Personally I prefer the realistic bombsite as it does make it more of a challange. But I think a bigger factor as to why you aren't seeing more bombers is the radar coverage. With the bombers that are in the setup, pilots look at the radar and realize there chances of even making it to the target are slim to none.
I not only want to see more bombers, but I'd like to have the ones that do up be a little more effective. I think having the wind there to throw off aim is a good compromise for using the MA site. I understand the desire for the AvA site, but I'm thinking for the time being maybe the MA one is the way to go.
You make a good point on the DAR coverage, not being familiar with the settings firsthand, I kinda had to wing it. So as I see things play out I hope everyone will be understanding that settings will change. I'm sure you all can appreciate the delicate nature of BBS discussions, so as long as we keep all discussions civil we should be able to flesh out a setup framework that is pleasing to a wide range of players. So for the criticism has been constructive, mature and meaningful. So I <S> you guys for that.
But back to DAR, I most definitely want full BARDAR to keep the sectors that have potential for a fight very well defined, but I am open to changing DOTDAR. It currently is set to 20 miles, what do you guys think about 10 miles? Remember take all style of players preference in mind, we are shooting for a balance here.
