Author Topic: Declassified Intel Trends  (Read 667 times)

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2006, 12:39:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fishu
Indeed a great way to tackle the terrorism problem by first creating majority of the insurgents as a result of own actions and then declaring the large body count as a success in the war on terrorism. :rolleyes:

Too bad there's 40 times more to kill, and after that there'll be another 40 times more to kill.


Perhaps the number of those willing to murder and die for their religion is large but it isn't infinite.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2006, 12:40:58 PM »
Quote
There was a great fuzz over Clinton's adultery


It wasn't the adultery or the sex that got Clinton infront of the judges.  It was the sexual harassment, charges of rape, and general sexual misconduct.


But of course, everyone just remembers that he was up there because of Lewinsky and a little sex.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2006, 12:55:32 PM »
Its clear what kind of wishful thinking is going on at the defense. From the speech it seems they're under the impression that they're somehow keeping an attacking force from entering the mainland by waging war overseas..

When the danger already sits inside borders in several dormant terrorist cells. Its like puckering up after the load already landed in the pants. :o
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18207
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2006, 01:01:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
Its clear what kind of wishful thinking is going on at the defense. From the speech it seems they're under the impression that they're somehow keeping an attacking force from entering the mainland by waging war overseas..

When the danger already sits inside borders in several dormant terrorist cells. Its like puckering up after the load already landed in the pants. :o


which is exactly why I wonder daily why they haven't launched an attack or two inside the states ...
seems like that'd be a sure way to punch holes in the whole "fight them there and not here" line
either they are too stupid to realize that or like the fact a wad of them can jump into the back of a 79 pickup truck and be shooting at an american within a couple of days .. dunno - just hope they continue to line up and get what's coming to em. Yes, fishu, the line is long but we have a bullet for each of them..
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2006, 01:31:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]

When the danger already sits inside borders in several dormant terrorist cells.  


you know of these cells? have you reported the cells to the proper authorities? are you or anyone you know a member of these cells?

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Declassified Intel Trends
« Reply #35 on: September 28, 2006, 02:07:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Perhaps the number of those willing to murder and die for their religion is large but it isn't infinite.


That's true, but how far are you willing to go by conventional means?
The more you kill, the more people over there will radicalize.