Wobble - the term 'nobhead' has nothing to do with race - it has everything to do with acting like a complete idiot. Now there's some irony for you.
...own idiosynchrisis and feign complete absence of racism.
Are you saying I'm racist, AKDejaVu? Is that 'feign complete absence of racism' referring to my character?
Real racism is noticing that the woman is Pakistani, then taking time to note how people treat here differently. I'm not saying this is bad, but you are able to attribute the mistreatment to race, then you recognize the racial difference.
Come on, DejaVu. You cite the example as being real racism, but seem to be implying that being racially abused (verbally) isn't bigotry. I'm describing racism that I have witnessed personally - overt, hateful abuse which has no place in the modern world. And there is still plenty of it to be sorted out.
...then taking time to note how people treat here differently.
I noticed alright. I was there. "Paki squeak", "Get the **** out of my country." Only a fool would need to 'take the time' to notice the comments were racist.
It seems to me most cases of descrimination in the work place involve overt racist or sexist language. Not this 'perfect' conspiracy you seem to be describing, where a person from an ethnic minority never is directly insulted, but just 'feels' intimidated.
Wotan,
The fact that a certain group believes they are treated differently doesn't give them the right of final judgement on things they percieve as offensive.
Really? Then who does make that decision? The majority? 'There is now no problem with using the words, gook, cupcake, rag-head, kike etc etc' If the majority decreed this, then the minority would have to accept that? Please tell me this is not the case.