Author Topic: Lavochka  (Read 1274 times)

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Lavochka
« Reply #30 on: September 11, 2007, 04:59:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nimrod45
I will check it out but all the data I have seen says 150 for two and 130 for the third


yes there is a variation in the typical load outs stated over several publications

I have seen many references to typical load outs of 150 and I have two test reports where the ac was tested at 130 (as well as others at 150 rpg) for the 3 gun set.

I have also seen 170 rpg mentioned on the La7 2 gun variant (in fact nearly all the test data I have is at this rpg for 2 gun variants) as well as 200 rpg.

Vestik is the only reference that actually gives the bin capacity.

AH seems to be based very much on Stapfer ISBN 0-89747-392-2  La5/7 Fighters. Which also takes a lot of data from Czech sources and is unusually accurate for  squadron/signal publications. (Infact I used to dismiss it as a comic but keep coming back and finding stuff to be accurate)

e.g it is the only publication that tells where spent shells are ejected on the 3 cannon variant  (fuselage side!!) as there is clearly not space to eject via the normal two gun ejection tubes.

My view is that the bins could hold more than was typically taken...... ie 200 or 170 but that they were loaded to ensure proper feeding to the cannon with a mind to the same overall weight penalty.

e.g the combined weight of a pair of Shvaks plus 400 rounds was more than 3 x B20's plus  450 rounds
Ludere Vincere

Offline Nimrod45

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Lavochka
« Reply #31 on: September 11, 2007, 06:32:33 PM »
It seems like it is overly difficult to get real reliable info or statistics on Russian aircraft.

But Yaks and LAs were definatly bad to the bone.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: Re: Re: Lavochka
« Reply #32 on: September 11, 2007, 07:00:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nimrod45
You have seen me in the game or you are talking out your butt, INTERNET TOUGH GUY!


I'd love to see you in game...I will be glad to when I re-make my account.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline evenhaim

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3329
Lavochka
« Reply #33 on: September 11, 2007, 08:23:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nimrod45
It seems like it is overly difficult to get real reliable info or statistics on Russian aircraft.

But Yaks and LAs were definatly bad to the bone.


You mean the la7s drastic over modeling isnt enough for you?
Freez/Freezman
Army of Muppets
I could strike down 1,000 bulletin board accounts in 5 seconds.
You want ownage, I'll give you ownage! -Skuzzy
I intend to live forever - so far, so good.

Offline Nimrod45

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Lavochka
« Reply #34 on: September 11, 2007, 10:24:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by evenhaim
You mean the la7s drastic over modeling isnt enough for you?


Yea, let me guess, P-51 stick.

They usually don't like LA-7s seein as how they are used to having the speed advantage.

Offline SAS_KID

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
      • http://www.myspace.com/saskid
Lavochka
« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2007, 12:40:21 AM »
The LA-7 does seem over modeled but I have nothing to contend to the statement. But I do believe that it deserves a minor perk price just like the spit16.

Edit: As for drop tanks I see no need.
Quote from: hitech on Today at 09:27:26 AM
What utter and compete BS, quite frankly I should kick you off this bbs for this post.

The real truth is you do not like the answer.

HiTech

Offline Nimrod45

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Lavochka
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2007, 08:08:26 AM »
Didn't know the Spit 16 was perked, and you must not fly it or you would feel the need for a little more go juice.

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Lavochka
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2007, 08:13:21 AM »
What he ment was the La-7 and the spit 16 both need minor perk values. The spit 16 isn't perked yet. Also, don't pick on my spitfire :) .

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Lavochka
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2007, 05:32:02 PM »
I rarely fly the LA, Spit...I'm always in a 234...

I do believe they need a low perk like the M4 has...

Thats all people do is up LAs and spixteens...
I most hate it when a LA7 catches my 234 going 500+.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com