Author Topic: Caption This 28 Aug 2006  (Read 820 times)

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #30 on: August 28, 2006, 06:08:45 PM »
PLLLLEEEEAAAASSSEEEE


US troops as "peackeepers" in lebanon would do more harm than good.  I thought that would be blatently obvious.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #31 on: August 28, 2006, 06:56:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rino
To be fair, they had to be embarrassed to commit the 2K.


True indeed, but they did. They were not as stubborn as they can be and that is what counts in the end.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #32 on: August 28, 2006, 07:02:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
PLLLLEEEEAAAASSSEEEE


US troops as "peackeepers" in lebanon would do more harm than good.  I thought that would be blatently obvious.


It is obvious, but the person that rolled his eyes about the commitment number (that also was not correct) cant really complain about those numbers if his own country has committed none.

That would be like if I rolled my eyes at the numbers of soldiers that the US has commited to Iraq (an example ofcourse) while my own committed none.

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #33 on: August 28, 2006, 07:09:45 PM »
US troops in Lebanon?!?!?!?

Highly doubtful that the UN would even consider it.....  hell, we'd more than likely disarm Hezbollah.  Thats something ole' Kofi wouldn't like now is it!  :rolleyes:
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #34 on: August 28, 2006, 07:12:22 PM »
We disarmed Iraq and Afghanistan so quickly and easily, Hezbollah should be no problem.  :aok

Offline Lye-El

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1466
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #35 on: August 28, 2006, 07:13:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
When i posted 2000 i was replying to the comment that you made that indicated 200. You were wrong and made it sound like they committed few troops.. 2000 is not few and in no way deserves your " :rolleyes: "

If you are going to roll your eyes at something then make sure you do so with the facts on your side. ;)



 
 
France to send 200 soldiers to Lebanon


Friday 18 August 2006, 2:29 Makka Time, 23:29 GMT    

 
Chirac's announcement has disappointed UN officials
   
 

France has said that it will initially provide only 200 soldiers for a new UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, which has disappointed some UN officials who had hoped for a contribution of thousands
 

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Lye-El
Initially, they commited to a whole div....err...200.  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The keyword being initially.  I believe my facts are correct.

:D


i dont got enough perkies as it is and i like upen my lancs to kill 1 dang t 34 or wirble its fun droping 42 bombs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Caption This 28 Aug 2006
« Reply #36 on: August 28, 2006, 07:17:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lye-El
France to send 200 soldiers to Lebanon


Friday 18 August 2006, 2:29 Makka Time, 23:29 GMT    

 
Chirac's announcement has disappointed UN officials
   
 

France has said that it will initially provide only 200 soldiers for a new UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, which has disappointed some UN officials who had hoped for a contribution of thousands
 

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Lye-El
Initially, they commited to a whole div....err...200.  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The keyword being initially.  I believe my facts are correct.

:D


ehh ok...

initially America committed 0 to ww2 :D


waa waaaa...hehe