Author Topic: Request for the Me262.  (Read 255 times)

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Request for the Me262.
« on: September 12, 2004, 04:35:50 PM »
ok.  i can't this anymore.

THE Me262 Needs those 24 rockets!!!

Pilots prefered them over the 30mm's cause you could shoot from longer distance and hope to hit something.  While with the 30mm you had to get in close and shooting time was very short before you had to break off.

BRING THE R4M ROCKETS TO AH!
« Last Edit: September 12, 2004, 09:01:31 PM by B17Skull12 »
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Fruda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Request for the Me262.
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2004, 08:58:06 PM »
Image Hosted by Tripod rockets... Now those would kick ass.

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Request for the Me262.
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2004, 09:00:00 PM »
bah.  i forgot about that lol.  let me find a different one.

ok there now you should be able to see it.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline Fruda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1267
Request for the Me262.
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2004, 09:12:17 PM »
I liked using the R4M's on Fighter Ace 3.6 (before I came back to AHII).

They worked surprisingly well in A2A fights. Downed some B-17's with them quite a few times. Hell, I even destroyed a P-51D with 2 rockets...

It's very hard to do so, but if you aim it just right --- BAM. Nothing left in the sky after one hits!

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Request for the Me262.
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2004, 10:23:15 PM »
My question is, How does an Me262 react with those things attached?
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline RTSigma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1318
Request for the Me262.
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2004, 10:37:03 PM »
Not too badly, considering their size and mass.

Sigma of VF-17 JOLLY ROGERS