Author Topic: Screenshots or possible patch today? (Read 1058 times)

Starbird · « **Reply #15 on:** September 17, 2004, 11:07:55 PM »

190 guns are not currently aiming where the gunsite is pointing. This was brought up in a post a week or 2 ago. HT did some tests and found he was using the wrong variable for something, and said it would be fixed in the next patch.

Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.

It doesn't have anything to do with the reworked flight models.

Roscoroo · « **Reply #16 on:** September 18, 2004, 12:30:30 AM »

one week i bet ... the'll turn the new rides loose on evil con nite like ussual

SunKing · « **Reply #17 on:** September 18, 2004, 01:45:04 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Roscoroo
one week i bet ... the'll turn the new rides loose on evil con nite like ussual

Yup should have realized that before I opened my mouth.

airbumba · « **Reply #18 on:** September 18, 2004, 03:45:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Starbird

Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.

Wholly carp!, Oh My Cod!, I knew something was fishy!! ...and to think I changed from liquer to beer for nothing...

Overlag · « **Reply #19 on:** September 18, 2004, 07:29:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Starbird
190 guns are not currently aiming where the gunsite is pointing. This was brought up in a post a week or 2 ago. HT did some tests and found he was using the wrong variable for something, and said it would be fixed in the next patch.

Right now 190s are aiming I believe below and to the left of the gunsite.

It doesn't have anything to do with the reworked flight models.

i hope they dont fix it, because im good with them when they are broken!! LOL

Karnak · « **Reply #20 on:** September 18, 2004, 10:47:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by airbumba
Wholly carp!, Oh My Cod!, I knew something was fishy!! ...and to think I changed from liquer to beer for nothing...

By a whole whopping foot.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #21 on:** September 18, 2004, 10:54:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak
By a whole whopping foot.

With the new hit model a foot might as well be a mile if you are shooting in a poor manouvering Fw190...

Karnak · « **Reply #22 on:** September 19, 2004, 01:34:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
With the new hit model a foot might as well be a mile if you are shooting in a poor manouvering Fw190...

It might, but it very well might not. And generally you are leading by estimating and not even using the gunsight. In addition the dispersion covers more than a foot.

I'm not saying it wasn't worth fixing. I certainly think it was and am glad HiTech did so. I am say that it had only a slight effect, very slight effect, on accuracy. I simply don't think getting mad about something that minor makes sense.

The nose down, guns forward flight that the Fw190 had is much more significant and I hope to see that fixed. That will get my attention.

Cooley · « **Reply #23 on:** September 19, 2004, 02:24:46 AM »

Im thinkin B-24 or Betty..
and dont tell me we dont need the '24 cause we have the B-17,
thats just plain funny

T-34 seems to be most likely , though I'd love some kind of quad 20mm ack-wagon

Karnak · « **Reply #24 on:** September 19, 2004, 03:10:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Cooley
and dont tell me we dont need the '24 cause we have the B-17,
thats just plain funny

But it is accurate for the time being.

There are many bombers that I'd like to see. I won't be unhappy, precisely, if it were a B-24, Halifax or He111, but I do think all of those would be redundant in the current AH planeset.

I'd like to see one of the following:

Pe-2FT
Tu-2S
S.M.79-II
Z.1007
He177A-5
Ju188A-2
B-25C
G4M2 "Betty"
Wellington Mk III

Any of those would help close a big gap in the current planeset. The B-24 holds the same place as the B-17. The Halifax holds the same place as the Lancaster and the He111 holds the same place as the Ju88A-4.

I don't really care. I'm getting the fighter I've wanted for a long time.

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #25 on:** September 19, 2004, 12:06:21 PM »

Blenheim!

Karnak · « **Reply #26 on:** September 19, 2004, 03:59:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Blenheim!

Knew you'd say that.

Overlag · « **Reply #27 on:** September 19, 2004, 04:39:18 PM »

whats the point of adding a bomber? no one flys them the way they are ment to. and anyone that does has no chance against these uber fighters

BlueJ1 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 19, 2004, 04:43:42 PM »

I fly bombers only the way their supposed to. And yes I get owned on occasion by the uber fighters. But the most deadly thing ive found are the 20k la7s, 205s, and spits.