellas.   :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: L0nGb0w on November 28, 2009, 06:46:17 AM
Bustr, you are right.  We should move on.


But 1st...


:banana:    :x

 :salute POTW  Great success!!

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-17.jpg)

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/Looney-Tunes---Porky-Pig--C11754-1.jpg)


Great victory for Pigs and Knightland.  Wtg fellas.   :aok


(http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll202/AWhetstone99/political-pictures-stephen-colbert-.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Changeup on November 28, 2009, 08:12:04 AM
 :angel:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 30, 2009, 01:05:42 PM
After about nine years of running and leading a squad, literally every day, then returning to find your best friend has literally erased your legacy, deleted your posts, and claimed responsibility for everything you've done, yeah, you're darn right I'm a little upset about it. Syko waited for all of about a month after I was gone and then started in on how he had always run the Pigs, when I called him out on this, his response to me was "It's my squad now, deal with it son." We had an understanding when I left, and he can claim responsibility for the Pigs on the Wing all he likes, but everybody who's played this game for more than a year knows who's who. If he wants to sit in my chair, scavenge my squad and take credit for what I've done, then that's his problem not mine.
I'm still a Pig, and if I have to start over from scratch then that don't bother me a bit, at least I can do it with a sense of honesty. I was recruiting when I started the Pigs ten years ago, I'll be recruiting tommorow.
Bipol... er I mean Krupinski, stodd, and some of you new Pigs aren't going to remember me, that's fine, but you guys need to know as much as you profess to dislike me, you're flying my legacy. I find that some how amusing.
It's not about base taking, it's about the herd.
Here's a little history lesson, Pigs on the Wing is my squad, I started it, I ran it for almost ten years. I let an unscrupulous person handle things while I was away, and he stabbed me in the back over it. That's the bottom line. It's a base taking squad, always has been, it's where the Oink originated, and it's where the Oink belongs. You can wear the snout and sport the pink skin, but if you're not rooting up real estate and traveling with the herd, then you're not a pig. The difference between Syko and I, all that loyalty he's enjoying from the new guys that's swelling his head, he had to lie about running the squad for ten years to get it. If he was so obsessed with being the big cheese, he should have simply started his own squad instead of scavenging someone elses behind their back.
Oink
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on November 30, 2009, 01:21:58 PM
Wow.  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 01:23:42 PM
I feel so guilty that the Hells Angels have so little drama, Angry, where are you when we need you? :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on November 30, 2009, 01:31:47 PM

-Twitchy

I actually had a convo. with a squaddie about this last night.  It disturbed me that the founder and Co. was booted from his own squad.  Me and the squaddie had a long talk about history and how import. it is to this hobby, and how so many new (ish) pilots have lost the sense of it.

I bet many of the players would be surprised that you can draw a straight line from AcesHigh back to the very first on-line multiplayer game ever on the internet (AirWarrior) and that all on-line games draw from the WW2 flight sim well.  (what was it... 1988?  87?)

History.

If the founder of my squad (CPID in AW of Spidr or +WM1) wanted to join the WidowMakers, it would go without saying I would welcome him with open arms.  Even if Tony (his name) started talking smack towards me or stepped on my toes I would never in a million years kick the guy.  He EARNED a place in the squad, and a level of respect and honor from all WidowMakers because he was the first, and we all owe him for it.

I am not saying the Pigs should have made Twitchy CO again.  That is their business and I understand that times change; BUT to kick the guy that created and built the squad...

I remember you building that squad Twitchy, even if some don't.

I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors Twitchy.

S! sir.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 30, 2009, 01:36:51 PM
Thank you Lute, I'm glad somebody remembers lol.  :old:
S!
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 01:49:12 PM
I actually had a convo. with a squaddie about this last night.  It disturbed me that the founder and Co. was booted from his own squad.  Me and the squaddie had a long talk about history and how import. it is to this hobby, and how so many new (ish) pilots have lost the sense of it.

I bet many of the players would be surprised that you can draw a straight line from AcesHigh back to the very first on-line multiplayer game ever on the internet (AirWarrior) and that all on-line games draw from the WW2 flight sim well.  (what was it... 1988?  87?)

History.

If the founder of my squad (CPID in AW of Spidr or +WM1) wanted to join the WidowMakers, it would go without saying I would welcome him with open arms.  Even if Tony (his name) started talking smack towards me or stepped on my toes I would never in a million years kick the guy.  He EARNED a place in the squad, and a level of respect and honor from all WidowMakers because he was the first, and we all owe him for it.

I am not saying the Pigs should have made Twitchy CO again.  That is their business and I understand that times change; BUT to kick the guy that created and built the squad...

I remember you building that squad Twitchy, even if some don't.

I wish you the best of luck in your endeavors Twitchy.

S! sir.
I'm sure there is a lot more involved than we know. I'm not taking sides, but there is always more than meets the eye. At least ours.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on November 30, 2009, 01:49:40 PM
I actually had a convo. with a squaddie about this last night.  It disturbed me that the founder and Co. was booted from his own squad.

I've given this consideration as well. If Twitchy is the CO and founder, the name stays with him, IMHO.  Guys having a problem with the new direction the CO and founder was taking should have left the squad.

As for the Muppets, Skyrock is the CO, but it's Kappa's squad.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TheDudeDVant on November 30, 2009, 02:18:17 PM
Well twitchy, look at it this way man, even if you no longer have the pig dynasty, there is always acting!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on November 30, 2009, 02:28:32 PM
This is not the place to air personal dirty laundry.  There are private venues that would accomplish far more.

 :salute

Way
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: NoBaddy on November 30, 2009, 02:30:36 PM
Lute...

It was '87 and the Damned were formed in '88 or '89 (havin' a brain fart :)).

We had a "palace coup" in '93. The guy that was "deposed" was a good person...just not a good leader. He deserved (and got) ample credit for keeping the squad alive in a down period. He is still around and still a friend. Of course, one thing we NEVER would have done is to air this crap in public. That is weak stuff (ie., childish).

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on November 30, 2009, 02:33:44 PM
This is not the place to air personal dirty laundry.  There are private venues that would accomplish far more.

 :salute

Way

Sure, let's go discuss this on the POTW forum.  Oh wait, I can't. I had an account there but  my privileges were revoked. I guess my very presence offended someone, considering I never posted anything there that the thinnest skinned virgin-nun would have found offensive.   :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on November 30, 2009, 02:37:28 PM
This is not the place to air personal dirty laundry.  There are private venues that would accomplish far more.

 :salute

Way


Im curious what some are trying to accomplish.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on November 30, 2009, 02:41:12 PM
I've given this consideration as well. If Twitchy is the CO and founder, the name stays with him, IMHO.  

An excellent point that I had not considered.

I agree that Twitchy created the Pigs and  the name is his.

Those not wanting to fly with Twitchy should start a new squad.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 30, 2009, 02:58:33 PM
This is not the place to air personal dirty laundry.  There are private venues that would accomplish far more.

 :salute

Way
Syko banned me from the POTW forum, deleted my posts, and that time has passed. Waystin, you're a natural leader, and to your credit, a gentleman besides. Whether you know it or not, you're leading the POTW now, and honestly, I can't imagine a better candidate for the job, at the moment.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Slash27 on November 30, 2009, 03:11:23 PM
I feel so guilty that the Hells Angels have so little drama, Angry, where are you when we need you? :rolleyes:

Oh really?? Well tell me this Mr Bigshot "CO", why does my key not work anymore and your car is in my parking spot?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 03:15:28 PM
Oh really?? Well tell me this Mr Bigshot "CO", why does my key not work anymore and your car is in my parking spot?
Me CO? No way. Too many coupes going on these days. That's your role.
 I couldn't resist, I always wanted to drive your Pinto :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on November 30, 2009, 04:20:35 PM
Twitchy you bumping this thread may just lose PoTW alot of members.

This is the truth for the community....Twitchy didnt change, PoTW did, we started becoming the sqaud we are now probably just before I joined it(it was actually more about score when I came in to think about it). We had kept this problem in our own private furoms but no it had to come here. We would like it if you dont help this out we were trying to solve this within the sqaud :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 30, 2009, 05:22:12 PM
Twitchy you bumping this thread may just lose PoTW alot of members.

This is the truth for the community....Twitchy didnt change, PoTW did, we started becoming the sqaud we are now probably just before I joined it(it was actually more about score when I came in to think about it). We had kept this problem in our own private furoms but no it had to come here. We would like it if you dont help this out we were trying to solve this within the sqaud :salute
I saw some trash falling off the garbage truck the other day, and it didn't hurt my feelings at all. The driver kept on going, and I realized that maybe the truck was just too full of trash to haul the load to begin with, of course it wasn't my trash truck, but I stopped to pick it up anyway 'cause I'm just like that.
Yeah it could have stayed on the POTW forum, but I'm not a member of that forum anymore, and all my posts have been deleted there, even the menial Happy Thanksgiving stuff. I read through about ten pages of folks bashing me here, and I've responded to them with the truth about what's happened. If that's something you're ashamed of, then well, good. I would be.
Bottom line is this junky, I'm back to lead my squad, I'm not bending over to pick up the soap for Syko. He dropped that soap the day he started claiming to have been the CO for nine years and inviting furballers to a base taking squadron. As far as I am concerned, POTW is reforming, Syko can either resign, or carry on and accept the inevitable label of scavenger, and the oinking will continue either way.
Yeah I'm sorry to sound like a party pooper here, I really am, but I'm pretty upset. I've apparently lost a good friend I've had for ten years, and I've been literally, LITERALLY erased from something I've invested ten years of my life into. Yeah I could eat crow and just watch half the squad furball as the other half struggles to defend or take a field, and yeah I could just walk away from it and let Syko have it, he obviously wanted it pretty bad, but I'm definately not going to sit back and watch him get away with it while retaining any credibility he might have imagined having to begin with.
There's really good reasons why people don't go around claiming they wrote all the Beatles songs, one of them is a moral issue, the other is because people know who Lennon and McCartney were. I'm Twitchy, POTW is my creation, thick or thin. I'm sorry that's an issue, but the truth often is, and darn well should be.
-Twitchy


Anyways, this thread went waaaayyy off the deep end here.
Base takers vs Furballers...
I think one suggestion that really seemed amiable was to take the two main arenas, and focus one of them on winning the war and taking fields, and focus the other on Furballing. I think you furballers would be surprised to see how many war oriented players are actually out there. We used to see a map reset almost daily, in the last three years or so, I don't think I've seen a single one. There's a rift developing between the two schools of thought, and it's causing alot of grief to both sides of it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 05:35:46 PM
I saw some trash falling off the garbage truck the other day, and it didn't hurt my feelings at all. The driver kept on going, and I realized that maybe the truck was just too full of trash to haul the load to begin with, of course it wasn't my trash truck, but I stopped to pick it up anyway 'cause I'm just like that.
Yeah it could have stayed on the POTW forum, but I'm not a member of that forum anymore, and all my posts have been deleted there, even the menial Happy Thanksgiving stuff. I read through about ten pages of folks bashing me here, and I've responded to them with the truth about what's happened. If that's something you're ashamed of, then well, good. I would be.
Bottom line is this junky, I'm back to lead my squad, I'm not bending over to pick up the soap for Syko. He dropped that soap the day he started claiming to have been the CO for nine years and inviting furballers to a base taking squadron. As far as I am concerned, POTW is reforming, Syko can either resign, or carry on and accept the inevitable label of scavenger, and the oinking will continue either way.
Yeah I'm sorry to sound like a party pooper here, I really am, but I'm pretty upset. I've apparently lost a good friend I've had for ten years, and I've been literally, LITERALLY erased from something I've invested ten years of my life into. Yeah I could eat crow and just watch half the squad furball as the other half struggles to defend or take a field, and yeah I could just walk away from it and let Syko have it, he obviously wanted it pretty bad, but I'm definately not going to sit back and watch him get away with it while retaining any credibility he might have imagined having to begin with.
There's really good reasons why people don't go around claiming they wrote all the Beatles songs, one of them is a moral issue, the other is because people know who Lennon and McCartney were. I'm Twitchy, POTW is my creation, thick or thin. I'm sorry that's an issue, but the truth often is, and darn well should be.
-Twitchy


Anyways, this thread went waaaayyy off the deep end here.
Base takers vs Furballers...
I think one suggestion that really seemed amiable was to take the two main arenas, and focus one of them on winning the war and taking fields, and focus the other on Furballing. I think you furballers would be surprised to see how many war oriented players are actually out there. We used to see a map reset almost daily, in the last three years or so, I don't think I've seen a single one. There's a rift developing between the two schools of thought, and it's causing alot of grief to both sides of it.

I hate to add insult to injury, but that "rift" could be bridged with Legos quite easily :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Strip on November 30, 2009, 05:37:33 PM
When I hear of POTW and herds, the thought of fish in a barrel comes to mind.

 ;)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on November 30, 2009, 05:41:05 PM

Base takers vs Furballers...
I think one suggestion that really seemed amiable was to take the two main arenas, and focus one of them on winning the war and taking fields, and focus the other on Furballing. I think you furballers would be surprised to see how many war oriented players are actually out there. We used to see a map reset almost daily, in the last three years or so, I don't think I've seen a single one. There's a rift developing between the two schools of thought, and it's causing alot of grief to both sides of it.


Mission in 3 minutes! Join Join Join Mission!!!Get the hangers down. Get town down.  Is town Down?  Need troops.
Mission in 3 minutes! Join Join Join Mission!!!Get the hangers down. Get town down.  Is town Down?  Need troops.
Mission in 3 minutes! Join Join Join Mission!!!Get the hangers down. Get town down.  Is town Down?  Need troops.
Mission in 3 minutes! Join Join Join Mission!!!Get the hangers down. Get town down.  Is town Down?  Need troops.
Mission in 3 minutes! Join Join Join Mission!!!Get the hangers down. Get town down.  Is town Down?  Need troops.
No Thanks.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Strip on November 30, 2009, 05:42:10 PM
Triple post....I am moving up in world.

 :joystick:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Strip on November 30, 2009, 05:45:39 PM
If your reading this you have to much time on your hands....
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 05:47:45 PM
I saw some trash falling off the garbage truck the other day, and it didn't hurt my feelings at all. The driver kept on going, and I realized that maybe the truck was just too full of trash to haul the load to begin with, of course it wasn't my trash truck, but I stopped to pick it up anyway 'cause I'm just like that.
Yeah it could have stayed on the POTW forum, but I'm not a member of that forum anymore, and all my posts have been deleted there, even the menial Happy Thanksgiving stuff. I read through about ten pages of folks bashing me here, and I've responded to them with the truth about what's happened. If that's something you're ashamed of, then well, good. I would be.
Bottom line is this junky, I'm back to lead my squad, I'm not bending over to pick up the soap for Syko. He dropped that soap the day he started claiming to have been the CO for nine years and inviting furballers to a base taking squadron. As far as I am concerned, POTW is reforming, Syko can either resign, or carry on and accept the inevitable label of scavenger, and the oinking will continue either way.
Yeah I'm sorry to sound like a party pooper here, I really am, but I'm pretty upset. I've apparently lost a good friend I've had for ten years, and I've been literally, LITERALLY erased from something I've invested ten years of my life into. Yeah I could eat crow and just watch half the squad furball as the other half struggles to defend or take a field, and yeah I could just walk away from it and let Syko have it, he obviously wanted it pretty bad, but I'm definately not going to sit back and watch him get away with it while retaining any credibility he might have imagined having to begin with.
There's really good reasons why people don't go around claiming they wrote all the Beatles songs, one of them is a moral issue, the other is because people know who Lennon and McCartney were. I'm Twitchy, POTW is my creation, thick or thin. I'm sorry that's an issue, but the truth often is, and darn well should be.
-Twitchy


Anyways, this thread went waaaayyy off the deep end here.
Base takers vs Furballers...
I think one suggestion that really seemed amiable was to take the two main arenas, and focus one of them on winning the war and taking fields, and focus the other on Furballing. I think you furballers would be surprised to see how many war oriented players are actually out there. We used to see a map reset almost daily, in the last three years or so, I don't think I've seen a single one. There's a rift developing between the two schools of thought, and it's causing alot of grief to both sides of it.

I found 5 Legos in my couch that should bridge that rift nicely :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 30, 2009, 06:08:19 PM
MANNN......

some of you guys are takin this waaaayyy too seriously.


let it die. have fun.

you're the first potw i've seen post crap. that could be something to do with them booting ya.

 deal with it. you made your bed, now lay in it. let them have their fun. those that i've flown with have always been cool, and fun to fly with/against.


sheesh.........
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on November 30, 2009, 06:09:39 PM
Developing? It's probably been there since capture was implemented.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 30, 2009, 06:14:03 PM
JERRY JERRY JERRY  :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 30, 2009, 06:15:53 PM
MANNN......

2x post......puter farted or somethingh.....
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on November 30, 2009, 06:17:09 PM
jerrry jerry jerry!!! :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 30, 2009, 06:51:53 PM
jerrry jerry jerry!!! :banana:
:rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on November 30, 2009, 06:53:02 PM
There seems to be an echo in here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on November 30, 2009, 06:53:46 PM
There seems to be an echo in here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on November 30, 2009, 06:54:31 PM
There seems to be an echo in here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on November 30, 2009, 06:55:56 PM
There seems to be an echo in here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on November 30, 2009, 06:57:23 PM
There seems to be an echo in here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: dunnrite on November 30, 2009, 07:26:49 PM
LMAO Target
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on November 30, 2009, 10:31:34 PM


now THAT's funny

 :rofl :aok :rofl :aok :rofl :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Oldman731 on November 30, 2009, 10:52:15 PM
Bottom line is this junky, I'm back to lead my squad, I'm not bending over to pick up the soap for Syko. He dropped that soap the day he started claiming to have been the CO for nine years and inviting furballers to a base taking squadron. As far as I am concerned, POTW is reforming, Syko can either resign, or carry on and accept the inevitable label of scavenger, and the oinking will continue either way.

You know, I've always thought that organized squadrons were part of the problem of these games.  It's posts like this that comfort me that I'm not altogether wrong.

- oldman
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on November 30, 2009, 11:14:17 PM
You know, I've always thought that organized squadrons were part of the problem of these games.
Funny, I always thought that people who flew around by themselves without the comradery and associations inherent to human nature were the ones that were the odd balls. I can't imagine this game without sqadrons, it's an age old tradition that goes back to our primate ancestry.
It doesn't matter how you play anymore, there's ho whines, BNZ whines, Alt Monkey Whines, Buff whines, Plane Type Whines, Base taker whines, furball whines, Score ho'ing whines, tool shedding whines, lone wolf wines, whiner whines, and now squadron whines... what else is left?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on November 30, 2009, 11:20:09 PM
Funny, I always thought that people who flew around by themselves without the comradery and associations inherent to human nature were the ones that were the odd balls. I can't imagine this game without sqadrons, it's an age old tradition that goes back to our primate ancestry.
It doesn't matter how you play anymore, there's ho whines, BNZ whines, Alt Monkey Whines, Buff whines, Plane Type Whines, Base taker whines, furball whines, Score ho'ing whines, tool shedding whines, lone wolf wines, whiner whines, and now squadron whines... what else is left?
Twitchy, if you played this game every day for the rest of your life, you will never get the respect or have the class of Oldman.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 01:31:38 AM
Twitchy, if you played this game every day for the rest of your life, you will never get the respect or have the class of Oldman.
Nor would I ever claim to.  :aok
Your admiration, however bear76, just isn't on my to do list today, perhaps in our next lives.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: PFactorDave on December 01, 2009, 01:50:41 AM
Twitchy, if you played this game every day for the rest of your life, you will never get the respect or have the class of Oldman.

You know...  Sometimes I think the best place to be is about where I am...   

I've been around long enough to not suck entirely.  I haven't been around long enough to feel that I am superior.  I'm new enough to have a sense of accomplishment when I score a kill.  I haven't been around long enough for my ego to be damaged by a loss...

The game is still fun, when I have the time to play...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 01, 2009, 01:51:32 AM
SkyRock<---owns Twitchy, and slaps him with some sense!   :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 01, 2009, 01:52:20 AM
You know...  Sometimes I think the best place to be is about where I am...   

I've been around long enough to not suck entirely.  I haven't been around long enough to feel that I am superior.  I'm new enough to have a sense of accomplishment when I score a kill.  I haven't been around long enough for my ego to be damaged by a loss...

The game is still fun, when I have the time to play...
you're living proof dorks have a place in suckdom!  :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: PFactorDave on December 01, 2009, 01:53:39 AM
you're living proof dorks have a place in suckdom!  :devil

Sure!  Why not?!  Whatever that means...   :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 01, 2009, 01:56:23 AM
Sure!  Why not?!  Whatever that means...   :uhoh
it means, you are a dork and you own in the kingdom of suck!..... duh!   :rolleyes:



other than you suck and you are a dork.... you're ok in my book!




 :noid




 :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 02:41:13 AM
it means, you are a dork and you own in the kingdom of suck!..... duh!   :rolleyes:



other than you suck and you are a dork.... you're ok in my book!




 :noid




 :devil


see now there is "smack talk" :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 03:35:21 AM
SkyRock<---owns Twitchy, and slaps him with some sense!   :devil
Heh, I probably need it.
Syko, I owe you an apology. I can't do it on the POTW forum at the moment, but here it is publicly...
I'm Sorry.
That said, you're going to have to come around to the realization that POTW is my squad, it always was and always will be. I am just as protective of it as you are, all the more so, in fact. We're going to work all this out and probably be just fine once the dust settles, but for now you're just going to have to relax long enough to realize it isn't about you or me, it's about POTW. Yeah we may loose some pigs over it, but if they have a problem with me leading my squad, they've no place in it to begin with....

Sigh... ok, base taking or furballing. I say base taking is where the glory is, watching the map turn green is a total turn on and chicks dig base takers. Furballers always end up with the heavy set chick in the glasses nobody wanted to dance with all night.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 01, 2009, 03:39:49 AM
Heh, I probably need it.
Syko, I owe you an apology. I can't do it on the POTW forum at the moment, but here it is publicly...
I'm Sorry.
That said, you're going to have to come around to the realization that POTW is my squad, it always was and always will be. I am just as protective of it as you are, all the more so, in fact. We're going to work all this out and probably be just fine once the dust settles, but for now you're just going to have to relax long enough to realize it isn't about you or me, it's about POTW. Yeah we may loose some pigs over it, but if they have a problem with me leading my squad, they've no place in it to begin with....

Sigh... ok, base taking or furballing. I say base taking is where the glory is, watching the map turn green is a total turn on and chicks dig base takers. Furballers always end up with the heavy set chick in the glasses nobody wanted to dance with all night.
-Twitchy
It isnt your sqaud...............and you just lost me

 :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 01, 2009, 04:59:00 AM
The long running SOAP As the world turns just lost all of its ratings as ACES HIGH forums has captured the imagination of all women ages 22-70.



Oprah is gonna blow a gasket!

Dangit ya Pigs.  can ya get your stuff together and deal with this without tempting all of us drama hounds?

My estrogen levels have spiked reading this stuff.   :frown:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 01, 2009, 05:14:03 AM
The long running SOAP As the world turns just lost all of its ratings as ACES HIGH forums has captured the imagination of all women ages 22-70.



Oprah is gonna blow a gasket!

Dangit ya Pigs.  can ya get your stuff together and deal with this without tempting all of us drama hounds?

My estrogen levels have spiked reading this stuff.   :frown:
1 person made it this way, he can fix it
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 05:16:17 AM
It isnt your sqaud...............and you just lost me
 :salute
Well, I'm sorry you feel that way, but, yeah junky, it is my squad, and if you can't at least stick around long enough to realize the only real difference is going to be in your head, then I'm sorry, but that's the way you want it apparently.
We used to have a squaddie named Seraphim, he played for score, and finished most of his tours with an overall rank in the low 20's, and I never once saw him outside of range channel. He enjoyed flying with the squad, and still managed to become one of the best sticks in the game.
If you're not willing to even try things out here, then there's not much I can do about it. I hate to see you go before you've even given it a shot here, but I will be taking command of my squad again, if I have to fly around by myself.
Why not stay a week or two and then at least have the option to later say you tried before you quit?
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 05:25:19 AM
1 person made it this way, he can fix it
You're right about that. You're wrong about who.
I'm going to fix it, absolutely, the question I have for you is are you going to quit, or are you going to stick around long enough to find out if it's worth quiting over? This whole thing with Syko has put us all in a bad light here obviously, but I didn't lead this squad for nine years because I'm some kind of schmuck man.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 01, 2009, 05:31:40 AM
You dont understand..........
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 05:42:22 AM
You dont understand..........
Nope, I sure don't. If yo think that quitting is your only option, then you don't understand either. I'm asking you to stay, you're telling me that you aren't going to because this isn't my squad, so one of the two of us is lacking the ability to compromise here.
Look, the only difference between Syko and myself, is that I require a cohesive squad. If that's really and truly too much for you then I understand, it takes a little commitment, and in this case it takes a little of the old college try, but nobody is asking any more or less of you than that junky. I've flown with you for about a month now, if you haven't seen any difference in that time, then maybe you're putting more into this than you need to be my friend.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 01, 2009, 05:59:58 AM
Funny, I always thought that people who flew around by themselves without the comradery and associations inherent to human nature were the ones that were the odd balls. I can't imagine this game without sqadrons, it's an age old tradition that goes back to our primate ancestry.
It doesn't matter how you play anymore, there's ho whines, BNZ whines, Alt Monkey Whines, Buff whines, Plane Type Whines, Base taker whines, furball whines, Score ho'ing whines, tool shedding whines, lone wolf wines, whiner whines, and now squadron whines... what else is left?
You missed his Key word "organized". The 2 squads I have been in  Pigstomers and the Blue Knights, both the comaradery level was high.  Pigstompers were a bit more organized, at times we could get a few together to "take a base" but usually fighter sweep was about it.  As for the BKs it's more along the lines of go over there and shoot the red guys.  Bother are a great bunch to fly with.  Needed no "little general" to order the squad what  to do to have fun... we just had fun
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 06:16:00 AM
Needed no "little general" to order the squad what  to do to have fun... we just had fun
That's great, good for you.
We had a ball ourselves for nine years with a CO, and managed to make a name for ourselves in the process. Used to play Dungeons and Dragons back in the day and had a ball doing that as well, of course without a dungeon master, it would have been bunch of guys sitting around having fun doing nothing, which is cool, but it was alot more fun to have a direction or a common goal to work towards and someone to take us there.
I'm guessing you won't be at the sign ups for POTW, bronk, but hey, we don't need a 'little general' to tell us how to be pigs either.  :aok
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: sunfan1121 on December 01, 2009, 06:53:38 AM
Dude you came in here after a year off, tried to play armchair general and made yourself look like an ass. As CO of a squad what you say reflects every member of your squad. If your views don't emulate those of your squad, then i think it was time to move on. When you came back, you did it guns blazing with no clue of current events. Compairing your own squad to the devils rejects is a prime example. You single handily rehashed a beef with our squad that had long sense passed. I received many Pm's from members of your former squad apologising for your actions. One of the earlyest things i learned in school was the difference of good attention and bad. All of this drama falls on your shoulders. You clearly wanted all the attention you could get otherwise this thread wouldn't be here.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 07:57:05 AM
Funny, I always thought that people who flew around by themselves without the comradery and associations inherent to human nature were the ones that were the odd balls. I can't imagine this game without sqadrons, it's an age old tradition that goes back to our primate ancestry.
It doesn't matter how you play anymore, there's ho whines, BNZ whines, Alt Monkey Whines, Buff whines, Plane Type Whines, Base taker whines, furball whines, Score ho'ing whines, tool shedding whines, lone wolf wines, whiner whines, and now squadron whines... what else is left?

people that fly around solo, don't "not" associate with other players. i flew without being in a squad for almost a year, but never "really" solo. i'd fly with different people, learning a little as i went on.
 after a little while, i was invited to join a squad. sometimes i flew with them, sometimes not.

 the problem is people that take this poop too seriously, not people in squads, or people not in squads.

 you, sir, are being too serious. i don't know how long you were gone for, but i've only recently heard of you. you came on the bbs with poop. to those of us that've never heard of ya, you come off as an arse. maybe you're different ingame, maybe not......

 this would appear to me to be the reason you got kicked out. dissappear for awhile, someone else is running the squad, squad has a good rep, then here comes twichey, actin like a jerk. doing her best to ruin the squads rep. sine you weren't the co anymore, that was their option, and prerogative. why keep up the crap? deal with it. move on. chill out, and have fun.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 01, 2009, 08:00:08 AM
Dude you came in here after a year off, tried to play armchair general and made yourself look like an ass. As CO of a squad what you say reflects every member of your squad. If your views don't emulate those of your squad, then i think it was time to move on. When you came back, you did it guns blazing with no clue of current events. Compairing your own squad to the devils rejects is a prime example. You single handily rehashed a beef with our squad that had long sense passed. I received many Pm's from members of your former squad apologising for your actions. One of the earlyest things i learned in school was the difference of good attention and bad. All of this drama falls on your shoulders. You clearly wanted all the attention you could get otherwise this thread wouldn't be here.
wait a second there slim willy. Since when did you start making sense? And what did you do with sunsfan?
 :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 08:03:57 AM
You missed his Key word "organized". The 2 squads I have been in  Pigstomers and the Blue Knights, both the comaradery level was high.  Pigstompers were a bit more organized, at times we could get a few together to "take a base" but usually fighter sweep was about it.  As for the BKs it's more along the lines of go over there and shoot the red guys.  Bother are a great bunch to fly with.  Needed no "little general" to order the squad what  to do to have fun... we just had fun
what is this organization you keep talking about? :neener: :uhoh :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 08:06:22 AM
just out of curiosity.......what do the members of potw that read these forums think?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 01, 2009, 08:11:57 AM
just out of curiosity.......what do the members of potw that read these forums think?
how bout they not and just let this go. Been enough drama in this thread. Worse than a jerry show called "my dad is my brother and i love midgets with mullets" Although it made for some very entertaining reading but, its ran its course.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 08:14:20 AM
how bout they not and just let this go. Been enough drama in this thread. Worse than a jerry show called "my dad is my brother and i love midgets with mullets" Although it made for some very entertaining reading but, its ran its course.

good point dude.
now stop with the sensible posts! :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 08:32:21 AM
Well, I'm sorry you feel that way, but, yeah junky, it is my squad, and if you can't at least stick around long enough to realize the only real difference is going to be in your head, then I'm sorry, but that's the way you want it apparently.
We used to have a squaddie named Seraphim, he played for score, and finished most of his tours with an overall rank in the low 20's, and I never once saw him outside of range channel. He enjoyed flying with the squad, and still managed to become one of the best sticks in the game.
If you're not willing to even try things out here, then there's not much I can do about it. I hate to see you go before you've even given it a shot here, but I will be taking command of my squad again, if I have to fly around by myself.
Why not stay a week or two and then at least have the option to later say you tried before you quit?
-Twitchy

do you really believe this?    because he scored in the 20's he was one of the best :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

please, the only thing he became good at was "gaming the game" oh wait he was always in vox range,     Dee Da Dee,
  I wish HTC would come in here and explain what most of us have been trying to explain, the friggin "war" is to promote combat, the game was NEVER about the "war"  it's about the "combat" always has been always will be, no matter how hard you try to make it about the war. you should go play WW2 online, that is the game you want to play!!!!

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 01, 2009, 09:05:40 AM
Funny, I always thought that people who flew around by themselves without the comradery and associations inherent to human nature were the ones that were the odd balls. I can't imagine this game without sqadrons, it's an age old tradition that goes back to our primate ancestry.
It doesn't matter how you play anymore, there's ho whines, BNZ whines, Alt Monkey Whines, Buff whines, Plane Type Whines, Base taker whines, furball whines, Score ho'ing whines, tool shedding whines, lone wolf wines, whiner whines, and now squadron whines... what else is left?
Funny..... you limit yourself to the comradery of just a squad. I fly with a lot more folks than just my squad and I fly on all sides.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 01, 2009, 09:11:06 AM
You know...  Sometimes I think the best place to be is about where I am...   

I've been around long enough to not suck entirely.  I haven't been around long enough to feel that I am superior.  I'm new enough to have a sense of accomplishment when I score a kill.  I haven't been around long enough for my ego to be damaged by a loss...

The game is still fun, when I have the time to play...
My comment was about twiggies lack of class :huh 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 09:24:37 AM
Funny..... you limit yourself to the comradery of just a squad. I fly with a lot more folks than just my squad and I fly on all sides.

I agree 100% Shuff, that was one of several reasons I left POTW a while back.... I still fly with my old buds from POTW sometimes, but I find myself MUCH happier in the widowmakers, simply a better fit for my playstyle and enjoyment. 

Side switching is VERY fun, get to meet a lot of good folks on each "side".  Not sure why some folks have such "country-centric" view of this game, after all, are we not all here for the same reasons?  The love of aviation, fun, and ww2 era combat/history?

Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 01, 2009, 09:27:04 AM
I agree 100% Shuff, that was one of several reasons I left POTW a while back.... I still fly with my old buds from POTW sometimes, but I find myself MUCH happier in the widowmakers, simply a better fit for my playstyle and enjoyment. 

Side switching is VERY fun, get to meet a lot of good folks on each "side".  Not sure why some folks have such "country-centric" view of this game, after all, are we not all here for the same reasons?  The love of aviation, fun, and ww2 era combat/history?

Sol

And you still miss me you hairless wonder! :x
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 09:28:31 AM
I agree 100% Shuff, that was one of several reasons I left POTW a while back.... I still fly with my old buds from POTW sometimes, but I find myself MUCH happier in the widowmakers, simply a better fit for my playstyle and enjoyment. 

Side switching is VERY fun, get to meet a lot of good folks on each "side".  Not sure why some folks have such "country-centric" view of this game, after all, are we not all here for the same reasons?  The love of aviation, fun, and ww2 era combat/history?

Sol

it took awhile for me to start side switching......but since i have, it's let me "meet" so many more fun people that play this game. makes for another dimension of fun.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 09:29:16 AM
And you still miss me you hairless wonder! :x


Waystin, the only guy I know who can cover my 6 with a wirble.. lol

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 09:33:32 AM

Waystin, the only guy I know who can cover my 6 with a wirble.. lol



know what's funny?


was fighting tike the other night.....him in a yak, me in a 38. he ran for the nearby v-base.........kept the fight in range of the manned gun. dude in the gun couldn't hit my big arsed bomb.......eerr....fighter though.  :banana: :rofl :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 01, 2009, 09:39:18 AM
smackem smackem smackem jaws....
Well school's starting isn't it, here comes the juveniles to smackem. Lay off the sugar boys, you'll live longer.
This thread was supposed to be about Furballers Vs Base Takers, you knobs are the ones that started the drama and smack talk from the first reply, it's all you guys do here and it's impressive if only in it's arrogance and mootness. I've said my peace, frankly the POTW stuff is none of your business to begin with, but again, I'm not the one that started smacking my gums about it here. This thread was intended to be something else entirely, and I honestly don't give a dried rat's turd what you guys think about me, or my squad. Thanks for your slighted and ignorant opinions about it though, I'll be sure to care what YOU think for sure Sunsfan, we all know what an ace you are.  :lol
INK, seraphim would have owned you, you're not all that. Your mediocrity is frustrating for you I guess, but then, you're the one who's obsessed with it.
Don't want you to be late for school boys, run along now.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 10:49:11 AM
Well school's starting isn't it, here comes the juveniles to smackem. Lay off the sugar boys, you'll live longer.
This thread was supposed to be about Furballers Vs Base Takers, you knobs are the ones that started the drama and smack talk from the first reply, it's all you guys do here and it's impressive if only in it's arrogance and mootness. I've said my peace, frankly the POTW stuff is none of your business to begin with, but again, I'm not the one that started smacking my gums about it here. This thread was intended to be something else entirely, and I honestly don't give a dried rat's turd what you guys think about me, or my squad. Thanks for your slighted and ignorant opinions about it though, I'll be sure to care what YOU think for sure Sunsfan, we all know what an ace you are.  :lol
INK, seraphim would have owned you, you're not all that. Your mediocrity is frustrating for you I guess, but then, you're the one who's obsessed with it.
Don't want you to be late for school boys, run along now.
-Twitchy



 :rofl :rofl :rofl

kicked your butt quit easily, and you  had what 2 to 4 friendlies with ya each time :rofl

besides I know I am not "all that... and a bag of chips."   

at least I fight,  even if I know I am not gonna win, I fight till I am dead or they are, you on the other hand could not "fight" your way out of a paper bag.


Sunsfan has more class and dignity  in his little pinky then you will ever have :aok




Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 01, 2009, 10:55:54 AM
  Your OP had zip to do with Furballers and Base takers.It was just another lame thread,by you,yet again spewing out another curdled dead on arrival attention seeking pile of crap.
 You have made the POTW business everyones business on a regular basis with your attention seeking BS fests and now you have the unmitigated GALL to say "its none of your business"  Oh thats rich. Youve earned your reputation in here.Youve smeared your squad,whom you claim to hold so dearly, with the dreck you roll in almost daily. You classless loser. If you had a shread of decency,you woulda took your lumps when they booted you like that bag of trash you found,but no,your gonna tear it apart. WTG.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m141/Drs109/failboat.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 11:00:57 AM
 Your OP had zip to do with Furballers and Base takers.It was just another lame thread,by you,yet again spewing out another curdled dead on arrival attention seeking pile of crap.
 You have made the POTW business everyones business on a regular basis with your attention seeking BS fests and now you have the unmitigated GALL to say "its none of your business"  Oh thats rich. Youve earned your reputation in here.Youve smeared your squad,whom you claim to hold so dearly, with the dreck you roll in almost daily. You classless loser. If you had a shread of decency,you woulda took your lumps when they booted you like that bag of trash you found,but no,your gonna tear it apart. WTG.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m141/Drs109/failboat.jpg)



 :aok :aok
could not have said it better myself :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CHAPPY on December 01, 2009, 11:01:13 AM
As CO of a squad what you say reflects every member of your squad. If your views don't emulate those of your squad, then i think it was time to move on.  

I hope not, or my squad is in big trouble.
:bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 01, 2009, 11:29:03 AM
Well school's starting isn't it, here comes the juveniles to smackem. Lay off the sugar boys, you'll live longer.
This thread was supposed to be about Furballers Vs Base Takers, you knobs are the ones that started the drama and smack talk from the first reply, it's all you guys do here and it's impressive if only in it's arrogance and mootness. I've said my peace, frankly the POTW stuff is none of your business to begin with, but again, I'm not the one that started smacking my gums about it here. This thread was intended to be something else entirely, and I honestly don't give a dried rat's turd what you guys think about me, or my squad. Thanks for your slighted and ignorant opinions about it though, I'll be sure to care what YOU think for sure Sunsfan, we all know what an ace you are.  :lol
INK, seraphim would have owned you, you're not all that. Your mediocrity is frustrating for you I guess, but then, you're the one who's obsessed with it.
Don't want you to be late for school boys, run along now.
-Twitchy

Haha, charade you are. :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bustr on December 01, 2009, 12:08:22 PM
Gentelmen,

1. At the moment this is the only forum Twitchy has to speak for himself about an issue he feels strongly about in the hopes another party might be following it. This is a Catch-22 that I respect Twitchy is caught in. All of us know historicly the AH Forum is the wrong place to air personal and squad issues. Management has been very kind to not step in yet as everyone has been warned over the years they will with prejudice. We owe it to our community and guests to get past this quickly. Right now we all are looking kind of silly on the Oprah meter.

2. There are exactly 2 people who can resolve this issue if it is ever to be resolved. This Forum is not, nor ever will be the location for that resolution. None of us in this audience are principles to the final resolution how ever it plays out. This is a personal issue between Twitchy and no one on this Forum.

3. The longer this carries on here at the AH Forum, the more people will get dragged in and peoples feelings will be hurt aside from the normal Forum bantor. It is human nature to get caught up in emotional issues while personaly identifying with aspects of the story that ring true to incidents in your own past. That is not what this game is about gentelmen...........Please let this thread go before it spirals out of control and HiTech performs an intervention.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 12:11:15 PM
Gentelmen,

1. At the moment this is the only forum Twitchy has to speak for himself about an issue he feels strongly about in the hopes another party might be following it. This is a Catch-22 that I respect Twitchy is caught in. All of us know historicly the AH Forum is the wrong place to air personal and squad issues. Management has been very kind to not step in yet as everyone has been warned over the years they will with prejudice. We owe it to our community and guests to get past this quickly. Right now we all are looking kind of silly on the Oprah meter.

2. There are exactly 2 people who can resolve this issue if it is ever to be resolved. This Forum is not, nor ever will be the location for that resolution. None of us in this audience are principles to the final resolution how ever it plays out. This is a personal issue between Twitchy and no one on this Forum.

3. The longer this carries on here at the AH Forum, the more people will get dragged in and peoples feelings will be hurt aside from the normal Forum bantor. It is human nature to get caught up in emotional issues while personaly identifying with aspects of the story that ring true to incidents in your own past. That is not what this game is about gentelmen...........Please let this thread go before it spirals out of control and HiTech performs an intervention.

IF HIS  issue is with one person, and he cannot go into the potw private forum, then he should have taken it to pm.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 12:11:28 PM
Gentelmen,

1. At the moment this is the only forum Twitchy has to speak for himself about an issue he feels strongly about in the hopes another party might be following it. This is a Catch-22 that I respect Twitchy is caught in. All of us know historicly the AH Forum is the wrong place to air personal and squad issues. Management has been very kind to not step in yet as everyone has been warned over the years they will with prejudice. We owe it to our community and guests to get past this quickly. Right now we all are looking kind of silly on the Oprah meter.

2. There are exactly 2 people who can resolve this issue if it is ever to be resolved. This Forum is not, nor ever will be the location for that resolution. None of us in this audience are principles to the final resolution how ever it plays out. This is a personal issue between Twitchy and no one on this Forum.

3. The longer this carries on here at the AH Forum, the more people will get dragged in and peoples feelings will be hurt aside from the normal Forum bantor. It is human nature to get caught up in emotional issues while personaly identifying with aspects of the story that ring true to incidents in your own past. That is not what this game is about gentelmen...........Please let this thread go before it spirals out of control and HiTech performs an intervention.


well my opinion of you just went way up, my last post here :aok :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 01, 2009, 12:15:19 PM
We used to have a squaddie named Seraphim, he played for score, and finished most of his tours with an overall rank in the low 20's, and I never once saw him outside of range channel. He enjoyed flying with the squad, and still managed to become one of the best sticks in the game.

-Twitchy

Seraphim was hardly one of the 'best sticks in the game', far from it actually, very, very, very far from it.  But considering you're using your other PoTW squadron mates as a comparison to come to that conclusion about Seraphim, I can see where you made your mistake.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bravoa8 on December 01, 2009, 12:20:33 PM
 Your OP had zip to do with Furballers and Base takers.It was just another lame thread,by you,yet again spewing out another curdled dead on arrival attention seeking pile of crap.
 You have made the POTW business everyones business on a regular basis with your attention seeking BS fests and now you have the unmitigated GALL to say "its none of your business"  Oh thats rich. Youve earned your reputation in here.Youve smeared your squad,whom you claim to hold so dearly, with the dreck you roll in almost daily. You classless loser. If you had a shread of decency,you woulda took your lumps when they booted you like that bag of trash you found,but no,your gonna tear it apart. WTG.

(http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m141/Drs109/failboat.jpg)
I want to ride it! :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 12:22:47 PM
ABout the ORIGINAL topic though...

Neither pure furballing, nor base taking, is what this game is about.
I am MUCH more of a furballer than a base taker, but I will assist in a base capture IF it provides good air to air fights. 
The base taking portion of the game is what drives the combat IMO, and the game would be lessened by the removal of it.  That said, the idea of a horde coming in with 50 guys to smash and grab a base, is incredibly boring.  What's the point?  THis tactic destroys the entire premise of a COMBAT game.  this could be accomplished as easily offline, as online.
The other tactic performed by many "base taking" squads, of dropping all teh fighter hangars int he middle of a great fight, is poor gameplay as well IMO.  Sure, it promotes taking of the base, but it is to the detriment of many who are enjoying the fight.  THere are many other bases aorund which you can go play pork n grab on.  Plus, is it not more satisfying to sneak that goon in with a battle raging overhead and snatch that base out from under the enemy's toes, than to fly a circle over the base while twiddling your toes waiting for the goont o show up?

Again, it boils down to, BOTH sides are right, in that base taking is a force which drives the combat (furball) portion of the game, and to loose either would lessen the game experience as a whole IMO.

Sol


(forgive my typing skillz, or lack thereof, passing a kidney stone, and am allll doped up on percocet)

Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 12:58:45 PM
ABout the ORIGINAL topic though...

Neither pure furballing, nor base taking, is what this game is about.
I am MUCH more of a furballer than a base taker, but I will assist in a base capture IF it provides good air to air fights. 
The base taking portion of the game is what drives the combat IMO, and the game would be lessened by the removal of it.  That said, the idea of a horde coming in with 50 guys to smash and grab a base, is incredibly boring.  What's the point?  THis tactic destroys the entire premise of a COMBAT game.  this could be accomplished as easily offline, as online.
The other tactic performed by many "base taking" squads, of dropping all teh fighter hangars int he middle of a great fight, is poor gameplay as well IMO.  Sure, it promotes taking of the base, but it is to the detriment of many who are enjoying the fight.  THere are many other bases aorund which you can go play pork n grab on.  Plus, is it not more satisfying to sneak that goon in with a battle raging overhead and snatch that base out from under the enemy's toes, than to fly a circle over the base while twiddling your toes waiting for the goont o show up?

Again, it boils down to, BOTH sides are right, in that base taking is a force which drives the combat (furball) portion of the game, and to loose either would lessen the game experience as a whole IMO.

Sol


(forgive my typing skillz, or lack thereof, passing a kidney stone, and am allll doped up on percocet)

Sol

butcha know what's fun/? when they drop the fighter hangars, people up il's, b25, and other bombers....and then still kick the attackers butts in air to air.  :devil
 ever seen nkl5, nb, cobia, snaphook, and a whole slew of others fight in a bomber?  :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 01:01:33 PM
butcha know what's fun/? when they drop the fighter hangars, people up il's, b25, and other bombers....and then still kick the attackers butts in air to air.  :devil
 ever seen nkl5, nb, cobia, snaphook, and a whole slew of others fight in a bomber?  :devil

hehe quite true, did it myself in A-20's the other night... can be a lot of fun, and laughs...
Landed 6 kills in one sortie in that A-20... lol.  Flies like a pregnant 38
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 01, 2009, 01:12:53 PM
That said, you're going to have to come around to the realization that POTW is my squad, it always was and always will be... realize it isn't about you or me, it's about POTW... if they have a problem with me leading my squad, they've no place in it to begin with....

Self-ownage.

It isnt your sqaud...............and you just lost me

 :salute

Uber ownage.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 01:17:14 PM
hehe quite true, did it myself in A-20's the other night... can be a lot of fun, and laughs...
Landed 6 kills in one sortie in that A-20... lol.  Flies like a pregnant 38


jerk!!

i never landed in an a20. seems i'm always losing things...... :rofl :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 01:22:22 PM
jerk!!

i never landed in an a20. seems i'm always losing things...... :rofl :bolt:

Never said I landed in 1 peice LOL

Misisng aileron, half elevator, one engine dead and gear shot out.. woowooo

 :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 01, 2009, 01:23:55 PM
Gentelmen,

1. At the moment this is the only forum Twitchy has to speak for himself about an issue he feels strongly about in the hopes another party might be following it. This is a Catch-22 that I respect Twitchy is caught in. All of us know historicly the AH Forum is the wrong place to air personal and squad issues. Management has been very kind to not step in yet as everyone has been warned over the years they will with prejudice. We owe it to our community and guests to get past this quickly. Right now we all are looking kind of silly on the Oprah meter.

2. There are exactly 2 people who can resolve this issue if it is ever to be resolved. This Forum is not, nor ever will be the location for that resolution. None of us in this audience are principles to the final resolution how ever it plays out. This is a personal issue between Twitchy and no one on this Forum.

3. The longer this carries on here at the AH Forum, the more people will get dragged in and peoples feelings will be hurt aside from the normal Forum bantor. It is human nature to get caught up in emotional issues while personaly identifying with aspects of the story that ring true to incidents in your own past. That is not what this game is about gentelmen...........Please let this thread go before it spirals out of control and HiTech performs an intervention.

Your piggy snout is so concentrated on the squad slop in front of you that you are failing to see that there is fresh forum food all around this thread.  It encompasses a whole host of issues that Twitchy has brought up. 

The fact that Pigs have used this forum like it's their own little pigsty over and over makes me hardly care to let this thread die just because it took a turn that makes you squeal.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 01:27:39 PM
Never said I landed in 1 peice LOL

Misisng aileron, half elevator, one engine dead and gear shot out.. woowooo

 :bolt:

perfect landing condition then.  :aok :airplane: :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 01, 2009, 01:36:32 PM
Never said I landed in 1 peice LOL

Misisng aileron, half elevator, one engine dead and gear shot out.. woowooo

 :bolt:

Like a true SAPP'er  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Twizzty on December 01, 2009, 02:07:54 PM
(forgive my typing skillz, or lack thereof, passing a kidney stone, and am allll doped up on percocet)
Sol

I feel your pain Sol, I passed one a few weeks ago. Never felt pain like that before and 4 strait days of Perc-325's will make you go loopy BTW!

In a related topic...I never knew I was armed with a 3.1mm cannon, good times!  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 02:09:21 PM
My last one was a 7mm! this one is 5mm...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Twizzty on December 01, 2009, 02:13:11 PM
OUCH...good luck sir!

They say once you have one, your 5 times more likely to get another one...I can't wait!  :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 02:23:13 PM
lol kidney stones, a small bit of pain,  Pancreatitis,  makes Kidney stones feel like a walk in the park!!

trust me 4 and a half months with NO FOOD, tube fed, hospitalized for a month, pain so extreme I was on Demerol and morphine,
and that did not get rid of the pain completely!!

 be thankful That's all you got!  
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 01, 2009, 02:33:11 PM
lol kidney stones, a small bit of pain,  Pancreatitis,  makes Kidney stones feel like a walk in the park!!

trust me 4 and a half months with NO FOOD, tube fed, hospitalized for a month, pain so extreme I was on Demerol and morphine,
and that did not get rid of the pain completely!!

 be thankful That's all you got!  
Well, I had a hang nail once so suck it up princess :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 02:33:37 PM
lol kidney stones, a small bit of pain,  Pancreatitis,  makes Kidney stones feel like a walk in the park!!

trust me 4 and a half months with NO FOOD, tube fed, hospitalized for a month, pain so extreme I was on Demerol and morphine,
and that did not get rid of the pain completely!!

 be thankful That's all you got! 

Damn man, hope I never have to experience that.  Kidney stones are plenty painful enough for me lol

Luckily, I am not making any NEW stones, only have to pass those that alrdy exist.  Mine were as a result of eating too many antacids for heartburn.  Excessive calcium.  Since I switched to Perscription acid refulx meds, I don't take rolaids any more, and am also not making any new kidney stones.

Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 02:33:53 PM
Well, I had a hang nail once so suck it up princess :D

<<<<<<<<<  had an infected ingrown toenail.  :neener: :uhoh :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 02:35:35 PM
Like a true SAPP'er  :aok

Heck., it's rare for me to land my 38 w/o at LEAST an engine out lol
Ifluff'n it ain't leakin an' smokin' my sortie ain't finished yet
Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 01, 2009, 02:37:00 PM
<<<<<<<<<  had an infected ingrown toenail.  :neener: :uhoh :bolt:

Go ahead Cap, post the picture and end this thread...I dare ya! :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 02:42:22 PM
Go ahead Cap, post the picture and end this thread...I dare ya! :neener:
Could post the pic of my finger vs a DA50 RC airplane engine/prop injury ;)

Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 02:45:12 PM
Well, I had a hang nail once so suck it up princess :D


 :rofl :rofl


Could post the pic of my finger vs a DA50 RC airplane engine/prop injury ;)

Sol

you do that I will post the pic of my Alligator bite where he almost took off my finger :D  alright I dont have a pic of it but it was crazy, I show the finger to people and ask if they can guess what caused it, first response is a motorcycle chain, or chainsaw :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 02:54:50 PM
Go ahead Cap, post the picture and end this thread...I dare ya! :neener:


somehow i think i'm gonna regret this.........

(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/HPIM8896.jpg)

and the chunk the doc cut out.......
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/toenail.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 01, 2009, 02:56:25 PM
Put a fork in it, it's done! :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 01, 2009, 02:57:24 PM

somehow i think i'm gonna regret this.........

(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/HPIM8896.jpg)

and the chunk the doc cut out.......
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/toenail.jpg)
anyone else curious what the brown stuff is? :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 02:58:08 PM
Holy crap.. thank god we don't have VR smellovision yet.

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 01, 2009, 02:58:54 PM

somehow i think i'm gonna regret this.........

(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/HPIM8896.jpg)

and the chunk the doc cut out.......
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/toenail.jpg)


 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 01, 2009, 03:01:01 PM
Holy crap.. thank god we don't have VR smellovision yet.


Imagine what flying near Jaxxo would be like :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 03:02:11 PM
(http://photos.bravenet.com/389/645/485/79D7640478.jpg)

Finger vs Prop

Prop PWND me
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 03:03:51 PM
(http://photos.bravenet.com/389/645/485/79D7640478.jpg)

Finger vs Prop

Prop PWND me


holy crap!!

think my toenail pic just got owned!! :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: PFactorDave on December 01, 2009, 03:06:36 PM
Hip joint vs 25 foot fall...

(http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w220/Davis_Andrews/IMG_1157.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 01, 2009, 03:11:10 PM

I'm guessing you won't be at the sign ups for POTW, bronk, but hey, we don't need a 'little general' to tell us how to be pigs either.  :aok
-Twitchy

Correct PoTW tossed you ... no more little general. WTG PoTW :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 01, 2009, 03:40:13 PM
You know I have a weak stomach right?
(http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm134/waystin2/puke.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 03:41:45 PM
You know I have a weak stomach right?
(http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm134/waystin2/puke.gif)

AND PROBABLY ENMPTY NOW TOO, EH? :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 01, 2009, 04:09:06 PM
hehe quite true, did it myself in A-20's the other night... can be a lot of fun, and laughs...
Landed 6 kills in one sortie in that A-20... lol.  Flies like a pregnant 38


I've seen cobia38 and snaphook do some great things in an A-20, though I've only seen NKL5 run so I really can't say how well he fights.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 04:29:15 PM
I've seen cobia38 and snaphook do some great things in an A-20, though I've only seen NKL5 run so I really can't say how well he fights.


ack-ack

i've seen him turnfight in a lanc...........
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 01, 2009, 05:11:44 PM
But considering you're using your other PoTW squadron mates as a comparison to come to that conclusion about Seraphim, I can see where you made your mistake.


ack-ack

 :lol :headscratch: ?


 Cap, check pm's.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 05:13:26 PM
(http://photos.bravenet.com/389/645/485/79D7640478.jpg)

Finger vs Prop

Prop PWND me

by the way sol.....what the hell were you trhinkin? starting an engine that big bare handed?and it DID heal well, i hope?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 05:14:08 PM
:lol :headscratch: ?


 Cap, check pm's.

i'm confused? nothing new in them? :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: dunnrite on December 01, 2009, 05:16:26 PM
i'm confused? nothing new in them? :headscratch:

He didn't say he sent ya anything, Cap  :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 01, 2009, 05:16:29 PM
i'm confused? nothing new in them? :headscratch:
:lol Was sending one now, didnt realize you'd be checking this thread so fast. :o
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 01, 2009, 05:33:26 PM
by the way sol.....what the hell were you trhinkin? starting an engine that big bare handed?and it DID heal well, i hope?

The engine was already running.  I was tuning/testing.  had the plane tied back by a rope tied to a tree.  The rope apparently had been nitro soaked and was weakend.  I was sitting in front of the A/C, and the rope snapped.  it began to roll at me.  Instinctively/thankfully I put my hand out to stop it, rather than get hit in the gut by it, thus the hand injury.

As for healing, it is going well.  I had to have a microsurgery on it to reattach tendons veins etc etc, and am currently in physical therapy for it, but all is going well so far!

Sol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 01, 2009, 05:40:15 PM
:lol Was sending one now, didnt realize you'd be checking this thread so fast. :o
arent you suppose to send the pm then say "check PMs  :noid"
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 05:41:03 PM
He didn't say he sent ya anything, Cap  :noid
:noid :bolt: :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 05:41:45 PM
:lol Was sending one now, didnt realize you'd be checking this thread so fast. :o

sorry bout that....got it............it's been a little slow here, and when it is, i get more chance to check the boards.......
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 01, 2009, 05:42:47 PM
arent you suppose to send the pm then say "check PMs  :noid"
I know  :o

go away bp. :devil
sorry bout that....got it............it's been a little slow here, and when it is, i get more chance to check the boards.......
My bad anyways :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 05:45:33 PM
The engine was already running.  I was tuning/testing.  had the plane tied back by a rope tied to a tree.  The rope apparently had been nitro soaked and was weakend.  I was sitting in front of the A/C, and the rope snapped.  it began to roll at me.  Instinctively/thankfully I put my hand out to stop it, rather than get hit in the gut by it, thus the hand injury.

As for healing, it is going well.  I had to have a microsurgery on it to reattach tendons veins etc etc, and am currently in physical therapy for it, but all is going well so far!

Sol

dam!!

now it sounds like you are one lucky sob!!

 i don't own anything that big....yet.....but when i'm working on any of my planes, regardless of how i tie it down, i can't make myself sit down....i kneel or squat.....but i want to be able to move quick.

i did catch my fingers in a prop on my twinstar once....i almost always start the right(as your facing the plane) engine first, but for some reason had started the left one first this time. reached to grtab the fuselage...stuck my 2 little fingers right in the prop.
 very unique noise......4 people were at me with towels, and first aid kit before i could shut it down.

 glad you're healing ok dude!! :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 01, 2009, 05:47:22 PM
I know  :o

go away bp. :devilMy bad anyways :lol
:noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 01, 2009, 05:58:09 PM
i've seen him turnfight in a lanc...........

No offense but that doesn't say squat for how good he is.  He tried to fight me in a goon the other day while I was engaged with 2 other bogies, I guess his intent was to try and intentionally ram me while I was fighting.  Because he lived for around 8 minutes while I turned with him and the other two Rooks that were in fighters mean he's any good because he survived the longest in his goon?  Not at all, just says that he's dumb enough or bored enough to try and fight in a plane without any guns and not that he's good.  The reason NKL5 lived as long as he did in his goon was that I was more concerned with the two other planes that had guns and were a threat, whereas the C-47 was hardly a threat and once the fighters were dispatched, NKL5 followed about 5 seconds later.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 01, 2009, 06:02:35 PM
No offense but that doesn't say squat for how good he is.  He tried to fight me in a goon the other day while I was engaged with 2 other bogies, I guess his intent was to try and intentionally ram me while I was fighting.  Because he lived for around 8 minutes while I turned with him and the other two Rooks that were in fighters mean he's any good because he survived the longest in his goon?  Not at all, just says that he's dumb enough or bored enough to try and fight in a plane without any guns and not that he's good.  The reason NKL5 lived as long as he did in his goon was that I was more concerned with the two other planes that had guns and were a threat, whereas the C-47 was hardly a threat and once the fighters were dispatched, NKL5 followed about 5 seconds later.


ack-ack

i'm only making observations on what i've seen. i don't care if he's good, bad, in between.......... :bolt: :aok

the point was, that he was having fun.......and not really detracting from anyone elses. he couldn't possibly have taken the fun out of that fight for you.

 personally, i almost fall out of my chair laughing when i see guys turnin n burnin in c47's like that.  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 01, 2009, 06:11:04 PM
Correct PoTW tossed you ... no more little general. WTG PoTW :aok


He was tossed?

Wouldnt that be poetic justice...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 01, 2009, 06:31:27 PM
He was tossed?

Wouldnt that be poetic justice...

I'll tell you this, he didn't leave willingly.  :bolt:

 :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kazaa on December 01, 2009, 08:43:29 PM
No offense but that doesn't say squat for how good he is.  He tried to fight me in a goon the other day while I was engaged with 2 other bogies, I guess his intent was to try and intentionally ram me while I was fighting.  Because he lived for around 8 minutes while I turned with him and the other two Rooks that were in fighters mean he's any good because he survived the longest in his goon?  Not at all, just says that he's dumb enough or bored enough to try and fight in a plane without any guns and not that he's good.  The reason NKL5 lived as long as he did in his goon was that I was more concerned with the two other planes that had guns and were a threat, whereas the C-47 was hardly a threat and once the fighters were dispatched, NKL5 followed about 5 seconds later.


ack-ack

 :lol :cry :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 01, 2009, 11:41:55 PM
He was tossed?

Wouldnt that be poetic justice...
Confucious say, man who leaves his woman or his squad with best friend, responsible for much screwing  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 12:23:46 AM
Confucious say, man who leaves his woman or his squad with best friend, responsible for much screwing  :D
im waiting on you to post pics of your and slash in a motel 6 together.  :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 02, 2009, 12:26:16 AM
im waiting on you to post pics of your and slash in a motel 6 together.  :noid
I wasn't infering Slash was cheating on you, but he probably is :P
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 12:29:54 AM
I wasn't infering Slash was cheating on you, but he probably is :P
thats ok, i have grizz and silat to keep me company  :P
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 02, 2009, 07:10:59 AM
He was tossed?

Wouldnt that be poetic justice...

Yeah, funny thing about that is that Syko didn't have the cajones to do it himself, he had bentnail passing messages to me like a third grader while he was on a 'secret channel' hiding from me for the last two weeks. It was real classy. In the ten years I've played this game I've never seen anything so low. Not only did he go around claiming to have run the Pigs on the Wing for the last ten years, he went so far as to delete my posts on the POTW site and literally hide from me on channel when I showed up in game to talk to him about it. Backstabbing cowardice at it's finest, but hey, if he wanted that shiny CO badge bad enough to steal somebody's squad while they're going through hard times, after ten years of being a friend and squadmate, and lie to take credit for a decade of running it, he deserves it, and the reputation that''s going to follow it. I'm the bad guy? LOL yeah.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 02, 2009, 07:41:00 AM
Yeah, funny thing about that is that Syko didn't have the cajones to do it himself, he had bentnail passing messages to me like a third grader while he was on a 'secret channel' hiding from me for the last two weeks. It was real classy. In the ten years I've played this game I've never seen anything so low. Not only did he go around claiming to have run the Pigs on the Wing for the last ten years, he went so far as to delete my posts on the POTW site and literally hide from me on channel when I showed up in game to talk to him about it. Backstabbing cowardice at it's finest, but hey, if he wanted that shiny CO badge bad enough to steal somebody's squad while they're going through hard times, after ten years of being a friend and squadmate, and lie to take credit for a decade of running it, he deserves it, and the reputation that''s going to follow it. I'm the bad guy? LOL yeah.
-Twitchy

sheesh dude! let it go.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Sd-j0rKeKw  (not work safe)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 02, 2009, 07:43:46 AM
sheesh dude! let it go.
He said as he hit the post button AGAIN.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 02, 2009, 08:16:59 AM
Cry wine wah wah wah
-Twitchy
I think your mistaking ignoring for hiding. If only Skuzzy would delet every thread where you claim POTW to be uber ownage it would clear a page. Suck it up princess.YOU brought this upon yourself. YOU made the squad cringe everytime you opened your cucumber holster. YOU are the one that just had to have all that attention and YOU are a sad case.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 02, 2009, 08:30:39 AM
I just got pwnt by "my" squad.

-Twitchy

As soon as the coffee kicks in, I'll be sure to come back here and laugh at you hysterically.

My opinion of POTW just increased ten-fold.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 02, 2009, 08:36:04 AM
Ok Im back.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A!!!!!   :lol :lol :lol

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YRG3_h4arbU/SE0DVIRl90I/AAAAAAAACM4/X8j4BPcF6ac/s400/coke+is+pwnt.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 02, 2009, 02:29:46 PM
Ok Im back.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A!!!!!   :lol :lol :lol

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_YRG3_h4arbU/SE0DVIRl90I/AAAAAAAACM4/X8j4BPcF6ac/s400/coke+is+pwnt.jpg)
:rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: NoBaddy on December 02, 2009, 03:28:06 PM
ever seen nkl5, nb, cobia, snaphook, and a whole slew of others fight in a bomber?  :devil

I could only wish I was as good as Cobia and Snaphook at stall fighting a buff. I'm only successful when I have an add. Win, lose or draw...stall fighting in a buff is a major hoot!!   :x

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 02, 2009, 03:33:23 PM
A-20s are a blast to DF in.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 02, 2009, 04:01:26 PM
Yeah, funny thing about that is that Syko didn't have the cajones to do it himself, he had bentnail passing messages to me like a third grader while he was on a 'secret channel' hiding from me for the last two weeks. It was real classy. In the ten years I've played this game I've never seen anything so low. Not only did he go around claiming to have run the Pigs on the Wing for the last ten years, he went so far as to delete my posts on the POTW site and literally hide from me on channel when I showed up in game to talk to him about it. Backstabbing cowardice at it's finest, but hey, if he wanted that shiny CO badge bad enough to steal somebody's squad while they're going through hard times, after ten years of being a friend and squadmate, and lie to take credit for a decade of running it, he deserves it, and the reputation that''s going to follow it. I'm the bad guy? LOL yeah.
-Twitchy

While the entire situation is very ironic/amusing, I do genuinely feel bad for you on a personal level Twitchy.  That's gotta burn deep getting kicked out of your own squad. 

Potw morphed into something that you didn't want to be a part of while you flat out quit for an entire year.  How often did you visit the Bbs or the Potw forums to keep tabs and greet friends during your hiatus?  The impression I got was that you completely vanished.  A squad is a group who enjoy flying together and when a stranger comes out of nowhere dictating game play, something was bound to give.  As far as the actual title 'Pigs on the Wing' goes, that's difficult to say who has the right to it, if you created it as you claim.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kermit de frog on December 02, 2009, 06:23:00 PM
  I have not read all of the pages in this or other related threads, so take my words as is.

  Twitchy, if what you say is true, then the name should stay with you.  Here are some info I've heard:
1)You had to leave AH for +1 year due to real life.  Thus you disbanded your squad once your account went inactive.
2)You and Syko agreed that he would reform the squad and act as CO in your absence.
3)Upon your return, it was agreed upon that you would be the CO again.
4)It was wrong of Syko to omit your 10 years as CO history from the website.  (Lots of time and work to pay for 10 years of gaming)
5)It is not right to have Syko ask other players if they should steal the squad name from you since you insist on keeping it for yourself.

These are the things I've heard.

   Syko and the others can choose to form a new squad with a different name.  If they do not, well, the older AH players will know who stole the name.  You as CO have the right to kick out players from your squad, just as they have the right to remove themselves.

  Also, by you posting negatively after your arrival back to AH, it attracts like minded others.  Learn from this humbling experience and move forward.  It's always a good ideas to show more respect to others, just as I do to you.  Have fun, and good luck with the rebuilding of your squadron.
 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 02, 2009, 06:28:44 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p128/Kevorkian_2007/Disfunction.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 02, 2009, 06:33:30 PM
 Here are some info I've heard:

<SNIP>
And where did you get all of that info? Because im sure that is "info" from both sides... :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 07:37:21 PM
  I have not read all of the pages in this or other related threads, so take my words as is.

  Twitchy, if what you say is true, then the name should stay with you.  Here are some info I've heard:
1)You had to leave AH for +1 year due to real life.  Thus you disbanded your squad once your account went inactive.
2)You and Syko agreed that he would reform the squad and act as CO in your absence.
3)Upon your return, it was agreed upon that you would be the CO again.
4)It was wrong of Syko to omit your 10 years as CO history from the website.  (Lots of time and work to pay for 10 years of gaming)
5)It is not right to have Syko ask other players if they should steal the squad name from you since you insist on keeping it for yourself.

These are the things I've heard.

   Syko and the others can choose to form a new squad with a different name.  If they do not, well, the older AH players will know who stole the name.  You as CO have the right to kick out players from your squad, just as they have the right to remove themselves.

  Also, by you posting negatively after your arrival back to AH, it attracts like minded others.  Learn from this humbling experience and move forward.  It's always a good ideas to show more respect to others, just as I do to you.  Have fun, and good luck with the rebuilding of your squadron.
 
I agree, let the kid get his own name.
POTW is your name and you should keep it.

god why do i have to agree?  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 07:38:44 PM
And where did you get all of that info? Because im sure that is "info" from both sides... :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
I'll say this, Twitchy came up with that name. And twitchy should keep that name. Dont get me wrong. I dont like him nor this syko kid. But right is right.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 02, 2009, 07:56:23 PM
Gotta agree here.If he named it,he should keep it and any member with half a brain should leave it.They can start one with far less drama.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 08:05:26 PM
Gotta agree here.If he named it,he should keep it and any member with half a brain should leave it.They can start one with far less drama.
:aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wax on December 02, 2009, 08:05:36 PM
Gotta agree here.If he named it,he should keep it and any member with half a brain should leave it.They can start one with far less drama.

What would be a good name for the new squad ?     :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: RedTop on December 02, 2009, 08:12:07 PM
What would be a good name for the new squad ?     :devil

SOWS on the Warpath ?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Lusche on December 02, 2009, 08:13:59 PM
What would be a good name for the new squad ?     :devil

Wigs on a string?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 02, 2009, 08:15:07 PM
SOWS on the Warpath ?
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on December 02, 2009, 08:15:45 PM
Whorders on the Border? ....the possibilities are endless :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 02, 2009, 08:16:30 PM
Whorders on the Border? ....the possibilities are endless :)
im not gonna start. I dont feel like getting that PNG  :aok :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 02, 2009, 09:09:10 PM
Quote
god why do i have to agree?

first time for everything

 :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Delirium on December 02, 2009, 09:27:04 PM
Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 02, 2009, 09:33:00 PM
Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.
He isnt in PoTW and he understands :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: RedTop on December 02, 2009, 09:42:32 PM
Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

Great point Del!!!

As CO of a squad I can agree completely with your points.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 02, 2009, 09:57:05 PM
Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

You can make an argument for both sides.  I think it's a given that the members make a squad.  It isn't the squad name that is important but that the members enjoy flying with each other.  Twitchy created "Pigs on the Wing" though, the name is his creation.  I don't really know what the solution is tbh, but I see both sides of it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 02, 2009, 11:01:31 PM
 Name it  "Pork.The other wing.   PTOW :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Plazus on December 02, 2009, 11:05:06 PM
Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing

I am honored to be your "mud" and "escrement"

 :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: PFactorDave on December 02, 2009, 11:05:14 PM

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild.

I agree with this.  When my squad lost its founder to real life issues, we reformed as necessary under another senior member.  While our CO's departure was on good terms, if it hadn't been I think it would have been wholly appropriate to reform the squad under the name we had.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 02, 2009, 11:09:35 PM
I agree with Del. POTW matured while twich was gone. He should simply start a new squad instead of trying to destroy another.

I agree with this.  When my squad lost its founder to real life issues, we reformed as necessary under another senior member.  While our CO's departure was on good terms, if it hadn't been I think it would have been wholly appropriate to reform the squad under the name we had.
The 80th reformed under a umm a junior member (he's 16 I think).  :D

He is excellent at augering and he knows how to flip over trees.... pretty much a born leader of our type.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 02, 2009, 11:28:49 PM
Name it  "Pork.The other wing.   PTOW :rofl
:rofl :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 02, 2009, 11:30:29 PM
What would be a good name for the new squad ?     :devil

fluffy bunnys?

 :neener:  :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 02, 2009, 11:35:20 PM
fluffy bunnys?

 :neener:  :noid

Pissed
Off
Twitchy
Wing
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 02, 2009, 11:48:41 PM
Pissed
Off
Twitchy
Wing

WINNAH!!!

maybe.........
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 03, 2009, 01:13:00 AM
What would be a good name for the new squad ?     :devil
OINK
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 03, 2009, 03:17:27 AM
You can make an argument for both sides.  I think it's a given that the members make a squad.  It isn't the squad name that is important but that the members enjoy flying with each other. Twitchy created "Pigs on the Wing" though, the name is his creation.  I don't really know what the solution is tbh, but I see both sides of it.
If he claims it to be his creation wouldnt that be a copyright violation? You listen to Pink flloyd Grizz?  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 03:35:45 AM
Roger Waters vs. Pink Floyd meets AHII.

 :old: :rock :old: :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 03, 2009, 08:51:13 AM
 Vatti formed The Flying Circus way back when AH started. We have had the same core squad for the most part since then. Vatti took a sabatical to go play WoW for a year or two and when the Squad was deleted after his name was deleted from the banks,we reformed it. He has since came back to fly now and then and never once was it even brought up to give him control of the unit.Hajo took over and reformed it,when Hajo left for a bit Rob reformed it. Hajo came back and it was also never considered.
  Ya see,TFC is a unit.Almost family.We dont have that petty little Its mine its mine bullcrap going on because its OURS.No one runs the squad because we work as a group.
  Take notes Twitchy. It only matters whos in charge if you have ego and maturity issues.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SlapShot on December 03, 2009, 10:06:24 AM
Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

Good points Del, but the conditions that you describe don't seem to be the same conditions for POTW.

Twitchy owns the name ... if there is a faction of the current members of the POTW that don't like him or his direction, then they simply withdraw from the POTW and form their own squad with new leadership. That may leave the POTW with 1 member (Twitchy) but he can then try to recruit people that are of the same mindset as him.

Whoever creates a squad name, owns that squad name until that person gives up the name ... pure and simple ... and it doesn't appear that Twitchy is willing to give up the name.

For example ... If yourself, Corky, Shuff, Soulyss, and Silat decided that the original "objective" of the 80th was not to your liking, would you try to oust Mensa, take the squad name, and re-mold the 80th to your collective "objective" ? ... or do you separate yourself from the squad and start your own squad with your new "objective" ?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SlapShot on December 03, 2009, 10:13:08 AM
Vatti formed The Flying Circus way back when AH started. We have had the same core squad for the most part since then. Vatti took a sabatical to go play WoW for a year or two and when the Squad was deleted after his name was deleted from the banks,we reformed it. He has since came back to fly now and then and never once was it even brought up to give him control of the unit.Hajo took over and reformed it,when Hajo left for a bit Rob reformed it. Hajo came back and it was also never considered.
  Ya see,TFC is a unit.Almost family.We dont have that petty little Its mine its mine bullcrap going on because its OURS.No one runs the squad because we work as a group.
  Take notes Twitchy. It only matters whos in charge if you have ego and maturity issues.

Apples and Oranges ... those COs who departed, passed the torch, and returned ... have only returned to the squad because they agree with the "objective" of the squad. If they didn't, they probably would have not re-joined and either formed their own squad or joined a squad who's objective was more to their liking.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 10:57:33 AM
Good points Del, but the conditions that you describe don't seem to be the same conditions for POTW.

Twitchy owns the name ... if there is a faction of the current members of the POTW that don't like him or his direction, then they simply withdraw from the POTW and form their own squad with new leadership. That may leave the POTW with 1 member (Twitchy) but he can then try to recruit people that are of the same mindset as him.

Whoever creates a squad name, owns that squad name until that person gives up the name ... pure and simple ... and it doesn't appear that Twitchy is willing to give up the name.

For example ... If yourself, Corky, Shuff, Soulyss, and Silat decided that the original "objective" of the 80th was not to your liking, would you try to oust Mensa, take the squad name, and re-mold the 80th to your collective "objective" ? ... or do you separate yourself from the squad and start your own squad with your new "objective" ?

i would think that if he dissappeared for a year, and the squad disbanded(since the co's account went idle?), and then was reformed under the new co, then the new co owns the name now. he gave it up.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 03, 2009, 11:25:28 AM
Apples and Oranges ... those COs who departed, passed the torch, and returned ... have only returned to the squad because they agree with the "objective" of the squad. If they didn't, they probably would have not re-joined and either formed their own squad or joined a squad who's objective was more to their liking.
I disagree.All we hear from Twitchy is I me mine. There is no we or us to him. In the sence that it sounds like the squad has pretty much stayed the same,it is Twitchy that has changed. I hear people say he was a great guy,and when he came back to the game he acted like he had lost his mind. He no longer fits what the squad perceives to be their role.
 What they do is their business,but he has caused them a LOT of grief,and that is unforgivable.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 12:01:26 PM
all this crap makes me soooooooooooo friggin glad i found the 80th.....or they found me......or somethign like that..............easiest going guys i've met in this game. that's not sayng anything bad about anyone else....just good about them.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on December 03, 2009, 12:16:52 PM
As far as the Squad name goes, that should Go with Twichy out of respect,  They should just start there own squad with a new name and make a name for thereselfs, If Twichy wants to keep his squad name then let him have it, whats the big deal ? Squads have been watching this whole deal unfold,Some have formed there own opinions and hope it gets put to rest "soon". This does no good for the community. Lets hope Adults can act as such. :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bustr on December 03, 2009, 12:26:29 PM
http://whois.domaintools.com/pigsonthewing.org

SYKO has owned the domain name since 2003 and the WEB site belongs to him.

Sorry.... forgot they encode the WHOIS Registrarant ID key. Besides paying for his own game account he has shelled out the additional money over the years to keep up the website and domain name. SYKO can do whatever he wants with and deny acces to whom ever with his own WEB site. SYKO is no kid as BiPolar suggests. He is my age and I remember when Mic Jagger was a skinny punk. The current crop of Pigs have never been threatened with expulsion for something that sounds like old fashioned back of the bus descrimination. "Their personal choice of what kind of player they want to be". The only expulsion rule any of them has ever known is no country changing. Other than that, SYKO's motto is: have fun!

Can this thread please die now? Or are you guys just doing the usual and seeing how far you can push Skuzzy before he steps in? This is between Twitchy and SYKO. Not the AH community. Twtichy has real world avenues to contact SYKO. They know each others real names and contact info.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: lowZX14 on December 03, 2009, 12:37:15 PM
Any of you use your PC for anything but this game......... :old:

http://whois.domaintools.com/pigsonthewing.org

What does who owns the website have to do with who owns the squad name within the game?  I own the rights to my squad's website but does that mean that I own the squad....NO, absolutely not.  IMO the squad C.O. owns it.  When you are invited to join, it comes up with their name.  Now if said squad C.O. hands it off to someone else, it's the new C.O.'s.  If the C.O. takes a break and leaves it in the hands of a trusted friend and squadmate but still keeps the account and leaves the squad in their name, it's theirs when they get back.  If they hand it off to someone and give that person the name of the squad, then it becomes more of a respect and attitude issue.  Ultimately it's the members of the squad that give it the strength that keeps it going and give the squad a certain reputation.  It's pretty simple.  If you want to be a close knit "family" limit who you bring in, you know the old adage about too many chefs spoiling the soup.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SlapShot on December 03, 2009, 01:08:56 PM
I disagree.All we hear from Twitchy is I me mine. There is no we or us to him. In the sence that it sounds like the squad has pretty much stayed the same,it is Twitchy that has changed. I hear people say he was a great guy,and when he came back to the game he acted like he had lost his mind. He no longer fits what the squad perceives to be their role.
 What they do is their business,but he has caused them a LOT of grief,and that is unforgivable.

I don't care what "we" hear from Twitchy ... makes no difference to "us" because we aren't in that squad. He can drive the POTW name into the ground for all I care ... he created it ... he can destroy it.

He started the squad ... he came up with the squad name ... it's his until he gives it up and from what I have read ... he's not giving it up.

Also, from what I have read, Twitchy's intent for the squad was to be a premiere "base taking" squad ... and other posts lead me to believe that a vast majority in the squad want to change the dynamics to a premiere "dog fighting" squad ... so I don't necessarily believe that the "squad" has stayed the same.

If there is a group that want to just "fight" and not "capture" ... then it's time for them to create their own squad.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SlapShot on December 03, 2009, 01:13:19 PM
Any of you use your PC for anything but this game......... :old:

http://whois.domaintools.com/pigsonthewing.org

That means doodily-squat ... I own the DFC web domain name ... but I don't own, nor rule supreme over the DFC simply because I coughed up the measly $31.00 to create the web domain.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Soulyss on December 03, 2009, 02:32:10 PM
For example ... If yourself, Corky, Shuff, Soulyss, and Silat decided that the original "objective" of the 80th was not to your liking, would you try to oust Mensa, take the squad name, and re-mold the 80th to your collective "objective" ? ... or do you separate yourself from the squad and start your own squad with your new "objective" ?

We tried a coup d'etat ounce and Mensa fiendishly squashed it with much violence and bloodshed.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on December 03, 2009, 02:36:54 PM
Real simple, people and squads know Twitchy Started the Pigs, whether you care or not...  what i find amazing is the childlike attitude of "were not going to change our name" Pigs have always been known for the base taking game, now seems a few are tired of taking bases and want a dogfighting, Seems to me like the reasonable thing to do is get yourselves a new name?..
i took over a year off from the 68Th's and when i came back i had my same rank and responsibilities, the squads gameplay hadn't changed. 2 people started the 68Th KO and Bragg and its grown ever sense, Bragg has retired due to health reasons and <S> Rip KO, Falcon took the Squad over and we haven't changed who the 68Th are, we base take, dogfight, resupply, and defend and help anyone who asks.

For what its worth that's my 2 cents
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CrAcKeR on December 03, 2009, 02:50:33 PM
Too many Dr Phils in here :rofl Im not offering any "2 cents" on it because i dont know the whole story and yes there are 2 sides to every story. And plus it is none of my business even though Twitchy wants it to be our business. For that i salute the squad in charge now because they are not on here doing the same thing as Twitchy. :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 03, 2009, 02:57:13 PM
We tried a coup d'etat ounce and Mensa fiendishly squashed it with much violence and bloodshed.
Not the dreaded sweetheart cannon?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 03, 2009, 03:06:25 PM
I felt the uncontrollable need to post but don't actually have anything to say

fixed
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 03:08:46 PM
Good points Del, but the conditions that you describe don't seem to be the same conditions for POTW.



For example ... If yourself, Corky, Shuff, Soulyss, and Silat decided that the original "objective" of the 80th was not to your liking, would you try to oust Mensa, take the squad name, and re-mold the 80th to your collective "objective" ? ... or do you separate yourself from the squad and start your own squad with your new "objective" ?

IF I'm not mistaken, i've heard rumors that they have some rather "compromising" pictures of him, just in case..... :noid :bolt: :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 03, 2009, 03:09:48 PM
Real simple, people and squads know Twitchy Started the Pigs, whether you care or not

I cant speak for "people" but I hadn't the faintest idea who Twiggy was until about three weeks ago.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 03:11:12 PM
Real simple, people and squads know Twitchy Started the Pigs, whether you care or not...  what i find amazing is the childlike attitude of "were not going to change our name" Pigs have always been known for the base taking game, now seems a few are tired of taking bases and want a dogfighting, Seems to me like the reasonable thing to do is get yourselves a new name?..
i took over a year off from the 68Th's and when i came back i had my same rank and responsibilities, the squads gameplay hadn't changed. 2 people started the 68Th KO and Bragg and its grown ever sense, Bragg has retired due to health reasons and <S> Rip KO, Falcon took the Squad over and we haven't changed who the 68Th are, we base take, dogfight, resupply, and defend and help anyone who asks.

For what its worth that's my 2 cents


i only have one rank, and one responisbility...well.....2 responsibilities in this game.

 rank? suck-ass p-38 pile-it supreme.
 responsibility? have fun
 responsibility2? bait for the other 38 pile-its.  :noid :airplane: :banana: :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 03:11:48 PM
I cant speak for "people" but I hadn't the faintest idea who Twiggy was until about three weeks ago.

+1
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 03, 2009, 03:28:39 PM
Good points Del, but the conditions that you describe don't seem to be the same conditions for POTW.

Twitchy owns the name ... if there is a faction of the current members of the POTW that don't like him or his direction, then they simply withdraw from the POTW and form their own squad with new leadership. That may leave the POTW with 1 member (Twitchy) but he can then try to recruit people that are of the same mindset as him.

Whoever creates a squad name, owns that squad name until that person gives up the name ... pure and simple ... and it doesn't appear that Twitchy is willing to give up the name.

For example ... If yourself, Corky, Shuff, Soulyss, and Silat decided that the original "objective" of the 80th was not to your liking, would you try to oust Mensa, take the squad name, and re-mold the 80th to your collective "objective" ? ... or do you separate yourself from the squad and start your own squad with your new "objective" ?

Part of the problem is... twitchy did give up the name. If he wanted to keep it he would have kept his account and control.

The major part of the problem is that the POTW matured way past where it was when twitchy had control.

If anyone thinks twitchy owns the name, I'd love to see the document espousing that.



As for the 80th... if they changed to something else that I did not like, I'd leave. Which is what twitchy should have done immediately upon returning and finding that POTW had advanced past where he wanted to be.

Just as you say here...
Apples and Oranges ... those COs who departed, passed the torch, and returned ... have only returned to the squad because they agree with the "objective" of the squad. If they didn't, they probably would have not re-joined and either formed their own squad or joined a squad who's objective was more to their liking.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ruler2 on December 03, 2009, 03:39:01 PM
Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.


Lol, that's us most of the time, if there are more than two of us on at once though, things start getting fun. But we DO have fun augering and EPIC FAILing in between those times  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 03, 2009, 04:20:42 PM
Lol, that's us most of the time, if there are more than two of us on at once though, things start getting fun. But we DO have fun augering and EPIC FAILing in between those times  :D

noooo nooo we fail more than you!   :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ruler2 on December 03, 2009, 04:25:45 PM
I'd like to see you try!  :banana:   I'll probably fail much more with this forced break I have to take from AH... long story, it's in another thread,lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 03, 2009, 05:03:36 PM
I almost think some people are baiting this drama into lasting........







 :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 03, 2009, 05:14:13 PM
This thread is like Herpes, one flare up after another :confused:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 05:21:12 PM
This thread is like Herpes, one flare up after another :confused:

who's on first? :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 03, 2009, 05:22:42 PM
who's on first? :noid
In your case a hemmeroid :P :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 05:25:03 PM
In your case a hemmeroid :P :D

 :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 03, 2009, 06:04:17 PM
There's some sheep here in the thread who look a little lost from the herd.

Twitchy was clawing for pity and trying to tear apart what has already been in existence and oinking along happily for the last decade without him.  We are not the same POTW that twitchy left behind to fend for itself in AH almost a decade ago (litteraly, our current senior leadership called Skuzzy when the original POTW was abandoned by Twitchy to have the old abandoned squad deleted and the current POTW founded with the same name).  Twitchy didn't unintentionaly destroy us the first time, damned if any of us are going to let him intentionaly try in round two.  We even listened to Twitchy when he came back, unforutnately we can't say the same was returned.  We don't want to change up the POTW or do things any different than what we've been doing for the past decade without him.  It's been a pretty damn good decade if we say so ourselves, but unfortunatley our founding leader who abandoned us for almost 10 years to fend and provide for ourselves disagrees.  This is why Twitchy is no longer a participant in the POTW message board, as likely any of us with malicious intent would be.  It seems he is quickly working for the privilage here on the AH general forums as well.

He is doing everything in his power now to enlist sympathy and persuade people of the general community that are not members of the POTW to support what he wants to do to the POTW.  The POTW would like to assure those of you not in POTW that: a) while your concerns are apreciated, the matter is unfortunatley none of your buisness (the same as non-American citizens should have no buisness voting in the president of the United States).  b) we are not taking the POTW that have been the way it has been for the past decade and turning it into "Twitchy's Fascist Base Takers - OINK!".  The "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko WILL still be the same "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko.  c) we are glad to have Twitchy back in the AH community and we still greatly respect and admire Twichy for one day, a very long time ago, starting the POTW name.  However that in no way means we're going to bend over and do what you want before taking into account what everyone else in POTW wants and will make the squad in general happier and healthier for another decade.

So now, lets seperate the sheep from the pigs here and end this thread.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 03, 2009, 06:17:58 PM
There's some sheep here in the thread who look a little lost from the herd.

Twitchy was clawing for pity and trying to tear apart what has already been in existence and oinking along happily for the last decade without him.  We are not the same POTW that twitchy left behind to fend for itself in AH almost a decade ago (litteraly, our current senior leadership called Skuzzy when the original POTW was abandoned by Twitchy to have the old abandoned squad deleted and the current POTW founded with the same name).  Twitchy didn't unintentionaly destroy us the first time, damned if any of us are going to let him intentionaly try in round two.  We even listened to Twitchy when he came back, unforutnately we can't say the same was returned.  We don't want to change up the POTW or do things any different than what we've been doing for the past decade without him.  It's been a pretty damn good decade if we say so ourselves, but unfortunatley our founding leader who abandoned us for almost 10 years to fend and provide for ourselves disagrees.  This is why Twitchy is no longer a participant in the POTW message board, as likely any of us with malicious intent would be.  It seems he is quickly working for the privilage here on the AH general forums as well.

He is doing everything in his power now to enlist sympathy and persuade people of the general community that are not members of the POTW to support what he wants to do to the POTW.  The POTW would like to assure those of you not in POTW that: a) while your concerns are apreciated, the matter is unfortunatley none of your buisness (the same as non-American citizens should have no buisness voting in the president of the United States).  b) we are not taking the POTW that have been the way it has been for the past decade and turning it into "Twitchy's Fascist Base Takers - OINK!".  The "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko WILL still be the same "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko.  c) we are glad to have Twitchy back in the AH community and we still greatly respect and admire Twichy for one day, a very long time ago, starting the POTW name.  However that in no way means we're going to bend over and do what you want before taking into account what everyone else in POTW wants and will make the squad in general happier and healthier for another decade.

So now, lets seperate the sheep from the pigs here and end this thread.

dude...i've said it before, and to stodd.....i respect the hell outta you guys for being able to be so quiet, about this, in the face of all the poop he's been trying to fling.  :aok i think others probably feel the same.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kermit de frog on December 03, 2009, 06:45:22 PM
There's some sheep here in the thread who look a little lost from the herd.

Twitchy was clawing for pity and trying to tear apart what has already been in existence and oinking along happily for the last decade without him.  We are not the same POTW that twitchy left behind to fend for itself in AH almost a decade ago (litteraly, our current senior leadership called Skuzzy when the original POTW was abandoned by Twitchy to have the old abandoned squad deleted and the current POTW founded with the same name).  Twitchy didn't unintentionaly destroy us the first time, damned if any of us are going to let him intentionaly try in round two.  We even listened to Twitchy when he came back, unforutnately we can't say the same was returned.  We don't want to change up the POTW or do things any different than what we've been doing for the past decade without him.  It's been a pretty damn good decade if we say so ourselves, but unfortunatley our founding leader who abandoned us for almost 10 years to fend and provide for ourselves disagrees.  This is why Twitchy is no longer a participant in the POTW message board, as likely any of us with malicious intent would be.  It seems he is quickly working for the privilage here on the AH general forums as well.

<snip>...

b) we are not taking the POTW that have been the way it has been for the past decade and turning it into "Twitchy's Fascist Base Takers - OINK!".  The "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko WILL still be the same "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko.  c) we are glad to have Twitchy back in the AH community and we still greatly respect and admire Twichy for one day, a very long time ago, starting the POTW name.  However that in no way means we're going to bend over and do what you want before taking into account what everyone else in POTW wants and will make the squad in general happier and healthier for another decade.

So now, lets seperate the sheep from the pigs here and end this thread.

So, you're saying Twitchy was NOT the CO for almost a decade?

Also, you're saying that Skuzzy had to replace Syko as the CO of POTW because Twitchy's name was still there?  Once a CO's account goes inactive, the squad is automatically disbanded.  Syko only then needs to send squad invites and have the new squad named the same as was before.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 03, 2009, 06:51:25 PM
There's some sheep here in the thread who look a little lost from the herd.

Twitchy was clawing for pity and trying to tear apart what has already been in existence and oinking along happily for the last decade without him.  We are not the same POTW that twitchy left behind to fend for itself in AH almost a decade ago (litteraly, our current senior leadership called Skuzzy when the original POTW was abandoned by Twitchy to have the old abandoned squad deleted and the current POTW founded with the same name).  Twitchy didn't unintentionaly destroy us the first time, damned if any of us are going to let him intentionaly try in round two.  We even listened to Twitchy when he came back, unforutnately we can't say the same was returned.  We don't want to change up the POTW or do things any different than what we've been doing for the past decade without him.  It's been a pretty damn good decade if we say so ourselves, but unfortunatley our founding leader who abandoned us for almost 10 years to fend and provide for ourselves disagrees.  This is why Twitchy is no longer a participant in the POTW message board, as likely any of us with malicious intent would be.  It seems he is quickly working for the privilage here on the AH general forums as well.

He is doing everything in his power now to enlist sympathy and persuade people of the general community that are not members of the POTW to support what he wants to do to the POTW.  The POTW would like to assure those of you not in POTW that: a) while your concerns are apreciated, the matter is unfortunatley none of your buisness (the same as non-American citizens should have no buisness voting in the president of the United States).  b) we are not taking the POTW that have been the way it has been for the past decade and turning it into "Twitchy's Fascist Base Takers - OINK!".  The "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko WILL still be the same "do-what-ya-want-or-come-join-the-rest-of-us-in-some-fun-oink" POTW as led by Syko.  c) we are glad to have Twitchy back in the AH community and we still greatly respect and admire Twichy for one day, a very long time ago, starting the POTW name.  However that in no way means we're going to bend over and do what you want before taking into account what everyone else in POTW wants and will make the squad in general happier and healthier for another decade.

So now, lets seperate the sheep from the pigs here and end this thread.

I don't care that much but some of this doesn't sound correct.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on December 03, 2009, 06:52:54 PM
So, you're saying Twitchy was NOT the CO for almost a decade?

Also, you're saying that Skuzzy had to replace Syko as the CO of POTW because Twitchy's name was still there?  Once a CO's account goes inactive, the squad is automatically disbanded.  Syko only then needs to send squad invites and have the new squad named the same as was before.
That is how it is now.  When I started (which comparatively wasn't that long ago), I was told all the names from old players were kept in the database and couldn't be re-used.  So if you left, let your account go, and wanted to come back sometime later (what I was contemplating), you would have to call HTC HQ to get your old handle reactivated, or come up with a new one.  I imagine it used to be the same for squad names ten years ago.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 03, 2009, 06:58:12 PM
Why is it when I read through this thread it reminds me of the..

Mother
Of
All
Trolls

Couldn't be that clever....could they?
 :noid

Edit for being a numpty. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: E25280 on December 03, 2009, 07:00:47 PM
Why is it when I read through this thread it reminds me of the..

Mother
Of
All
Trolls

Couldn't be they couldn't be that clever....could they?
 :noid
Surely not . . .  :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: LYNX on December 03, 2009, 07:02:10 PM
Why is it when I read through this thread it reminds me of the..

Mother
Of
All
Trolls

Couldn't be that clever....could they?
 :noid

Edit for being a numpty. :D

it takes one to spot one  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 03, 2009, 07:13:03 PM
dude...i've said it before, and to stodd.....i respect the hell outta you guys for being able to be so quiet, about this, in the face of all the poop he's been trying to fling.  :aok i think others probably feel the same.
Not really
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on December 03, 2009, 07:34:51 PM
I thought Twitchy just took a year off ? not a DECADE as posted if he took a decade=10yrs off ?? then no he cant just come back and expect to take control,, Hmmm so Twitchy left POW in 1999 according to your statement, lol oh boy...stuff just aint making sense now  :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 07:41:35 PM
There's some sheep here in the thread who look a little lost from the herd.

(More pig issues that don't need to be aired in public)

So now, lets seperate the sheep from the pigs here and end this thread.


 :banana:
That's a great way to attempt to end the thread, or at least stop the opinions from being given.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 03, 2009, 08:04:51 PM
:banana:
That's a great way to attempt to end the thread, or at least stop the opinions from being given.
Do you know why DMGOD is such a nut job?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 03, 2009, 08:24:27 PM
The solution here is simple.

Do a 'Squad Ranking' look up on the AH homepage and see who had the name before whom.

Krupnski  appears to have become the CO of POTW in Nov. 2009.

Waystin2 appears to have become the CO of POTW in March 2009.

1BDSPADE appears to have been the CO of POTW from Aug. 2008

Syko appears to have become the CO of POTW in Oct. 2007.

Twitchy appears to have been the CO of POTW in Aug. 2002.


hmmm....

Lets go a step further and use 'Individual Statistics - Squad' to see what squad Syko was in before the Pigs.

I show him having an account that started one month after Twitchy started the Pigs 2002, yet he never was in a squad for most of the years he has flown.

Do explain to me how Syko was not even IN a sqad, let alone the POTW, before 10/07 and yet he "ran" the Pigs for 10 years?

How can a player "run" the POTW when he wasn't even IN the squad?

The only POTW squad I can find before 10/07 is Twitchy's.

Somebody is tossing about a bunch o' lies and from what I can tell, it ain't Twitchy.
(unless indeed this is another MOAT in which case I have been hooked)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 03, 2009, 08:41:33 PM
Opinions are fine, seeking answers and sharing wisdom regarding a tricky subject/matter are fine, however very little about this particular thread resembles an open and constructive medium that all members of this community can freely contribute and participate in to resolve an issue.  This thread is nothing but a disquised ploy and last-ditch-effort to gain outside support on a purely inside matter (the direction and goals of our squad).  

So, you're saying Twitchy was NOT the CO for almost a decade?

Also, you're saying that Skuzzy had to replace Syko as the CO of POTW because Twitchy's name was still there?  Once a CO's account goes inactive, the squad is automatically disbanded.  Syko only then needs to send squad invites and have the new squad named the same as was before.

Twitchy hasn't been an active participant in the POTW for many years.  When I first joined POTW I heard rumors that he might pop online once every year or two, but that he was a very rare sight since he originaly had to leave due to RL troubles many years ago.  

His name and legacy though (as the founding leader) has been shared and passed down from pig to pig though, so every active pig in the squad did know of Twitchy and who he was.  He just popped back up a few weeks ago and we of cource scooped him imediatley back up and into our ranks.  However, not much time passed before Twitchy wanted to regain full control of the squad and lead it in a direction he desired.  This disagreed though heavily with a signifigant majority of us pigs (I'm being generous to Twitchy when I say about 9 out of 10 of us silently or vocaly disagreed with Twtichy's intentions).  That's what I know and personaly witnessed.  

If you want details about what happened (from what I was told) about 7-8 years ago, I've only heard it through word of mouth and the grapevine within the squad (the same as most members today), however quite a few pigs that were around back then and who were involved in the actual preservation of the squad are still around and active today.  Drop me a line sometime you have a moment online in the arena Kermit, or stop by the POTW forum and post some questions you have.  This was a long time ago, and I'll tell you what was told me and most of the other pigs, but I'll try my best to get someone who was actually there and involved to answer your questions.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 03, 2009, 08:50:59 PM
I've only heard it through word of mouth and the grapevine within the squad (the same as most members today), however quite a few pigs that were around back then and who were involved in the actual preservation of the squad are still around and active today.

Tell me the CPIDs of the players that were "around back then and who were involved" so I can look up what squad they were in at the time.

The ONLY Pigs on the Wing squad that I can find in the AH squad pages, that is older than @ 2yrs, is Twitchy's.

Do tell who was the CO at the time because it wan't any of the current POTW CO's.

Who held the CO spot before Syko. (if there was one)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 03, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
WMlute check pm's.

hehe bravo was editing.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bravoa8 on December 03, 2009, 08:56:48 PM
/
Is that off topic? :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 03, 2009, 09:03:08 PM
Found another POTW CO that I have edited to my post a few above this one.

Geez y'all have gone through a lot of diff. wings and CO's and such.

I now know how someone can make some of the claims I have seen in this thread 'cause I bet most of the POTW don't have a clue about the actual history of their squad.  It is a convoluted mess.

But there has been one CO that has always been the CO of a POTW squad for 7 yrs now.
(and apparently the founder)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 09:03:17 PM
Do you know why DMGOD is such a nut job?

Do you know why my sig says my in game name?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 03, 2009, 09:05:26 PM
Do you know why my sig says my in game name?
I assume to let people know you have a different in game name then forum name?

Sorry I still dont follow.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 09:14:36 PM
I assume to let people know you have a different in game name then forum name?

Sorry I still dont follow.

It means that I don't belong to DM's in game.  Your question...
Do you know why DMGOD is such a nut job?
about DMGOD should be directed to someone currently involved with the squad.  I cannot answer it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 03, 2009, 09:17:32 PM
It means that I don't belong to DM's in game.  Your question...  about DMGOD should be directed to someone currently involved with the squad.  I cannot answer it.
I am aware of that. However that still doesnt mean you may not know why.

a great way to attempt to end the thread
+1
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 09:38:44 PM
I am aware of that. However that still doesnt mean you may not know why.

It means I'm not going to comment on it since I'm not in the squad.

As far as talking about another squaddie in the forums...I have done it and don't feel bad about it. 

The difference is that I'd have been a donkey to get upset if people outside the squad got involved after I brought it here.  If you bring it here it gets new life inviting opinion.  Why else bring it here?

 :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 09:42:19 PM
Btw...my monkey would b slap Billy Mays and my dancing bear snacks on cheesehead pus...errr kittens.  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 03, 2009, 09:51:42 PM
Btw...my monkey would b slap Billy Mays and my dancing bear snacks on cheesehead pus...errr kittens.  :D
:furious
(http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww279/stodd602/vincescar.jpg)Billy Mays practicing his aim. Next time it will be a dancing bear.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 03, 2009, 10:04:51 PM
So on and so forth...

Youre missing it. 

At the risk of speaking for others incorrectly, I think Im relatively safe in stating that no one really gives a hoot what may or may not be going on inside the inner circle of swinery.

For all the complicated posts and in-depth analysis, the entire thread can be summed up as follows.

1.)  Twiggy starts stupid thread.
2.)  Twiggy makes your (his, whatever) squad look bad by association.
3.)  Twiggy is removed from squad.
4.)  Robin's minstrels are eaten and there is much rejoicing.

If Twiggy's aim was actually to drum up public support, as has been stated, I havent seen a PR job that bad since yesterday; when I got a very nice Email from Joe Biden explaining to me that the "surge" in Afghanistan constituted a clear and focused plan for sucess and, of course, a clean break from "failed Bush policies."
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 10:05:29 PM
:furious
(http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww279/stodd602/vincescar.jpg)Billy Mays practicing his aim. Next time it will be a dancing bear.

(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/baboon.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bravoa8 on December 03, 2009, 10:06:24 PM
:furious
(http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww279/stodd602/vincescar.jpg)Billy Mays practicing his aim. Next time it will be a dancing bear.
(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/baboon.jpg)
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl 

This one is going to be close!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Taurus45 on December 03, 2009, 10:11:23 PM
Not a single reply in regards to the topic or the OP, just all smart aleks and personal attacks. Classy forum you got going here guys, classy. Game's great as always, this forum is another matter. Flame on fellers, this isn't a potw thread, it's about the base takers/furballers debate that is currently raging and IMO breaking the game up. Thanks for replying though, jerks.
Anyways, too many aces and not enough pilots. Team Players are are far and few between and all that's left of us are called toolshedders now. That's sad really. But I think you're going to find a silent majority is still wanting to return to the war and team oriented aspects of the game, more than you think.
-Twitchy

Not having posted in God knows how long I'm sorta outtaDAloop but......MeThinks this argument is an old one :banana: :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 03, 2009, 10:13:55 PM
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl 

This one is going to be close!

C'mon bravoa!  I live on Lake Texoma.  Stodd likes cities that center around Hubs.  C'mon!!!!  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 03, 2009, 10:48:37 PM
Twitchy hasn't been an active participant in the POTW for many years.... If you want details about what happened (from what I was told) about 7-8 years ago, I've only heard it through word of mouth and the grapevine

Babalon, I was gone for about a year. Syko has been going on about having run the squad for 9 years, so whatever grapvine you're hearing this through is full of sour grapes. Syko told me when I got back, my squad was going to be there, and there were no problems with my return to command my squad.
As to running the squad in some kind of a new direction, no, all I wanted was our cohesion back, and ONE of the members who isn't who they say they are off the roster. I heard the rumors of this 'list of guys' I was going to boot, and it's rubbish. Just one boot, and he knows who he is.
In fact the ONLY members of this squad who are qualified to comment on our 10 year history with any credibility are Myself, Syko, Citation, bustr, Aspen, Bentnail, mrmeaty, Habu55, and Might... Bentnail, Meaty, and Might were new-ish when I left.
The name is mine, I started the Pigs on the Wing, I ran it daily for nearly a decade, and I left because I hit rock bottom financially, literally fishing for supper at one point. I get back to find Syko had been claiming to have run the squad for nearly ten years, telling the other pigs I didn't start the squad in the first place, and literally hiding from me in game on a secret channel and refusing to talk to me in person about it.
Yeah the name is mine, and at this point, that's all I am asking for out of this deal, having been done the way I was, it's all I want.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 03, 2009, 10:59:56 PM
I get back to find Syko had been claiming to have run the squad for nearly ten years, telling the other pigs I didn't start the squad in the first place, and literally hiding from me in game on a secret channel and refusing to talk to me in person about it.

Twitchy, please refer to Stodd's sig. You're completely wrong here.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 03, 2009, 11:16:47 PM
Twitchy, please refer to Stodd's sig. You're completely wrong here.  :aok
Just one boot, and he knows who he is.... Speak of the devil....
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 03, 2009, 11:18:12 PM
Lute,
you have taken a serious look at PoTW history.....Ill give you what I know....Long long time ago Twitchy started the sqaud with and Ltar named turmoil, he left to start LTAR or something IDK. Then came the names I always knew Jolly, Syko and Lunatic. Syko and lunatic made the site, JoLLy was the wyastin back in the day when it was only 1 wing. Some members of the wing before we grew were MrMeaty, GowGow, Anus, Aspen, sourmash, rip, Modo, tip, Bentnail, bustr, Might, pattonjr, VansCrew, skullman, GovtFlu, codyH, VonMessa(luftweenie:) ) and Me. I didnt see twitchy much at all during this time period that was 2 years ago by your investigating. The sqaud was already changing then and I have to say thats why I liked it, we furballed alot until about peak hours when we got alot on then Vans would run missions for acouple hours. This is where we got the idea of starting a second wing because alot were asking to join but we didnt have the slots so VansCrew started a second wing(he was CO or XO cant remember). This is when we got alot of the members that make up the half which are new with some of the names mentioned above. The change into a "screw it lets kill red guys" mentality really kicked off and still holds today. Honestly the furballing look at us didnt really come around till Sol75 or as you know him WMSol started up the 3rd wing. By this time we had 3 wings 1 under Syko, 1 under Waystin, and 1 under Sol. Syko got the idea of starting a score sqaud which actually was pretty cool to see how low we got (i think 3rd) so we had 4 Syko's, 1BDSpades(for the older guys, Waystin had the new guys, and recently this year I took fighters when Sol left.


Now thats the history as you can see it got a brand new face since twitchy left, and when he got mad at Krup and a few others for wanting to furball instead of take bases he got mad and started a thread(the one he says got erased). Then he wanted our sqaud to be more like the Devils Rejects and I think alot of people know how me and acouple of POTW feel about those guys :rolleyes: He is the one who couldnt handle us changing which he should as a leader which he gave away when he said in a post that I cant quote but he siad something along these lines "I dont plan on running, Syko and Waystin have done a great job building the sqaud I just look forward to coming back" Now with that comment I took it as he was giving Syko the sqaud, but he had to come out with the BS about we are a base taking sqaud, which is a horrible thing for the community as a whole. Sqauds should want to fight not do NOE runs just to take bases like many of the "ALLIANCE" tardlings did about a year back. No fight when you take 45 knights to a base NOE......not a fight when you take 12-15 either.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 03, 2009, 11:19:34 PM
Just one boot, and he knows who he is.... Speak of the devil....
Sorry but as I said in my post to lute you gave it up when you got back, you said it yourself. Now im slapping myself in the face for not saving that quote from the POTW site
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 04, 2009, 12:08:58 AM
Was wondering when one of the POTW would remember Sol is now a WM and through him I have a pretty decent understanding of the "recent" activities of the POTW.

Honestly, as fractured as the squad has been, and considering the current incarnation(s) of the Pigs is under 2yrs old, y'all should prob. just create your own thing, or embrase Twitchy.

The ONLY player that has been a Pig for more than 2 yrs is Twitchy (and that one guy that is in Twitchys squad which is prob. a shade of Twitchys <ducks>) and in all honesty, it is Twitchy's squad. 

His idea, his name, he was the only one that has been a pig for any great length of time (gawd i've done this way too long when I consider 2 years a "short" amout of time) and it is his baby.

If twitchy wants to become a base taking squad, help him, start your own squad, or join a squad with similar interests like Sol did.
(WM's are not recruiting btw)

At the end of the day, the bottom line is that Twitchy started the Pigs and it is his right as founder/CO to do whatever he wants with the squad.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 12:40:05 AM
Was wondering when one of the POTW would remember Sol is now a WM and through him I have a pretty decent understanding of the "recent" activities of the POTW.

Honestly, as fractured as the squad has been, and considering the current incarnation(s) of the Pigs is under 2yrs old, y'all should prob. just create your own thing, or embrase Twitchy.

The ONLY player that has been a Pig for more than 2 yrs is Twitchy (and that one guy that is in Twitchys squad which is prob. a shade of Twitchys <ducks>) and in all honesty, it is Twitchy's squad. 

His idea, his name, he was the only one that has been a pig for any great length of time (gawd i've done this way too long when I consider 2 years a "short" amout of time) and it is his baby.

If twitchy wants to become a base taking squad, help him, start your own squad, or join a squad with similar interests like Sol did.
(WM's are not recruiting btw)

At the end of the day, the bottom line is that Twitchy started the Pigs and it is his right as founder/CO to do whatever he wants with the squad.
Sorry but Sol couldnt read the private area of the PoTW boards :noid Twitchy said Syko was leading now since he had been gone so long, but had a change of mind once he found that some were "free-thinking" and not all about base taking anymore
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 04, 2009, 12:42:17 AM
Then he wanted our sqaud to be more like the Devils Rejects and I think alot of people know how me and acouple of POTW feel about those guys :rolleyes:

IMHO opinion...we all play different.  There are a good deal of dorks that want to play Twitchy's and Dogfite's way.


(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-18.jpg)

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 12:44:33 AM
IMHO opinion...we all play different.  There are a good deal of dorks that want to play Twitchy's and Dogfite's way.


(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-18.jpg)


dont get soft on me now Assi, They deserve to be degraded for their blasphemies against good furballs and taking bases without anyone defending them :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 04, 2009, 01:32:23 AM
Babalon, I was gone for about a year. Syko has been going on about having run the squad for 9 years, so whatever grapvine you're hearing this through is full of sour grapes. Syko told me when I got back, my squad was going to be there, and there were no problems with my return to command my squad.
As to running the squad in some kind of a new direction, no, all I wanted was our cohesion back, and ONE of the members who isn't who they say they are off the roster. I heard the rumors of this 'list of guys' I was going to boot, and it's rubbish. Just one boot, and he knows who he is.
In fact the ONLY members of this squad who are qualified to comment on our 10 year history with any credibility are Myself, Syko, Citation, bustr, Aspen, Bentnail, mrmeaty, Habu55, and Might... Bentnail, Meaty, and Might were new-ish when I left.
The name is mine, I started the Pigs on the Wing, I ran it daily for nearly a decade, and I left because I hit rock bottom financially, literally fishing for supper at one point. I get back to find Syko had been claiming to have run the squad for nearly ten years, telling the other pigs I didn't start the squad in the first place, and literally hiding from me in game on a secret channel and refusing to talk to me in person about it.
Yeah the name is mine, and at this point, that's all I am asking for out of this deal, having been done the way I was, it's all I want.
-Twitchy
This sounds real....and I am all for a congressional inquiry!   <S> Twitchy!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 05:46:34 AM
This sounds real....and I am all for a congressional inquiry!   <S> Twitchy!
Thats funny. he put Meaty in there when I have more time in the pigs then him(no offense meaty), he is just bias and wont realize times have changed



EDIT I dont know why im still posting here, its just making me feel hes retarded and making myself feel retarded Bah...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 04, 2009, 07:41:52 AM
Found another POTW CO that I have edited to my post a few above this one.

Geez y'all have gone through a lot of diff. wings and CO's and such.

I now know how someone can make some of the claims I have seen in this thread 'cause I bet most of the POTW don't have a clue about the actual history of their squad.  It is a convoluted mess.

But there has been one CO that has always been the CO of a POTW squad for 7 yrs now.
(and apparently the founder)

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  has been flying since 05 or 06, and never heard of him till he started doing these half arsed threads.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 04, 2009, 08:40:26 AM
my squad... my return to command... my squad... I wanted... The name is mine... I started the Pigs on the Wing... I ran it daily... the name is mine... I want.
-Twitchy

Lute may be dead on with his assessment but considering the depth of human feces in which you are wading - your own feces I should clarify - I doubt many people really give a flying monkey's left nostril what you want.

You "own" the name?  Awesome.  That makes watching it taken from you all the more satisfying.

Do the right thing.  Shut up, change your CPID and start over already.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SunBat on December 04, 2009, 08:48:05 AM
Just one boot, and he knows who he is.... Speak of the devil....

Krup should get a medal for this.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 04, 2009, 11:10:12 AM
I felt a few things needed to be cleared up here.  The 35+ active players that compromise the Pigs as you all know them tried and failed to mend the rift with our former El Presidente.  Not just one of us, but many of us tried to reason this situation through to no avail.  I have no personal beef with Twitchy, and he knows that it was my sincerest wish that this be resolved amicably for all involved.  This whole discussion has been rife with lies, half-truths, and facts that are obscured by time. 

I know the following to be fact with no embellishment:

Did he found the original POTW squad?  Yes.  
Did Twitchy leave the game for personal reasons almost 2 years ago and his squad was disbanded?  Yes.
Did Pigs try to stay in contact with him during his absence?  Yes.
Did 1BDspade pick up the POTW name to start the squad up again? Yes.
Did Syko claim himself as founder of the Pigs?  No.
Was Twitchy embraced with open arms upon his return? Yes.
Did multiple Pigs try to reason with him on the issues involved? Yes.
Was Twitchy open to discussion on the issues? No.
Did the Pigs as a group decide to remove him from leadership? Yes.
Are the current Pigs united in their stance to continue as the POTW? Yes.
Is there anything that will change the Pigs minds? No.








Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 04, 2009, 11:20:02 AM
I felt a few things needed to be cleared up here.  The 35+ active players that compromise the Pigs as you all know them tried and failed to mend the rift with our former El Presidente.  Not just one of us, but many of us tried to reason this situation through to no avail.  I have no personal beef with Twitchy, and he knows that it was my sincerest wish that this be resolved amicably for all involved.  This whole discussion has been rife with lies, half-truths, and facts that are obscured by time. 

I know the following to be fact with no embellishment:

Did he found the original POTW squad?  Yes.  
Did Twitchy leave the game for personal reasons almost 2 years ago and his squad was disbanded?  Yes.
Did Pigs try to stay in contact with him during his absence?  Yes.
Did 1BDspade pick up the POTW name to start the squad up again? Yes.
Did Syko claim himself as founder of the Pigs?  No.
Was Twitchy embraced with open arms upon his return? Yes.
Did multiple Pigs try to reason with him on the issues involved? Yes.
Was Twitchy open to discussion on the issues? No.
Did the Pigs as a group decide to remove him from leadership? Yes.
Are the current Pigs united in their stance to continue as the POTW? Yes.
Is there anything that will change the Pigs minds? No.



(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/alg_parcells-gatorade.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 04, 2009, 11:25:03 AM
I felt a few things needed to be cleared up here.  The 35+ active players that compromise the Pigs as you all know them tried and failed to mend the rift with our former El Presidente.  Not just one of us, but many of us tried to reason this situation through to no avail.  I have no personal beef with Twitchy, and he knows that it was my sincerest wish that this be resolved amicably for all involved.  This whole discussion has been rife with lies, half-truths, and facts that are obscured by time.  

I know the following to be fact with no embellishment:

Did he found the original POTW squad?  Yes.  
Did Twitchy leave the game for personal reasons almost 2 years ago and his squad was disbanded?  Yes.
Did Pigs try to stay in contact with him during his absence?  Yes.
Did 1BDspade pick up the POTW name to start the squad up again? Yes.
Did Syko claim himself as founder of the Pigs?  No.
Was Twitchy embraced with open arms upon his return? Yes.
Did multiple Pigs try to reason with him on the issues involved? Yes.
Was Twitchy open to discussion on the issues? No.
Did the Pigs as a group decide to remove him from leadership? Yes.
Are the current Pigs united in their stance to continue as the POTW? Yes.
Is there anything that will change the Pigs minds? No.
Do i care about your squad drama? NO!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 04, 2009, 11:46:21 AM
Do i care about your squad drama? NO!!

Ya other than Babalon's wild exaggerations, I think the Care-o-meter is without a pulse. The fact that adult males would go through such soap opera like drama was briefly amusing. This is dead, time for some new drama.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 04, 2009, 11:50:33 AM
Do i care about your squad drama? NO!!

Ya other than Babalon's wild exaggerations, I think the Care-o-meter is without a pulse. The fact that adult males would go through such soap opera like drama was briefly amusing. This is dead, time for some new drama.

It wasn't very nice of them to steal AoM and Sapp forum attention was it.   :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 04, 2009, 11:55:25 AM
It wasn't very nice of them to steal AoM and Sapp forum attention was it.   :D


aom?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 04, 2009, 11:55:33 AM
This is dead, time for some new drama.

My thoughts exactly Sir!

 :salute

Way
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 04, 2009, 11:56:07 AM
Gay Muppet marriages?
(http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/f/f0/Gayrumor.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Soulyss on December 04, 2009, 12:22:28 PM
I dunno CAP, once wasn't enough this thread may need a double dose of "the toe" before it'll end. :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 04, 2009, 12:23:11 PM
It wasn't very nice of them to steal AoM and Sapp forum attention was it.   :D

 :huh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 04, 2009, 12:24:21 PM
Gay Muppet marriages?
(http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/f/f0/Gayrumor.jpg)
we must have told you "no we're sorry, we are full. not accepting new members"
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 04, 2009, 12:28:17 PM
I dunno CAP, once wasn't enough this thread may need a double dose of "the toe" before it'll end. :)


got something better..........


SOL75!!!!! where ya at sir? need to see your finger vs da50 prop pic please!
 :devil :bolt: :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 04, 2009, 02:22:05 PM
we must have told you "no we're sorry, we are full. not accepting new members"
You didn't have tell me you were full,we all knew that.
We also know what you're full of. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 04, 2009, 02:22:40 PM

got something better..........


SOL75!!!!! where ya at sir? need to see your finger vs da50 prop pic please!
 :devil :bolt: :noid

Has a new king of thread closers been crowned? :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 04, 2009, 02:40:46 PM
Has a new king of thread closers been crowned? :uhoh

i think possibly. go back to page 15 of this very thread.......it should';ve worked.......
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 04, 2009, 04:00:39 PM
Did he found the original POTW squad? 
Yes, it's my squad, my idea, my name and nearly nine years of my time.

Did Twitchy leave the game for personal reasons almost 2 years ago and his squad was disbanded? 
Yup, and Syko and I agreed that I would return to command. It was a little over a year ago, not 7 years, and not nine years.

Did Pigs try to stay in contact with him during his absence? 
Yup, and Syko knew I was comming back.

Did 1BDspade pick up the POTW name to start the squad up again?
Yeah. Could 1BDspade have started his own squad?

Did Syko claim himself as founder of the Pigs? 
Nope, he lied claiming to have been the CO of the Pigs for Nine years, and lied about me be not being the Founder of the Pigs, this started about right after I left actually.

Was Twitchy embraced with open arms upon his return?
Yeah, as long as I didn't Invite anyone to the Squad, or try to remove a player who was being a smart arse, or try to lead them any in any way, shape, or form.

Did multiple Pigs try to reason with him on the issues involved?
No, actually hell no. My issues were few and reasonable, the cohesion of the squad, and one member that decided to start trash talking me from day one of my return who needed booted.

Was Twitchy open to discussion on the issues?
We did discuss the issues at length, my posts on the POTW forum were deleted, and Syko hid from me for two weeks. I literally BEGGED Syko to talk to me and he decided to have Bentnail pass notes for him like third grader instead.

Did the Pigs as a group decide to remove him from leadership?
LOL, Yeah. Could they have started their own squad instead of stealing someone else's idea and letting their 'leader' get away with lying for over a year?

Are the current Pigs united in their stance to continue as the POTW?
Start your own squad guys, or simply be known as Syko's Scavengers. Anyone who's played the game for more than year knows damned well who's squad it is. Syko literally told me he was jealous of me once, I didn't think much of it at the time, but now I think I understand his true motivations and it wasn't about the Pigs at all, it was about Syko. Why would he claim to have run the squad for a decade and lie about me not being the founder, then hide from me like a coward when I got back and delete my posts?

Is there anything that will change the Pigs minds?
Myself, Citation, and Habu55 are the ONLY legitimate Pigs at this point, no, we're not changing our minds. I am recruiting though and I will be rebuilding the Pigs on the Wing. If you're interested, let me know. There will be no hard feelings, and with the exception of BiKrupolarinski, I will gladly take any of you guys on board, including Syko. The one and only requirement for membership is cohesion, it's all I've ever asked of my squad.
If you guys want to fly under Syko's flag, that's all well and good, but Syko's name is quickly and rightfully becomming mud in this game. He had no right to lie, and he had no right to take the name for himself and claim my legacy as his own.
I understand you guys are friends, I understand that alot of the new pigs only know Syko as a leader, but you need to understand what Syko did was a dirty business, and he took something that didn't belong to him. Change your name to Syko's Sycophants if you like, I don't care. All I want is the name of the POTW restored to the rightful owner, and to lead my squad again. That was the understanding Syko and I had until I found out what he had been doing behind my back while I was gone. Change the name, or accept the label... or better yet, I'll send every one of you guys an invite to the legitimate Pigs squad, and we can keep on keeping on.

Stealing someone elses idea is hardly something to be proud of, stabbing your ten year friend in the back and lying about it is even less. If that's what you guys want to inherit in Syko's leadership, then there's nothing I can do about it, but like I told Syko, everybody is going to know what he's done.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 04:15:20 PM
Why does everyone give Krup a new name?

BiKrupolarinski
Krupnizzal
Kruptastic
Kerpernicus



 :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 04, 2009, 04:15:22 PM
I felt a few things needed to be cleared up here.  The 35+ active players that compromise the Pigs as you all know them tried and failed to mend the rift with our former El Presidente.  Not just one of us, but many of us tried to reason this situation through to no avail.  I have no personal beef with Twitchy, and he knows that it was my sincerest wish that this be resolved amicably for all involved.  This whole discussion has been rife with lies, half-truths, and facts that are obscured by time. 

I know the following to be fact with no embellishment:

Did he found the original POTW squad?  Yes.  
Did Twitchy leave the game for personal reasons almost 2 years ago and his squad was disbanded?  Yes.
Did Pigs try to stay in contact with him during his absence?  Yes.
Did 1BDspade pick up the POTW name to start the squad up again? Yes.
Did Syko claim himself as founder of the Pigs?  No.
Was Twitchy embraced with open arms upon his return? Yes.
Did multiple Pigs try to reason with him on the issues involved? Yes.
Was Twitchy open to discussion on the issues? No.
Did the Pigs as a group decide to remove him from leadership? Yes.
Are the current Pigs united in their stance to continue as the POTW? Yes.
Is there anything that will change the Pigs minds? No.









The name has been somewhat tainted as a result of all this. A fresh start may avoid much of what will likely follow. If twitchy started the squad with the understanding it was his when he came back, it's his. Keep your squad together under a different banner. These things have a habit of haunting a squad. Just a suggestion.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 04, 2009, 04:27:35 PM
The name has been somewhat tainted as a result of all this. A fresh start may avoid much of what will likely follow. If twitchy started the squad with the understanding it was his when he came back, it's his. Keep your squad together under a different banner. These things have a habit of haunting a squad. Just a suggestion.
Pigs are stubborn creatures. :D

Oh and Bear hand the squad over to me DO IT ! :mad:  The Gods command it. :old:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 04, 2009, 04:32:25 PM
Pigs are stubborn creatures. :D

Oh and Bear hand the squad over to me DO IT ! :mad:  The Gods command it. :old:
Cool, the job comes with a life time supply of Preparation H  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SunBat on December 04, 2009, 04:36:41 PM
What's in a name? The ppl are the squad, not the name.  It's not like it's all that great of a name anyway. My opinion which I admit means nothing would be for the non-land grabbing pigs to make up a new name and move on. You guys have really taken a stand against being lopsided tards and the community's respect for you has gone way up. You are just one step away from coming  out of this thing with high regard in everyone's mind. Just ditch the name and win.  
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 04, 2009, 04:44:05 PM
What's in a name? The ppl are the squad, not the name.  It's not like it's all that great of a name anyway. My opinion which I admit means nothing would be for the non-land grabbing pigs to make up a new name and move on. You guys have really taken a stand against being lopsided tards and the community's respect for you has gone way up. You are just one step away from coming  out of this thing with high regard in everyone's mind. Just ditch the name and win.  




agree 100% :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 04, 2009, 04:47:21 PM
Quote
What's in a name? The ppl are the squad
i have to agree

this "pigs on a wing" deal needs a "Final Cut" seems not enough mud to go around
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 04, 2009, 04:47:42 PM
Cool, the job comes with a life time supply of Preparation H  :D
:uhoh  couldn't I start off being quatermaster of beer and coffee. :D

As long as the squad name isn't shaders bakers Im ok with it. :t
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on December 04, 2009, 04:52:53 PM
What's in a name? The ppl are the squad, not the name.  It's not like it's all that great of a name anyway. My opinion which I admit means nothing would be for the non-land grabbing pigs to make up a new name and move on. You guys have really taken a stand against being lopsided tards and the community's respect for you has gone way up. You are just one step away from coming  out of this thing with high regard in everyone's mind. Just ditch the name and win.  

+2
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wax on December 04, 2009, 05:21:00 PM
Why does everyone give Krup a new name?

BiKrupolarinski
Krupnizzal
Kruptastic
Kerpernicus



 :rofl :rofl :rofl

I just call him the Polish guy :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 04, 2009, 06:04:31 PM
Just ditch the name and win.  
It really is that easy.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: eddiek on December 04, 2009, 06:19:33 PM
The name has been somewhat tainted as a result of all this. A fresh start may avoid much of what will likely follow. If twitchy started the squad with the understanding it was his when he came back, it's his. Keep your squad together under a different banner. These things have a habit of haunting a squad. Just a suggestion.
This x1000   :aok
Who wants to be a part of a squad where the CO thinks he speaks for the squad and everyone should do what HE wants, anyway?  Squads are about the members, not just what the CO wants.  You've already distanced yourselves by removing him from the squad......ask for a public apology for his behavior that led to his expulsion from the squad, then come up with a new name and move on.  Let him have the name......he tainted it with his behavior, so do you want to be associated with any longer than necessary?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 09:38:39 PM
It really is that easy.  :aok
Then why dont you do it? other then you made a name after o PF song?............ Did you recruit any of the current people other then Syko and Habu? How can you say Habu is a "true pig" when he only has been on sqaud vox once......?



darn i did it again I need to stop posting here......


Is JG7 taken by any sqauds right now? I always liked that wing :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Motherland on December 04, 2009, 09:45:39 PM
Is JG7 taken by any sqauds right now? I always liked that wing :rock
JG7 was retrained to the Me 262 from bombers (originally KG7). So that may be appropriate :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 04, 2009, 09:55:26 PM
lol thats funny :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on December 04, 2009, 10:46:51 PM
What I haven't seen here, is what Twitchy's long-view of the squad is, vs. where it is now? I see big, huge, multi-winged, mostly base-taking mob, with some furballers....what would Twitchy have done differently?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bruv119 on December 05, 2009, 12:21:01 AM
What I haven't seen here, is what Twitchy's long-view of the squad is, vs. where it is now? I see big, huge, multi-winged, mostly base-taking mob, with some furballers....what would Twitchy have done differently?

Kicked Junky in the nads for being a furballing tard!    :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 05, 2009, 01:03:43 AM
you can give a pig wings but dosn't make it a eagle
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 05, 2009, 02:38:42 AM
Kicked Junky in the nads for being a furballing tard!    :aok
At least im not an alt monkey, pick, gang tard!!! :devil








And he didnt kick me.....I left :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bruv119 on December 05, 2009, 02:41:02 AM
At least im not an alt monkey, pick, gang tard!!! :devil

And he didnt kick me.....I left :aok

 :lol   better to jump than be pushed i hear you. 

I look forward to seeing your new squad name and don't go with something lame like  a JG prefix   :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BillyD on December 05, 2009, 02:43:30 AM
 Zach, JG 53 isn't represented. If you do that you gotta fly German metal. 109s preferably ;)

If not you could start Pigs on the wing pt. 2

y'know the one where it bookends the animals album.....

I know that you care.....for me yadda yadda yadda

or maybe you should call the squad " Bike " after my favorite PF song
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 05, 2009, 05:30:08 AM
Zach, JG 53 isn't represented. If you do that you gotta fly German metal. 109s preferably ;)

If not you could start Pigs on the wing pt. 2

y'know the one where it bookends the animals album.....

I know that you care.....for me yadda yadda yadda

or maybe you should call the squad " Bike " after my favorite PF song
Just for you Phil :aok , but looks like Krup needs me after all, he keeps sending me pms and sqaud invites and yea you know Krup can be ........persuasive :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 05, 2009, 09:45:09 AM
Twitch trying to destroy a squad and yet talks of cohesion. That is just odd.

In AH all you own is your account.

Hitech can remove that if necessary.

If you change your name someone else can get that name.

If you DISBAND a squad then someone else can take it.

If a squad grows in a direction your not happy with.... move to another.

If you want to wear a crown then start a new squad... you can even name it Twitchy's Squad so that everyone will know that squad is all about you and not the group. All the members can even be named according to the rank you bestow on them like this... twitchy1, twitchy2, etc. All with small case "t" so that everyone will know who's the boss. Then you can send out a list of words they can use in conjunction with your name and let them know that they must pay tribute to you on the public boards at least once a day. The ideas are endless for the "twitchy loves twitchy campaign".

Maybe twitch can take the 2 pigs that want to follow him in base taking to start that squad.

Cohesion in a squad is much more than simply what one person wants. It is what the group wants.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 05, 2009, 03:43:07 PM
Lol Shuff
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Slash27 on December 05, 2009, 04:09:14 PM
(http://janezlifeandtimes.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/thats-all-folks.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 05, 2009, 04:52:49 PM
so....do we make it to 30 pages?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kermit de frog on December 05, 2009, 05:06:32 PM
Twitch trying to destroy a squad and yet talks of cohesion. That is just odd.

In AH all you own is your account.

Hitech can remove that if necessary.

If you change your name someone else can get that name.

If you DISBAND a squad then someone else can take it.

If a squad grows in a direction your not happy with.... move to another.

If you want to wear a crown then start a new squad... you can even name it Twitchy's Squad so that everyone will know that squad is all about you and not the group. All the members can even be named according to the rank you bestow on them like this... twitchy1, twitchy2, etc. All with small case "t" so that everyone will know who's the boss. Then you can send out a list of words they can use in conjunction with your name and let them know that they must pay tribute to you on the public boards at least once a day. The ideas are endless for the "twitchy loves twitchy campaign".

Maybe twitch can take the 2 pigs that want to follow him in base taking to start that squad.

Cohesion in a squad is much more than simply what one person wants. It is what the group wants.

I smell a troll, and her name is Shuffler... :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 05, 2009, 06:56:01 PM
I smell a troll, and her name is Shuffler... :D

 :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 05, 2009, 06:57:33 PM
I smell a troll, and her name is Shuffler... :D
A little Summer's Eve might help :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 05, 2009, 07:01:32 PM
Shouldn't all bears be in hibernation now?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 05, 2009, 07:52:04 PM
Shouldn't all bears be in hibernation now?
My rent check bounced :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 05, 2009, 07:55:58 PM
Shouldn't all bears be in hibernation now?

Global Warming keeps us roaming
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 05, 2009, 08:17:19 PM
Quote
so....do we make it to 30 pages?

slowly but surely  :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 05, 2009, 08:34:22 PM
My rent check bounced :D
Tell em you'll have it next friday.  Global warming NOOOO! Save the polar bears. Even though they'd eat you if they got the chance. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Tarstar on December 05, 2009, 08:36:21 PM
Do bears south of Mason Dixon hibernate for shorter periods of time?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 05, 2009, 08:48:30 PM
Do bears south of Mason Dixon hibernate for shorter periods of time?

Bears don't actually hibernate.  :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Tarstar on December 05, 2009, 08:51:01 PM
Bears don't actually hibernate.  :neener:


Thanks for clearing that up  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on December 05, 2009, 09:03:42 PM
Bears don't actually hibernate.  :neener:

Well...after mid December, my trash can is safe
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 05, 2009, 09:16:45 PM
Well...after mid December, my trash can is safe

Well yea, they may get up and move around a bit if a warm spell occurs, but don't stray far from their dens.

A few years ago during a study of black bears in northern Wisconsin we went out in February in three feet of snow and temps in the teens to pull some out of their dens and collect data.  The sows were pretty groggy, but even though we made a great effort to approach quietly, they still lifted their heads and peered around.  We had to tranquilize the sows and one year old cubs.  The newborn cubs were quite a bit more active, and were too young to tranquilize.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on December 05, 2009, 09:48:57 PM
I remember on my kid's 17th birthday, (April, still get frosts where I live) she had a half-dozen or so bottles of Mtn Dew, etc on outside porch, to keep cold for party. Frikkin bear came UP on porch, dragged bottles into yard..popped em with his teeth, and then commenced to flatten each bottle with his paw, turning them into plastic soad-pop fountains. Next morning there were a half-dozen pancaked plastic bottles in yard..wish I had it on video
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 05, 2009, 10:00:36 PM
Shooting sleeping bears with tranqs. Thats just rude Mtnman. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 06, 2009, 01:05:49 AM
Shooting sleeping bears with tranqs. Thats just rude Mtnman. :D

Aww, it wasn't like that! 

We had (er, the lead researcher had) a broomstick with a syringe on it.  He just reached in and poked the bear.  He also had a dart gun, but didn't want to use it because due to the dart size he figured he'd need two darts instead of one poke, lol!  The sows were awake but groggy when we reached the dens.  Picking up their heads and looking around like you would if you heard a funny noise in your bedroom, but weren't really alarmed.  Just the sound of us walking up in the soft snow was enough to get their attention. 

I was ready to trip someone if I needed to (I didn't want to be the slowest to clear the area if they got irked, and waist-deep snow can be a hindrance when you need to flee).
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 06, 2009, 01:25:56 AM
A singular black bear is one thing, mama bear and cubs is another   :O
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 06, 2009, 01:39:20 AM
Best bear experience I had was when a guide, his wife(cooK), and my dad were heading into the Tetons on horseback for over a week.  We didnt notice the fresh bearclaw marks in the tree until the horses got spooked.   When we saw the marks and realized we were looking up at them on horseback we knew that being unarmed sucked.

We tied our horses far from our camp, and we tied our food high in the air. I learned to function throught the days with little sleep at night.  By the last few nights I didnt fear the bears.  They stink like nothing you have smelled if you get close, but you get used to them. 

What I'm trying to say is that Furballers won this thread and also stole the OP's squad.  :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 06, 2009, 05:37:23 AM
I was ready to trip someone if I needed to (I didn't want to be the slowest to clear the area if they got irked, and waist-deep snow can be a hindrance when you need to flee).
<Blinding light.Deep voice> Grasshopper,you have truly learned the meaning of situational awareness. I am pleased.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: gpwurzel on December 06, 2009, 05:41:28 AM
Makes mental note not to go bear hunting with MtnMan - specially as I cant run for toffee, let alone away from a rampaging bear lol....


Wurzel
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 06, 2009, 12:26:56 PM
Going fishing in Alaska.... the first thing you learn is to take friends you can outrun.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 06, 2009, 12:53:45 PM
Going fishing in Alaska.... the first thing you learn is to take friends you can outrun.
Rifle's for big game, pistol's to slow your friends down :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 06, 2009, 01:07:48 PM
Rifle's for big game, pistol's to slow your friends down :D

 :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: gpwurzel on December 06, 2009, 03:08:03 PM
Makes mental note not to fish with Shuffler either  :D

Will be able to run once me cruciate gets operated on and sorted out (with a bit of luck)

Wurzel
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SunBat on December 06, 2009, 03:42:17 PM

If you want to wear a crown then start a new squad... you can even name it Twitchy's Squad so that everyone will know that squad is all about you and not the group. All the members can even be named according to the rank you bestow on them like this... twitchy1, twitchy2, etc. All with small case "t" so that everyone will know who's the boss. Then you can send out a list of words they can use in conjunction with your name and let them know that they must pay tribute to you on the public boards at least once a day. The ideas are endless for the "twitchy loves twitchy campaign".


"Twits on the Wing"

It has everything.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 06, 2009, 05:59:15 PM
Or I could name it Army of Muppets and go around saying that I was the CO of the muppets for nine years, and that Kappa never started it in the first place... but then most folks would probably know better than that, and I just wouldn't do something that crappy to begin with. Of course if I could delete posts off the muppets' site and recruit a whole new generation of muppets under my command like Pol Pot in Cambodia, then maybe I'd get away with it huh?  :O
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 06, 2009, 06:06:05 PM
Or I could name it Army of Muppets and go around saying that I was the CO of the muppets for nine years, and that Kappa never started it in the first place... but then most folks would probably know better than that, and I just wouldn't do something that crappy to begin with. Of course if I could delete posts off the muppets' site and recruit a whole new generation of muppets under my command like Pol Pot in Cambodia, then maybe I'd get away with it huh?  :O
-Twitchy
You could be Pork Pot :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 06, 2009, 06:12:17 PM
Pigs
Of
Twitchy's
Wing
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 06, 2009, 06:42:34 PM
Or I could name it Army of Muppets and go around saying that I was the CO of the muppets for nine years, and that Kappa never started it in the first place... but then most folks would probably know better than that, and I just wouldn't do something that crappy to begin with. Of course if I could delete posts off the muppets' site and recruit a whole new generation of muppets under my command like Pol Pot in Cambodia, then maybe I'd get away with it huh?  :O
-Twitchy

You've always have been a non-factor in game Twitchy. 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 07, 2009, 03:02:59 AM
Is he gunna dig 30 pages deep?







 :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 07, 2009, 03:26:24 AM
Having base takers acting like little Napoleons on country channel...$15/month

Having said base takers trying to tell you you are less of a man for not playing the game to win the war, comparing you to those they served with in real life and did not like, asking you why there are "objectives" if winning the war isn't the ultimate goal, claiming you are a furballer just because you don't want to see them constantly whine on country channel about winning the war following their orders...15$/month

Having a guy that lost his squad try to berate you for these things after 30 embarrassing pages that highlight the reasons for his failure in game by being one of these Napoleons...priceless.

TY Twitchy.  :salute

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 07, 2009, 03:36:39 AM
Having base takers acting like little Napoleons on country channel...$15/month

Having said base takers trying to tell you you are less of a man for not playing the game to win the war, comparing you to those they served with in real life and did not like, asking you why there are "objectives" if winning the war isn't the ultimate goal, claiming you are a furballer just because you don't want to see them constantly whine on country channel about winning the war following their orders...15$/month

Having a guy that lost his squad try to berate you for these things after 30 embarrassing pages that highlight the reasons for his failure in game by being one of these Napoleons...priceless.

TY Twitchy.  :salute


What's in your wallet?  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 07, 2009, 05:40:54 PM
Best bear experience I had was when a guide, his wife(cooK), and my dad were heading into the Tetons on horseback for over a week.  We didnt notice the fresh bearclaw marks in the tree until the horses got spooked.   When we saw the marks and realized we were looking up at them on horseback we knew that being unarmed sucked.

We tied our horses far from our camp, and we tied our food high in the air. I learned to function throught the days with little sleep at night.  By the last few nights I didnt fear the bears.  They stink like nothing you have smelled if you get close, but you get used to them. 

What I'm trying to say is that Furballers won this thread and also stole the OP's squad.  :banana:

"Furballers", "babynappers", "basetakers", "raiders-of-your-daughter's-innocence", "squadtakers"...   which one is it now?  Will the community make up its mind already?   :neener:


Edit:  Page 30, Oink!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 07, 2009, 05:59:43 PM



Edit:  Page 30, Oink!
page 5. :P
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 07, 2009, 06:31:05 PM
"Furballers", "babynappers", "basetakers", "raiders-of-your-daughter's-innocence", "squadtakers"...   which one is it now?  Will the community make up its mind already?   :neener:


Edit:  Page 30, Oink!
Which POTW are you in?
Syko's Smoked Pork
or
Twitchy's Tangy BBQ?
 :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 07, 2009, 07:17:52 PM
POTW II (2nd) Wing, Waystin2's wing, send all complaints and court injunctions to him.
(http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/images/squads/approved/waystin2.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 07, 2009, 07:30:39 PM
POTW II (2nd) Wing, Waystin2's wing, send all complaints and court injunctions to him.
(http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/images/squads/approved/waystin2.gif)
More sauce please :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 07, 2009, 11:00:54 PM
More sauce please :D
Ill give you some of my special sauce :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 08, 2009, 12:23:18 AM
Ill give you some of my special sauce :devil
It hasn't aged enough :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: RoGenT on December 08, 2009, 01:56:32 AM
Nothing better than furballing in order to take a base  :joystick:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Slash27 on December 08, 2009, 04:02:52 AM
It hasn't aged enough :D

Got a new boyfriend? Is this why you haven't called?!?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 08, 2009, 07:51:21 AM
do we hear 31?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 08, 2009, 12:45:20 PM
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:m6isgyFICN4fvM:http://primes.utm.edu/curios/)

-------------------------> :banana: :banana: :banana:--------> :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 08, 2009, 03:57:29 PM
Twitchy says I think Im stalking him........ :noid







 :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 08, 2009, 05:26:13 PM
Twitchy says I think Im stalking him........ :noid


 :devil

Remember last night when Dogfite said I wanted to be in his squad?   :rofl

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 08, 2009, 09:18:42 PM
Remember last night when Dogfite said I wanted to be in his squad?   :rofl


That was a good laugh :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 08, 2009, 09:58:20 PM
Remember last night when Dogfite said I wanted to be in his squad?   :rofl


1Assi  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 09, 2009, 02:34:43 AM
1Assi  :aok
:lol






31 oink
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stealth on December 09, 2009, 02:42:58 AM
:lol






31 oink
:huh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 09, 2009, 02:44:14 AM
:huh
What you lookin :huh at?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 09, 2009, 06:18:46 AM
What you lookin :huh at?

Maybe he doesn't get it? 1Assi :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 09, 2009, 07:43:40 AM
What you lookin :huh at?

oJUNKYo  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 09, 2009, 07:56:33 AM
do we hear/see 32?

32?
32?


beuller?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 09, 2009, 08:51:31 AM
oJUNKYo  :aok

That hurts!  It's funny, but that hurts!  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 09, 2009, 09:58:58 AM
(http://blogs.securiteam.com/wp-content/NOD32_1.jpg)

32  :O
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 09, 2009, 03:53:37 PM
oJUNKYo  :aok
:rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 09, 2009, 04:29:31 PM
JunkLL  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 09, 2009, 05:30:06 PM
Quote from: syko
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,260010.msg3226136.html#msg3226136
So after nine years of playing Aces High as C.O. with Pigs On The Wing
It's amazing, to even try to pull that off in the first place.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 09, 2009, 10:16:22 PM
It's amazing, to even try to pull that off in the first place.
The drama queen has done a lil diggin, diggin for page 32







 :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 09, 2009, 10:17:15 PM
32?

Doh. :(
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 09, 2009, 10:20:45 PM
32323232232323232322323232323 22323232232323223232323223232 32322323232323232232323232323 2232323 :x :banana: :airplane:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 09, 2009, 10:34:59 PM
bump?





 :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on December 09, 2009, 10:39:28 PM
32323232323232323232323232
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 10, 2009, 01:18:27 AM
Can I get a?....
(http://www.neonsign.com/eng_tackers/images/rollingrockroadsigntin.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 10, 2009, 02:54:05 AM
1Assi  :aok

 :O
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 10, 2009, 05:37:07 AM
I see twitchy has yet to get his panties untwisted.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 10, 2009, 06:44:10 AM
I see twitchy has yet to get his panties untwisted.
He told me he was in the Navy, so they are probably knotted up real tight :devil
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: eddiek on December 10, 2009, 07:36:22 AM

LOL.......Skuzzy nullified twitchy's claim to the squad name in this thread:

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,279589.90.html

Last post before he locked it:  "Just for the record, no one owns a squad name."   :neener:

Now that THAT little issue is settle, can this thread die? 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 10, 2009, 08:12:30 AM
LOL.......Skuzzy nullified twitchy's claim to the squad name in this thread:

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,279589.90.html

Last post before he locked it:  "Just for the record, no one owns a squad name."   :neener:

Now that THAT little issue is settle, can this thread die? 

but...but....he nursed it....breast fed it....kept it going.......it HASSSS to be his..... :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 10, 2009, 04:00:27 PM
LOL.......Skuzzy nullified twitchy's claim to the squad name in this thread:

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,279589.90.html

Last post before he locked it:  "Just for the record, no one owns a squad name."   :neener:

Now that THAT little issue is settle, can this thread die? 
:rofl :aok :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 10, 2009, 05:25:08 PM
can we make 33 by tonight?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on December 10, 2009, 05:41:53 PM
furball

(http://www.garycmartin.com/images/furball.jpg)

base takers

(http://www.ninebullets.net/wp-images/2009/takereasy.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 10, 2009, 10:25:42 PM
I see twitchy has yet to get his panties untwisted.
You're right, I'm pissed off about it.
I built that squad for nearly a decade, and I come back to see Syko taking my place like a doppleganger, hiding from me in game for weeks, and telling people I never started it in the first place. Sure, nobody owns a squad name, but after nearly ten years, you'd think people would posess a little more decency than to pull something like that. If POTW are happy flying under that kind of flag, then so be it, but like others have said, simply change the name and walk away from it with some kind of honor intact in the situation here. POTW wasn't meant to be a loose group of assorted furballers scattered across the map, they've taken one of the finest and most cohesive and primarily base taking squadrons in the game and in less than a year, completely screwed the pooch. Why call it Pigs on the Wing anymore to begin with?
Why not start their own squad and come up with their own idea for a name rather than taking credit for nine years of my reputation?
Yeah panties in a wad, little upset, whatever you want to call it, it's a rotten thing to do to somebody, and some of you guys are supporting this mess?
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 10, 2009, 11:03:29 PM
This should be good for a few more pages now :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 10, 2009, 11:44:09 PM
This should be good for a few more pages now :aok

think we'll hit 40?


wopnder if this is twentyfo's shade?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 12:26:17 AM
p
Why not start their own squad and come up with their own idea for a name rather than taking credit for nine years of my reputation?

-Twitchy
I hear they did. Previous fellow disbanded it and the current folks revised it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 11, 2009, 12:26:32 AM
(http://www.smileyshut.com/smileys/new/MSN-Emoticons/MSN-Emoticon-valentine-chocolate-148.gif) (http://www.smileyshut.com/Smileys/Smiley-Huts-Free-MSN-Emoticons-Smileys.html)

couple pages anyway  :D
chocolates anyone?     :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 11, 2009, 01:26:45 AM
I hear they did. Previous fellow disbanded it and the current folks revised it.
Funny you should mention this

 :devil







 :noid


boinked to 33
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 11, 2009, 05:44:40 AM
You're right, I'm pissed off about it.
I built that squad for nearly a decade, and I come back to see Syko taking my place like a doppleganger, hiding from me in game for weeks, and telling people I never started it in the first place. Sure, nobody owns a squad name, but after nearly ten years, you'd think people would posess a little more decency than to pull something like that. If POTW are happy flying under that kind of flag, then so be it, but like others have said, simply change the name and walk away from it with some kind of honor intact in the situation here. POTW wasn't meant to be a loose group of assorted furballers scattered across the map, they've taken one of the finest and most cohesive and primarily base taking squadrons in the game and in less than a year, completely screwed the pooch. Why call it Pigs on the Wing anymore to begin with?
Why not start their own squad and come up with their own idea for a name rather than taking credit for nine years of my reputation?
Yeah panties in a wad, little upset, whatever you want to call it, it's a rotten thing to do to somebody, and some of you guys are supporting this mess?
-Twitchy
Move on... they did. Start a new saquad. If Ohhh so many desire you and your style of play they will flock to you in droves.  Call it twitchy's raiders or some such but make sure your name is in there. If you stop play for any length of time I'm quite sure NOBODY will want to take credit for that.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 11, 2009, 08:39:19 AM
Move on... they did. Start a new saquad. If Ohhh so many desire you and your style of play they will flock to you in droves.  Call it twitchy's raiders or some such but make sure your name is in there. If you stop play for any length of time I'm quite sure NOBODY will want to take credit for that.


 :rofl :rofl


whats a saquad anyways?  and were can I get one?????
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: dedalos on December 11, 2009, 08:56:01 AM
That means doodily-squat ... I own the DFC web domain name ... but I don't own, nor rule supreme over the DFC simply because I coughed up the measly $31.00 to create the web domain.

Ohhhhh he spoke the name in public  :O  I demand immediate disciplinary action  :mad:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 11, 2009, 09:27:51 AM
I hear they did. Previous fellow disbanded it and the current folks revised it.

More revisons are in process to distance ourselves from the POTW name.  I will post as info becomes available.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 11, 2009, 09:30:16 AM
More revisons are in process to distance ourselves from the POTW name.  I will post as info becomes available.

that is a good idea, every time I hear of the POTW i think of twitchy and his screwed up way of looking at this game :rolleyes:


Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 09:30:39 AM
More revisons are in process to distance ourselves from the POTW name.  I will post as info becomes available.

Pick
On
Twitchy
Wing

or

Piss
Off
Twitchy
Wing



???
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 11, 2009, 09:44:01 AM
I believe the current vote is in favor of "The Pigs".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 11, 2009, 09:46:22 AM
Pick
On
Twitchy
Wing

or

Piss
Off
Twitchy
Wing



???

Previously
Owned by
Twitchy
Wing
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 09:51:37 AM
Previously
Owned by
Twitchy
Wing


<snicker>
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 11, 2009, 09:52:23 AM
I believe the current vote is in favor of "The Pigs".

dood why not just come up with a better name?  if you call it "the pigs" its still part of POTW

I will tell ya what, I created a squad awhile back that is a perfect name for a "fighting" squad,

"SUICIDE DWEEBZ"  has a great ring to it, and it tells it like it is.

you can have it, BUT  you can NOT RTB, the catch phrase is "Blood or Bullets" in other words no RTB until one or the other happens.

seriously though if I was you I would get as far away from anything that remotely resembles POTW.

Let "Twitchy" keep the POTW and every one will know what they are.

my.02$




Paul
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 09:54:19 AM
OWs

Oinkless Wonders

ABTs

All Bacon Taken
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 11, 2009, 10:04:04 AM
OWs

Oinkless Wonders

ABTs

All Bacon Taken

i like the abt's :aok :rofl :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 11, 2009, 10:09:08 AM
It is not written in stone, but there is about 40 pilots that have always known themselves as Pigs.  Hard to envison anything else, ya know.  I agree the POTW name has been mudded, hence the ongoing discussions within the squad.  Imagine the Muppet's in a similar mess.  You might understand...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 10:12:02 AM
It is not written in stone, but there is about 40 pilots that have always known themselves as Pigs.  Hard to envison anything else, ya know.  I agree the POTW name has been mudded, hence the ongoing discussions within the squad.  Imagine the Muppet's in a similar mess.  You might understand...

Muppets could successfully change their names to TBB (The Big Birds).
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 11, 2009, 10:16:03 AM
It is not written in stone, but there is about 40 pilots that have always known themselves as Pigs.  Hard to envison anything else, ya know.  I agree the POTW name has been mudded, hence the ongoing discussions within the squad.  Imagine the Muppet's in a similar mess.  You might understand...

I do understand, it suks this is happnin, I fought a few of the POTW, and most seem like good fellas, to bad "T" crapped all over it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 11, 2009, 11:31:06 AM
I do understand, it suks this is happnin, I fought a few of the POTW, and most seem like good fellas, to bad "T" crapped all over it.
Yes he did, and hes fighting for that crap.....but my first and only true sqaud has been with the Pigs so the name feels like home in game to me......How can something soo good come to an end, well they always do








man im wasted im getting dramatic,.... :cry :D :aok :rofl :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 11, 2009, 01:11:14 PM
Posts
Onerous
Threads
Weekly


(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-20.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 11, 2009, 01:12:46 PM
(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/untitled-20.jpg)

 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: nitefox2 on December 11, 2009, 01:25:10 PM
 i feel the same way junk,we as a squad never wanted all this drama,and im sure other squads didnt want to see 30+ pages of this either,i know i didnt.times change,squads come and go and leadership changes.that is life,you learn to deal with it and move on.just like skuzzy said nobody owns a squad! and the reason for that is drama like this.it is a game and if your legacy in life is about some squad in a GAME,u should step back and think about where you failed in life..if this game was to end tommorrow its not like there would be a top story about it on the ten o'clock news,the stock market aint going to crash because of it..we would all just find another game to play.when i started playing i was known as fritzX and the first squad i was part of was the air raiders(a great group of guys and girls i aint forgot about you she got ya :)) and then i went away for about a year or so,then i got my own computer and took on the name nitefox,and the guy i shared a computer with kept the name fritzX,we started a squad called the devils rejects,there was only three of us ,myself ,fritzX and his cousin Trench,and as time went on we never made a website for it and eventully we disbanded for other reasons,me and fritzX went to the p.o.t.w and trench ended up going to a new founded squad called the V devils rejects.which i thought was cool that the name of a squad that we thought of as we were all zombie fans, was made by 1dogfight, a former pig himself,which was cool to see the name live on and is one of the premiere bombing squads on the game.but in no way shape or form did i feel that somebody had taken somthing from me that i thought of .and dogfight and his crew had made it a legitamint squad which is awsome and i wish them the best of luck in hopes that 10 years from now will still be a premiere squad on the game..with saying that even if i had made a website,made the squad official with hitech where it showed in the squads forums or wherever you go to see the squads list,and ran it for a few years,fell on bad times for a year or so and came back to see another squad with the same name or somebody that was part of the squad take it over,i would not be offended by this move.to me it would be cool just to know that the name survived and lived on.and if the squad wasnt what it was when i left wether it be furballin or base takin when i came back if i didnt like what i saw.then i would have went on to some other squad or started another to see what i could do with it.but either way would i feel that it was my squad just because i came up with the name and they should give it back to me.i would be happy just to see that it had endured.and moved on,espically if i just left it for dead,couldnt pay to play and it was disbanded.no one would have brought this matter on but myself,so there would be no one to be mad at but myself for letting it happen in the first place,and i wouldnt go on the forums to air my dirty laundry and whine about it...its a name of a squad on a game,no hair off my back,no money out of my pocket,no biggie..so just be happy your creation lived on and walk away....and dont make 40 pages out of it for all to see and if you cared for the squad so much why drag its name through the mud,and try to destroy all that it has become in less then a month!!!  
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 11, 2009, 01:33:48 PM
 :rofl  I guess this means I need to find a Christmass card for Shuffler and the Muppets now.

If you guys think those creative POTW acronyms are something, you should see some of what we've come up with in our squad's private forum.  We will most likely be changing our squads name in the very near iminute future to "Pigs" (Some good fun acronyms to be had with that one too :t ).  But keep your eyes open for the temporary "Pigs Auf Das Wing" and the "Schweinwaffel" in the meantime.  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bruv119 on December 11, 2009, 01:41:54 PM
holy frikkin wall o text  paragraphs man  !

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TnDep on December 11, 2009, 01:42:54 PM
Well I'm a pig and I could care less what anyone thinks about me or the squad.  I have built friendships in the squad and outside of the squad and that's all that matters.  As far as the other people I don't live with you so think what you want to because I don't care.  

When you get down to the nuts and bolts it's all about the friendships mixed with alittle fun that keeps us here, I think the social status is blown out of proportion "who cares".



Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 01:46:29 PM
Well I'm a pig and I could care less what anyone thinks about me or the squad.  I have built friendships in the squad and outside of the squad and that's all that matters.  As far as the other people I don't live with you so think what you want to because I don't care.  

When you get down to the nuts and bolts it's all about the friendships mixed with alittle fun that keeps us here, I think the social status is blown out of proportion "who cares".


Wow... is this twitchy's shade?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 11, 2009, 02:14:24 PM
It is not written in stone, but there is about 40 pilots that have always known themselves as Pigs.  Hard to envison anything else, ya know.  I agree the POTW name has been mudded, hence the ongoing discussions within the squad.  Imagine the Muppet's in a similar mess.  You might understand...

Frankly, it's the people that make  the squad, not the name.  I could care less what the muppets are called. I mean, we already have a dumb name "Army of Muppets", so what's in a name?

Your group of guys could be called the SissyBoy NancyPants Gang  and you'd still have the same group of people you like to hang out with.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 68ZooM on December 11, 2009, 02:17:34 PM
Steve, i will say thou, That Funny name you call your Squad is a Highly Respected Name by alot of Squads   :cheers:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 11, 2009, 04:13:20 PM
Purses
On
Their
Wings

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 11, 2009, 05:09:41 PM
Pilots
On
The
Wrag



lol Sorry wrag but it was needed.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Soulyss on December 11, 2009, 06:50:39 PM
lol Sorry wrag but it was needed.

 :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 11, 2009, 07:11:11 PM
Pilots
On
The
Wrag



lol Sorry wrag but it was needed.


 :rofl  :rofl  :rofl

I'm soooo linking this in the squad forum.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 11, 2009, 07:44:27 PM
(http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/mittelgrosse/medium-smiley-094.gif)


         :banana: 35 :banana:----------------------------------> 36
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 11, 2009, 07:57:40 PM

Yeah, I got lost somewhere in the drivel too. I must not be the choosen one. :rofl

Pilots
On
The
Wrag



hehe.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cjohnson on December 11, 2009, 09:30:47 PM
I vote you change the name to 357th Pigs on the Wing.    :bolt:


That could lead to hours and hours of reading enjoyment.  :D




cj3
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 11, 2009, 09:40:59 PM
Quote
I vote you change the name to 357th Pigs on the Wing
+1 :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 11, 2009, 10:49:50 PM
Greens and afew others in his village will fight yah for it . :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 12, 2009, 03:04:49 AM
WOOT WOOT we jump countries now wooot wooot :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 12, 2009, 03:08:00 AM
WOOT WOOT we jump countries now wooot wooot :rock
AND GOATS!
(http://tinyfarmblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/sum2007_goats.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 12, 2009, 05:11:40 AM
How is this thread still alive?  Good job on the life support I guess...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 12, 2009, 05:33:22 AM
More revisons are in process to distance ourselves from the POTW name.  I will post as info becomes available.
:aok
Awesome, that's all I'm asking for at this point. I hate that all of this crap with Syko happened but I do think that this name change is going to be in the best interest of all involved, and it's a solution I can respect.
I am reforming Pigs on the Wing with the original recipe of cohesion and organized assaults, and will be recruiting heavily over the next several weeks.
As I said before,
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

The oink originated in taking bases, and it's there that 'Pigs on the Wing' belongs, if you guys have decided that isn't your game, then you guys really should change the name, and I would consider that a fair arrangement. Nothing personal guys, no hard feelings, nine years isn't a legal title obviously and it probably seems trivial to alot of folks, but it's important to me. Change the name and we all win here.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 12, 2009, 05:47:36 AM
Ah its over..............rooks arent ready for us :D :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bj229r on December 12, 2009, 09:31:08 AM
Quote
~ First Sargeant-POTW Second Wing ~
<cough cough sErgeant;>
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CrAcKeR on December 12, 2009, 10:40:15 AM
Well twitchy, looks like you have your name. Now the pigs on the wing will surley die in a couple months when you leave again.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 12, 2009, 10:41:25 AM
Now they'll be relegated to also rans.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 12, 2009, 11:34:32 AM
Well twitchy, looks like you have your name. Now the pigs on the wing will surley die in a couple months when you leave again.  :aok

and that's all he really wanted
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SQUAT! on December 13, 2009, 08:35:24 PM
first i'd like to state that i'm posting this against the wish's of my squady's. i've held my toung long enough

twitchy. your a cry baby. plane and simple. if you start a bussiness retire and sell it. you can't come back in a year or 2 take it back and demand it to change. witch is what you were trying to do with POTW. you left Syko took over and made the squad into somethin you never could. we are furballers base takers, GVers, what ever alows us to get our $15 worth. we all do our own thing but still back each other up when needed. you couldn't accept this lil fact when you came back so we as a squad booted you. and although we MAY LET you take the name POTW we are still going to be pigs. and the OINK stay's with us. don't like it. cry about it in another post. or take it up with me in the DA. <FINGER> TWITCH TARD
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kurtank on December 13, 2009, 08:47:18 PM
I'm sorry. But there's an old saying EVERYONE here ought to know.

You don't diddly another man's wife. Plain and simple.

Twitch started the Pigs. He may not be the de facto leader, but he is ALWAYS the founder. I don't know what the situation is, but what's his is his. The POTW have been an AHII staple for years, and I hate to see them go. And to anyone calling twitch a menstruating banana; You can't blame a man fighting to defend what's his.

That is all.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 13, 2009, 08:50:53 PM
first i'd like to state that i'm posting this against the wish's of my squady's. i've held my toung long enough

twitchy. your a cry baby. plane and simple. if you start a bussiness retire and sell it. you can't come back in a year or 2 take it back and demand it to change. witch is what you were trying to do with POTW. you left Syko took over and made the squad into somethin you never could. we are furballers base takers, GVers, what ever alows us to get our $15 worth. we all do our own thing but still back each other up when needed. you couldn't accept this lil fact when you came back so we as a squad booted you. and although we MAY LET you take the name POTW we are still going to be pigs. and the OINK stay's with us. don't like it. cry about it in another post. or take it up with me in the DA. <FINGER> TWITCH TARD
You squaddies were right :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 13, 2009, 09:00:08 PM

Twitchy- glad you got the name back.  Even though I don't really think there's "ownership" of that name, it stank of dirty pool (or pig-pen). 

I have more respect for the "old" pigs that returned the name to you.

But, more importantly, I think the "not" in your quote should be "naught" (as it is later on in your quote).

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SQUAT! on December 13, 2009, 09:00:16 PM
yea but if you divorce your wife and she remarries do you have controle of there relationship? yea he founded it but he also abandoned it for almost 2 years. syko saved it
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 13, 2009, 09:25:35 PM
I'm sorry. But there's an old saying EVERYONE here ought to know.

You don't twittle another man's wife. Plain and simple.

Twitch started the Pigs. He may not be the de facto leader, but he is ALWAYS the founder. I don't know what the situation is, but what's his is his. The POTW have been an AHII staple for years, and I hate to see them go. And to anyone calling twitch a menstruating banana; You can't blame a man fighting to defend what's his.

That is all.

Kurtank I suggest you drop that name as it was used a few years back.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 13, 2009, 09:32:43 PM
yea but if you divorce your wife and she remarries do you have controle of there relationship? yea he founded it but he also abandoned it for almost 2 years. syko saved it

I was going by his earlier posts, where he mentioned a "temporary" leave.  I didn't see "divorce" or "retire", but I could be mistaken.  I don't care enough to look back.

The important thing is the "not/naught" aspect of his posts.

The wife thing- if she remarries me, I'd say we're back to "equals" right?  Or does she now control me?  If it was going to be that way, I wouldn't re-marry her.  How would that effect my name?

IMO, if he really did come up with the name originally, it's the nice thing to do (giving it back).  I wouldn't say he "owns" the name, but I wouldn't say the rest of you do either.  Don't attach more weight to my opinion than it deserves though; if you don't like it, just ignore it.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Kurtank on December 13, 2009, 09:39:14 PM
Kurtank I suggest you drop that name as it was used a few years back.
Can't tell if that's a joke or serious.  :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on December 13, 2009, 09:40:57 PM


I was going by his earlier posts, where he mentioned a "temporary" leave.  I didn't see "divorce" or "retire", but I could be mistaken.  I don't care enough to look back.

The important thing is the "not/naught" aspect of his posts.

The wife thing- if she remarries me, I'd say we're back to "equals" right?  Or does she now control me?  If it was going to be that way, I wouldn't re-marry her.  How would that effect my name?

IMO, if he really did come up with the name originally, it's the nice thing to do (giving it back).  I wouldn't say he "owns" the name, but I wouldn't say the rest of you do either.  Don't attach more weight to my opinion than it deserves though; if you don't like it, just ignore it.


Stop with the metaphors... its not a wife or a job its a squad. It has evolved and is no longer in his control now be done with it. He chose to give up all rights and command when he decided to leave us, no matter what the reason. We keep the squad and the name, you keep the "change" Mr.Obama... er herm I meant twitchy..




MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 13, 2009, 09:45:36 PM


Stop with the metaphors... its not a wife or a job its a squad. It has evolved and is no longer in his control now be done with it. He chose to give up all rights and command when he decided to leave us, no matter what the reason. We keep the squad and the name, you keep the "change" Mr.Obama... er herm I meant twitchy..




MrMeaty

So no SissyBoy NancyPants Gang?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on December 13, 2009, 09:51:42 PM
So no SissyBoy NancyPants Gang?



Only in your wettest of dreams.... :neener:



MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 14, 2009, 01:20:54 AM
first i'd like to state that i'm posting this against the wish's of my squady's. i've held my toung long enough

twitchy. your a cry baby. plane and simple. if you start a bussiness retire and sell it. you can't come back in a year or 2 take it back and demand it to change. witch is what you were trying to do with POTW. you left Syko took over and made the squad into somethin you never could. we are furballers base takers, GVers, what ever alows us to get our $15 worth. we all do our own thing but still back each other up when needed. you couldn't accept this lil fact when you came back so we as a squad booted you. and although we MAY LET you take the name POTW we are still going to be pigs. and the OINK stay's with us. don't like it. cry about it in another post. or take it up with me in the DA. <FINGER> TWITCH TARD
I read his posts, and saw his little campaign ads for 'President Syko', and the simple truth of the matter is that Syko had somewhat dishonest delusions of granduer and rather than actually leading the squad, he formed his own elite score wing and let waystin lead the rest of you guys... Syko was my best friend for nine years, until the day I read his posts on the forum and what he had been saying while I was gone, it was pretty devastating stuff to be honest with you. I'm sitting here drinking coffee from a Squad CO coffee mug he sent me right now and it's not a pleasant thing to go through, but he knows what the score is.
 
For nine years squat, the cohesion of the squad was our only requirement, and that was what made the POTW. Yeah he turned it in to something, but it wasn't Pigs on the Wing, it was Syko's Autonomous Collective. The only changes I wanted to make was to get rid of one smart alek, and bring the squad back into cohesion where it belonged. Doing your own thing is fine, hey I spend 15 bucks just like you do, but doing your own thing isn't what POTW was about, and Syko knew that when he 'took over'.

Syko could have simply started his own squad, any player can. Rather than starting his own, he chose to use and claim credit for the squad's 10 year legacy, sorry but that one thing is completely unacceptable to me.
Like I said before, any player, upon joining the game can choose to start their own squad, but not surprisingly most choose to join an established squad, and when you figure out why that is you can begin to understand the signifigance of your role as a CO and a squad leader. I didn't lead POTW for nine years by being a draconian dictator, but the squad didn't last as long as it did by letting the members fly around and do whatever they wanted. When the Pigs fly, they do so in a herd, or they have no right calling themselves Pigs on the Wing in the first place, Syko included. He used to boot people himself for that very reason FYI.

I'm sorry you don't know me better, I'm actually a pretty decent guy, and I am, or well, used to be a hell of a good squad leader. I will be rebuilding the Pigs on the Wing, and all old the Pigs are welcome, no questions asked. I don't care if you oink or not, I know who oinked the first oink, and it wasn't Syko or myself, but I started the squad and named it, and built it around one simple concept, cohesion. Play for score, just pick a name that doesn't have a ten year history on this game already. Pigs travel in a herd, I'm sorry if that was too much for you guys to handle but it takes a little commitment above and beyond the ordinary, but that's the one single thing that made us POTW.
-Twitchy
<finger> right back at ya  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: JunkyII on December 14, 2009, 02:31:04 AM
. Pigs travel in a herd, I'm sorry if that was too much for you guys to handle but it takes a little commitment above and beyond the ordinary, but that's the one single thing that made us POTW.
-Twitchy
<finger> right back at ya  :aok
Not for the last two years...................oh and yea we stuck in a herd, all the way over to rook land  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 14, 2009, 02:37:32 AM
I think 40 is still a possibility ;)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 14, 2009, 11:54:02 AM
Can't tell if that's a joke or serious.  :lol

 :P
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 12:03:57 PM
I think 40 is still a possibility ;)

Without question my esteemed colleague. 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 14, 2009, 12:11:07 PM
the big 40

 :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 12:13:35 PM
Come on you sallies!!!!   "Over hill, over dale, 40 pages should never fail!!!!!"
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: nitefox2 on December 14, 2009, 01:46:46 PM
either way if the name changes as skuzzy posted in another thread..no one owns a squad,so you can preach all you want about its yours,you started it...bla,bla,bla,tired of seeing your threads about it twitchy,wish hitech will just kill this post.and fyi twitch theres no way i would ever join a squad that you was in charge of,aint no way somebody is going to tell me what to do and or when to do it on a game i pay to have fun on,if i want to be told to do somthing it will be at work,not on here,thats why i joined the squad under syk.and fyi i never heard syko say or take credit for running the squad,he never said i founded the potw or told us he ran it for 9 years so you need to get off that high horse twitchy.and whatever we call our squad we will look foward to killing yours everytime we run into your emporer allmighty twitchys do what i say squad
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 14, 2009, 01:52:27 PM
fyi i never heard syko say or take credit for running the squad,he never said i founded the potw or told us he ran it for 9 years so you need to get off that high horse twitchy

LINK (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,260010.msg3226136.html#msg3226136)

Read the first line.


Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 14, 2009, 02:16:58 PM
I read his posts, and saw his little campaign ads for 'President Syko', and the simple truth of the matter is that Syko had somewhat dishonest delusions of granduer and rather than actually leading the squad, he formed his own elite score wing and let waystin lead the rest of you guys... Syko was my best friend for nine years, until the day I read his posts on the forum and what he had been saying while I was gone, it was pretty devastating stuff to be honest with you. I'm sitting here drinking coffee from a Squad CO coffee mug he sent me right now and it's not a pleasant thing to go through, but he knows what the score is.
 
For nine years squat, the cohesion of the squad was our only requirement, and that was what made the POTW. Yeah he turned it in to something, but it wasn't Pigs on the Wing, it was Syko's Autonomous Collective. The only changes I wanted to make was to get rid of one smart alek, and bring the squad back into cohesion where it belonged. Doing your own thing is fine, hey I spend 15 bucks just like you do, but doing your own thing isn't what POTW was about, and Syko knew that when he 'took over'.

Syko could have simply started his own squad, any player can. Rather than starting his own, he chose to use and claim credit for the squad's 10 year legacy, sorry but that one thing is completely unacceptable to me.
Like I said before, any player, upon joining the game can choose to start their own squad, but not surprisingly most choose to join an established squad, and when you figure out why that is you can begin to understand the signifigance of your role as a CO and a squad leader. I didn't lead POTW for nine years by being a draconian dictator, but the squad didn't last as long as it did by letting the members fly around and do whatever they wanted. When the Pigs fly, they do so in a herd, or they have no right calling themselves Pigs on the Wing in the first place, Syko included. He used to boot people himself for that very reason FYI.

I'm sorry you don't know me better, I'm actually a pretty decent guy, and I am, or well, used to be a hell of a good squad leader. I will be rebuilding the Pigs on the Wing, and all old the Pigs are welcome, no questions asked. I don't care if you oink or not, I know who oinked the first oink, and it wasn't Syko or myself, but I started the squad and named it, and built it around one simple concept, cohesion. Play for score, just pick a name that doesn't have a ten year history on this game already. Pigs travel in a herd, I'm sorry if that was too much for you guys to handle but it takes a little commitment above and beyond the ordinary, but that's the one single thing that made us POTW.
-Twitchy
<finger> right back at ya  :aok
(http://ihasahotdog.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/cute-puppy-pictures-blah-blah-talking.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 14, 2009, 02:20:02 PM
(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/ren_dirtylaundry_ls.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: nitefox2 on December 14, 2009, 02:39:44 PM
well lute you just know it all,all your threads you know everthing about every game name,squad,time and place just stfu allready.i know this is why u pay every month so you can talk smack on this forum
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TequilaChaser on December 14, 2009, 03:14:19 PM
well lute you just know it all,all your threads you know everthing about every game name,squad,time and place just stfu allready.i know this is why u pay every month so you can talk smack on this forum

some wish you would follow your own 4 letter advice, i bet..... oh mighty i been here 8 years newb....
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 03:20:27 PM
Come on 38!!!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 14, 2009, 03:20:42 PM
some wish you would follow your own 4 letter advice, i bet..... oh mighty i been here 8 years newb....


 :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 14, 2009, 03:38:35 PM
38 38 38 :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: greens on December 14, 2009, 03:45:30 PM
i can't type in english! can someone tell me how?!. maybe tootie fruitie lutie can teach me  :devil or even better a guy so called name bear. maybe he has killed one before, close encounter with one, chased by one, got chased by one maybe not  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: nitefox2 on December 14, 2009, 03:47:45 PM
naw id rather piss everbody off and dont care about it one bit.and what can you all do about this...not a dam thing.enjoy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: dunnrite on December 14, 2009, 03:49:45 PM
naw id rather piss everbody off and dont care about it one bit.and what can you all do about this...not a dam thing.enjoy

Sure we can, if it wasn't so damned funny

Quote
We also added a simple "ignore user" feature.  Not exactly intuitive, as you have to add the user manually to an ignore list located in your "Profile->Personal Message Options".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 14, 2009, 04:39:35 PM
38 38 38 :aok

Let's raise the bar...


39!


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 14, 2009, 05:00:01 PM
Pretty soon we will see Skuzzy: This one is done.  OR Skuzzy: This one has run its course.
 :devil

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 14, 2009, 06:00:31 PM
i can't type in english! can someone tell me how?!. maybe tootie fruitie lutie can teach me  :devil or even better a guy so called name bear. maybe he has killed one before, close encounter with one, chased by one, got chased by one maybe not  :rofl
Just trying to figure out what the hell you're talking about
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bustr on December 14, 2009, 06:00:36 PM
Maybe I'm mistaken but, I thought Skuzzy had a very wise rule by which he locked threads for the best intrests of the community.

Rule 000dumbasastump: Don't air personal dirty laundry between yourself and another player, players, squad(s) or your own squad in the AH Forums.

This thread has become a collosal honey pot. Most of us have been caught so far. Skuzzy is either very busy helping with the WWI arena release, or we are about to be taught one of those 3rd grade Ms. Kittenskinner lessons.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 06:01:16 PM
"Do I hear 40?" :uhoh
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 14, 2009, 06:13:43 PM
Maybe I'm mistaken but, I thought Skuzzy had a very wise rule by which he locked threads for the best intrests of the community.

Rule 000dumbasastump: Don't air personal dirty laundry between yourself and another player, players, squad(s) or your own squad in the AH Forums.

This thread has become a collosal honey pot. Most of us have been caught so far. Skuzzy is either very busy helping with the WWI arena release, or we are about to be taught one of those 3rd grade Ms. Kittenskinner lessons.


It's probably been kept on life support because he knows you guys will just take over another thread with this stuff if he locks this one.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 06:14:11 PM

It's probably been kept on life support because he knows you guys will just take over another thread with this stuff if he locks this one.  :aok

Ding!!!!   
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on December 14, 2009, 06:16:39 PM

It's probably been kept on life support because he knows you guys will just take over another thread with this stuff if he locks this one.  :aok


good thing you don't get paid to think or you'd be poor...



MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 14, 2009, 06:18:27 PM
Maybe I'm mistaken but, I thought Skuzzy had a very wise rule by which he locked threads for the best intrests of the community.

Rule 000dumbasastump: Don't air personal dirty laundry between yourself and another player, players, squad(s) or your own squad in the AH Forums.

This thread has become a collosal honey pot. Most of us have been caught so far. Skuzzy is either very busy helping with the WWI arena release, or we are about to be taught one of those 3rd grade Ms. Kittenskinner lessons.
Well it was pretty much dead until one of your guys revived it :frown:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on December 14, 2009, 06:23:47 PM
Well it was pretty much dead until one of your guys revived it :frown:



not guilty.... :neener:


MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: The Fugitive on December 14, 2009, 06:28:46 PM
well lute you just know it all,all your threads you know everthing about every game name,squad,time and place just stfu allready.i know this is why u pay every month so you can talk smack on this forum


I'll add to the thread and page count only because this guy, when proven wrong resorts to name calling. As a favorite friend of mine says "What a maroon!"
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MrMeaty on December 14, 2009, 06:30:49 PM

I'll add to the thread and page count only because this guy, when proven wrong resorts to name calling. As a favorite friend of mine says "What a maroon!"



reply with a pic? well hell yea...


(http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z36/PIGS-ON-THE-WING/wat.jpg)


MrMeaty
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: WMLute on December 14, 2009, 07:02:48 PM
(http://imagechan.com/images/3d5d90ca05980a3baab9e1b253d75be7.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SPKmes on December 14, 2009, 07:10:02 PM


That I have to try..........too funny  :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TUK on December 14, 2009, 07:24:01 PM
End this madness skuzzy!  Gotten out of hand..
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: caldera on December 14, 2009, 07:37:12 PM
Just because.


(http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o460/caldera_08/b25_jpg.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 14, 2009, 07:50:26 PM
Well it was pretty much dead until one of your guys revived it :frown:
(http://i234.photobucket.com/albums/ee19/KimCandy2/Funny/1e1502.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: caldera on December 14, 2009, 07:54:53 PM
 :rofl :rofl :rofl

I miss watching the Stooges.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 14, 2009, 08:52:09 PM
Pretty soon we will see Skuzzy: This one is done.  OR Skuzzy: This one has run its course.
 :devil



nah.....he prolly comes in every morning, reads this, then goes and hides in the corner.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: mtnman on December 14, 2009, 08:57:24 PM

It's probably been kept on life support because he knows you guys will just take over another thread with this stuff if he locks this one.  :aok

Maybe Skuzzy's using this thread as bait.  Maybe it'll be locked, but with all of us still in it, instead of locking everyone out! 

Think about it- his job would be much easier if he started to lock threads that way.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 14, 2009, 08:58:24 PM
Maybe Skuzzy's using this thread as bait.  Maybe it'll be locked, but with all of us still in it, instead of locking everyone out! 

Think about it- his job would be much easier if he started to lock threads that way.
:noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 14, 2009, 08:58:37 PM
nah.....he prolly comes in every morning, reads this, then goes and hides in the corner.
Maybe he turns the computer off and just walks away ! :old:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: The Fugitive on December 14, 2009, 09:11:45 PM
I'm thinking Skuzzy has "40" in the "guess the number of pages pool"
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 10:27:42 PM
 :old:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 14, 2009, 10:41:36 PM
Maybe he turns the computer off and just walks away ! :old:

WHATWHATWHAT??!!??!!

turn off the computer??? are YOU INSANE MAN!!??!!??!??

 :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: USRanger on December 14, 2009, 10:42:42 PM
I hate to drag the man out of bed, but...

(http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/4598/skuzzysignal.gif) (http://img692.imageshack.us/i/skuzzysignal.gif/)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 11:02:39 PM
 :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 14, 2009, 11:11:00 PM
40 FTW???
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 14, 2009, 11:35:25 PM
(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/pig-roast.jpg)

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 11:36:31 PM
LOL
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 14, 2009, 11:45:06 PM
 :aok tasty  :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 14, 2009, 11:48:07 PM
I'm hungry too.  Time to leave these 40 pages and go eat!  :aok  :cheers:  :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 14, 2009, 11:56:09 PM
 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ink on December 15, 2009, 12:40:28 AM
Ranja that was awesome :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: F111 on December 16, 2009, 03:26:23 PM
 :rock
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: W7LPNRICK on December 16, 2009, 08:45:41 PM
 :rock I wondered myself what the fun is in showing up with a bunch of dweebs 25-30 to overwhelm a base and take it, shooting fighters on the runway, 10:1 or worse, no skill acquired in learning maneuvers, etc., etc. Then logging off until a brief slaughter the next night?  :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 17, 2009, 01:22:04 PM
can we make it to 41?----------------------->almost there :rock---------------------------> :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 17, 2009, 01:22:56 PM
41?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 17, 2009, 01:23:19 PM
41?


Easily
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: waystin2 on December 17, 2009, 01:57:24 PM
Easily

Oh ok 41 it is... :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SQUAT! on December 17, 2009, 02:03:07 PM
Quote
I read his posts, and saw his little campaign ads for 'President Syko', and the simple truth of the matter is that Syko had somewhat dishonest delusions of granduer and rather than actually leading the squad, he formed his own elite score wing and let waystin lead the rest of you guys... Syko was my best friend for nine years, until the day I read his posts on the forum and what he had been saying while I was gone, it was pretty devastating stuff to be honest with you. I'm sitting here drinking coffee from a Squad CO coffee mug he sent me right now and it's not a pleasant thing to go through, but he knows what the score is.
 
For nine years squat, the cohesion of the squad was our only requirement, and that was what made the POTW. Yeah he turned it in to something, but it wasn't Pigs on the Wing, it was Syko's Autonomous Collective. The only changes I wanted to make was to get rid of one smart alek, and bring the squad back into cohesion where it belonged. Doing your own thing is fine, hey I spend 15 bucks just like you do, but doing your own thing isn't what POTW was about, and Syko knew that when he 'took over'.

Syko could have simply started his own squad, any player can. Rather than starting his own, he chose to use and claim credit for the squad's 10 year legacy, sorry but that one thing is completely unacceptable to me.
Like I said before, any player, upon joining the game can choose to start their own squad, but not surprisingly most choose to join an established squad, and when you figure out why that is you can begin to understand the signifigance of your role as a CO and a squad leader. I didn't lead POTW for nine years by being a draconian dictator, but the squad didn't last as long as it did by letting the members fly around and do whatever they wanted. When the Pigs fly, they do so in a herd, or they have no right calling themselves Pigs on the Wing in the first place, Syko included. He used to boot people himself for that very reason FYI.

I'm sorry you don't know me better, I'm actually a pretty decent guy, and I am, or well, used to be a hell of a good squad leader. I will be rebuilding the Pigs on the Wing, and all old the Pigs are welcome, no questions asked. I don't care if you oink or not, I know who oinked the first oink, and it wasn't Syko or myself, but I started the squad and named it, and built it around one simple concept, cohesion. Play for score, just pick a name that doesn't have a ten year history on this game already. Pigs travel in a herd, I'm sorry if that was too much for you guys to handle but it takes a little commitment above and beyond the ordinary, but that's the one single thing that made us POTW.
-Twitchy
<finger> right back at ya  Thumbs UP!


first off. we have cohesion. we do our own thing but the second someone calls for us we join up. it's rare to see a pig alone not to say it don't happen. syko does lead the pigs and does a great job at it. when you left the squad was nearly gone. look at the numbers now. we have a scoreing wing. and any pig that want's can join it as long as he can hold a score of around 100. waystin just happens to be the co thats on the most. and is leader of 2nd wing.and a great freind to all the pigs. when syko's on we fallow him. this all shows how long you been away. you haven't seen the system syko set up. a sytem that workes. we evan tryed letting you take over and fallowing you. but you couldn't accept the fact that alote of us felt takeing base after base after base with only the goal to reset the map is boring and pointless. and you were mad cause we didn't want to do it 24/7. none of us said you wern't the founder. but most of us never flew with you untill your return. and as far as 1 smart mouthed guy. i saw the list. it was a few more then 1. you just need to get over it and accept that the squad you started died when abanded it and left syko to rebuild it. your just mad cause you couldn't do what syko has done and are trying to take credit for another mans work. if you were so great how many people are in your new basterd wing? how many pig's new or old fallowed you and left syko? NONE

<finger>twitch tard
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 17, 2009, 02:17:24 PM
twitch tard

I like this.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: usvi on December 17, 2009, 02:34:36 PM
I could go to...
(http://larryshomeport.com/assets/images/41for.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Tordon22 on December 17, 2009, 02:39:36 PM
Poll: Will we hit 42? Yes or no?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 17, 2009, 02:42:08 PM
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/taskforce.jpg)


41
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 17, 2009, 02:59:53 PM
I know them thar fellers............
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 17, 2009, 03:09:36 PM
600 wooooot!!!! :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 17, 2009, 03:49:08 PM
42's a comin....... :airplane:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 17, 2009, 04:02:09 PM
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/taskforce.jpg)


41
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SunBat on December 17, 2009, 04:03:01 PM
Can somebody summarize the last 10 pages for me?  

Ah, on second thought, Skarzzybat please kill this thang!!!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 17, 2009, 04:17:15 PM
Can somebody summarize the last 10 pages for me?  

Ah, on second thought, Skarzzybat please kill this thang!!!!
At At At, not untill  I score + 10 on my post count. (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-taunt001.gif) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 17, 2009, 04:18:33 PM
42, come on, you can do it!   :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 17, 2009, 04:24:21 PM
Can somebody summarize the last 10 pages for me? 


(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/021109-slap-fight1.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 17, 2009, 04:25:22 PM
Shhhhhhhh listen... you can almost hear it comin'
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 17, 2009, 05:22:57 PM
42424242424244242442424244242 42424424244242442424244242442 4242442424242242

(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/aprilfools.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 17, 2009, 05:46:47 PM
42424242424244242442424244242424244242442424424242442424424242442424242242

(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/aprilfools.jpg)

 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 17, 2009, 05:53:12 PM
42 umm MG 42

(http://world.guns.ru/machine/mg42_03.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Becinhu on December 17, 2009, 06:11:26 PM
I haven't read all 41 pages. But I just farted so I think I get the general idea.... :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 2ace on December 17, 2009, 06:12:56 PM
42
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SlapShot on December 17, 2009, 07:49:51 PM

first off. we have cohesion. we do our own thing but the second someone calls for us we join up. it's rare to see a pig alone not to say it don't happen. syko does lead the pigs and does a great job at it. when you left the squad was nearly gone. look at the numbers now. we have a scoreing wing. and any pig that want's can join it as long as he can hold a score of around 100. waystin just happens to be the co thats on the most. and is leader of 2nd wing.and a great freind to all the pigs. when syko's on we fallow him. this all shows how long you been away. you haven't seen the system syko set up. a sytem that workes. we evan tryed letting you take over and fallowing you. but you couldn't accept the fact that alote of us felt takeing base after base after base with only the goal to reset the map is boring and pointless. and you were mad cause we didn't want to do it 24/7. none of us said you wern't the founder. but most of us never flew with you untill your return. and as far as 1 smart mouthed guy. i saw the list. it was a few more then 1. you just need to get over it and accept that the squad you started died when abanded it and left syko to rebuild it. your just mad cause you couldn't do what syko has done and are trying to take credit for another mans work. if you were so great how many people are in your new basterd wing? how many pig's new or old fallowed you and left syko? NONE

<finger>twitch tard

Is there something in the POTW doctrine that states that if you are to post on the BBS it must be only one run-on paragraph with spelling errors that would make HiTech cringe ?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CHAPPY on December 17, 2009, 07:53:51 PM
(http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-eatdrink033.gif) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: PFactorDave on December 17, 2009, 08:01:33 PM
one run-on paragraph with spelling errors that would make HiTech cringe ?

Now THAT is saying something!  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 17, 2009, 09:01:02 PM
Is there something in the POTW doctrine that states that if you are to post on the BBS it must be only one run-on paragraph with spelling errors that would make HiTech cringe ?

OINK!   :devil


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 18, 2009, 06:02:31 PM
Shhhhhhhh listen... you can almost hear it comin'

So I'm not the only one hearing the tell-tale "woosh" from a 50-pound banhammer swinging through the virtual nether and about to strike?


Is there something in the POTW doctrine that states that if you are to post on the BBS it must be only one run-on paragraph with spelling errors that would make HiTech cringe ?

No, unlike BK doctorine, we don't force our members to pass all their english classes or to display a lack of tollerance for others in a game/game-forum.  Actually we don't really have much of a doctorine beyond "have fun in the game, do what ya want (helping and contributing is nice though) and be respectful of those that respect us".
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 18, 2009, 06:04:23 PM
 :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DMBEAR on December 18, 2009, 06:06:31 PM
(http://i411.photobucket.com/albums/pp193/dmbear/earl-pony.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ardy123 on December 18, 2009, 06:27:50 PM
Man this thread is lame.... but Assi's signature pic thing is not  :D ... new direction who has the best signature picture!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: AAJagerX on December 18, 2009, 06:41:07 PM
Hey Karaya, long time no talk man.  BTW, did ya like those bullets I sent your way the other night? 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 18, 2009, 07:55:58 PM
Man this thread is lame.... but Assi's signature pic thing is not  :D ... new direction who has the best signature picture!
:headscratch:

  |
  |
  |
  \/
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 18, 2009, 08:05:40 PM
Slapshot were you ever a Pigstomper? Cause you sure making pigs SQUEEEEEEEEEE now.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 18, 2009, 08:39:14 PM
Slapshot were you ever a Pigstomper? Cause you sure making pigs SQUEEEEEEEEEE now.

Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 18, 2009, 08:51:25 PM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


ack-ack

Yeah, I met Rager in 2003 at the Indy Con.   
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 18, 2009, 08:58:45 PM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


ack-ack
Yes sir he was/is/always will be. One of the nicest people to ever play the game.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 18, 2009, 08:59:57 PM
Yes sir he was/is/always will be. One of the nicest people to ever play the game.


We used to fly a lot together and against each other stemming back from AW.  Yeah, always a class act and a good laugh.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 18, 2009, 11:34:32 PM
(http://43splittests.com/index_files/43_product2.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 19, 2009, 12:01:27 AM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


 If I remember correct I think 1ijac was with the efw-sog in AW (or for part of the time),... when AW quit I came to AH for 2 months  I flew with the efw-sog, the efw-sog flew with the pigstompers quite abit. But the thats been long time ago now.
 At some time I know the efw-sog disbanded.
 I flew with the Misfits at the end of AW(Otto,Guchi,Riddler some of the names) I was the only one to come to AH. They went thier own ways.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Mustaine on December 19, 2009, 01:33:38 AM
test post, figured this thread is irrelevant, but having trouble posting...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 19, 2009, 01:47:51 AM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


 If I remember correct I think 1ijac was with the efw-sog in AW (or for part of the time),... when AW quit I came to AH for 2 months  I flew with the efw-sog, the efw-sog flew with the pigstompers quite abit. But the thats been long time ago now.
 At some time I know the efw-sog disbanded.
 I flew with the Misfits at the end of AW(Otto,Guchi,Riddler some of the names) I was the only one to come to AH. They went thier own ways.

I remember otto... good guy.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 19, 2009, 02:24:43 AM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


 If I remember correct I think 1ijac was with the efw-sog in AW (or for part of the time),... when AW quit I came to AH for 2 months  I flew with the efw-sog, the efw-sog flew with the pigstompers quite abit. But the thats been long time ago now.
 At some time I know the efw-sog disbanded.
 I flew with the Misfits at the end of AW(Otto,Guchi,Riddler some of the names) I was the only one to come to AH. They went thier own ways.

Otto...that's one name I haven't seen in a long time.


ack-ck
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 19, 2009, 04:54:24 PM
Quote
I remember otto... good guy.
yes he is as a person, fun to fly with as wingman
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 19, 2009, 04:57:15 PM
Otto...that's one name I haven't seen in a long time.


ack-ck

Yall remember Deth7?  He was the CO of Pigstompers in AW1/3 Korea and flew AH2 in PS as well.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 19, 2009, 05:29:36 PM
Yall remember Deth7?  He was the CO of Pigstompers in AW1/3 Korea and flew AH2 in PS as well.

Of course I remember Deth7, another great guy to wing and fight against.  IIRC, he did fly here briefly after the Exodus.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 19, 2009, 08:57:23 PM
my typing is getting worse
yes he is as a good person, fun to fly with as wingman (otto), forgot to insert good

I remember deth 7
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 20, 2009, 06:20:08 AM
I Believe Deth7 PC isn't up to snuff so he went to FA Korea. I'm thinking a few others did also.
I hope with the introduction of WWI, a few will return. After all the Pigstompers started out as a WWI squad.
 Just look how worked up Mano is. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 20, 2009, 11:12:44 AM
I Believe Deth7 PC isn't up to snuff so he went to FA Korea. I'm thinking a few others did also.
I hope with the introduction of WWI, a few will return. After all the Pigstompers started out as a WWI squad.
 Just look how worked up Mano is. :D

I doubt if they will be able to run WWI if they can't WWII.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ROX on December 20, 2009, 12:45:17 PM
Pigstompers were a good outfit, wasn't 1ijac a member?


ack-ack

1ijac was the longtime CO and was one of the originals from Air Warrior.

ROX  (former Air Warrior Pigstomper and AH Pigstomper...GREAT bunch of guys!)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bronk on December 20, 2009, 12:57:46 PM
I doubt if they will be able to run WWI if they can't WWII.
Might entice them to upgrade a bit. Know what I'm ;) sayin?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 20, 2009, 05:10:29 PM
Might entice them to upgrade a bit. Know what I'm ;) sayin?

If a WWII fan won't or can't upgrade for a WWII air combat game I don't figure they will for a WWI.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: ROX on December 21, 2009, 03:50:07 PM
I Believe Deth7 PC isn't up to snuff so he went to FA Korea. I'm thinking a few others did also.
I hope with the introduction of WWI, a few will return. After all the Pigstompers started out as a WWI squad.
 Just look how worked up Mano is. :D


Deth7 was on our current game up until the last game upgrade that his computer couldn't handle.

I exchanged emails with him last week and he is spending more time with his motorcycle.

ROX
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Babalonian on December 21, 2009, 06:56:00 PM
Make sure he's grabbed and tested out the latest patch ROX, it's been a lot friendlier on two older machines that I run AH on, compared to the first batch of upgrades/patches applied to the game earleir this year.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 2flie on December 24, 2009, 09:54:56 PM
IIRC, the Pigstompers were Az in AW for some time. Something came up that caused them to change to Cz, and they allied with SOG. I think it may have started one time when 1ijac became PNG back in AW4W (AW Classic on Gamestorm) while diving through the middle of a furball. SlugM signs him up for a day, and then the next day he's back to Az and the Pigstompers. That started the relationship, even though we were always fighting Pigstompers. I just can't remember when the transition happened. I wanna say it occurred in AW3, and I think it had something to do with another Az squadron. Anyways, they never gave up their Pigstomper identity, and SlugM never asked them to. They just wore a SOG uniform for a brief time, until enough of them made whichever transition precipitated the change.

2flie
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 25, 2009, 01:43:20 PM
More revisons are in process to distance ourselves from the POTW name.  I will post as info becomes available.
Any idea when this is going to happen, I'm reforming and am going to be recruiting heavily and obviously, I'd like to be able to have this squad name stuff with you guys straightened out as soon as possible.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 25, 2009, 01:45:31 PM
Any idea when this is going to happen, I'm reforming and am going to be recruiting heavily and obviously, I'd like to be able to have this squad name stuff with you guys straightened out as soon as possible.
-Twitchy

Never.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 25, 2009, 02:30:33 PM
IIRC, the Pigstompers were Az in AW for some time. Something came up that caused them to change to Cz, and they allied with SOG. I think it may have started one time when 1ijac became PNG back in AW4W (AW Classic on Gamestorm) while diving through the middle of a furball. SlugM signs him up for a day, and then the next day he's back to Az and the Pigstompers. That started the relationship, even though we were always fighting Pigstompers. I just can't remember when the transition happened. I wanna say it occurred in AW3, and I think it had something to do with another Az squadron. Anyways, they never gave up their Pigstomper identity, and SlugM never asked them to. They just wore a SOG uniform for a brief time, until enough of them made whichever transition precipitated the change.

2flie

2flie!  You old P-47 flyin' bastige!

ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 25, 2009, 02:31:43 PM
Never.

Stop being an bellybutton and let him have the name back, it's not like you guys are making a name for yourselves in it.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 25, 2009, 02:39:20 PM
Stop being an bellybutton and let him have the name back, it's not like you guys are making a name for yourselves in it.


ack-ack

+1
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 25, 2009, 04:41:09 PM
Never.

Sell it on ebay.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 25, 2009, 05:25:39 PM
Stop being an bellybutton and let him have the name back, it's not like you guys are making a name for yourselves in it.


ack-ack

Calling me an ass? It wasn't and isn't my decision.  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 25, 2009, 05:51:11 PM
Calling me an ass? It wasn't and isn't my decision.  :aok

From your previous post, it is quite clear that you support the decision, so basically, yeah I am.  Toss in the rest of your squadron as well for acting the same way.  Only reason why you guys won't give the name back is just to spite twitchy, no other reason. 


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 25, 2009, 06:07:08 PM
Oh please Ack-Ack, you know we want this to end just as much as Twitchy. For all we care our name could be the "SissyBoy NancyPants Gang". The only thing that matters to us is eachother, not the name we fly under but that's not my decision to make. This is a game, for those of you who haven't realized it yet.

 :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: phatzo on December 25, 2009, 06:31:15 PM
For all we care our name could be the "SissyBoy NancyPants Gang".  :salute
Double dog dare ya.
 :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 25, 2009, 08:02:59 PM
Double dog dare ya.
 :bolt:

+1

 :noid :neener: :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Steve on December 25, 2009, 10:20:44 PM
. For all we care our name could be the "SissyBoy NancyPants Gang".  :salute

I'm so  in!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 25, 2009, 11:42:50 PM
yaknow what?

i think twitchy is wrong. i htink he's an arse. but it's only a name. if he wants it so bad, give the dam thing to him, and stop lowerin yourselves to him.

 those of you i know, i like, and respect........but this is gettin kinda silly now.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 26, 2009, 12:16:58 AM
yaknow what?

i think twitchy is wrong. i htink he's an arse. but it's only a name. if he wants it so bad, give the dam thing to him, and stop lowerin yourselves to him.

 those of you i know, i like, and respect........but this is gettin kinda silly now.
It got silly 30+ pages ago :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 26, 2009, 12:25:52 AM
It got silly 30+ pages ago :lol

good point :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 26, 2009, 07:22:47 AM
can we get to 45

(http://www.beersodasports.com/images/img08/my8826.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 26, 2009, 07:44:34 AM
can we get to 45

(http://www.beersodasports.com/images/img08/my8826.jpg)

 :banana: :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 26, 2009, 11:40:20 AM
can we get to 45

(http://www.beersodasports.com/images/img08/my8826.jpg)
FELIZ NAVIDAD! :cheers: :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CrAcKeR on December 26, 2009, 11:59:22 AM
Stop being an bellybutton and let him have the name back, it's not like you guys are making a name for yourselves in it.


 
ack-ack

Why are you even responding anyways? You never have anything good to say about anything. Yet you respond anyways like were listening to you. Just another drama queen tard that wants to be in the spotlight :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: The Fugitive on December 26, 2009, 12:18:53 PM
Why are you even responding anyways? You never have anything good to say about anything. Yet you respond anyways like were listening to you. Just another drama queen tard that wants to be in the spotlight :aok

unlike your post that has nothing to do with the OP's topic and is in stead just a personal attack on another player. Whats that "other" face you wear look like?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 26, 2009, 02:06:01 PM
unlike your post that has nothing to do with the OP's topic and is in stead just a personal attack on another player. Whats that "other" face you wear look like?

 :lol Like Ack Ack's post is so on the OP's topic and devoid of personal attack?  :lol :rolleyes:
Stop being an bellybutton and let him have the name back, it's not like you guys are making a name for yourselves in it.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 26, 2009, 04:24:27 PM
:lol Like Ack Ack's post is so on the OP's topic and devoid of personal attack?  :lol :rolleyes:

I hate to say it, 'cause i kinda like flyin with him when i'm knight.......but the majority of his posts in the recent months seem fairly negative.

as is this one of mine....... :noid :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: TW9 on December 26, 2009, 04:31:52 PM
Just because you're better than me doesn't mean you are NOT a noob. Just means I suck and HAVE sucked for a long time.

Thank you. Carry on with regularly scheduled program.

 :salute
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 26, 2009, 04:39:04 PM
Just another drama queen tard that wants to be in the spotlight :aok

That's what your posts are pretty much like in this thread.  You know there is an ignore feature, suggest you use it.  


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Ack-Ack on December 26, 2009, 04:43:26 PM
:lol Like Ack Ack's post is so on the OP's topic and devoid of personal attack?  :lol :rolleyes:

It's rather accurate though.  You guys are acting like a bunch of tulips just to spite Twitchy.  Let him have the name of his squadron back and be done with it, get a new name like Furballers Aces and Good Sports or some other name that fits you guys.


ack-ack
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 26, 2009, 05:19:14 PM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,279392.15.html
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 26, 2009, 06:02:38 PM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,279392.15.html

The last I heard you guys wanted to distance yourselves from the POTW name anyway, I've been patiently waiting until you guys change the name to start rebuilding and recruiting, and well frankly, it's starting to get a little ridiculous. I've tried the polite way here, with no result, so perhaps a more assertive approach, like 'hey get your own damned name' would suffice? Syko's apparently a fairly creative fellow these days, creating lists and the like, so why don't he just simply create his own squad name like he should have done in the first place and get his doppleganger butt on down the road.
Sorry but this whole thing has been dragging on long enough and I want my squad name, if he can't come up with a simple name for his squadron, I'd more than happy to make a few suggestions.
Ack Ack and I seldom agree on anything here, but I think he nailed it, and you guys are just hanging on to it now for spite. Come off it, it's not that hard to come up with your own idea for a name. You guys want to use my toothbrush and borrow some of my underwear while your at it?
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 26, 2009, 06:05:23 PM
The last I heard you guys wanted to distance yourselves from the POTW name anyway, I've been patiently waiting until you guys change the name to start rebuilding and recruiting, and well frankly, it's starting to get a little ridiculous. I've tried the polite way here, with no result, so perhaps a more assertive approach, like 'hey get your own damned name' would suffice? Syko's apparently a fairly creative fellow these days, creating lists and the like, so why don't he just simply create his own squad name like he should have done in the first place and get his doppleganger butt on down the road.
Sorry but this whole thing has been dragging on long enough and I want my squad name, if he can't come up with a simple name for his squadron, I'd more than happy to make a few suggestions.
Ack Ack and I seldom agree on anything here, but I think he nailed it, and you guys are just hanging on to it now for spite. Come off it, it's not that hard to come up with your own idea for a name. You guys want to use my toothbrush and borrow some of my underwear while your at it?
-Twitchy


this entire thread went silly about 30 pages ago.


but then...they poop you came in here with...if it was me, i'd do whatever i could to spit ya, or piss ya off....and i;m not that kind of person.


 that being said, i wish they'd give it back to ya, and stop lowering themselves to your level.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: stodd on December 26, 2009, 08:01:24 PM
/
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 26, 2009, 08:26:17 PM
lol at hanging on  :rofl

POTW is not an amazing name or historic in any way. Just make up another.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 26, 2009, 09:37:31 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1R-X6xOuHwo/StHOgnoUDqI/AAAAAAAASwY/Jx4ZKdRTMSI/s400/Kana+Tsugihara+-+Young+Magazine+No.+46+coolfwdmail+nookdeejung+jsexyidol+japan+japanese+sexy+idol+model+girl+2.jpg)

how about 46
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 27, 2009, 12:39:27 PM
yo
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: caldera on December 27, 2009, 01:46:52 PM
lol at hanging on  :rofl

POTW is not an amazing name or historic in any way. Just make up another.


How about "The Pursefighters"?  :neener:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 27, 2009, 02:10:31 PM
lol at hanging on  :rofl

POTW is not an amazing name or historic in any way. Just make up another.
Actually, a little research goes a long way, I chose POTW for my squad name for a couple reasons, one of them is because I've always been a Floyd fan, the other is a little more pertinent to ariel combat...

(http://www.jaypig.com/archives/flying-pig.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cactuskooler on December 27, 2009, 04:04:42 PM
Looks more like "Wings on the Pig" than "Pigs on the Wing".   :P
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrBone1 on December 27, 2009, 04:12:23 PM
this may not be my place to say anything but why all this over a measly squad name? why not sort the problem like adults  :headscratch:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: chewie86 on December 27, 2009, 04:21:02 PM
42....45... mine is only at 7 pages ... 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: crazyivan on December 27, 2009, 04:21:29 PM
this may not be my place to say anything but why all this over a measly squad name? why not sort the problem like adults  :headscratch:
I know you are but what am I. :neener: Woo Woo Sooka choo Cattb! :banana:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 27, 2009, 10:15:16 PM
this may not be my place to say anything but why all this over a measly squad name? why not sort the problem like adults  :headscratch:
Tried that, Syko has been literally hiding from me for two months. He communicated through another squaddie like a middle schooler, that he wouldn't talk to me directly because he wanted to 'avoid confrontation'. The truth of the matter is that Syko pulled some underhanded and dishonest crap and doesn't want to own up to it. My previous posts on this thread are a glimpse of what's been going on to which I will add that he apaprently even went so far as to create a phoney list of all these squaddies I was going to boot and claimed I had made it.
All I want at this point is the name back, if Syko wants to be the big cheese bad enough to pull this crap on a ten year friend then he should have started his own squad rather than taking credit for the nearly ten year legacy I built. No, nobody owns a squad name, but right is right.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrBone1 on December 27, 2009, 10:21:54 PM
Tried that, Syko has been literally hiding from me for two months. He communicated through another squaddie like a middle schooler, that he wouldn't talk to me directly because he wanted to 'avoid confrontation'. The truth of the matter is that Syko pulled some underhanded and dishonest crap and doesn't want to own up to it. My previous posts on this thread are a glimpse of what's been going on to which I will add that he apaprently even went so far as to create a phoney list of all these squaddies I was going to boot and claimed I had made it.
All I want at this point is the name back, if Syko wants to be the big cheese bad enough to pull this crap on a ten year friend then he should have started his own squad rather than taking credit for the nearly ten year legacy I built. No, nobody owns a squad name, but right is right.
-Twitchy
i have heard that you are the only CO for POTW by many people im sure none will forget even if he doesnt give the name up i understand exactly where you are coming from  :salute Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 27, 2009, 10:43:04 PM
Why did you give up a name you wanted to keep?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 27, 2009, 11:02:36 PM
Why did you give up a name you wanted to keep?
I didn't, I left becasue of financial/marital reasons with the understanding with Syko that yes, I would be returning to the game and reassuming command of my squad when I was able to play again. While I was gone Syko started in on his Mr. President campaign and telling everybody I never started the POTW in the first place and that he had run the squad for nine years. When I got back, I assumed command with a few bumps of course, that is until I confronted Syko on his crap, next thing I know, all my posts are deleted off the POTW site, Syko starts hiding from me and I start hearing rumors about all the terrible things I was going to do if I was command again.
I didn't give the name up shuffler, I foolishly trusted my ten year XO with it while I was gone. If you had to quit the game because of some bad circumstances, and came back to find that your friend was now claiming to be shuffler, that would be pretty crappy, if he was claiming to have been shuffler for the last nine years and that you were never shuffler to begin with and squelching you or hiding from you in game when you tried to confront them, that would be pretty nasty stuff. Now imagine if the doppleganger shuffler ran 'therealshuffler.com' and deleted all your posts and started posting a bunch of anti-shuffler crap on there...
Yeah, you could call yourself shuffler2 and just go on with it, but when you've been shuffler for nearly a decade, it's not something the other guy is going to just get away with because everybody knows better. If it is indeed 'just a name', then why not come up with their own and get off of my porch?
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 28, 2009, 08:21:48 AM
 Cheeze and rice. Give Twitchy the damn name. Its not like most people at this point will think much of anyone wearing that tag at this point now as it is.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 28, 2009, 09:14:33 AM
I didn't, I left becasue of financial/marital reasons with the understanding with Syko that yes, I would be returning to the game and reassuming command of my squad when I was able to play again. While I was gone Syko started in on his Mr. President campaign and telling everybody I never started the POTW in the first place and that he had run the squad for nine years. When I got back, I assumed command with a few bumps of course, that is until I confronted Syko on his crap, next thing I know, all my posts are deleted off the POTW site, Syko starts hiding from me and I start hearing rumors about all the terrible things I was going to do if I was command again.
I didn't give the name up shuffler, I foolishly trusted my ten year XO with it while I was gone. If you had to quit the game because of some bad circumstances, and came back to find that your friend was now claiming to be shuffler, that would be pretty crappy, if he was claiming to have been shuffler for the last nine years and that you were never shuffler to begin with and squelching you or hiding from you in game when you tried to confront them, that would be pretty nasty stuff. Now imagine if the doppleganger shuffler ran 'therealshuffler.com' and deleted all your posts and started posting a bunch of anti-shuffler crap on there...
Yeah, you could call yourself shuffler2 and just go on with it, but when you've been shuffler for nearly a decade, it's not something the other guy is going to just get away with because everybody knows better. If it is indeed 'just a name', then why not come up with their own and get off of my porch?
-Twitchy


I've been Shuff for a long time but I'm not married to the name. I can take any other name and be the same person. The other guy that may take my name would not be me and folks would know it.

My point is... what's in a name? I mean it's like the kids that are married to a chess piece. It's really unimportant in the big picture. If you make a new name and lead it like you did the POTW earlier on... then that group would be like you want it.

It's not the name, it is how you play that folks will remember. If you made (and I know you did make the original POTW) POTW you can make any other successful.  Good Luck!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SQUAT! on December 30, 2009, 04:35:14 AM
Quote
I didn't, I left becasue of financial/marital reasons with the understanding with Syko that yes, I would be returning to the game and reassuming command of my squad when I was able to play again. While I was gone Syko started in on his Mr. President campaign and telling everybody I never started the POTW in the first place and that he had run the squad for nine years. When I got back, I assumed command with a few bumps of course, that is until I confronted Syko on his crap, next thing I know, all my posts are deleted off the POTW site, Syko starts hiding from me and I start hearing rumors about all the terrible things I was going to do if I was command again.
I didn't give the name up shuffler, I foolishly trusted my ten year XO with it while I was gone. If you had to quit the game because of some bad circumstances, and came back to find that your friend was now claiming to be shuffler, that would be pretty crappy, if he was claiming to have been shuffler for the last nine years and that you were never shuffler to begin with and squelching you or hiding from you in game when you tried to confront them, that would be pretty nasty stuff. Now imagine if the doppleganger shuffler ran 'therealshuffler.com' and deleted all your posts and started posting a bunch of anti-shuffler crap on there...
Yeah, you could call yourself shuffler2 and just go on with it, but when you've been shuffler for nearly a decade, it's not something the other guy is going to just get away with because everybody knows better. If it is indeed 'just a name', then why not come up with their own and get off of my porch?

you left for 1 /12 to 2 years.you make it seem like it was for a tour or 2. if it was for a few months i'm shore things would be different. we all knew who you were and that you founded the squad even though most of us never meet you. syko never talked badly about you to my knowledge either. you need to just give it up already. your not going to win this one. sorry
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 30, 2009, 04:46:01 AM
Wow squat, you had to bump it didn't you?   :furious

(http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii316/hewhokillz/Hello_Kitty_AK47_1.jpg)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 30, 2009, 04:47:15 AM
thought this finally died neverending
how about 50 pages
(http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Animals/Pigs/Mad_pig.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 08:30:35 AM
adie thread die!!!!! :noid
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Bear76 on December 30, 2009, 12:27:50 PM
you left for 1 /12 to 2 years.you make it seem like it was for a tour or 2. if it was for a few months i'm shore things would be different. we all knew who you were and that you founded the squad even though most of us never meet you. syko never talked badly about you to my knowledge either. you need to just give it up already. your not going to win this one. sorry
What a tool :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrBone1 on December 30, 2009, 12:38:15 PM
you left for 1 /12 to 2 years.you make it seem like it was for a tour or 2. if it was for a few months i'm shore things would be different. we all knew who you were and that you founded the squad even though most of us never meet you. syko never talked badly about you to my knowledge either. you need to just give it up already. your not going to win this one. sorry
thats cheap even for you Squat  :lol
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 12:39:27 PM
maybe if we mention a certain member in here, this thread will finally die?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 12:42:50 PM
you left for 1 /12 to 2 years.you make it seem like it was for a tour or 2. if it was for a few months i'm shore things would be different. we all knew who you were and that you founded the squad even though most of us never meet you. syko never talked badly about you to my knowledge either. you need to just give it up already. your not going to win this one. sorry
It was a little over a year FYI, and yeah Syko pulled some pretty underhanded crap... and there's nothing to 'win', it's really simple, just get the hell off my squad name.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrBone1 on December 30, 2009, 12:44:21 PM
It was a little over a year FYI, and yeah Syko pulled some pretty underhanded crap... and there's nothing to 'win', it's really simple, just get the hell off my squad name.
-Twitchy
:aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 30, 2009, 12:49:14 PM
pfft whatever, furballers are over rated game killers  :noid :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 12:53:15 PM
pfft whatever, furballers are over rated game killers  :noid :bolt:

i'm a furballer....and i sure as hell ain't over rated :noid :rofl :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SkyRock on December 30, 2009, 01:00:56 PM
 :banana:

 :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 30, 2009, 01:07:46 PM
It was a little over a year FYI, and yeah Syko pulled some pretty underhanded crap... and there's nothing to 'win', it's really simple, just get the hell off my squad name.
-Twitchy

There is the problem... at this time you have no squad name. Skuzzy himself said no one owns a name in here.

All your doing right now is delaying getting your squad going. Get a name and git-r-dun.  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 30, 2009, 01:21:25 PM
(http://www.amuseline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/Mud_wrestling_video_clips.jpg)

hummm how about new sport like mud wrestling for squad names
pigs like playing in the mud anyhow. :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 01:24:58 PM
There is the problem... at this time you have no squad name. Skuzzy himself said no one owns a name in here.

All your doing right now is delaying getting your squad going. Get a name and git-r-dun.  :D
No, nobody owns a squad name, but after nearly ten years I sure think that some are more entitled to a name than others, especially when one of them has done some dishonest and really sleazy things to get it.
Actually I do have a squad name, it's Pigs on the Wing and has been for a long time. What I need from Syko and Co. is for them to have enough decency and grown up courtesy to get off of it. I was told they would be changing their name, it was a solution to this problem I could respect, but it hasn't happened and I have no intention of letting up on this issue until they do. Syko can walk away with all the Pigs he likes but I'll be damned if he's going to walk away with the name I created and built, he can have the members, but yeah the name and the legacy is mine, and rightfully so.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 01:37:48 PM
hummm how about new sport like mud wrestling for squad names
pigs like playing in the mud anyhow. :D

Cattb, nice shot last night by the way, <S>  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 30, 2009, 01:43:04 PM
"Please stop beating me..." -Chief Dead Horse, December 2009
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 01:48:20 PM
"Please stop beating me..." -Chief Dead Horse, December 2009
It's not a dead horse, their still squatting on my squad name, thanks for playing though. They change their name to something original, and then it's a dead horse. I hope this simple logic doesn't escape you Mazz  :lol
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 01:54:31 PM
It's not a dead horse, their still squatting on my squad name, thanks for playing though. They change their name to something original, and then it's a dead horse. I hope this simple logic doesn't escape you Mazz  :lol
-Twitchy

nvm
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 30, 2009, 02:09:21 PM
No, nobody owns a squad name, but after nearly ten years I sure think that some are more entitled to a name than others, especially when one of them has done some dishonest and really sleazy things to get it.
Actually I do have a squad name, it's Pigs on the Wing and has been for a long time. What I need from Syko and Co. is for them to have enough decency and grown up courtesy to get off of it. I was told they would be changing their name, it was a solution to this problem I could respect, but it hasn't happened and I have no intention of letting up on this issue until they do. Syko can walk away with all the Pigs he likes but I'll be damned if he's going to walk away with the name I created and built, he can have the members, but yeah the name and the legacy is mine, and rightfully so.
-Twitchy

No ownership, no entitlements.

Decency, grown-up courtesy???? How old are you? I can't imagine you being too young as the POTW have been around for awhile. I also can't imagine an adult being so bent out of shape by a name in a game.


Start a new squad. The old squad moved on and is not what you envisioned for it anyway. I'm sure most any name you can imagine has already been used before... just like POTW. More than likely whoever used those before won't mind. <S>



It's not a dead horse, their still squatting on my squad name, thanks for playing though. They change their name to something original, and then it's a dead horse. I hope this simple logic doesn't escape you Mazz  :lol
-Twitchy

Pink Floyd 1977

 World War I pilot lingo for an enemy pilot in your blind spot.
 

Anyone in public you don't want to see is Pigs On The Wing


Hardly original are we......

Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 02:21:51 PM
No ownership, no entitlements.

Decency, grown-up courtesy???? How old are you? I can't imagine you being too young as the POTW have been around for awhile. I also can't imagine an adult being so bent out of shape by a name in a game.


Start a new squad. The old squad moved on and is not what you envisioned for it anyway. I'm sure most any name you can imagine has already been used before... just like POTW. More than likely whoever used those before won't mind. <S>
Start a new squad? Hey that's an idea, I wonder why the hell Syko can't do that? Yeah sure, I could just walk away from the whole thing and let Syko get away with this kind of crap, but then as you said, POTW has been around a long time. Everybody who's played for more than a year or so knows who's squad it is, and like I said before, if Syko wanted that shiny CO badge that bad, he could have simply 'started a new squad', but no, he wanted that ten year legacy that goes along with it, and I'm sorry, but that's mine and he's not getting that, and retaining any credibility.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 02:25:07 PM
Start a new squad? Hey that's an idea, I wonder why the hell Syko can't do that?

'cause he's been here for the last year and whatever it was.




jeeeeeeeeeeeeze edit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: xbrit on December 30, 2009, 02:27:47 PM
omg let it go and grow up there are more important things in life, try worrying about something important and don't sweat the stuff in a game.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 02:29:27 PM
omg let it go
Absolutely not.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 30, 2009, 02:36:10 PM
I should email this to "Pink Floyd Ltd" and see who "has the rights to Pigs on the Wing"?    I support Twitchy and all, but this has NO BUSINESS being on the BBS any longer.   This really needs to be let go.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 02:45:34 PM
I should email this to "Pink Floyd Ltd" and see who "has the rights to Pigs on the Wing"?    I support Twitchy and all, but this has NO BUSINESS being on the BBS any longer.   This really needs to be let go.

agreed.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: flatiron1 on December 30, 2009, 03:05:20 PM
Absolutely not.
-Twitchy


maybe I missed it but why you quit the squad to start with?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Flayed on December 30, 2009, 03:21:51 PM
<---- runs in excitedly.....    Oh pink Floyd not pink Flayed.  Never mind  :)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: SunBat on December 30, 2009, 03:48:06 PM

maybe I missed it but why you quit the squad to start with?

Please read the first 47 fricking pages.    :D

Have a good 'un. 
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: caldera on December 30, 2009, 04:05:48 PM
Like The Doomsday Clock; every time this thread appears to have stopped, it just starts all over again.

  (http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o460/caldera_08/smilies/character0220.gif)   (http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o460/caldera_08/smilies/character0165.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: 2ace on December 30, 2009, 04:08:11 PM
Wow this thread is still alive?
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 30, 2009, 04:10:08 PM
Start a new squad? Hey that's an idea, I wonder why the hell Syko can't do that? Yeah sure, I could just walk away from the whole thing and let Syko get away with this kind of crap, but then as you said, POTW has been around a long time. Everybody who's played for more than a year or so knows who's squad it is, and like I said before, if Syko wanted that shiny CO badge that bad, he could have simply 'started a new squad', but no, he wanted that ten year legacy that goes along with it, and I'm sorry, but that's mine and he's not getting that, and retaining any credibility.
-Twitchy

Syko has a squad... why start another.

I've been here since about 2000 and on the boards since about 2002...... I don't care who runs what squad. If you had not said you started POTW... I would never have known.

Good lord.... I can't help but get a chuckle from the "it's mine". You seem to not understand even though Skuzzy posted in plain english. Ten year "legacy"  is another grand chuckle.

I see some POTW around flying sometimes... to me they are just another squad. Most of the time if I fly with someone I have no idea what squad afiliations they have. What it boils down to is the individual. No "squad" makes an individual worth being around.... the individual makes theirself worth being around... or not.  :D
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BillyD on December 30, 2009, 04:18:32 PM
Syko has a squad... why start another.

I've been here since about 2000 and on the boards since about 2002...... I don't care who runs what squad. If you had not said you started POTW... I would never have known.

Good lord.... I can't help but get a chuckle from the "it's mine". You seem to not understand even though Skuzzy posted in plain english. Ten year "legacy"  is another grand chuckle.

I see some POTW around flying sometimes... to me they are just another squad. Most of the time if I fly with someone I have no idea what squad afiliations they have. What it boils down to is the individual. No "squad" makes an individual worth being around.... the individual makes theirself worth being around... or not.  :D

wow well said shuffler. half the time i have no clue what's goin on too
  (http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y128/retardy/Towelie.gif)


page 50 here we come!!!!!
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 04:46:47 PM
I don't care who runs what squad.
Awesome, we'll see you another thread then.  :aok
Why are some of you guys so obsessed with how long this thread is anyways, if it weren't for all the 'how many pages' posts, this thing wouldn't be but five pages long.
-Twitchy

flatiron1 I left because of primarily financial reasons with the assurances and understanding that I was returning to command my squad, when I got back it hit the fan as I found out Syko was pulling some really underhanded crap.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Krupinski on December 30, 2009, 05:21:13 PM
No offence Twitchy but you're acting like a teenage girl who just had her cell-phone taken away.  :rofl  :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 05:29:39 PM
I THINK twitchy is legomans shade :noid :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: grizz441 on December 30, 2009, 05:30:18 PM
I left because of primarily financial reasons with the assurances and understanding that I was returning to command my squad, when I got back it hit the fan as I found out Syko was pulling some really underhanded crap.

No offense but why didn't you stay in contact with the squad via BBS and Pigs Forums?  Such means of communication are free and non time consuming.  It would have also been a good way to maintain a relationship with Syko and make sure the squad was being run how you wanted it to be.  Sounds like you wanted your cake and to eat it too.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 30, 2009, 05:34:09 PM
 Sounds more like Storchita
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Masherbrum on December 30, 2009, 05:34:54 PM
Sounds more like Storchita

I ALMOST gave my monitor a shower.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 30, 2009, 05:35:48 PM
I ALMOST gave my monitor a shower.
                                                          :x
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 30, 2009, 05:51:37 PM
No offense but why didn't you stay in contact with the squad via BBS and Pigs Forums?  Such means of communication are free and non time consuming.  It would have also been a good way to maintain a relationship with Syko and make sure the squad was being run how you wanted it to be.  Sounds like you wanted your cake and to eat it too.
Grizz, regardless of what he's led everybody to believe, Syko knew I was comming back. Like I said before, we had an understanding, and I spoke with him on several occasions about it. I didn't have a working computer or internet for alot of the time I was gone and was literally fishing for supper at one point to feed my family, we basicly hit rock bottom here.

Krupinski, maybe so, but it's also possible I'm acting like a person who got completely screwed over by one of his best friends. Sitting on a squad name that you didn't come up with out of nothing but spite after already agreeing to change it is hardly a basis for behavioral comparison.
Look I'm not asking for an apology, all I want is the name, that's it. It isn't about the squad, it's about the name and a little common friggin decency. Syko pulled some underhanded crap and I'm not backing down to just let walk away with it. Change the name, and poof, all this fades away like it never happened. Amazingly simple, and it's the right thing to do.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 30, 2009, 05:52:06 PM
Sounds more like Storchita

 :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Sol75 on December 30, 2009, 05:53:22 PM
I ALMOST gave my monitor a shower.

Just had to buy a new monitor... the shower I gave it wouldn't get rid of the filth.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Wax on December 30, 2009, 06:29:29 PM
 Let me get this correct.. You leave the squad in the hands of Syko. You come back and want your squad back name rank ect. Than you want to kick out 1 guy( A smart arse in you words). The squad members all like this  polish guy and your acting like a pr-ik to everyone else in the squad. The squad is all pissed off at you and they boot you.. Than you come on here telling your side to the story and bad mouthing Syko in every post you make. Hmm
 
  If I were Syko I would keep the name just to piss you off for all the bad mouthing you been giving him..But that just me :devil
 
 Can you see the light.. are you blind..When someone acts like a Putz they get treated like a Putz..

 Get over it the name is gone.. Well lets just say its there but your not.. :cheers:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 30, 2009, 07:05:19 PM
Cattb, nice shot last night by the way, <S>  :D
Thanks twitchy <S>
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 30, 2009, 07:22:24 PM
I can't help it..... I gotta come check on this funny thread. He ignores everything said about moving on. Very similar to that thor guy.  :lol

I'm tired of trying to talk sense to the guy. Now we're just at the laughingstock part. Skuzzy will probably drive the nail in the coffin soon if for no other reason than to protect the clueless.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Delirium on December 30, 2009, 08:23:10 PM
Never expected to see this much drama coming from a community that is 99% men and based on a WWII flight sim.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: greens on December 30, 2009, 08:30:34 PM
I say furby's win  :aok
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: cattb on December 30, 2009, 08:56:23 PM
No offence Twitchy but you're acting like a teenage girl who just had her cell-phone taken away.  :rofl  :rofl :rofl

Hate to say it, Both sides are  (http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Clothing/Womens_Clothes/Blue_dress.gif)

(http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/ernaehrung/food-smiley-012.gif)
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DrDea on December 30, 2009, 08:58:31 PM
 Twity,I think you should have the name.That being said,as soon as you got back you hit the forums like a 12 yr old on crack and extasy sounding like the biggest dip s***t on the planet. The POTW name has been so tarnished,I dont know why they DONT give it to you but be that as it may,they wont.Perhaps YOU should just move on. Take a stab at being the bigger <cough> man.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: RedTop on December 30, 2009, 09:27:35 PM
30 pages....wow.

"Tonight...on As the BBS turns.....  Will Twitchy finally win support.....Will syko come in a take the Twitch out of twitchy and make him Steady? Or will Twitchy become full blown terrets? Will the Pigs finally deliver the bacon....Will the new pigs be fatter and stink more? Will Skuzzy finally get his monitor cleaned from all the coffee spewed in laughter at a bunch of grown men arguing over a make believe war game name and nail this thread shut? Find out tonight in this episode of....

As the BBS turns...."


<Yawn>
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 31, 2009, 01:58:44 AM
Twity,I think you should have the name.
Believe it or not, that's all I'm after. It's a pretty simple solution really, and something that I was under the impression was already in the works. Yeah it probably does seem petty to alot of you and I understand that, but it's important to me and it's not something I'm just going to walk away from when the solution is as simple as comming up with their OWN name.
I'm calling out Syko, Waystin2, and Krupsinki, the respective squad Co's to do the right thing and simply come up with another name to call themselves, that's pretty easily accomplished... if the spirit is willing, then the flesh hath the strength of ten, plenty enough to click that squad name box and type something else in there.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: DaddyAck on December 31, 2009, 03:23:59 AM
Look at this thread. I am at work at my cube and reading this laughing my butt off. Y'all are too much. Perhaps I need to check these boards more often.  :rofl
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: BiPoLaR on December 31, 2009, 03:36:28 AM
im bout ready to pay for "female entertainment" for someone at HTC if they'll lock this damn thread.

Reading this makes my bowels move  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: twitchy on December 31, 2009, 04:57:47 AM
lock this damn thread....Reading this ...
You don't have to read it Bipolar, that's the beauty of it. Start your own 'Hey I'm a jerk' thread and I'll hop on yours and complain incessantly about it. I love these guys that get on a thread and complain about how long it is as they click the reply button. Do you really care about the topic here, or are you just smacken em cause there's about 49 thousand three hundred and something other threads in this forum alone you can smack your gums on and not have to hear a word about it.
The reason this thread is still going is because those hosers are still hijacking my squad name, it's not to entertain you, sorry I know that conflicts with your understanding about the center of the known YOUniverse.
-Twitchy
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: MadHatter on December 31, 2009, 06:23:27 AM
***Pilot Duress signal blares throughout the base. Through the window a lone B-17 is seen making it's descent; half a wing missing and 2 engines smoking. As it touches down the nose gear collapses, the loud screech of grinding metal resonates throughout the dayroom. A billowing cloud of dirt and debris blocks the view from the window as the stricken Fortress slides to a halt. A few moments later, footsteps are heard racing up the stairs. The pilot enters the room, his cap kicked back and the look of urgency permeates his face. He scans the room once and says.........








                                                                                42 purples, since Ice Cream has no bones
because if you're flying down the highway in your canoe doing 65 miles an hour when a wheel falls off, that's how many pancakes it would take to cover a dog house. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.


If this did not make any sense to you whatsoever, do not be alarmed. Neither does this thread. If this made perfect sense to you, please report to Section 8 immediately, thank you



 :salute  :neener:  :bolt:
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: CAP1 on December 31, 2009, 07:54:37 AM
You don't have to read it Bipolar, that's the beauty of it. Start your own 'Hey I'm a jerk' thread and I'll hop on yours

the problem is that once one responds to a thread, it moves up to tht top of the list if there were respinses.


i cannot for the life of me believe that you have so little in your real life(do you have one?) that you're so friggin worried about a Golly-gee namd.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Saurdaukar on December 31, 2009, 09:33:28 AM
It's not a dead horse, their still squatting on my squad name, thanks for playing though. They change their name to something original, and then it's a dead horse. I hope this simple logic doesn't escape you Mazz  :lol
-Twitchy

In all candor, sir, you are, beyond a shadow of a doubt, one of the dumbest individuals I have yet had the displeasure of coming across.

I made a brief attempt to consider the use of a word more elegant than "dumb" but could identify no synonym fit enough to so accurately describe your complete lack of anything even remotely approaching the ability to reason with this "logic" of which you speak.

Do not presume to dictate anything to me, sir.  You are a twit.
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: bravoa8 on December 31, 2009, 09:37:10 AM
*yaaaawwwwwwn* Here we go again...
Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: Shuffler on December 31, 2009, 09:50:03 AM
I picture someone jobless sitting in his Mom's basement with a generous fluorescent light tan eating doritos.


"gimme dat or I'll pixilate you"


Title: Re: Furballers VS Base Takers
Post by: hitech on December 31, 2009, 09:52:20 AM
I believe this thread has run it's course.

For the record no one has any right to a be in any squad, nor the name of a squad.

I.E. you start a squad, after a number of years all squad members mutiny leave your squad, and start another with the same name, it sucks to be you.

HiTech