Author Topic: FSO idea  (Read 827 times)

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
FSO idea
« on: January 11, 2009, 02:05:35 PM »
Still hoping for a--> "WHAT IF" scenario based on late war Russian/Japanese conflict, LAs, Yaks, IL2s  vs Nikis, Kis, Bettys etc.  would be a real HOOT I believe  :devil

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2009, 02:26:08 PM »
Anything is possible.  I do think though that the "What If" situations might be better played out in a single scenario battle vs an FSO.  I know they've has those before.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2009, 03:50:05 PM »
I'd still like to see the "Project Danny" scenario I floated a couple months ago. USMC Corsairs hitting V-1 launch rails in Europe. Historically canceled by a combination of George Marshall refusing to allow Marines in "his" war and the Allied invasion overtaking the launch sites, anyway. It would have involved VMF-511, 512, 513 and 514 taking off from carriers in the North Sea to strike V-1 launch sites along the English Channel (apparently the were all loaded up and ready to go when the plan was scrapped). Combine this with a few other ops so the Germans don't know exactly what the targets are (IE, give the Luftwaffe the assignment of "defend Sector X.X", and have each target area contain both V-1s and some other valid target like an airfield, with 3-4 V-1 sites in every target sector. Something like 6 targets altogether, four of which are F4U squadrons hitting V-1 sites).
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline maxy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2009, 06:09:55 PM »
i would like to see the US vs Russia continuation of WW2 , somewhat the way General Patton visioned it would be   ;)

Offline Sled

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3595
      • Friday Squad Operations
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2009, 06:42:05 PM »
Still hoping for a--> "WHAT IF" scenario based on late war Russian/Japanese conflict, LAs, Yaks, IL2s  vs Nikis, Kis, Bettys etc.  would be a real HOOT I believe  :devil

I don't think you will be waiting long.

;)
~Sled~                 Aces High Special Events
USMC/71sqn
      XO               What Aces High is really all about.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2009, 03:24:36 PM »
i would like to see the US vs Russia continuation of WW2 , somewhat the way General Patton visioned it would be   ;)

THIS has promise. 

I think the Soviets would get their arse handed to them in the skies, both in AH2 and in the real thing.   ;)   All the combined might of the USAF, USN, RAF, FAA, Italy, what is left over of the German LW and the Me262/Ar234 wings, and all the heavy bombers, vs some La5/7, Yak's, P40's, P39's, IL-4 sustitues (B25?), a Tu-2 substitute, etc???

I dunno.. but the oadds would be stacked against the Soviets I do belive. 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2009, 03:41:48 PM »
A lot would depend on how the war was fought. If the Allies continued to focus on the high-altitude strategic air war, then yes, the Red Air Force would be in deep trouble (I love running across La-7s above 15k). Things would be much more even in mid-to-low altitude, tho.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2009, 05:12:29 PM »
We'd need the La-9. :t
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2009, 12:55:07 AM »
i would like to see the US vs Russia continuation of WW2 , somewhat the way General Patton visioned it would be   ;)

I was thinking about that too.  US vs Russia over Germany.  The plane set would be interesting on this one.

P-51 D
P-38-J
P-47D40/N
B-24
B-17
B-25
B-26
A-20


La-7
Yak 9U
IL-2
A-20
B-25
Hurri
maight throw a few 109 and 190 as capture planes. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2009, 11:17:30 AM »
I was thinking about that too.  US vs Russia over Germany.  The plane set would be interesting on this one.

P-51 D
P-38-J
P-47D40/N
B-24
B-17
B-25
B-26
A-20


La-7
Yak 9U
IL-2
A-20
B-25
Hurri
maight throw a few 109 and 190 as capture planes. 

The 109s and 190s belong on the allied side.  The Russians were highly disdainful of the 190 and had no need of surplus captured aircraft in 1945.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline 68Wooley

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 931
Re: FSO idea
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2009, 02:22:36 PM »
You could also include more 262's on both sides than we're used to as substitutes for British Meteors and Vampires, American Shooting Stars and possibly Russian MiG-9's and YAK-15's.