Hello, Ruah and all.
This is busa01.
By the way, "C6N carrier recon plane" has two performance tables.
They are two kinds of performances in which the state where NK9-H was installed, and NK9-H-B was installed.
This data shows the very interesting result.
The maximum speed of Ki84 is 631 km/h / 6150m (624 km/h / 5000m).
The maximum speed of N1K2-J is 583 km/h / 3000m, 611 km/h / 6000m. (The only official data indicated by the pilot handbook) .
The maximum speed of C6N (MP+250) is 580 km/h / 3000m, 609 km/h / 6100m.
The prediction performance in MP+350 of Ki84 is 660 km/h / 6000m.
Un-official data 660 km/h of Ki84-1b / 6000m.
The maximum speed of C6N (MP+350) is 635-654 km/h / 6000m.
The prediction performance in (MP+350) of N1K2-J is 644-653 km/h / 6000m.
These results do not cause collision.
The aero dynamics software which I am using did not cause collision.
Historical investigation about the performance of Ki84 in AH was performed carefully.
It will not be necessary to change until the data of special new discovery come out.
The special performance of Ki84 in IJAAF Aero Examination Department will be operated by MP+350.
Incidentally there was gasoline of the octane number 100 also in a Japanese mainland.
Probably, this performance of Ki84 was also demonstrated with the gasoline of the octane number 100.
In N1K2-J, the gasoline of the octane number 100 was used at the time of Kikai island air superiority mission.
The pilot who carried out the missions said that the performance of N1K improved wonderfully.
And it said further.
Probably, many of my war comrades survived, if it could always use this gasoline.
I told this fact to HTC.
But I said that I did not need to take such a special situation into consideration.
By the way, in Japan's examination, the airplane imported from Germany and the United States did not demonstrate catalog spec in many cases.
Since fuel and oil were imports, they are not those causes.
In many cases, the cause was the cause of weight regulation.
Moreover, when the airplane of IJNAF was examined by IJAAF, the performance improved.
Those causes were also the causes of weight regulation.
IJNAF was the Strategic Air Command. (imagined enemy is the United States of America) .
IJAAF was Tactical Air Command . (imagined enemy is the Soviet Union) .
IJNAF assumed Full road, when engaged.
When IJAAF was engaged, fuel loading assumed about 6 - 70 percent.
for example, Ki 61-1a and b performed performance measurement at about 60 percent of fuel loading
This regulation in IJAAF was changeover by 1943.
Ki84 plan started at these days.
Although Ki84 was nomal road 3600kg, but it performed performance measurement by full road 3750kg.
By the way, Ruah.
If you can speak Japanese, I will want to talk with you.
And if you are staying in Japan even now, each other data will be exchangeable.
Thank you for reading my poor English.