Author Topic: Russian Spit16  (Read 2188 times)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10632
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2009, 07:00:28 AM »
I think Jocko was doing a Russian spit I know I had posted a thread at some point or he did? Here it is some of the links have pictures that may be better suited to skin. His was a Spit five.
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,248698.0.html

Offline jocko-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2009, 08:27:22 PM »
I've been side tracked lately with another project and a lot of RL stuff but yes, I did start a VVS LF Mk IXe skin for the Mk XVI as in the above model box/profile.  As of today I am on vacation 'til the end of May so I'll make it a priority, now that I think of it I still haven't finished that BPF Hellcat either... :rolleyes: 
417jocko
XO
351st FS, 353rd FG
"Slybirds!"

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2009, 11:17:02 AM »
I thought I had already done the USSR LF IX, hmmm.

Mind you getting old memory going.

Probably forgot to submit it lol.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2009, 09:04:38 PM »
Maybe because the 9s didn't see any action, Kev?

Just wondering if you chose to not submit, or forgot to submit.


But... just in case...


If ya forgot, YOU BUGGER!!! WHY?!??!?!?!?  :O


Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2009, 11:31:41 PM »
Maybe because the 9s didn't see any action, Kev?

Just wondering if you chose to not submit, or forgot to submit.


But... just in case...


If ya forgot, YOU BUGGER!!! WHY?!??!?!?!?  :O



Krusty, they did see some action.  But I said that already :)

The remnants of one of those Russian Spit IXs that was shot down in combat
http://fighter-collection.com/pages/aircraft/spit_ix_2/index.php
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2009, 09:02:15 PM »
The Mk IXs had better altitude performance than any Soviet fighter but most of the fighting was done at low altitudes. So it was decided to use them in the PVO regiments. These units were tasked with defending key cities and installations from air attack and had proper airfields with concrete runways. Trouble is, by the time the Spit IXs became operational the long range LW attacks and recon flights had dried up. The front line was soon pushed too far west and the Spits saw little action.

That would imply otherwise. If you can find one that specifically saw combat (i.e. the one shot down before the museum repainted it?) that would be great. I dislike the idea of a skin on a plane that never saw combat, though.


EDIT: I see the museum hasn't restored it yet. Interesting that it's got mostly RAF markings. All the VVS markings eroded away over the years (only being just visible), so it's kind of moot as far as skinning it goes (nothing to go on!). Pretty astounding how that plane wrapped the tail like that!
« Last Edit: May 22, 2009, 09:09:07 PM by Krusty »

Offline danny37

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 329
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2009, 11:18:09 PM »
spit captured by the germans,not sure of the model

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #22 on: May 23, 2009, 07:08:21 PM »
It's the messerspit. 109F engine mated to a Spit (SpitV, I think?) frame. Many complications due to different voltages with the 109 engine and the spit frame, supposedly was better than a spit or a 109, but was only a test bed.

It may have been bombed on a runway. Either that or I'm thinking of the 109Z.

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2009, 12:30:50 PM »
They were generally assigned to air defence units (and fleet/navy units).......... the main beef the VVS seemed to have agin the Spit was the comparatively maintenance heavy Merlin. It was not built to the brick sh*t house standards normally required by front line VVs units(VVS view not mine).


Duxford spit is interesting. I am sure they have researched it as much as possible. Delivered Dec44 yet found shot up on the Russian Steppe (Ukraine?). Yet Romania had surrendered in August 44 and the Red Army had crossed into both Romania and Hungary before this bird was delivered...

In essence then the UKraine was rear of the lines (by the time this Spit would have been assigned) and might well indeed have been under the guard of rear air defence units or indeed parts of the Black sea naval air regiments.  Its combat damage would have been as a result then of a rare incursion (for time) of the LW into what would have been considered pretty secure VVS air space.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2009, 01:35:56 PM by Tilt »
Ludere Vincere

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15667
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Russian Spit16
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2009, 01:58:33 AM »
spit captured by the germans,not sure of the model
(Image removed from quote.)

 :furious  :mad: 

I'm gonna Puke.
The Few ***
F.P.H