Author Topic: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?  (Read 953 times)

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2009, 06:50:38 AM »
People shouldn't hack on the poles too much...
They have a long and great battle history..

As part of the holy roman empire, the polish
teutonic knights stopped the mongol horde from
invading europe.. Outnumbered 500 to 1, They were
slaughtered, but caused so many casualties to the
mongols, that they couldn't continue their conquest...

They changed history!!!
Thank God for the Poles, or western culture wouldn't exist...

There are MANY other examples!!!

RC
"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"

Offline chewie86

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2009, 07:36:24 AM »
I think the polish jokes are in bad taste considering how much they fought for our country (I.E Britain)

However, if only the Italians had entered the marathon the would win it hands down! Brilliant runners! :P
With a gun pointing backwards, are you SURE its not Italian?  :P

[OT]
An Italian guy must have beaten you during your infancy,did he? Dont misunderstand me, but if you were fighting a war in their same conditions (not instructd officers, not trained infantry, no industry.. basically a country very far from to be ready for the war) you probably would have took care about your life than to a single man's country. For example do some research about the "Italian army in Russia, Alpini"
[/OT]

sorry for OT, pls respect other countries.

chewie.
Lube & Shame "peneduro"
My AH2 videos
SDL SEASON 1 Champions:
Loose Deuce
, ~Black Leather & Pink Slippers~

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2009, 01:14:31 PM »


As part of the holy roman empire, the polish
teutonic knights stopped the mongol horde from
invading europe.. Outnumbered 500 to 1, They were
slaughtered, but caused so many casualties to the
mongols, that they couldn't continue their conquest...


RC

Actually, that's not quite true.  The Battle of Legnica was a crushing loss for the combined European armies that resulted in the death of their commander, Henry II the Pious of Silesia and the majority of the noble/prince Knights of the European allies.  The Mongols never had intentions to expand further westward, and the Mongol forces that fought in the battle were a diversionary force to occupy the European allies to prevent them from coming to the aid of the Kingdom of Hungary, which was the main target of the main Mongol army.  Afterwards, the Mongols retreated not because they lost (they thoroughly beat the crap out of the Hungarians and the European forces) but because Grand Khan Ögedei had passed the previous year and Ghangis Khan ordered all descendents to return to Mongolia to select a new Grand Khan.

Not saying the Europeans didn't fight bravely, I'm sure they did but they did lose this battle.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6586
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2009, 07:08:32 PM »
 :salute Pulaski and Kosciuszko
Tours 86 - 296

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2009, 12:57:14 AM »
LOL ok so this post has strayd a bit id say .... :lol
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: British anti tank gun mounted reverse?
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2009, 06:32:31 AM »
Actually, that's not quite true.  The Battle of Legnica was a crushing loss for the combined European armies that resulted in the death of their commander, Henry II the Pious of Silesia and the majority of the noble/prince Knights of the European allies.  The Mongols never had intentions to expand further westward, and the Mongol forces that fought in the battle were a diversionary force to occupy the European allies to prevent them from coming to the aid of the Kingdom of Hungary, which was the main target of the main Mongol army.  Afterwards, the Mongols retreated not because they lost (they thoroughly beat the crap out of the Hungarians and the European forces) but because Grand Khan Ögedei had passed the previous year and Ghangis Khan ordered all descendents to return to Mongolia to select a new Grand Khan.

Not saying the Europeans didn't fight bravely, I'm sure they did but they did lose this battle.


ack-ack

Hey ack, no argument from me, good post...

I do most of this stuff from memory, and that is
one of the small dusty ones from the far back shelf, lol....

Yep, the european army was slaughtered, the mongols left
none alive, as was their custom in warfare.. But also,  I
know the Mongol army retreated on the verge of conquest..

That definately changed the course of history..

But I didn't know about them being ordered back..
Thats a new one to me...

My point was, that the poles are a fightin people...
In NO way, are they inept, or chicken squat!!!
So many times in history they have taken the field,
with no hope of victory, but they did it anyway...

They should be given their due...

 :salute
RC
"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"